Bacterial endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery: effect of incision placement and intraocular lens type
To determine whether endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery is affected by the incision site (superior sclerocorneal versus temporal cornea) or the foldable intraocular lens (IOL) material (silicone versus acrylic). Multicenter study. Patients who had small-incision cataract surgery a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 2003, Vol.29 (1), p.20-26 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 26 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 20 |
| container_title | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Nagaki, Yasunori Hayasaka, Seiji Kadoi, Chiharu Matsumoto, Masayuki Yanagisawa, Shuiichiro Watanabe, Kazuhiko Watanabe, Konomi Hayasaka, Yoriko Ikeda, Nariko Sato, Shoichi Kataoka, Yasushi Togashi, Mika Abe, Tomohiro |
| description | To determine whether endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery is affected by the incision site (superior sclerocorneal versus temporal cornea) or the foldable intraocular lens (IOL) material (silicone versus acrylic).
Multicenter study.
Patients who had small-incision cataract surgery at Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital and affiliated hospitals from March 1998 to March 2001 were examined prospectively. The patients were randomized into 3 groups. In Group A, an acrylic IOL (MA60BM, Alcon) was implanted through a temporal corneal incision. In Group B, an acrylic IOL (MA60BM) was implanted via a superior sclerocorneal incision. In Group C, a silicone poly(methyl methacrylate) IOL (SI-40NB, Allergan) was implanted via a superior sclerocorneal incision. Each patient was followed for more than 6 months.
Initially, 7622 patients (12 317 eyes) agreed to participate in the study. The final study included 3831 eyes in Group A, 3901 eyes in Group B, and 3863 eyes in Group C. Postoperative endophthalmitis was diagnosed clinically in 11 eyes (0.29%) in Group A, 2 (0.05%) in Group B, and 2 (0.05%) in Group C. Endophthalmitis proven by culture was found in 9 eyes in Group A, 2 in Group B, and 2 in Group C. The incidence of endophthalmitis in Group A was higher than in the other groups. The incidence of endophthalmitis in Group B was similar to that in Group C. The relative risk of postoperative endophthalmitis proven by culture in Groups B and C was 4.6 times (
P = .037) lower than in Group A.
The findings suggest that a temporal corneal incision may lead to an increased risk of postoperative endophthalmitis and that the IOL material does not affect the incidence of this complication. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01483-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72980287</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0886335002014839</els_id><sourcerecordid>72980287</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-e3daf84cb0ec7e3c63b652d7fc531ceb2604516e41748ba51c5e3574485f2ae33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEuPFSEQRonRONerP0HDRqOLVp7d3NkYnfhKJnGhrkk1XTgY-iHQmvvv5T4ys3RVoTgfVRxCnnL2mjPevvnGjGkbKTV7ycQrxpWRze4e2XDTyUZpJu6TzS1yQR7l_IsxpoTUD8kFF1rzthUb8vc9uIIpQKQ4DfNyU24gjqGETMHXC5pHiLEJkws5zBN1UCDVCM1r-olpf0nRe6zn2dNbaIngcMSpUJiG2i4JZrdGSDTilGnZL_iYPPAQMz451y358fHD96vPzfXXT1-u3l03TspdaVAO4I1yPUPXoXSt7Fsths47LbnDXrRM1Z-g4p0yPWjuNErdKWW0F4BSbsmL07tLmn-vmIsdQ3YYI0w4r9l2YmeYqM62RJ9Al-acE3q7pDBC2lvO7MG4PRq3B52WCXs0bnc19-w8YO1HHO5SZ8UVeH4GIDuIPsFB0x2ntNDmyL09cVh1_AmYbHYBJ4dDSFWwHebwn1X-AUZan8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72980287</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bacterial endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery: effect of incision placement and intraocular lens type</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nagaki, Yasunori ; Hayasaka, Seiji ; Kadoi, Chiharu ; Matsumoto, Masayuki ; Yanagisawa, Shuiichiro ; Watanabe, Kazuhiko ; Watanabe, Konomi ; Hayasaka, Yoriko ; Ikeda, Nariko ; Sato, Shoichi ; Kataoka, Yasushi ; Togashi, Mika ; Abe, Tomohiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagaki, Yasunori ; Hayasaka, Seiji ; Kadoi, Chiharu ; Matsumoto, Masayuki ; Yanagisawa, Shuiichiro ; Watanabe, Kazuhiko ; Watanabe, Konomi ; Hayasaka, Yoriko ; Ikeda, Nariko ; Sato, Shoichi ; Kataoka, Yasushi ; Togashi, Mika ; Abe, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery is affected by the incision site (superior sclerocorneal versus temporal cornea) or the foldable intraocular lens (IOL) material (silicone versus acrylic).
Multicenter study.
Patients who had small-incision cataract surgery at Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital and affiliated hospitals from March 1998 to March 2001 were examined prospectively. The patients were randomized into 3 groups. In Group A, an acrylic IOL (MA60BM, Alcon) was implanted through a temporal corneal incision. In Group B, an acrylic IOL (MA60BM) was implanted via a superior sclerocorneal incision. In Group C, a silicone poly(methyl methacrylate) IOL (SI-40NB, Allergan) was implanted via a superior sclerocorneal incision. Each patient was followed for more than 6 months.
