Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the rural setting

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced into the United States in the last 2 years following a lengthy evolutionary process of laparoscopic techniques abroad. Work done in major centers in Nashville, Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, and Chicago has quickly extended to other areas of the country. Thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery 1992-04, Vol.2 (2), p.89-92
Hauptverfasser: Kreuder, K A, Chown, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue 2
container_start_page 89
container_title Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery
container_volume 2
creator Kreuder, K A
Chown, M
description Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced into the United States in the last 2 years following a lengthy evolutionary process of laparoscopic techniques abroad. Work done in major centers in Nashville, Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, and Chicago has quickly extended to other areas of the country. This report attempts to evaluate the applicability of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to rural portions of the United States by analyzing the early experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy by two rural surgeons. Seventy-three patients with cholecystitis were treated consecutively. Three of these were relatively emergent cases. In 69 patients, the Veress needle insufflation technique was used, and in 4 patients the Hasson open laparoscopic technique was used. Electrocautery dissection was employed in 55 of these patients, and in 15 patients the KTP-532 laser, set at 20 W, was used. Three patients required open surgery due to adhesions or inadequate scope visualization. Twenty-five patients underwent intraoperative cholangiography. Between 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively, 2 of the 73 patients developed retrograde bile leak and peritoneal bile soilage, leading to open common bile duct exploration. Three patients were discharged from the hospital in less than 24 h, 56 within 36 h, 9 within 48 h, and 2 patients went home after more than 48 h in the hospital. The 3 patients who had converted to open cholecystectomy required the usual hospitalization for that procedure. Over half the patients returned to full activity in less than 2 weeks. The surgeons noticed a gradual decrease in operative time as their experience increased. The rural experience of these two surgeons was consistent with statistics identified within the university setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/lps.1992.2.89
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72969888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72969888</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-a78036fadc3dd2160c6ff5ecfc8e0ab312333762158b64f8b49ec6e1ed29ec533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkDtPwzAUhT2ASimMjEiZ2BL8SBx7RBUvKRILzJZzc02D8sJ2hvx7UrUS0znDpyOdj5A7RjNGlX7sppAxrXnGM6UvyJbRgqdCU3ZFrkP4oVQWJacbsmGFyHNdbgmr7GT9GGCcWkjgMHYIS4gIceyXpB2SeMDEz952ScAY2-H7hlw62wW8PeeOfL08f-7f0urj9X3_VKXAqYipLRUV0tkGRNNwJilI5woEBwqprQXjQohSclaoWuZO1blGkMiw4WsphNiRh9Pu5MffGUM0fRsAu84OOM7BlFxLrZRawfQEwvojeHRm8m1v_WIYNUctZtVijloMN0qv_P15eK57bP7pkxPxB16fYKI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72969888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the rural setting</title><source>Mary Ann Liebert Online Subscription</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Kreuder, K A ; Chown, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Kreuder, K A ; Chown, M</creatorcontrib><description>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced into the United States in the last 2 years following a lengthy evolutionary process of laparoscopic techniques abroad. Work done in major centers in Nashville, Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, and Chicago has quickly extended to other areas of the country. This report attempts to evaluate the applicability of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to rural portions of the United States by analyzing the early experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy by two rural surgeons. Seventy-three patients with cholecystitis were treated consecutively. Three of these were relatively emergent cases. In 69 patients, the Veress needle insufflation technique was used, and in 4 patients the Hasson open laparoscopic technique was used. Electrocautery dissection was employed in 55 of these patients, and in 15 patients the KTP-532 laser, set at 20 W, was used. Three patients required open surgery due to adhesions or inadequate scope visualization. Twenty-five patients underwent intraoperative cholangiography. Between 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively, 2 of the 73 patients developed retrograde bile leak and peritoneal bile soilage, leading to open common bile duct exploration. Three patients were discharged from the hospital in less than 24 h, 56 within 36 h, 9 within 48 h, and 2 patients went home after more than 48 h in the hospital. The 3 patients who had converted to open cholecystectomy required the usual hospitalization for that procedure. Over half the patients returned to full activity in less than 2 weeks. The surgeons noticed a gradual decrease in operative time as their experience increased. The rural experience of these two surgeons was consistent with statistics identified within the university setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-3901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/lps.1992.2.89</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1534497</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Cholecystectomy - methods ; Cholecystitis - epidemiology ; Cholecystitis - surgery ; Hospitals, Rural ; Humans ; Idaho - epidemiology ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery, 1992-04, Vol.2 (2), p.89-92</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-a78036fadc3dd2160c6ff5ecfc8e0ab312333762158b64f8b49ec6e1ed29ec533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-a78036fadc3dd2160c6ff5ecfc8e0ab312333762158b64f8b49ec6e1ed29ec533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3042,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1534497$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kreuder, K A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chown, M</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the rural setting</title><title>Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery</title><addtitle>J Laparoendosc Surg</addtitle><description>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced into the United States in the last 2 years following a lengthy