Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania

Three mysid species showed differences in chemosensory feeding as judged from stereotyped food capturing responses to dissolved mixtures of feeding stimulant (either betaine–HCl or glycine) and suppressant (ammonium). The strongest responses were to 50:50 mixtures of both betaine–ammonium and glycin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology Molecular & integrative physiology, 2003-02, Vol.134 (2), p.399-408
Hauptverfasser: Metillo, Ephrime B, Ritz, David A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 408
container_issue 2
container_start_page 399
container_title Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology
container_volume 134
creator Metillo, Ephrime B
Ritz, David A
description Three mysid species showed differences in chemosensory feeding as judged from stereotyped food capturing responses to dissolved mixtures of feeding stimulant (either betaine–HCl or glycine) and suppressant (ammonium). The strongest responses were to 50:50 mixtures of both betaine–ammonium and glycine–ammonium solutions. In general, the response curve to the different mixtures tested was bell-shaped. Anisomysis mixta australis only showed the normal curve in response to the glycine–ammonium mixture. The platykurtic curve for Tenagomysis tasmaniae suggests a less optimal response to the betaine–HCl–ammonium solution. Paramesopodopsis rufa reacted more strongly to the betaine–ammonium than to the glycine–ammonium solutions, and more individuals of this species responded to both solutions than the other two species. It is suggested that these contrasting chemosensitivities of the three coexisting mysid species serve as a means of partitioning the feeding niche.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00293-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72974682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1095643302002933</els_id><sourcerecordid>18868941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-8cadf0bfce95418bb53363de57305ea96aba77713db7ae99ee6b3b4ab583dfe63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuP1DAMgCMEYh_wE0A5oV2JQtIkTXtCaFge0iIOLOfISR0maNoscbvS8OtpdwZxXF9sOZ9jyR9jL6R4I4Vs3n6XojNVo5W6EPWlEHWnKvWInUqjZLV068dL_Q85YWdEv8QSWuqn7ETWRtvailP250OKEQuOU4IdD1scMuFIuex5ROzT-JN73MJdynPhfs-nbUHkIVc5hLmU9X3YU-qJX2zKTBMEhNf869pay0seSx445XnaItCEZeQ3QAOMCZ6xJxF2hM-P-Zz9-Hh1s_lcXX_79GXz_roKSoupagP0UfgYsDNatt4bpRrVo7FKGISuAQ_WWql6bwG7DrHxymvwplV9xEads1eHf29L_j0jTW5IFHC3gxHzTM7WndVNWz8IyrZt2k7LBTQHMJRMVDC625IGKHsnhVvtuHs7bj29E7W7t-PUMvfyuGD2A_b_p446FuDdAcDlHncJi6OQcAyLiIJhcn1OD6z4C9SJoe8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18868941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Metillo, Ephrime B ; Ritz, David A</creator><creatorcontrib>Metillo, Ephrime B ; Ritz, David A</creatorcontrib><description>Three mysid species showed differences in chemosensory feeding as judged from stereotyped food capturing responses to dissolved mixtures of feeding stimulant (either betaine–HCl or glycine) and suppressant (ammonium). The strongest responses were to 50:50 mixtures of both betaine–ammonium and glycine–ammonium solutions. In general, the response curve to the different mixtures tested was bell-shaped. Anisomysis mixta australis only showed the normal curve in response to the glycine–ammonium mixture. The platykurtic curve for Tenagomysis tasmaniae suggests a less optimal response to the betaine–HCl–ammonium solution. Paramesopodopsis rufa reacted more strongly to the betaine–ammonium than to the glycine–ammonium solutions, and more individuals of this species responded to both solutions than the other two species. It is suggested that these contrasting chemosensitivities of the three coexisting mysid species serve as a means of partitioning the feeding niche.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-6433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00293-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12547270</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ammonium ; Animals ; Anisomysis mixta australis ; Behavior, Animal - drug effects ; Behaviour ; Betaine - pharmacology ; Betaine–HCl ; Chemoreception ; Chemoreceptor Cells - physiology ; Crustacea - physiology ; Drug Combinations ; Feeding Behavior - drug effects ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Feeding niche partitioning ; Glycine ; Glycine - pharmacology ; Mysidacea ; Paramesopodopsis rufa ; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - pharmacology ; Species Specificity ; Tail - physiology ; Tasmania ; Taste - physiology ; Tenagomysis tasmaniae</subject><ispartof>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular &amp; integrative physiology, 2003-02, Vol.134 (2), p.399-408</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-8cadf0bfce95418bb53363de57305ea96aba77713db7ae99ee6b3b4ab583dfe63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00293-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12547270$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Metillo, Ephrime B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritz, David A</creatorcontrib><title>Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania</title><title>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular &amp; integrative physiology</title><addtitle>Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol</addtitle><description>Three mysid species showed differences in chemosensory feeding as judged from stereotyped food capturing responses to dissolved mixtures of feeding stimulant (either betaine–HCl or glycine) and suppressant (ammonium). The strongest responses were to 50:50 mixtures of both betaine–ammonium and glycine–ammonium solutions. In general, the response curve to the different mixtures tested was bell-shaped. Anisomysis mixta australis only showed the normal curve in response to the glycine–ammonium mixture. The platykurtic curve for Tenagomysis tasmaniae suggests a less optimal response to the betaine–HCl–ammonium solution. Paramesopodopsis rufa reacted more strongly to the betaine–ammonium than to the glycine–ammonium solutions, and more individuals of this species responded to both solutions than the other two species. It is suggested that these contrasting chemosensitivities of the three coexisting mysid species serve as a means of partitioning the feeding niche.