Nosocomial pneumonia

Nosocomial pneumonia, or terminal pneumonia as it was formerly called, results from the repetitive microaspiration of contaminated oropharyngeal secretions into the lungs in the presence of impaired host defenses. This pathophysiologic sequence was suggested by the observations of Osler but clarifie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intensive care medicine 2003, Vol.29 (1), p.23-29
Hauptverfasser: JOHANSON, Waldemar G, DEVER, Lisa L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 23
container_title Intensive care medicine
container_volume 29
creator JOHANSON, Waldemar G
DEVER, Lisa L
description Nosocomial pneumonia, or terminal pneumonia as it was formerly called, results from the repetitive microaspiration of contaminated oropharyngeal secretions into the lungs in the presence of impaired host defenses. This pathophysiologic sequence was suggested by the observations of Osler but clarified by the seminal work of Rouby and colleagues. The enormous impact of antimicrobial agents on the organisms responsible for nosocomial pneumonias was first identified by Kneeland and Price who found that organisms of the normal pharyngeal flora virtually disappeared in terminal pneumonias following administration of these drugs, being replaced by gram-negative bacilli. The remarkable susceptibility of seriously ill patients to becoming colonized by exogenous organisms, even in the absence of antimicrobial therapy, was shown by Johanson et al. These factors, antibiotics and the change in bacterial binding receptors in the airways associated with illness, lead to infections caused by exogenous organisms that are frequently resistant to antimicrobial agents. Clinical findings that usually identify patients with respiratory infections are unreliable for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonias as shown by Andrews et al. Invasive techniques, especially the protected specimen brush (PSB) technique, avoid contamination of the specimen by proximal secretions and accurately reflect the bacterial burden of the lung, as first shown by Chastre et al. Quantitation of such specimens serves as an excellent proxy for direct cultures of the lung and are the current gold standard for diagnosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00134-002-1589-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72961478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72961478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-678f30a61ead12ef502e8e386ccf205a18fa5b4f0c551572c8b5f77d983dd6da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMotlZ3btyICLqL5uY9Sym-oOhG1yGTSWDKzKQmnYX_3pQOFFxdLnzncPgQugLyAISox0wIMI4JoRiErrA6QnPgrHyU6WM0J4xTzCWnM3SW87rQSgo4RTOggmoCeo4uP2KOLvat7W42gx_7OLT2HJ0E22V_Md0F-n55_lq-4dXn6_vyaYUdE3yLpdKBESvB2waoD4JQrz3T0rlAibCggxU1D8QJAUJRp2sRlGoqzZpGNpYt0P2-d5Piz-jz1vRtdr7r7ODjmI2ilQSudAFv_4HrOKahbDMUJOhKU1Eg2EMuxZyTD2aT2t6mXwPE7HyZvS9TfJmdL6NK5noqHuveN4fEJKgAdxNgs7NdSHZwbT5wXFRVWcD-ADNbcBg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216189825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nosocomial pneumonia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>JOHANSON, Waldemar G ; DEVER, Lisa L</creator><creatorcontrib>JOHANSON, Waldemar G ; DEVER, Lisa L</creatorcontrib><description>Nosocomial pneumonia, or terminal pneumonia as it was formerly called, results from the repetitive microaspiration of contaminated oropharyngeal secretions into the lungs in the presence of impaired host defenses. This pathophysiologic sequence was suggested by the observations of Osler but clarified by the seminal work of Rouby and colleagues. The enormous impact of antimicrobial agents on the organisms responsible for nosocomial pneumonias was first identified by Kneeland and Price who found that organisms of the normal pharyngeal flora virtually disappeared in terminal pneumonias following administration of these drugs, being replaced by gram-negative bacilli. The remarkable susceptibility of seriously ill patients to becoming colonized by exogenous organisms, even in the absence of antimicrobial therapy, was shown by Johanson et al. These factors, antibiotics and the change in bacterial binding receptors in the airways associated with illness, lead to infections caused by exogenous organisms that are frequently resistant to antimicrobial agents. Clinical findings that usually identify patients with respiratory infections are unreliable for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonias as shown by Andrews et al. Invasive techniques, especially the protected specimen brush (PSB) technique, avoid contamination of the specimen by proximal secretions and accurately reflect the bacterial burden of the lung, as first shown by Chastre et al. Quantitation of such specimens serves as an excellent proxy for direct cultures of the lung and are the current gold standard for diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1589-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12528018</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ICMED9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid - microbiology ; Critical Illness ; Cross Infection - diagnosis ; Cross Infection - physiopathology ; Disease Susceptibility ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Pneumology ; Pneumonia, Aspiration - diagnosis ; Pneumonia, Aspiration - history ; Pneumonia, Aspiration - physiopathology ; Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Specimen Handling - instrumentation ; Specimen Handling - methods</subject><ispartof>Intensive care medicine, 2003, Vol.29 (1), p.23-29</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-678f30a61ead12ef502e8e386ccf205a18fa5b4f0c551572c8b5f77d983dd6da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-678f30a61ead12ef502e8e386ccf205a18fa5b4f0c551572c8b5f77d983dd6da3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14599161$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12528018$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>JOHANSON, Waldemar G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEVER, Lisa L</creatorcontrib><title>Nosocomial pneumonia</title><title>Intensive care medicine</title><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><description>Nosocomial pneumonia, or terminal pneumonia as it was formerly called, results from the repetitive microaspiration of contaminated oropharyngeal secretions into the lungs in the presence of impaired host defenses. This pathophysiologic sequence was suggested by the observations of Osler but clarified by the seminal work of Rouby and colleagues. The enormous impact of antimicrobial agents on the organisms responsible