Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania
Three mysid species showed differences in chemosensory feeding as judged from stereotyped food capturing responses to dissolved mixtures of feeding stimulant (either betaine–HCl or glycine) and suppressant (ammonium). The strongest responses were to 50:50 mixtures of both betaine–ammonium and glycin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology Molecular & integrative physiology, 2003-02, Vol.134 (2), p.399-408 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 408 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 399 |
container_title | Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Metillo, Ephrime B Ritz, David A |
description | Three mysid species showed differences in chemosensory feeding as judged from stereotyped food capturing responses to dissolved mixtures of feeding stimulant (either betaine–HCl or glycine) and suppressant (ammonium). The strongest responses were to 50:50 mixtures of both betaine–ammonium and glycine–ammonium solutions. In general, the response curve to the different mixtures tested was bell-shaped.
Anisomysis mixta australis only showed the normal curve in response to the glycine–ammonium mixture. The platykurtic curve for
Tenagomysis tasmaniae suggests a less optimal response to the betaine–HCl–ammonium solution.
Paramesopodopsis rufa reacted more strongly to the betaine–ammonium than to the glycine–ammonium solutions, and more individuals of this species responded to both solutions than the other two species. It is suggested that these contrasting chemosensitivities of the three coexisting mysid species serve as a means of partitioning the feeding niche. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00293-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72974682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1095643302002933</els_id><sourcerecordid>18868941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-8cadf0bfce95418bb53363de57305ea96aba77713db7ae99ee6b3b4ab583dfe63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUuP1DAMgCMEYh_wE0A5oV2JQtIkTXtCaFge0iIOLOfISR0maNoscbvS8OtpdwZxXF9sOZ9jyR9jL6R4I4Vs3n6XojNVo5W6EPWlEHWnKvWInUqjZLV068dL_Q85YWdEv8QSWuqn7ETWRtvailP250OKEQuOU4IdD1scMuFIuex5ROzT-JN73MJdynPhfs-nbUHkIVc5hLmU9X3YU-qJX2zKTBMEhNf869pay0seSx445XnaItCEZeQ3QAOMCZ6xJxF2hM-P-Zz9-Hh1s_lcXX_79GXz_roKSoupagP0UfgYsDNatt4bpRrVo7FKGISuAQ_WWql6bwG7DrHxymvwplV9xEads1eHf29L_j0jTW5IFHC3gxHzTM7WndVNWz8IyrZt2k7LBTQHMJRMVDC625IGKHsnhVvtuHs7bj29E7W7t-PUMvfyuGD2A_b_p446FuDdAcDlHncJi6OQcAyLiIJhcn1OD6z4C9SJoe8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18868941</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Metillo, Ephrime B ; Ritz, David A</creator><creatorcontrib>Metillo, Ephrime B ; Ritz, David A</creatorcontrib><description>Three mysid species showed differences in chemosensory feeding as judged from stereotyped food capturing responses to dissolved mixtures of feeding stimulant (either betaine–HCl or glycine) and suppressant (ammonium). The strongest responses were to 50:50 mixtures of both betaine–ammonium and glycine–ammonium solutions. In general, the response curve to the different mixtures tested was bell-shaped.
Anisomysis mixta australis only showed the normal curve in response to the glycine–ammonium mixture. The platykurtic curve for
Tenagomysis tasmaniae suggests a less optimal response to the betaine–HCl–ammonium solution.
Paramesopodopsis rufa reacted more strongly to the betaine–ammonium than to the glycine–ammonium solutions, and more individuals of this species responded to both solutions than the other two species. It is suggested that these contrasting chemosensitivities of the three coexisting mysid species serve as a means of partitioning the feeding niche.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1095-6433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4332</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00293-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12547270</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ammonium ; Animals ; Anisomysis mixta australis ; Behavior, Animal - drug effects ; Behaviour ; Betaine - pharmacology ; Betaine–HCl ; Chemoreception ; Chemoreceptor Cells - physiology ; Crustacea - physiology ; Drug Combinations ; Feeding Behavior - drug effects ; Feeding Behavior - physiology ; Feeding niche partitioning ; Glycine ; Glycine - pharmacology ; Mysidacea ; Paramesopodopsis rufa ; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - pharmacology ; Species Specificity ; Tail - physiology ; Tasmania ; Taste - physiology ; Tenagomysis tasmaniae</subject><ispartof>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology, 2003-02, Vol.134 (2), p.399-408</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-8cadf0bfce95418bb53363de57305ea96aba77713db7ae99ee6b3b4ab583dfe63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00293-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12547270$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Metillo, Ephrime B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritz, David A</creatorcontrib><title>Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania</title><title>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology</title><addtitle>Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol</addtitle><description>Three mysid species showed differences in chemosensory feeding as judged from stereotyped food capturing responses to dissolved mixtures of feeding stimulant (either betaine–HCl or glycine) and suppressant (ammonium). The strongest responses were to 50:50 mixtures of both betaine–ammonium and glycine–ammonium solutions. In general, the response curve to the different mixtures tested was bell-shaped.
Anisomysis mixta australis only showed the normal curve in response to the glycine–ammonium mixture. The platykurtic curve for
Tenagomysis tasmaniae suggests a less optimal response to the betaine–HCl–ammonium solution.
