Communication among rehabilitation staff : mild, moderate, or severe deficits ?
Effective communication among members of the various rehabilitation disciplines is considered an essential component of the modern team approach. Inconsistency in the use of terminology within and across disciplines poses a significant barrier to effective communication. To systematically examine th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1992-05, Vol.73 (5), p.477-481 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 481 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 477 |
| container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 73 |
| creator | WANLASS, R. L REUTTER, S. L KLINE, A. E |
| description | Effective communication among members of the various rehabilitation disciplines is considered an essential component of the modern team approach. Inconsistency in the use of terminology within and across disciplines poses a significant barrier to effective communication. To systematically examine the extent of this problem, 132 respondents representing 14 rehabilitation facilities in six states were surveyed regarding their use of the descriptive labels "mild," "moderate," and "severe" as they pertain to level of cognitive impairment. They were also questioned regarding their use of terms to characterize different types of memory. As predicted, the results reflect a lack of consensus regarding the use of such terminology. The implications of this communication failure for rehabilitation staff, family members, patients, and third-party payers are discussed, and recommendations are made for ameliorating this problem. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72946294</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72946294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-78e5345b51a804b0b864bb99eb03602a7b130534fabf99c117e5eebd23351ab03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EtLxDAQAOAgyrqu_gQhB_G0hTyapvEisviChb0oeCtJO9FI06xJK_jvDWzx6mEYZuabOcwRWlLBWVEz-naMloQQXiil-Ck6S-kzl5XgdIEWVNRESrlEu03wfhpcq0cXBqx9GN5xhA9tXO_GQzON2lp8g73ruzX2oYOoR1jjEHGCb4iAO7CudWPCt-foxOo-wcWcV-j14f5l81Rsd4_Pm7ttsWdVNRayBsFLYQTVNSkNMXVVGqMUGMIrwrQ0lJMsrDZWqZZSCQLAdIzzvJLRCl0f7u5j-JogjY13qYW-1wOEKTWSqbLK8S-ktSyZ4HWGlzOcjIeu2Ufndfxp5lfl-dU816nVvY16aF36Y6KUjCrKfwFV_HHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18742538</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Communication among rehabilitation staff : mild, moderate, or severe deficits ?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>WANLASS, R. L ; REUTTER, S. L ; KLINE, A. E</creator><creatorcontrib>WANLASS, R. L ; REUTTER, S. L ; KLINE, A. E</creatorcontrib><description>Effective communication among members of the various rehabilitation disciplines is considered an essential component of the modern team approach. Inconsistency in the use of terminology within and across disciplines poses a significant barrier to effective communication. To systematically examine the extent of this problem, 132 respondents representing 14 rehabilitation facilities in six states were surveyed regarding their use of the descriptive labels "mild," "moderate," and "severe" as they pertain to level of cognitive impairment. They were also questioned regarding their use of terms to characterize different types of memory. As predicted, the results reflect a lack of consensus regarding the use of such terminology. The implications of this communication failure for rehabilitation staff, family members, patients, and third-party payers are discussed, and recommendations are made for ameliorating this problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1580777</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier</publisher><subject>Allied Health Personnel - psychology ; Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Communication ; Female ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Memory Disorders - diagnosis ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Patient Care Team ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Rehabilitation - manpower ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Terminology as Topic</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1992-05, Vol.73 (5), p.477-481</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5472191$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1580777$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WANLASS, R. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REUTTER, S. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLINE, A. E</creatorcontrib><title>Communication among rehabilitation staff : mild, moderate, or severe deficits ?</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Effective communication among members of the various rehabilitation disciplines is considered an essential component of the modern team approach. Inconsistency in the use of terminology within and across disciplines poses a significant barrier to effective communication. To systematically examine the extent of this problem, 132 respondents representing 14 rehabilitation facilities in six states were surveyed regarding their use of the descriptive labels "mild," "moderate," and "severe" as they pertain to level of cognitive impairment. They were also questioned regarding their use of terms to characterize different types of memory. As predicted, the results reflect a lack of consensus regarding the use of such terminology. The implications of this communication failure for rehabilitation staff, family members, patients, and third-party payers are discussed, and recommendations are made for ameliorating this problem.</description><subject>Allied Health Personnel - psychology</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Memory Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Rehabilitation - manpower</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EtLxDAQAOAgyrqu_gQhB_G0hTyapvEisviChb0oeCtJO9FI06xJK_jvDWzx6mEYZuabOcwRWlLBWVEz-naMloQQXiil-Ck6S-kzl5XgdIEWVNRESrlEu03wfhpcq0cXBqx9GN5xhA9tXO_GQzON2lp8g73ruzX2oYOoR1jjEHGCb4iAO7CudWPCt-foxOo-wcWcV-j14f5l81Rsd4_Pm7ttsWdVNRayBsFLYQTVNSkNMXVVGqMUGMIrwrQ0lJMsrDZWqZZSCQLAdIzzvJLRCl0f7u5j-JogjY13qYW-1wOEKTWSqbLK8S-ktSyZ4HWGlzOcjIeu2Ufndfxp5lfl-dU816nVvY16aF36Y6KUjCrKfwFV_HHA</recordid><startdate>19920501</startdate><enddate>19920501</enddate><creator>WANLASS, R. L</creator><creator>REUTTER, S. L</creator><creator>KLINE, A. E</creator><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920501</creationdate><title>Communication among rehabilitation staff : mild, moderate, or severe deficits ?</title><author>WANLASS, R. L ; REUTTER, S. L ; KLINE, A. E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p266t-78e5345b51a804b0b864bb99eb03602a7b130534fabf99c117e5eebd23351ab03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Allied Health Personnel - psychology</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Memory Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Rehabilitation - manpower</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WANLASS, R. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>REUTTER, S. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KLINE, A. E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WANLASS, R. L</au><au>REUTTER, S. L</au><au>KLINE, A. E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Communication among rehabilitation staff : mild, moderate, or severe deficits ?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>1992-05-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>477-481</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Effective communication among members of the various rehabilitation disciplines is considered an essential component of the modern team approach. Inconsistency in the use of terminology within and across disciplines poses a significant barrier to effective communication. To systematically examine the extent of this problem, 132 respondents representing 14 rehabilitation facilities in six states were surveyed regarding their use of the descriptive labels "mild," "moderate," and "severe" as they pertain to level of cognitive impairment. They were also questioned regarding their use of terms to characterize different types of memory. As predicted, the results reflect a lack of consensus regarding the use of such terminology. The implications of this communication failure for rehabilitation staff, family members, patients, and third-party payers are discussed, and recommendations are made for ameliorating this problem.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier</pub><pmid>1580777</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
| ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 1992-05, Vol.73 (5), p.477-481 |
| issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72946294 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Allied Health Personnel - psychology Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Communication Female Humans Medical sciences Memory Disorders - diagnosis Middle Aged Miscellaneous Patient Care Team Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Rehabilitation - manpower Surveys and Questionnaires Terminology as Topic |
| title | Communication among rehabilitation staff : mild, moderate, or severe deficits ? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T01%3A34%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Communication%20among%20rehabilitation%20staff%20:%20mild,%20moderate,%20or%20severe%20deficits%20?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=WANLASS,%20R.%20L&rft.date=1992-05-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=477-481&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72946294%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18742538&rft_id=info:pmid/1580777&rfr_iscdi=true |