</description><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anisomysis mixta australis</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</subject><subject>Behaviour</subject><subject>Betaine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Betaine–HCl</subject><subject>Chemoreception</subject><subject>Chemoreceptor Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Crustacea - physiology</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - drug effects</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Feeding niche partitioning</subject><subject>Glycine</subject><subject>Glycine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Mysidacea</subject><subject>Paramesopodopsis rufa</subject><subject>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - pharmacology</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Tail - physiology</subject><subject>Tasmania</subject><subject>Taste - physiology</subject><subject>Tenagomysis tasmaniae</subject><issn>1095-6433</issn><issn>1531-4332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuP1DAMgCMEYh_wE0A5oV2JQtIkTXtCaFge0iIOLOfISR0maNoscbvS8OtpdwZxXF9sOZ9jyR9jL6R4I4Vs3n6XojNVo5W6EPWlEHWnKvWInUqjZLV068dL_Q85YWdEv8QSWuqn7ETWRtvailP250OKEQuOU4IdD1scMuFIuex5ROzT-JN73MJdynPhfs-nbUHkIVc5hLmU9X3YU-qJX2zKTBMEhNf869pay0seSx445XnaItCEZeQ3QAOMCZ6xJxF2hM-P-Zz9-Hh1s_lcXX_79GXz_roKSoupagP0UfgYsDNatt4bpRrVo7FKGISuAQ_WWql6bwG7DrHxymvwplV9xEads1eHf29L_j0jTW5IFHC3gxHzTM7WndVNWz8IyrZt2k7LBTQHMJRMVDC625IGKHsnhVvtuHs7bj29E7W7t-PUMvfyuGD2A_b_p446FuDdAcDlHncJi6OQcAyLiIJhcn1OD6z4C9SJoe8</recordid><startdate>20030201</startdate><enddate>20030201</enddate><creator>Metillo, Ephrime B</creator><creator>Ritz, David A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030201</creationdate><title>Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania</title><author>Metillo, Ephrime B ; Ritz, David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-8cadf0bfce95418bb53363de57305ea96aba77713db7ae99ee6b3b4ab583dfe63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anisomysis mixta australis</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</topic><topic>Behaviour</topic><topic>Betaine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Betaine–HCl</topic><topic>Chemoreception</topic><topic>Chemoreceptor Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Crustacea - physiology</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - drug effects</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Feeding niche partitioning</topic><topic>Glycine</topic><topic>Glycine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Mysidacea</topic><topic>Paramesopodopsis rufa</topic><topic>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - pharmacology</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Tail - physiology</topic><topic>Tasmania</topic><topic>Taste - physiology</topic><topic>Tenagomysis tasmaniae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Metillo, Ephrime B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritz, David A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular &amp; integrative physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Metillo, Ephrime B</au><au>Ritz, David A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania</atitle><jtitle>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular &amp; integrative physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol</addtitle><date>2003-02-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>408</epage><pages>399-408</pages><issn>1095-6433</issn><eissn>1531-4332</eissn><abstract>Three mysid species showed differences in chemosensory feeding as judged from stereotyped food capturing responses to dissolved mixtures of feeding stimulant (either betaine–HCl or glycine) and suppressant (ammonium). The strongest responses were to 50:50 mixtures of both betaine–ammonium and glycine–ammonium solutions. In general, the response curve to the different mixtures tested was bell-shaped. Anisomysis mixta australis only showed the normal curve in response to the glycine–ammonium mixture. The platykurtic curve for Tenagomysis tasmaniae suggests a less optimal response to the betaine–HCl–ammonium solution. Paramesopodopsis rufa reacted more strongly to the betaine–ammonium than to the glycine–ammonium solutions, and more individuals of this species responded to both solutions than the other two species. It is suggested that these contrasting chemosensitivities of the three coexisting mysid species serve as a means of partitioning the feeding niche.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12547270</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00293-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1095-6433
ispartof Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology, 2003-02, Vol.134 (2), p.399-408
issn 1095-6433
1531-4332
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72974682
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Ammonium
Animals
Anisomysis mixta australis
Behavior, Animal - drug effects
Behaviour
Betaine - pharmacology
Betaine–HCl
Chemoreception
Chemoreceptor Cells - physiology
Crustacea - physiology
Drug Combinations
Feeding Behavior - drug effects
Feeding Behavior - physiology
Feeding niche partitioning
Glycine
Glycine - pharmacology
Mysidacea
Paramesopodopsis rufa
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - pharmacology
Species Specificity
Tail - physiology
Tasmania
Taste - physiology
Tenagomysis tasmaniae
title Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A06%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20chemosensory%20feeding%20behaviour%20by%20three%20co-occurring%20mysids%20(Crustacea,%20Mysidacea)%20from%20southeastern%20Tasmania&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20biochemistry%20and%20physiology.%20Part%20A,%20Molecular%20&%20integrative%20physiology&rft.au=Metillo,%20Ephrime%20B&rft.date=2003-02-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=408&rft.pages=399-408&rft.issn=1095-6433&rft.eissn=1531-4332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00293-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18868941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18868941&rft_id=info:pmid/12547270&rft_els_id=S1095643302002933&rfr_iscdi=true