Initially, 7622 patients (12 317 eyes) agreed to participate in the study. The final study included 3831 eyes in Group A, 3901 eyes in Group B, and 3863 eyes in Group C. Postoperative endophthalmitis was diagnosed clinically in 11 eyes (0.29%) in Group A, 2 (0.05%) in Group B, and 2 (0.05%) in Group C. Endophthalmitis proven by culture was found in 9 eyes in Group A, 2 in Group B, and 2 in Group C. The incidence of endophthalmitis in Group A was higher than in the other groups. The incidence of endophthalmitis in Group B was similar to that in Group C. The relative risk of postoperative endophthalmitis proven by culture in Groups B and C was 4.6 times (
P = .037) lower than in Group A.
The findings suggest that a temporal corneal incision may lead to an increased risk of postoperative endophthalmitis and that the IOL material does not affect the incidence of this complication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-3350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01483-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12551662</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCSUEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acrylates ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacterial Infections - etiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cataract Extraction - adverse effects ; Cataract Extraction - methods ; Cornea - surgery ; Endophthalmitis - epidemiology ; Endophthalmitis - microbiology ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Polymethyl Methacrylate ; Prospective Studies ; Sclera - surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><ispartof>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2003, Vol.29 (1), p.20-26</ispartof><rights>2003 ASCRS and ESCRS</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-e3daf84cb0ec7e3c63b652d7fc531ceb2604516e41748ba51c5e3574485f2ae33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886335002014839$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,58525,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14525862$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12551662$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagaki, Yasunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayasaka, Seiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadoi, Chiharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagisawa, Shuiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Kazuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Konomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayasaka, Yoriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Nariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kataoka, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Togashi, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><title>Bacterial endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery: effect of incision placement and intraocular lens type</title><title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><description>To determine whether endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery is affected by the incision site (superior sclerocorneal versus temporal cornea) or the foldable intraocular lens (IOL) material (silicone versus acrylic).
Multicenter study.
Patients who had small-incision cataract surgery at Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital and affiliated hospitals from March 1998 to March 2001 were examined prospectively. The patients were randomized into 3 groups. In Group A, an acrylic IOL (MA60BM, Alcon) was implanted through a temporal corneal incision. In Group B, an acrylic IOL (MA60BM) was implanted via a superior sclerocorneal incision. In Group C, a silicone poly(methyl methacrylate) IOL (SI-40NB, Allergan) was implanted via a superior sclerocorneal incision. Each patient was followed for more than 6 months.
Initially, 7622 patients (12 317 eyes) agreed to participate in the study. The final study included 3831 eyes in Group A, 3901 eyes in Group B, and 3863 eyes in Group C. Postoperative endophthalmitis was diagnosed clinically in 11 eyes (0.29%) in Group A, 2 (0.05%) in Group B, and 2 (0.05%) in Group C. Endophthalmitis proven by culture was found in 9 eyes in Group A, 2 in Group B, and 2 in Group C. The incidence of endophthalmitis in Group A was higher than in the other groups. The incidence of endophthalmitis in Group B was similar to that in Group C. The relative risk of postoperative endophthalmitis proven by culture in Groups B and C was 4.6 times (
P = .037) lower than in Group A.
The findings suggest that a temporal corneal incision may lead to an increased risk of postoperative endophthalmitis and that the IOL material does not affect the incidence of this complication.</description><subject>Acrylates</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cataract Extraction - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cataract Extraction - methods</subject><subject>Cornea - surgery</subject><subject>Endophthalmitis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Endophthalmitis - microbiology</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Polymethyl Methacrylate</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sclera - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><issn>0886-3350</issn><issn>1873-4502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEuPFSEQRonRONerP0HDRqOLVp7d3NkYnfhKJnGhrkk1XTgY-iHQmvvv5T4ys3RVoTgfVRxCnnL2mjPevvnGjGkbKTV7ycQrxpWRze4e2XDTyUZpJu6TzS1yQR7l_IsxpoTUD8kFF1rzthUb8vc9uIIpQKQ4DfNyU24gjqGETMHXC5pHiLEJkws5zBN1UCDVCM1r-olpf0nRe6zn2dNbaIngcMSpUJiG2i4JZrdGSDTilGnZL_iYPPAQMz451y358fHD96vPzfXXT1-u3l03TspdaVAO4I1yPUPXoXSt7Fsths47LbnDXrRM1Z-g4p0yPWjuNErdKWW0F4BSbsmL07tLmn-vmIsdQ3YYI0w4r9l2YmeYqM62RJ9Al-acE3q7pDBC2lvO7MG4PRq3B52WCXs0bnc19-w8YO1HHO5SZ8UVeH4GIDuIPsFB0x2ntNDmyL09cVh1_AmYbHYBJ4dDSFWwHebwn1X-AUZan8U</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Nagaki, Yasunori</creator><creator>Hayasaka, Seiji</creator><creator>Kadoi, Chiharu</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Masayuki</creator><creator>Yanagisawa, Shuiichiro</creator><creator>Watanabe, Kazuhiko</creator><creator>Watanabe, Konomi</creator><creator>Hayasaka, Yoriko</creator><creator>Ikeda, Nariko</creator><creator>Sato, Shoichi</creator><creator>Kataoka, Yasushi</creator><creator>Togashi, Mika</creator><creator>Abe, Tomohiro</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Bacterial endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery: effect of incision placement and intraocular lens type</title><author>Nagaki, Yasunori ; Hayasaka, Seiji ; Kadoi, Chiharu ; Matsumoto, Masayuki ; Yanagisawa, Shuiichiro ; Watanabe, Kazuhiko ; Watanabe, Konomi ; Hayasaka, Yoriko ; Ikeda, Nariko ; Sato, Shoichi ; Kataoka, Yasushi ; Togashi, Mika ; Abe, Tomohiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-e3daf84cb0ec7e3c63b652d7fc531ceb2604516e41748ba51c5e3574485f2ae33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Acrylates</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cataract Extraction - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cataract Extraction - methods</topic><topic>Cornea - surgery</topic><topic>Endophthalmitis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Endophthalmitis - microbiology</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Polymethyl Methacrylate</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sclera - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagaki, Yasunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayasaka, Seiji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadoi, Chiharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagisawa, Shuiichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Kazuhiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Konomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayasaka, Yoriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Nariko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kataoka, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Togashi, Mika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagaki, Yasunori</au><au>Hayasaka, Seiji</au><au>Kadoi, Chiharu</au><au>Matsumoto, Masayuki</au><au>Yanagisawa, Shuiichiro</au><au>Watanabe, Kazuhiko</au><au>Watanabe, Konomi</au><au>Hayasaka, Yoriko</au><au>Ikeda, Nariko</au><au>Sato, Shoichi</au><au>Kataoka, Yasushi</au><au>Togashi, Mika</au><au>Abe, Tomohiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bacterial endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery: effect of incision placement and intraocular lens type</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>20-26</pages><issn>0886-3350</issn><eissn>1873-4502</eissn><coden>JCSUEV</coden><abstract>To determine whether endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery is affected by the incision site (superior sclerocorneal versus temporal cornea) or the foldable intraocular lens (IOL) material (silicone versus acrylic).
Multicenter study.
Patients who had small-incision cataract surgery at Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital and affiliated hospitals from March 1998 to March 2001 were examined prospectively. The patients were randomized into 3 groups. In Group A, an acrylic IOL (MA60BM, Alcon) was implanted through a temporal corneal incision. In Group B, an acrylic IOL (MA60BM) was implanted via a superior sclerocorneal incision. In Group C, a silicone poly(methyl methacrylate) IOL (SI-40NB, Allergan) was implanted via a superior sclerocorneal incision. Each patient was followed for more than 6 months.
Initially, 7622 patients (12 317 eyes) agreed to participate in the study. The final study included 3831 eyes in Group A, 3901 eyes in Group B, and 3863 eyes in Group C. Postoperative endophthalmitis was diagnosed clinically in 11 eyes (0.29%) in Group A, 2 (0.05%) in Group B, and 2 (0.05%) in Group C. Endophthalmitis proven by culture was found in 9 eyes in Group A, 2 in Group B, and 2 in Group C. The incidence of endophthalmitis in Group A was higher than in the other groups. The incidence of endophthalmitis in Group B was similar to that in Group C. The relative risk of postoperative endophthalmitis proven by culture in Groups B and C was 4.6 times (
P = .037) lower than in Group A.
The findings suggest that a temporal corneal incision may lead to an increased risk of postoperative endophthalmitis and that the IOL material does not affect the incidence of this complication.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12551662</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01483-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0886-3350 |
| ispartof | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2003, Vol.29 (1), p.20-26 |
| issn | 0886-3350 1873-4502 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72980287 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Acrylates Aged Aged, 80 and over Bacterial Infections - etiology Biological and medical sciences Cataract Extraction - adverse effects Cataract Extraction - methods Cornea - surgery Endophthalmitis - epidemiology Endophthalmitis - microbiology Equipment Design Female Humans Incidence Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects Male Medical sciences Polymethyl Methacrylate Prospective Studies Sclera - surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the eye and orbit |
| title | Bacterial endophthalmitis after small-incision cataract surgery: effect of incision placement and intraocular lens type |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A21%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bacterial%20endophthalmitis%20after%20small-incision%20cataract%20surgery:%20effect%20of%20incision%20placement%20and%20intraocular%20lens%20type&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cataract%20and%20refractive%20surgery&rft.au=Nagaki,%20Yasunori&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=20-26&rft.issn=0886-3350&rft.eissn=1873-4502&rft.coden=JCSUEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01483-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72980287%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72980287&rft_id=info:pmid/12551662&rft_els_id=S0886335002014839&rfr_iscdi=true |