Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitment

BACKGROUND : The potential effectiveness of various donation incentive programs may vary by demographics, first‐time or repeat status, and collection site. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : Attitudes toward future incentives were obtained from a 1998 anonymous survey sent to 92,581 US blood donors. Respons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2003-01, Vol.43 (1), p.7-16
Hauptverfasser: Glynn, Simone A., Williams, Alan E., Nass, Catharie C., Bethel, James, Kessler, Debra, Scott, Edward P., Fridey, Joy, Kleinman, Steven H., Schreiber, George B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 16
container_issue 1
container_start_page 7
container_title Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)
container_volume 43
creator Glynn, Simone A.
Williams, Alan E.
Nass, Catharie C.
Bethel, James
Kessler, Debra
Scott, Edward P.
Fridey, Joy
Kleinman, Steven H.
Schreiber, George B.
description BACKGROUND : The potential effectiveness of various donation incentive programs may vary by demographics, first‐time or repeat status, and collection site. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : Attitudes toward future incentives were obtained from a 1998 anonymous survey sent to 92,581 US blood donors. Responses (encouraged, discouraged, no difference) to incentives were compared within demographic groups, donations sites, and between first‐time and repeat community whole‐blood (WB) donors using chi‐square tests and logistic regressions adjusted for sample design. RESULTS : Incentives most likely to encourage donation return among all 45,588 WB respondents were blood credits (61%), cholesterol screening (61%), and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening (73% of men). Younger donors (≤25 years old) were 4 to 5 times more likely to be encouraged to donate if offered compensatory incentives (tickets to events, discounts or lottery and/or raffle tickets), gifts, or a token of appreciation than were those donors older than 55. This age effect influenced positive attitudes toward incentives in first‐time donors and in donors giving at schools, universities, or military sites. Among all donors, up to 7 to 9 percent reported they would be discouraged to return if offered compensatory incentives. CONCLUSIONS : Blood credits and cholesterol and PSA screening would be well received at all donation sites. Gifts, compensatory incentives, and tokens of appreciation appeal more to younger donors. These data may allow blood centers to optimize recruitment by tailoring limited incentive resources more effectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00252.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72946167</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72946167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4322-e4bfc89fa704b2c4fc3c63e62678ba43ad4572155b8067e3b0ba4b17b7f1ff2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtuFSEAQInR2Gv1Fwwb3c3Ic5gxbpqmD5NGY23TJQEGIteZ4QqMvd2Z-Kf9Epnem3brCgLn8DgAQIxqjFjzYV1jTkVFuo7XBCFaI0Q4qbfPwOpx4zlYIcRwhTElB-BVSmtUqA7hl-AAE447RvgK2KOcfZ57m2AOtyr2UA8h9LAPk8o-TNBPxk7Z_y6An2D-YeH15LPt4fessk0foR83gzcPcIIuxEUN8f7P32hNnH0ei_4avHBqSPbNfjwE16cnV8fn1cXXs8_HRxeVYZSQyjLtTNs5JRDTxDBnqGmobUgjWq0YVT3jgmDOdYsaYalGZVVjoYXDzhFLD8H73bmbGH7NNmU5-mTsMKjJhjlJQTrW4EYUsN2BJoaUonVyE_2o4p3ESC6J5VouJeVSUi6J5UNiuS3q2_0dsx5t_yTumxbg3R5QyajBRTUZn5441nFM2q5wn3bcrR_s3X8_QF5dnpZJ0aud7lO220ddxZ-yfFBwefPlTKJvFDPR3shL-g-ILKi-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72946167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitment</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Glynn, Simone A. ; Williams, Alan E. ; Nass, Catharie C. ; Bethel, James ; Kessler, Debra ; Scott, Edward P. ; Fridey, Joy ; Kleinman, Steven H. ; Schreiber, George B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Glynn, Simone A. ; Williams, Alan E. ; Nass, Catharie C. ; Bethel, James ; Kessler, Debra ; Scott, Edward P. ; Fridey, Joy ; Kleinman, Steven H. ; Schreiber, George B. ; Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study ; Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND : The potential effectiveness of various donation incentive programs may vary by demographics, first‐time or repeat status, and collection site. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : Attitudes toward future incentives were obtained from a 1998 anonymous survey sent to 92,581 US blood donors. Responses (encouraged, discouraged, no difference) to incentives were compared within demographic groups, donations sites, and between first‐time and repeat community whole‐blood (WB) donors using chi‐square tests and logistic regressions adjusted for sample design. RESULTS : Incentives most likely to encourage donation return among all 45,588 WB respondents were blood credits (61%), cholesterol screening (61%), and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening (73% of men). Younger donors (≤25 years old) were 4 to 5 times more likely to be encouraged to donate if offered compensatory incentives (tickets to events, discounts or lottery and/or raffle tickets), gifts, or a token of appreciation than were those donors older than 55. This age effect influenced positive attitudes toward incentives in first‐time donors and in donors giving at schools, universities, or military sites. Among all donors, up to 7 to 9 percent reported they would be discouraged to return if offered compensatory incentives. CONCLUSIONS : Blood credits and cholesterol and PSA screening would be well received at all donation sites. Gifts, compensatory incentives, and tokens of appreciation appeal more to younger donors. These data may allow blood centers to optimize recruitment by tailoring limited incentive resources more effectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00252.