Interhemispheric visual interaction in a patient with posterior callosectomy

The role of anterior commissure (AC) and anterior parts of corpus callosum in visual interactions was investigated in a partial split-brain patient whose posterior and middle parts of the corpus callosum were resected surgically leaving intact only a thin portion of anterior corpus callosum. Althoug...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuropsychologia 2003, Vol.41 (5), p.597-604
Hauptverfasser: Afraz, S.R, Montaser-Kouhsari, L, Vaziri-Pashkam, M, Moradi, F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 604
container_issue 5
container_start_page 597
container_title Neuropsychologia
container_volume 41
creator Afraz, S.R
Montaser-Kouhsari, L
Vaziri-Pashkam, M
Moradi, F
description The role of anterior commissure (AC) and anterior parts of corpus callosum in visual interactions was investigated in a partial split-brain patient whose posterior and middle parts of the corpus callosum were resected surgically leaving intact only a thin portion of anterior corpus callosum. Although the primary visual areas of the two hemispheres are disconnected in the patient, we found that visual distracters presented to one hemisphere (in a crowding paradigm) impaired recognition of the target stimulus presented to the other hemisphere. The normal control group showed the same result. To rule out the possible contribution of subcortical areas to this interaction, we repeated the same crowding task with texture-defined stimuli. The patient again showed an interhemispheric interaction, even though subcortical structures respond poorly or do not respond at all to texture defined shapes. Despite the evidence for interhemispheric interaction, a classic match-to-sample task confirmed that the patient was unable to explicitly report when stimuli in left and right hemifields were the same or different. Similarly, in a search task, the patient’s reaction time was unaffected by distracters in the hemifield opposite the target whereas normals’ response time was affected. Considering the dissociation between these two tasks, we conclude that the anterior commissure and/or the anterior corpus callosum contribute to interhemispheric interactions in the attentional selection of location.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00201-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72989631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0028393202002014</els_id><sourcerecordid>72989631</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5ad5e6355c047388a50b236b4b243eaef05b4ea764bf57a55e44c25a2c2e54283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grIn0cNqXrOPk0jxUSh4UM8hm53SyHazJttK_71ZW_QoBCaZfDOTfIScM3rDKMtuXynlRSpKwa8ov44HylJ5QMasyEUqgMlDMv5FRuQkhA9KqQReHJMR4wAlAz4m81nbo1_iyoZuid6aZGPDWjeJHfLa9Na1cZ_opNO9xbZPvmy_TDoX4rV1PjG6aVxA07vV9pQcLXQT8GwfJ-T98eFt-pzOX55m0_t5akTG-hR0DZgJAENlLopCA624yCpZcSlQ44JCJVHnmawWkGsAlNJw0NxwBMkLMSGXu76dd59rDL2KzzfYNLpFtw4q52VRZoJFEHag8S4EjwvVebvSfqsYVYNG9aNRDY4UjWvQqGSsu9gPWFcrrP-q9t4icLcDMH5zY9GrYKIdg7X10YWqnf1nxDcyJoKD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72989631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interhemispheric visual interaction in a patient with posterior callosectomy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Afraz, S.R ; Montaser-Kouhsari, L ; Vaziri-Pashkam, M ; Moradi, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Afraz, S.R ; Montaser-Kouhsari, L ; Vaziri-Pashkam, M ; Moradi, F</creatorcontrib><description>The role of anterior commissure (AC) and anterior parts of corpus callosum in visual interactions was investigated in a partial split-brain patient whose posterior and middle parts of the corpus callosum were resected surgically leaving intact only a thin portion of anterior corpus callosum. Although the primary visual areas of the two hemispheres are disconnected in the patient, we found that visual distracters presented to one hemisphere (in a crowding paradigm) impaired recognition of the target stimulus presented to the other hemisphere. The normal control group showed the same result. To rule out the possible contribution of subcortical areas to this interaction, we repeated the same crowding task with texture-defined stimuli. The patient again showed an interhemispheric interaction, even though subcortical structures respond poorly or do not respond at all to texture defined shapes. Despite the evidence for interhemispheric interaction, a classic match-to-sample task confirmed that the patient was unable to explicitly report when stimuli in left and right hemifields were the same or different. Similarly, in a search task, the patient’s reaction time was unaffected by distracters in the hemifield opposite the target whereas normals’ response time was affected. Considering the dissociation between these two tasks, we conclude that the anterior commissure and/or the anterior corpus callosum contribute to interhemispheric interactions in the attentional selection of location.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-3932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00201-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12559152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attentional selection ; Corpus Callosum - pathology ; Corpus Callosum - surgery ; Crowding effect ; Dominance, Cerebral - physiology ; Epilepsy, Generalized - physiopathology ; Epilepsy, Generalized - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Split-brain ; Visual Pathways - physiology ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual search</subject><ispartof>Neuropsychologia, 2003, Vol.41 (5), p.597-604</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5ad5e6355c047388a50b236b4b243eaef05b4ea764bf57a55e44c25a2c2e54283</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393202002014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12559152$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Afraz, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montaser-Kouhsari, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaziri-Pashkam, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moradi, F</creatorcontrib><title>Interhemispheric visual interaction in a patient with posterior callosectomy</title><title>Neuropsychologia</title><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><description>The role of anterior commissure (AC) and anterior parts of corpus callosum in visual interactions was investigated in a partial split-brain patient whose posterior and middle parts of the corpus callosum were resected surgically leaving intact only a thin portion of anterior corpus callosum. Although the primary visual areas of the two hemispheres are disconnected in the patient, we found that visual distracters