Endotracheal intubation for airway protection during endoscopy for severe upper GI hemorrhage
Background: Aspiration of blood may cause significant morbidity during emergent endoscopy for severe upper GI bleeding. Endotracheal intubation is widely performed for airway protection in this setting, but there are few data regarding its efficacy. Methods: Outcomes were compared for intensive care...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2003, Vol.57 (1), p.58-61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 58 |
container_title | Gastrointestinal endoscopy |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Rudolph, Stephen J. Landsverk, Brian K. Freeman, Martin L. |
description | Background: Aspiration of blood may cause significant morbidity during emergent endoscopy for severe upper GI bleeding. Endotracheal intubation is widely performed for airway protection in this setting, but there are few data regarding its efficacy.
Methods: Outcomes were compared for intensive care unit patients with upper GI bleeding for 1 year (1988) during which prophylactic endotracheal intubation was seldom performed before endoscopy, with outcomes during a subsequent year (1992) in which endotracheal intubation was routine for airway protection before or during EGD when there was hematemesis, altered mentation, unstable cardiopulmonary status, or large amounts of blood in the proximal GI tract, or before endoscopic treatment of lesions at high risk for bleeding.
Results: Background variables were similar for intensive care unit patients in 1988 (n = 101) and 1992 (n = 119) with respect to number of patients who had shock (respectively, 66.3% vs. 67.2%), cirrhosis (34.7% vs. 38.6%), variceal/portal hypertensive bleeding (22.8% vs. 33.6%), and endoscopic therapy (37.6% vs. 42.0%). Although use of endotracheal intubation specifically for EGD increased significantly between 1988 and 1992 (3.0% vs. 15.1%;
p < 0.05), there were no significant changes in endotracheal intubation at any time during hospitalization (24.8% vs. 28.6%), in all EGD-related cardiopulmonary complications (5.0% vs. 3.4%), in new pulmonary infiltrates after EGD (12.9% vs. 15.1%), in mean number of intensive care unit days (7.1 vs. 6.4), or in mortality (15.9% vs. 11.8%). New infiltrates developed in 10 (48%) of 21 patients after EGD despite endotracheal intubation specifically for airway protection. However, in 1992 there were no fatal episodes of aspiration during EGD (2.0% vs. 0%;
p = 0.21), no emergent post-EGD endotracheal intubation (6.0% vs. 0%;
p < 0.05), and fewer in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests (12.9% vs. 5.0%;
p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Frequent use of endotracheal intubation for airway protection during EGD for upper GI bleeding requiring intensive care unit admission did not significantly change the relatively high frequency of acquired pneumonia or cardiopulmonary events, but may have prevented the rare fatal episode of massive aspiration. Endotracheal intubation may benefit selected patients with upper GI bleeding, but its specific role remains unclear, and alternative methods of airway protection should be investigated. (Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:58-61.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1067/mge.2003.46 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72944387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016510703701151</els_id><sourcerecordid>72944387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d93098c9641164e03c661c386f57b5adb78434308b8bd82e1ebdcd512439c6d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0M9LwzAUwPEgips_Tt6lF71IZ9KkSXqUoVMQvOhRQpq8bpG2qUk72X9v9wO8eAqEz3s8vghdETwjmIv7ZgmzDGM6Y_wITQkuRMqFKI7RFGPC05xgMUFnMX5hjGVGySmakCwnktBsij4fW-v7oM0KdJ24th9K3TvfJpUPiXbhR2-SLvgezO7XDsG1ywTGoWh8t9mxCGsIkAxdByFZvCQraHwIK72EC3RS6TrC5eE9Rx9Pj-_z5_T1bfEyf3hNDeWkT21BcSFNwRkhnAGmhnNiqORVLspc21JIRhnFspSllRkQKK2xOckYLQy3kp6j2_3e8dTvAWKvGhcN1LVuwQ9RiaxgjEoxwrs9NMHHGKBSXXCNDhtFsNrWVGNNta2pGB_19WHtUDZg_-wh3whuDkBHo-sq6Na4-OdYnlEhtovyvYMxwtpBUNE4aA1YF8ayynr37wG_972P4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72944387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endotracheal intubation for airway protection during endoscopy for severe upper GI hemorrhage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rudolph, Stephen J. ; Landsverk, Brian K. ; Freeman, Martin L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Stephen J. ; Landsverk, Brian K. ; Freeman, Martin L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Aspiration of blood may cause significant morbidity during emergent endoscopy for severe upper GI bleeding. Endotracheal intubation is widely performed for airway protection in this setting, but there are few data regarding its efficacy.