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12519425</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRANAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA, USA: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Attitude ; Bioethics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Donors - psychology ; Blood Donors - supply &amp; distribution ; Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy ; United States</subject><ispartof>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2003-01, Vol.43 (1), p.7-16</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4322-e4bfc89fa704b2c4fc3c63e62678ba43ad4572155b8067e3b0ba4b17b7f1ff2e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4322-e4bfc89fa704b2c4fc3c63e62678ba43ad4572155b8067e3b0ba4b17b7f1ff2e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1537-2995.2003.00252.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1537-2995.2003.00252.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,4021,27921,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14951289$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12519425$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Glynn, Simone A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Alan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nass, Catharie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bethel, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Edward P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fridey, Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinman, Steven H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, George B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study</creatorcontrib><title>Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitment</title><title>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND : The potential effectiveness of various donation incentive programs may vary by demographics, first‐time or repeat status, and collection site. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : Attitudes toward future incentives were obtained from a 1998 anonymous survey sent to 92,581 US blood donors. Responses (encouraged, discouraged, no difference) to incentives were compared within demographic groups, donations sites, and between first‐time and repeat community whole‐blood (WB) donors using chi‐square tests and logistic regressions adjusted for sample design. RESULTS : Incentives most likely to encourage donation return among all 45,588 WB respondents were blood credits (61%), cholesterol screening (61%), and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening (73% of men). Younger donors (≤25 years old) were 4 to 5 times more likely to be encouraged to donate if offered compensatory incentives (tickets to events, discounts or lottery and/or raffle tickets), gifts, or a token of appreciation than were those donors older than 55. This age effect influenced positive attitudes toward incentives in first‐time donors and in donors giving at schools, universities, or military sites. Among all donors, up to 7 to 9 percent reported they would be discouraged to return if offered compensatory incentives. CONCLUSIONS : Blood credits and cholesterol and PSA screening would be well received at all donation sites. Gifts, compensatory incentives, and tokens of appreciation appeal more to younger donors. These data may allow blood centers to optimize recruitment by tailoring limited incentive resources more effectively.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Donors - psychology</subject><subject>Blood Donors - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0041-1132</issn><issn>1537-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtuFSEAQInR2Gv1Fwwb3c3Ic5gxbpqmD5NGY23TJQEGIteZ4QqMvd2Z-Kf9Epnem3brCgLn8DgAQIxqjFjzYV1jTkVFuo7XBCFaI0Q4qbfPwOpx4zlYIcRwhTElB-BVSmtUqA7hl-AAE447RvgK2KOcfZ57m2AOtyr2UA8h9LAPk8o-TNBPxk7Z_y6An2D-YeH15LPt4fessk0foR83gzcPcIIuxEUN8f7P32hNnH0ei_4avHBqSPbNfjwE16cnV8fn1cXXs8_HRxeVYZSQyjLtTNs5JRDTxDBnqGmobUgjWq0YVT3jgmDOdYsaYalGZVVjoYXDzhFLD8H73bmbGH7NNmU5-mTsMKjJhjlJQTrW4EYUsN2BJoaUonVyE_2o4p3ESC6J5VouJeVSUi6J5UNiuS3q2_0dsx5t_yTumxbg3R5QyajBRTUZn5441nFM2q5wn3bcrR_s3X8_QF5dnpZJ0aud7lO220ddxZ-yfFBwefPlTKJvFDPR3shL-g-ILKi-</recordid><startdate>200301</startdate><enddate>200301</enddate><creator>Glynn, Simone A.</creator><creator>Williams, Alan E.</creator><creator>Nass, Catharie C.