Paramesopodopsis rufa reacted more strongly to the betaine–ammonium than to the glycine–ammonium solutions, and more individuals of this species responded to both solutions than the other two species. It is suggested that these contrasting chemosensitivities of the three coexisting mysid species serve as a means of partitioning the feeding niche.</description><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anisomysis mixta australis</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</subject><subject>Behaviour</subject><subject>Betaine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Betaine–HCl</subject><subject>Chemoreception</subject><subject>Chemoreceptor Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Crustacea - physiology</subject><subject>Drug Combinations</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - drug effects</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Feeding niche partitioning</subject><subject>Glycine</subject><subject>Glycine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Mysidacea</subject><subject>Paramesopodopsis rufa</subject><subject>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - pharmacology</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Tail - physiology</subject><subject>Tasmania</subject><subject>Taste - physiology</subject><subject>Tenagomysis tasmaniae</subject><issn>1095-6433</issn><issn>1531-4332</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUuP1DAMgCMEYh_wE0A5oV2JQtIkTXtCaFge0iIOLOfISR0maNoscbvS8OtpdwZxXF9sOZ9jyR9jL6R4I4Vs3n6XojNVo5W6EPWlEHWnKvWInUqjZLV068dL_Q85YWdEv8QSWuqn7ETWRtvailP250OKEQuOU4IdD1scMuFIuex5ROzT-JN73MJdynPhfs-nbUHkIVc5hLmU9X3YU-qJX2zKTBMEhNf869pay0seSx445XnaItCEZeQ3QAOMCZ6xJxF2hM-P-Zz9-Hh1s_lcXX_79GXz_roKSoupagP0UfgYsDNatt4bpRrVo7FKGISuAQ_WWql6bwG7DrHxymvwplV9xEads1eHf29L_j0jTW5IFHC3gxHzTM7WndVNWz8IyrZt2k7LBTQHMJRMVDC625IGKHsnhVvtuHs7bj29E7W7t-PUMvfyuGD2A_b_p446FuDdAcDlHncJi6OQcAyLiIJhcn1OD6z4C9SJoe8</recordid><startdate>20030201</startdate><enddate>20030201</enddate><creator>Metillo, Ephrime B</creator><creator>Ritz, David A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030201</creationdate><title>Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania</title><author>Metillo, Ephrime B ; Ritz, David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-8cadf0bfce95418bb53363de57305ea96aba77713db7ae99ee6b3b4ab583dfe63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anisomysis mixta australis</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</topic><topic>Behaviour</topic><topic>Betaine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Betaine–HCl</topic><topic>Chemoreception</topic><topic>Chemoreceptor Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Crustacea - physiology</topic><topic>Drug Combinations</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - drug effects</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Feeding niche partitioning</topic><topic>Glycine</topic><topic>Glycine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Mysidacea</topic><topic>Paramesopodopsis rufa</topic><topic>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - pharmacology</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Tail - physiology</topic><topic>Tasmania</topic><topic>Taste - physiology</topic><topic>Tenagomysis tasmaniae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Metillo, Ephrime B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritz, David A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Metillo, Ephrime B</au><au>Ritz, David A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania</atitle><jtitle>Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol</addtitle><date>2003-02-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>408</epage><pages>399-408</pages><issn>1095-6433</issn><eissn>1531-4332</eissn><abstract>Three mysid species showed differences in chemosensory feeding as judged from stereotyped food capturing responses to dissolved mixtures of feeding stimulant (either betaine–HCl or glycine) and suppressant (ammonium). The strongest responses were to 50:50 mixtures of both betaine–ammonium and glycine–ammonium solutions. In general, the response curve to the different mixtures tested was bell-shaped.
Anisomysis mixta australis only showed the normal curve in response to the glycine–ammonium mixture. The platykurtic curve for
Tenagomysis tasmaniae suggests a less optimal response to the betaine–HCl–ammonium solution.
Paramesopodopsis rufa reacted more strongly to the betaine–ammonium than to the glycine–ammonium solutions, and more individuals of this species responded to both solutions than the other two species. It is suggested that these contrasting chemosensitivities of the three coexisting mysid species serve as a means of partitioning the feeding niche.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12547270</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00293-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1095-6433 |
ispartof | Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology, 2003-02, Vol.134 (2), p.399-408 |
issn | 1095-6433 1531-4332 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72974682 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Ammonium Animals Anisomysis mixta australis Behavior, Animal - drug effects Behaviour Betaine - pharmacology Betaine–HCl Chemoreception Chemoreceptor Cells - physiology Crustacea - physiology Drug Combinations Feeding Behavior - drug effects Feeding Behavior - physiology Feeding niche partitioning Glycine Glycine - pharmacology Mysidacea Paramesopodopsis rufa Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - pharmacology Species Specificity Tail - physiology Tasmania Taste - physiology Tenagomysis tasmaniae |
title | Differential chemosensory feeding behaviour by three co-occurring mysids (Crustacea, Mysidacea) from southeastern Tasmania |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T19%3A06%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differential%20chemosensory%20feeding%20behaviour%20by%20three%20co-occurring%20mysids%20(Crustacea,%20Mysidacea)%20from%20southeastern%20Tasmania&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20biochemistry%20and%20physiology.%20Part%20A,%20Molecular%20&%20integrative%20physiology&rft.au=Metillo,%20Ephrime%20B&rft.date=2003-02-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=408&rft.pages=399-408&rft.issn=1095-6433&rft.eissn=1531-4332&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00293-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18868941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18868941&rft_id=info:pmid/12547270&rft_els_id=S1095643302002933&rfr_iscdi=true |