evolutionary process of laparoscopic techniques abroad. Work done in major centers in Nashville, Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, and Chicago has quickly extended to other areas of the country. This report attempts to evaluate the applicability of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to rural portions of the United States by analyzing the early experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy by two rural surgeons. Seventy-three patients with cholecystitis were treated consecutively. Three of these were relatively emergent cases. In 69 patients, the Veress needle insufflation technique was used, and in 4 patients the Hasson open laparoscopic technique was used. Electrocautery dissection was employed in 55 of these patients, and in 15 patients the KTP-532 laser, set at 20 W, was used. Three patients required open surgery due to adhesions or inadequate scope visualization. Twenty-five patients underwent intraoperative cholangiography. Between 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively, 2 of the 73 patients developed retrograde bile leak and peritoneal bile soilage, leading to open common bile duct exploration. Three patients were discharged from the hospital in less than 24 h, 56 within 36 h, 9 within 48 h, and 2 patients went home after more than 48 h in the hospital. The 3 patients who had converted to open cholecystectomy required the usual hospitalization for that procedure. Over half the patients returned to full activity in less than 2 weeks. The surgeons noticed a gradual decrease in operative time as their experience increased. The rural experience of these two surgeons was consistent with statistics identified within the university setting.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cholecystectomy - methods</subject><subject>Cholecystitis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cholecystitis - surgery</subject><subject>Hospitals, Rural</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Idaho - epidemiology</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1052-3901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkDtPwzAUhT2ASimMjEiZ2BL8SBx7RBUvKRILzJZzc02D8sJ2hvx7UrUS0znDpyOdj5A7RjNGlX7sppAxrXnGM6UvyJbRgqdCU3ZFrkP4oVQWJacbsmGFyHNdbgmr7GT9GGCcWkjgMHYIS4gIceyXpB2SeMDEz952ScAY2-H7hlw62wW8PeeOfL08f-7f0urj9X3_VKXAqYipLRUV0tkGRNNwJilI5woEBwqprQXjQohSclaoWuZO1blGkMiw4WsphNiRh9Pu5MffGUM0fRsAu84OOM7BlFxLrZRawfQEwvojeHRm8m1v_WIYNUctZtVijloMN0qv_P15eK57bP7pkxPxB16fYKI</recordid><startdate>199204</startdate><enddate>199204</enddate><creator>Kreuder, K A</creator><creator>Chown, M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199204</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the rural setting</title><author>Kreuder, K A ; Chown, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c203t-a78036fadc3dd2160c6ff5ecfc8e0ab312333762158b64f8b49ec6e1ed29ec533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cholecystectomy - methods</topic><topic>Cholecystitis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cholecystitis - surgery</topic><topic>Hospitals, Rural</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Idaho - epidemiology</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kreuder, K A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chown, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kreuder, K A</au><au>Chown, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the rural setting</atitle><jtitle>Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Laparoendosc Surg</addtitle><date>1992-04</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>89-92</pages><issn>1052-3901</issn><abstract>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was introduced into the United States in the last 2 years following a lengthy evolutionary process of laparoscopic techniques abroad. Work done in major centers in Nashville, Los Angeles, Salt Lake City, and Chicago has quickly extended to other areas of the country. This report attempts to evaluate the applicability of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to rural portions of the United States by analyzing the early experience of laparoscopic cholecystectomy by two rural surgeons. Seventy-three patients with cholecystitis were treated consecutively. Three of these were relatively emergent cases. In 69 patients, the Veress needle insufflation technique was used, and in 4 patients the Hasson open laparoscopic technique was used. Electrocautery dissection was employed in 55 of these patients, and in 15 patients the KTP-532 laser, set at 20 W, was used. Three patients required open surgery due to adhesions or inadequate scope visualization. Twenty-five patients underwent intraoperative cholangiography. Between 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively, 2 of the 73 patients developed retrograde bile leak and peritoneal bile soilage, leading to open common bile duct exploration. Three patients were discharged from the hospital in less than 24 h, 56 within 36 h, 9 within 48 h, and 2 patients went home after more than 48 h in the hospital. The 3 patients who had converted to open cholecystectomy required the usual hospitalization for that procedure. Over half the patients returned to full activity in less than 2 weeks. The surgeons noticed a gradual decrease in operative time as their experience increased. The rural experience of these two surgeons was consistent with statistics identified within the university setting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>1534497</pmid><doi>10.1089/lps.1992.2.89</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-3901
ispartof Journal of laparoendoscopic surgery, 1992-04, Vol.2 (2), p.89-92
issn 1052-3901
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72969888
source Mary Ann Liebert Online Subscription; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Aged
Cholecystectomy - methods
Cholecystitis - epidemiology
Cholecystitis - surgery
Hospitals, Rural
Humans
Idaho - epidemiology
Laparoscopy
Length of Stay
Middle Aged
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Time Factors
title Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the rural setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A45%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20cholecystectomy%20in%20the%20rural%20setting&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20laparoendoscopic%20surgery&rft.au=Kreuder,%20K%20A&rft.date=1992-04&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=89-92&rft.issn=1052-3901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/lps.1992.2.89&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72969888%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72969888&rft_id=info:pmid/1534497&rfr_iscdi=true