</creator><creator>Bethel, James</creator><creator>Kessler, Debra</creator><creator>Scott, Edward P.</creator><creator>Fridey, Joy</creator><creator>Kleinman, Steven H.</creator><creator>Schreiber, George B.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200301</creationdate><title>Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitment</title><author>Glynn, Simone A. ; Williams, Alan E. ; Nass, Catharie C. ; Bethel, James ; Kessler, Debra ; Scott, Edward P. ; Fridey, Joy ; Kleinman, Steven H. ; Schreiber, George B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4322-e4bfc89fa704b2c4fc3c63e62678ba43ad4572155b8067e3b0ba4b17b7f1ff2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Donors - psychology</topic><topic>Blood Donors - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Glynn, Simone A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Alan E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nass, Catharie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bethel, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessler, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Edward P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fridey, Joy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinman, Steven H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreiber, George B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Glynn, Simone A.</au><au>Williams, Alan E.</au><au>Nass, Catharie C.</au><au>Bethel, James</au><au>Kessler, Debra</au><au>Scott, Edward P.</au><au>Fridey, Joy</au><au>Kleinman, Steven H.</au><au>Schreiber, George B.</au><aucorp>Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study</aucorp><aucorp>Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitment</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><date>2003-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>7-16</pages><issn>0041-1132</issn><eissn>1537-2995</eissn><coden>TRANAT</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND : The potential effectiveness of various donation incentive programs may vary by demographics, first‐time or repeat status, and collection site. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS : Attitudes toward future incentives were obtained from a 1998 anonymous survey sent to 92,581 US blood donors. Responses (encouraged, discouraged, no difference) to incentives were compared within demographic groups, donations sites, and between first‐time and repeat community whole‐blood (WB) donors using chi‐square tests and logistic regressions adjusted for sample design. RESULTS : Incentives most likely to encourage donation return among all 45,588 WB respondents were blood credits (61%), cholesterol screening (61%), and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening (73% of men). Younger donors (≤25 years old) were 4 to 5 times more likely to be encouraged to donate if offered compensatory incentives (tickets to events, discounts or lottery and/or raffle tickets), gifts, or a token of appreciation than were those donors older than 55. This age effect influenced positive attitudes toward incentives in first‐time donors and in donors giving at schools, universities, or military sites. Among all donors, up to 7 to 9 percent reported they would be discouraged to return if offered compensatory incentives. CONCLUSIONS : Blood credits and cholesterol and PSA screening would be well received at all donation sites. Gifts, compensatory incentives, and tokens of appreciation appeal more to younger donors. These data may allow blood centers to optimize recruitment by tailoring limited incentive resources more effectively.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><pmid>12519425</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00252.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1132
ispartof Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2003-01, Vol.43 (1), p.7-16
issn 0041-1132
1537-2995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72946167
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Attitude
Bioethics
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Donors - psychology
Blood Donors - supply & distribution
Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis
Humans
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Motivation
Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy
United States
title Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T16%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attitudes%20toward%20blood%20donation%20incentives%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20implications%20for%20donor%E2%80%83recruitment&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Glynn,%20Simone%E2%80%83A.&rft.aucorp=Retrovirus%20Epidemiology%20Donor%20Study&rft.date=2003-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=7-16&rft.issn=0041-1132&rft.eissn=1537-2995&rft.coden=TRANAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00252.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72946167%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72946167&rft_id=info:pmid/12519425&rfr_iscdi=true