for nosocomial pneumonias was first identified by Kneeland and Price who found that organisms of the normal pharyngeal flora virtually disappeared in terminal pneumonias following administration of these drugs, being replaced by gram-negative bacilli. The remarkable susceptibility of seriously ill patients to becoming colonized by exogenous organisms, even in the absence of antimicrobial therapy, was shown by Johanson et al. These factors, antibiotics and the change in bacterial binding receptors in the airways associated with illness, lead to infections caused by exogenous organisms that are frequently resistant to antimicrobial agents. Clinical findings that usually identify patients with respiratory infections are unreliable for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonias as shown by Andrews et al. Invasive techniques, especially the protected specimen brush (PSB) technique, avoid contamination of the specimen by proximal secretions and accurately reflect the bacterial burden of the lung, as first shown by Chastre et al. Quantitation of such specimens serves as an excellent proxy for direct cultures of the lung and are the current gold standard for diagnosis.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid - microbiology</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Cross Infection - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cross Infection - physiopathology</subject><subject>Disease Susceptibility</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Aspiration - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Aspiration - history</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Aspiration - physiopathology</subject><subject>Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - instrumentation</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><issn>0342-4642</issn><issn>1432-1238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEUhYMotlZ3btyICLqL5uY9Sym-oOhG1yGTSWDKzKQmnYX_3pQOFFxdLnzncPgQugLyAISox0wIMI4JoRiErrA6QnPgrHyU6WM0J4xTzCWnM3SW87rQSgo4RTOggmoCeo4uP2KOLvat7W42gx_7OLT2HJ0E22V_Md0F-n55_lq-4dXn6_vyaYUdE3yLpdKBESvB2waoD4JQrz3T0rlAibCggxU1D8QJAUJRp2sRlGoqzZpGNpYt0P2-d5Piz-jz1vRtdr7r7ODjmI2ilQSudAFv_4HrOKahbDMUJOhKU1Eg2EMuxZyTD2aT2t6mXwPE7HyZvS9TfJmdL6NK5noqHuveN4fEJKgAdxNgs7NdSHZwbT5wXFRVWcD-ADNbcBg</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>JOHANSON, Waldemar G</creator><creator>DEVER, Lisa L</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Nosocomial pneumonia</title><author>JOHANSON, Waldemar G ; DEVER, Lisa L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-678f30a61ead12ef502e8e386ccf205a18fa5b4f0c551572c8b5f77d983dd6da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid - microbiology</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Cross Infection - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cross Infection - physiopathology</topic><topic>Disease Susceptibility</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Aspiration - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Aspiration - history</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Aspiration - physiopathology</topic><topic>Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - instrumentation</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>JOHANSON, Waldemar G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEVER, Lisa L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>JOHANSON, Waldemar G</au><au>DEVER, Lisa L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nosocomial pneumonia</atitle><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>23-29</pages><issn>0342-4642</issn><eissn>1432-1238</eissn><coden>ICMED9</coden><abstract>Nosocomial pneumonia, or terminal pneumonia as it was formerly called, results from the repetitive microaspiration of contaminated oropharyngeal secretions into the lungs in the presence of impaired host defenses. This pathophysiologic sequence was suggested by the observations of Osler but clarified by the seminal work of Rouby and colleagues. The enormous impact of antimicrobial agents on the organisms responsible for nosocomial pneumonias was first identified by Kneeland and Price who found that organisms of the normal pharyngeal flora virtually disappeared in terminal pneumonias following administration of these drugs, being replaced by gram-negative bacilli. The remarkable susceptibility of seriously ill patients to becoming colonized by exogenous organisms, even in the absence of antimicrobial therapy, was shown by Johanson et al. These factors, antibiotics and the change in bacterial binding receptors in the airways associated with illness, lead to infections caused by exogenous organisms that are frequently resistant to antimicrobial agents. Clinical findings that usually identify patients with respiratory infections are unreliable for the diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonias as shown by Andrews et al. Invasive techniques, especially the protected specimen brush (PSB) technique, avoid contamination of the specimen by proximal secretions and accurately reflect the bacterial burden of the lung, as first shown by Chastre et al. Quantitation of such specimens serves as an excellent proxy for direct cultures of the lung and are the current gold standard for diagnosis.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12528018</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00134-002-1589-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0342-4642
ispartof Intensive care medicine, 2003, Vol.29 (1), p.23-29
issn 0342-4642
1432-1238
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72961478
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid - microbiology
Critical Illness
Cross Infection - diagnosis
Cross Infection - physiopathology
Disease Susceptibility
History, 20th Century
Humans
Medical sciences
Pneumology
Pneumonia, Aspiration - diagnosis
Pneumonia, Aspiration - history
Pneumonia, Aspiration - physiopathology
Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specimen Handling - instrumentation
Specimen Handling - methods
title Nosocomial pneumonia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T18%3A23%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nosocomial%20pneumonia&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20care%20medicine&rft.au=JOHANSON,%20Waldemar%20G&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=23-29&rft.issn=0342-4642&rft.eissn=1432-1238&rft.coden=ICMED9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00134-002-1589-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72961478%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216189825&rft_id=info:pmid/12528018&rfr_iscdi=true