Methods: Outcomes were compared for intensive care unit patients with upper GI bleeding for 1 year (1988) during which prophylactic endotracheal intubation was seldom performed before endoscopy, with outcomes during a subsequent year (1992) in which endotracheal intubation was routine for airway protection before or during EGD when there was hematemesis, altered mentation, unstable cardiopulmonary status, or large amounts of blood in the proximal GI tract, or before endoscopic treatment of lesions at high risk for bleeding.
Results: Background variables were similar for intensive care unit patients in 1988 (n = 101) and 1992 (n = 119) with respect to number of patients who had shock (respectively, 66.3% vs. 67.2%), cirrhosis (34.7% vs. 38.6%), variceal/portal hypertensive bleeding (22.8% vs. 33.6%), and endoscopic therapy (37.6% vs. 42.0%). Although use of endotracheal intubation specifically for EGD increased significantly between 1988 and 1992 (3.0% vs. 15.1%;
p < 0.05), there were no significant changes in endotracheal intubation at any time during hospitalization (24.8% vs. 28.6%), in all EGD-related cardiopulmonary complications (5.0% vs. 3.4%), in new pulmonary infiltrates after EGD (12.9% vs. 15.1%), in mean number of intensive care unit days (7.1 vs. 6.4), or in mortality (15.9% vs. 11.8%). New infiltrates developed in 10 (48%) of 21 patients after EGD despite endotracheal intubation specifically for airway protection. However, in 1992 there were no fatal episodes of aspiration during EGD (2.0% vs. 0%;
p = 0.21), no emergent post-EGD endotracheal intubation (6.0% vs. 0%;
p < 0.05), and fewer in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests (12.9% vs. 5.0%;
p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Frequent use of endotracheal intubation for airway protection during EGD for upper GI bleeding requiring intensive care unit admission did not significantly change the relatively high frequency of acquired pneumonia or cardiopulmonary events, but may have prevented the rare fatal episode of massive aspiration. Endotracheal intubation may benefit selected patients with upper GI bleeding, but its specific role remains unclear, and alternative methods of airway protection should be investigated. (Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:58-61.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-5107</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6779</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mge.2003.46</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12518132</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GAENBQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Endoscopy, Digestive System - methods ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - complications ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis ; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Intubation, Intratracheal - methods ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention & control ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><ispartof>Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2003, Vol.57 (1), p.58-61</ispartof><rights>2003 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d93098c9641164e03c661c386f57b5adb78434308b8bd82e1ebdcd512439c6d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d93098c9641164e03c661c386f57b5adb78434308b8bd82e1ebdcd512439c6d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510703701151$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14523776$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12518132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landsverk, Brian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Martin L.</creatorcontrib><title>Endotracheal intubation for airway protection during endoscopy for severe upper GI hemorrhage</title><title>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</title><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><description>Background: Aspiration of blood may cause significant morbidity during emergent endoscopy for severe upper GI bleeding. Endotracheal intubation is widely performed for airway protection in this setting, but there are few data regarding its efficacy.
Methods: Outcomes were compared for intensive care unit patients with upper GI bleeding for 1 year (1988) during which prophylactic endotracheal intubation was seldom performed before endoscopy, with outcomes during a subsequent year (1992) in which endotracheal intubation was routine for airway protection before or during EGD when there was hematemesis, altered mentation, unstable cardiopulmonary status, or large amounts of blood in the proximal GI tract, or before endoscopic treatment of lesions at high risk for bleeding.