presented to one hemisphere (in a crowding paradigm) impaired recognition of the target stimulus presented to the other hemisphere. The normal control group showed the same result. To rule out the possible contribution of subcortical areas to this interaction, we repeated the same crowding task with texture-defined stimuli. The patient again showed an interhemispheric interaction, even though subcortical structures respond poorly or do not respond at all to texture defined shapes. Despite the evidence for interhemispheric interaction, a classic match-to-sample task confirmed that the patient was unable to explicitly report when stimuli in left and right hemifields were the same or different. Similarly, in a search task, the patient’s reaction time was unaffected by distracters in the hemifield opposite the target whereas normals’ response time was affected. Considering the dissociation between these two tasks, we conclude that the anterior commissure and/or the anterior corpus callosum contribute to interhemispheric interactions in the attentional selection of location.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attentional selection</subject><subject>Corpus Callosum - pathology</subject><subject>Corpus Callosum - surgery</subject><subject>Crowding effect</subject><subject>Dominance, Cerebral - physiology</subject><subject>Epilepsy, Generalized - physiopathology</subject><subject>Epilepsy, Generalized - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Split-brain</subject><subject>Visual Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual search</subject><issn>0028-3932</issn><issn>1873-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMotlZ_grIn0cNqXrOPk0jxUSh4UM8hm53SyHazJttK_71ZW_QoBCaZfDOTfIScM3rDKMtuXynlRSpKwa8ov44HylJ5QMasyEUqgMlDMv5FRuQkhA9KqQReHJMR4wAlAz4m81nbo1_iyoZuid6aZGPDWjeJHfLa9Na1cZ_opNO9xbZPvmy_TDoX4rV1PjG6aVxA07vV9pQcLXQT8GwfJ-T98eFt-pzOX55m0_t5akTG-hR0DZgJAENlLopCA624yCpZcSlQ44JCJVHnmawWkGsAlNJw0NxwBMkLMSGXu76dd59rDL2KzzfYNLpFtw4q52VRZoJFEHag8S4EjwvVebvSfqsYVYNG9aNRDY4UjWvQqGSsu9gPWFcrrP-q9t4icLcDMH5zY9GrYKIdg7X10YWqnf1nxDcyJoKD</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Afraz, S.R</creator><creator>Montaser-Kouhsari, L</creator><creator>Vaziri-Pashkam, M</creator><creator>Moradi, F</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Interhemispheric visual interaction in a patient with posterior callosectomy</title><author>Afraz, S.R ; Montaser-Kouhsari, L ; Vaziri-Pashkam, M ; Moradi, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-5ad5e6355c047388a50b236b4b243eaef05b4ea764bf57a55e44c25a2c2e54283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attentional selection</topic><topic>Corpus Callosum - pathology</topic><topic>Corpus Callosum - surgery</topic><topic>Crowding effect</topic><topic>Dominance, Cerebral - physiology</topic><topic>Epilepsy, Generalized - physiopathology</topic><topic>Epilepsy, Generalized - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Split-brain</topic><topic>Visual Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual search</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Afraz, S.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montaser-Kouhsari, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaziri-Pashkam, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moradi, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Afraz, S.R</au><au>Montaser-Kouhsari, L</au><au>Vaziri-Pashkam, M</au><au>Moradi, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interhemispheric visual interaction in a patient with posterior callosectomy</atitle><jtitle>Neuropsychologia</jtitle><addtitle>Neuropsychologia</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>597</spage><epage>604</epage><pages>597-604</pages><issn>0028-3932</issn><eissn>1873-3514</eissn><abstract>The role of anterior commissure (AC) and anterior parts of corpus callosum in visual interactions was investigated in a partial split-brain patient whose posterior and middle parts of the corpus callosum were resected surgically leaving intact only a thin portion of anterior corpus callosum. Although the primary visual areas of the two hemispheres are disconnected in the patient, we found that visual distracters presented to one hemisphere (in a crowding paradigm) impaired recognition of the target stimulus presented to the other hemisphere. The normal control group showed the same result. To rule out the possible contribution of subcortical areas to this interaction, we repeated the same crowding task with texture-defined stimuli. The patient again showed an interhemispheric interaction, even though subcortical structures respond poorly or do not respond at all to texture defined shapes. Despite the evidence for interhemispheric interaction, a classic match-to-sample task confirmed that the patient was unable to explicitly report when stimuli in left and right hemifields were the same or different. Similarly, in a search task, the patient’s reaction time was unaffected by distracters in the hemifield opposite the target whereas normals’ response time was affected. Considering the dissociation between these two tasks, we conclude that the anterior commissure and/or the anterior corpus callosum contribute to interhemispheric interactions in the attentional selection of location.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12559152</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00201-4</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0028-3932
ispartof Neuropsychologia, 2003, Vol.41 (5), p.597-604
issn 0028-3932
1873-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72989631
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Attentional selection
Corpus Callosum - pathology
Corpus Callosum - surgery
Crowding effect
Dominance, Cerebral - physiology
Epilepsy, Generalized - physiopathology
Epilepsy, Generalized - surgery
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Photic Stimulation
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Recognition (Psychology)
Split-brain
Visual Pathways - physiology
Visual Perception - physiology
Visual search
title Interhemispheric visual interaction in a patient with posterior callosectomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A32%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interhemispheric%20visual%20interaction%20in%20a%20patient%20with%20posterior%20callosectomy&rft.jtitle=Neuropsychologia&rft.au=Afraz,%20S.R&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=597&rft.epage=604&rft.pages=597-604&rft.issn=0028-3932&rft.eissn=1873-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00201-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72989631%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72989631&rft_id=info:pmid/12559152&rft_els_id=S0028393202002014&rfr_iscdi=true