Aesthetic Considerations in Nasal Reconstruction and the Role of Modified Nasal Subunits

In 1985, Burget and Menick's landmark article on the nasal subunit principle popularized the technique of reconstructing the specific topographic subunits that they identified as the dorsum, tip, and columella and the paired alae, sidewalls, and soft triangles. In patients with more than 50 per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2003-02, Vol.111 (2), p.639-648
Hauptverfasser: Singh, Davinder J, Bartlett, Scott P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 648
container_issue 2
container_start_page 639
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 111
creator Singh, Davinder J
Bartlett, Scott P
description In 1985, Burget and Menick's landmark article on the nasal subunit principle popularized the technique of reconstructing the specific topographic subunits that they identified as the dorsum, tip, and columella and the paired alae, sidewalls, and soft triangles. In patients with more than 50 percent of subunit loss, Burget and Menick proposed removing the remaining portion of the subunit and reconstructing the entire subunit with a skin graft or flap. They further supported the placement of incisions for local flaps along borders of aesthetic subunits to maximize scar camouflage. Although the concept of nasal subunits is important in planning the reconstruction, other aesthetic considerations, such as skin texture, color, contour, and actinic damage, are also crucial in achieving an optimal result. Often, focusing on these aspects with the goal of nasal symmetry in mind leads to the violation of the subunit principle but provides a pleasing result of both the defect and the donor site. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate when and how the modification of the nasal subunit principle is used to achieve coverage of nasal skin defects. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent nasal reconstruction after skin cancer ablation surgery by one surgeon at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from 1987 to 2000 was performed. During this 13-year period, 219 patients underwent 245 nasal reconstructions. Seventy-four patients with 76 reconstructions (31 percent) had procedures that violated the classic nasal subunit principle. Eight of these 74 patients (11 percent) had complications, and eight (11 percent) had 10 revisions performed. The aesthetic and functional results were graded as excellent, good, and fair. The results for the 74 patients who underwent modification of the subunit were excellent in 85 percent, good in 13 percent, and fair in 2 percent. Case reports were selected to illustrate situations in which the nasal subunit was altered. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 111639, 2003.)
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.PRS.0000041602.85239.93
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72998363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72998363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3600-d3801a1fb8c448573af8315ff2c0c94513141b948d5c82d82a2f23213b0884943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkV1LHDEUhoNUdGv9CxJ60buZnpOP2cQ7WdQWrC1rC96FTCZho7MzNplB-u-bdRcM5Is87wl5QshnhBpBL78C1r_WDzXsmsAGWK0k47rW_IgsUDJdCSbYB7IA4KxCkOyUfMz5CQCXvJEn5BSZbKBRckEer3yeNn6Kjq7GIcfOJzvFsqJxoPc2256uvSv7Kc1ud0Dt0NGSoOux93QM9MfYxRB9d6Af5nYe4pQ_keNg--zPD_MZ-XNz_Xv1rbr7eft9dXVXOd4AVB1XgBZDq5wQSi65DYqjDIE5cFpI5Ciw1UJ10inWKWZZYJwhb0EpoQU_I1_2dV_S-HcujzHbmJ3vezv4cc5mybRWvOEFvNyDLo05Jx_MS4pbm_4ZBLPzagBN8WrevZo3r0bvwheHW-Z267v36EFkAcQeeB37yaf83M-vPpmNt_20eSvZSC4qVr4EygBV6Qz4f-FqgpY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72998363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aesthetic Considerations in Nasal Reconstruction and the Role of Modified Nasal Subunits</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Singh, Davinder J ; Bartlett, Scott P</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Davinder J ; Bartlett, Scott P</creatorcontrib><description>In 1985, Burget and Menick's landmark article on the nasal subunit principle popularized the technique of reconstructing the specific topographic subunits that they identified as the dorsum, tip, and columella and the paired alae, sidewalls, and soft triangles. In patients with more than 50 percent of subunit loss, Burget and Menick proposed removing the remaining portion of the subunit and reconstructing the entire subunit with a skin graft or flap. They further supported the placement of incisions for local flaps along borders of aesthetic subunits to maximize scar camouflage. Although the concept of nasal subunits is important in planning the reconstruction, other aesthetic considerations, such as skin texture, color, contour, and actinic damage, are also crucial in achieving an optimal result. Often, focusing on these aspects with the goal of nasal symmetry in mind leads to the violation of the subunit principle but provides a pleasing result of both the defect and the donor site. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate when and how the modification of the nasal subunit principle is used to achieve coverage of nasal skin defects. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent nasal reconstruction after skin cancer ablation surgery by one surgeon at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from 1987 to 2000 was performed. During this 13-year period, 219 patients underwent 245 nasal reconstructions. Seventy-four patients with 76 reconstructions (31 percent) had procedures that violated the classic nasal subunit principle. Eight of these 74 patients (11 percent) had complications, and eight (11 percent) had 10 revisions performed. The aesthetic and functional results were graded as excellent, good, and fair. The results for the 74 patients who underwent modification of the subunit were excellent in 85 percent, good in 13 percent, and fair in 2 percent. Case reports were selected to illustrate situations in which the nasal subunit was altered. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 111639, 2003.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000041602.85239.93</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12560685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Esthetics ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mohs Surgery ; Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery ; Nose Neoplasms - surgery ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Rhinoplasty - methods ; Skin Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgical Flaps ; Suture Techniques</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2003-02, Vol.111 (2), p.639-648</ispartof><rights>2003American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3600-d3801a1fb8c448573af8315ff2c0c94513141b948d5c82d82a2f23213b0884943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3600-d3801a1fb8c448573af8315ff2c0c94513141b948d5c82d82a2f23213b0884943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12560685$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Davinder J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Scott P</creatorcontrib><title>Aesthetic Considerations in Nasal Reconstruction and the Role of Modified Nasal Subunits</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>In 1985, Burget and Menick's landmark article on the nasal subunit principle popularized the technique of reconstructing the specific topographic subunits that they identified as the dorsum, tip, and columella and the paired alae, sidewalls, and soft triangles. In patients with more than 50 percent of subunit loss, Burget and Menick proposed removing the remaining portion of the subunit and reconstructing the entire subunit with a skin graft or flap. They further supported the placement of incisions for local flaps along borders of aesthetic subunits to maximize scar camouflage. Although the concept of nasal subunits is important in planning the reconstruction, other aesthetic considerations, such as skin texture, color, contour, and actinic damage, are also crucial in achieving an optimal result. Often, focusing on these aspects with the goal of nasal symmetry in mind leads to the violation of the subunit principle but provides a pleasing result of both the defect and the donor site. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate when and how the modification of the nasal subunit principle is used to achieve coverage of nasal skin defects. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent nasal reconstruction after skin cancer ablation surgery by one surgeon at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from 1987 to 2000 was performed. During this 13-year period, 219 patients underwent 245 nasal reconstructions. Seventy-four patients with 76 reconstructions (31 percent) had procedures that violated the classic nasal subunit principle. Eight of these 74 patients (11 percent) had complications, and eight (11 percent) had 10 revisions performed. The aesthetic and functional results were graded as excellent, good, and fair. The results for the 74 patients who underwent modification of the subunit were excellent in 85 percent, good in 13 percent, and fair in 2 percent. Case reports were selected to illustrate situations in which the nasal subunit was altered. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 111639, 2003.)</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Esthetics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mohs Surgery</subject><subject>Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery</subject><subject>Nose Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Rhinoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkV1LHDEUhoNUdGv9CxJ60buZnpOP2cQ7WdQWrC1rC96FTCZho7MzNplB-u-bdRcM5Is87wl5QshnhBpBL78C1r_WDzXsmsAGWK0k47rW_IgsUDJdCSbYB7IA4KxCkOyUfMz5CQCXvJEn5BSZbKBRckEer3yeNn6Kjq7GIcfOJzvFsqJxoPc2256uvSv7Kc1ud0Dt0NGSoOux93QM9MfYxRB9d6Af5nYe4pQ_keNg--zPD_MZ-XNz_Xv1rbr7eft9dXVXOd4AVB1XgBZDq5wQSi65DYqjDIE5cFpI5Ciw1UJ10inWKWZZYJwhb0EpoQU_I1_2dV_S-HcujzHbmJ3vezv4cc5mybRWvOEFvNyDLo05Jx_MS4pbm_4ZBLPzagBN8WrevZo3r0bvwheHW-Z267v36EFkAcQeeB37yaf83M-vPpmNt_20eSvZSC4qVr4EygBV6Qz4f-FqgpY</recordid><startdate>200302</startdate><enddate>200302</enddate><creator>Singh, Davinder J</creator><creator>Bartlett, Scott P</creator><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200302</creationdate><title>Aesthetic Considerations in Nasal Reconstruction and the Role of Modified Nasal Subunits</title><author>Singh, Davinder J ; Bartlett, Scott P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3600-d3801a1fb8c448573af8315ff2c0c94513141b948d5c82d82a2f23213b0884943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Esthetics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mohs Surgery</topic><topic>Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery</topic><topic>Nose Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Rhinoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Davinder J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartlett, Scott P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Davinder J</au><au>Bartlett, Scott P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aesthetic Considerations in Nasal Reconstruction and the Role of Modified Nasal Subunits</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2003-02</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>639</spage><epage>648</epage><pages>639-648</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>In 1985, Burget and Menick's landmark article on the nasal subunit principle popularized the technique of reconstructing the specific topographic subunits that they identified as the dorsum, tip, and columella and the paired alae, sidewalls, and soft triangles. In patients with more than 50 percent of subunit loss, Burget and Menick proposed removing the remaining portion of the subunit and reconstructing the entire subunit with a skin graft or flap. They further supported the placement of incisions for local flaps along borders of aesthetic subunits to maximize scar camouflage. Although the concept of nasal subunits is important in planning the reconstruction, other aesthetic considerations, such as skin texture, color, contour, and actinic damage, are also crucial in achieving an optimal result. Often, focusing on these aspects with the goal of nasal symmetry in mind leads to the violation of the subunit principle but provides a pleasing result of both the defect and the donor site. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate when and how the modification of the nasal subunit principle is used to achieve coverage of nasal skin defects. A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent nasal reconstruction after skin cancer ablation surgery by one surgeon at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from 1987 to 2000 was performed. During this 13-year period, 219 patients underwent 245 nasal reconstructions. Seventy-four patients with 76 reconstructions (31 percent) had procedures that violated the classic nasal subunit principle. Eight of these 74 patients (11 percent) had complications, and eight (11 percent) had 10 revisions performed. The aesthetic and functional results were graded as excellent, good, and fair. The results for the 74 patients who underwent modification of the subunit were excellent in 85 percent, good in 13 percent, and fair in 2 percent. Case reports were selected to illustrate situations in which the nasal subunit was altered. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 111639, 2003.)</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>12560685</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.PRS.0000041602.85239.93</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2003-02, Vol.111 (2), p.639-648
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72998363
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Esthetics
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mohs Surgery
Nose Deformities, Acquired - surgery
Nose Neoplasms - surgery
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Rhinoplasty - methods
Skin Neoplasms - surgery
Surgical Flaps
Suture Techniques
title Aesthetic Considerations in Nasal Reconstruction and the Role of Modified Nasal Subunits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A36%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aesthetic%20Considerations%20in%20Nasal%20Reconstruction%20and%20the%20Role%20of%20Modified%20Nasal%20Subunits&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Singh,%20Davinder%20J&rft.date=2003-02&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=639&rft.epage=648&rft.pages=639-648&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.PRS.0000041602.85239.93&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72998363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72998363&rft_id=info:pmid/12560685&rfr_iscdi=true