Results: Background variables were similar for intensive care unit patients in 1988 (n = 101) and 1992 (n = 119) with respect to number of patients who had shock (respectively, 66.3% vs. 67.2%), cirrhosis (34.7% vs. 38.6%), variceal/portal hypertensive bleeding (22.8% vs. 33.6%), and endoscopic therapy (37.6% vs. 42.0%). Although use of endotracheal intubation specifically for EGD increased significantly between 1988 and 1992 (3.0% vs. 15.1%;
p < 0.05), there were no significant changes in endotracheal intubation at any time during hospitalization (24.8% vs. 28.6%), in all EGD-related cardiopulmonary complications (5.0% vs. 3.4%), in new pulmonary infiltrates after EGD (12.9% vs. 15.1%), in mean number of intensive care unit days (7.1 vs. 6.4), or in mortality (15.9% vs. 11.8%). New infiltrates developed in 10 (48%) of 21 patients after EGD despite endotracheal intubation specifically for airway protection. However, in 1992 there were no fatal episodes of aspiration during EGD (2.0% vs. 0%;
p = 0.21), no emergent post-EGD endotracheal intubation (6.0% vs. 0%;
p < 0.05), and fewer in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests (12.9% vs. 5.0%;
p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Frequent use of endotracheal intubation for airway protection during EGD for upper GI bleeding requiring intensive care unit admission did not significantly change the relatively high frequency of acquired pneumonia or cardiopulmonary events, but may have prevented the rare fatal episode of massive aspiration. Endotracheal intubation may benefit selected patients with upper GI bleeding, but its specific role remains unclear, and alternative methods of airway protection should be investigated. (Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:58-61.)</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endoscopy, Digestive System - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - complications</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention & control</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</subject><issn>0016-5107</issn><issn>1097-6779</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0M9LwzAUwPEgips_Tt6lF71IZ9KkSXqUoVMQvOhRQpq8bpG2qUk72X9v9wO8eAqEz3s8vghdETwjmIv7ZgmzDGM6Y_wITQkuRMqFKI7RFGPC05xgMUFnMX5hjGVGySmakCwnktBsij4fW-v7oM0KdJ24th9K3TvfJpUPiXbhR2-SLvgezO7XDsG1ywTGoWh8t9mxCGsIkAxdByFZvCQraHwIK72EC3RS6TrC5eE9Rx9Pj-_z5_T1bfEyf3hNDeWkT21BcSFNwRkhnAGmhnNiqORVLspc21JIRhnFspSllRkQKK2xOckYLQy3kp6j2_3e8dTvAWKvGhcN1LVuwQ9RiaxgjEoxwrs9NMHHGKBSXXCNDhtFsNrWVGNNta2pGB_19WHtUDZg_-wh3whuDkBHo-sq6Na4-OdYnlEhtovyvYMxwtpBUNE4aA1YF8ayynr37wG_972P4g</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Rudolph, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Landsverk, Brian K.</creator><creator>Freeman, Martin L.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>Endotracheal intubation for airway protection during endoscopy for severe upper GI hemorrhage</title><author>Rudolph, Stephen J. ; Landsverk, Brian K. ; Freeman, Martin L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-d93098c9641164e03c661c386f57b5adb78434308b8bd82e1ebdcd512439c6d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endoscopy, Digestive System - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - complications</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - methods</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention & control</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rudolph, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landsverk, Brian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Martin L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rudolph, Stephen J.</au><au>Landsverk, Brian K.</au><au>Freeman, Martin L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endotracheal intubation for airway protection during endoscopy for severe upper GI hemorrhage</atitle><jtitle>Gastrointestinal endoscopy</jtitle><addtitle>Gastrointest Endosc</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>58</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>58-61</pages><issn>0016-5107</issn><eissn>1097-6779</eissn><coden>GAENBQ</coden><abstract>Background: Aspiration of blood may cause significant morbidity during emergent endoscopy for severe upper GI bleeding. Endotracheal intubation is widely performed for airway protection in this setting, but there are few data regarding its efficacy.
Methods: Outcomes were compared for intensive care unit patients with upper GI bleeding for 1 year (1988) during which prophylactic endotracheal intubation was seldom performed before endoscopy, with outcomes during a subsequent year (1992) in which endotracheal intubation was routine for airway protection before or during EGD when there was hematemesis, altered mentation, unstable cardiopulmonary status, or large amounts of blood in the proximal GI tract, or before endoscopic treatment of lesions at high risk for bleeding.
Results: Background variables were similar for intensive care unit patients in 1988 (n = 101) and 1992 (n = 119) with respect to number of patients who had shock (respectively, 66.3% vs. 67.2%), cirrhosis (34.7% vs. 38.6%), variceal/portal hypertensive bleeding (22.8% vs. 33.6%), and endoscopic therapy (37.6% vs. 42.0%). Although use of endotracheal intubation specifically for EGD increased significantly between 1988 and 1992 (3.0% vs. 15.1%;
p < 0.05), there were no significant changes in endotracheal intubation at any time during hospitalization (24.8% vs. 28.6%), in all EGD-related cardiopulmonary complications (5.0% vs. 3.4%), in new pulmonary infiltrates after EGD (12.9% vs. 15.1%), in mean number of intensive care unit days (7.1 vs. 6.4), or in mortality (15.9% vs. 11.8%). New infiltrates developed in 10 (48%) of 21 patients after EGD despite endotracheal intubation specifically for airway protection. However, in 1992 there were no fatal episodes of aspiration during EGD (2.0% vs. 0%;
p = 0.21), no emergent post-EGD endotracheal intubation (6.0% vs. 0%;
p < 0.05), and fewer in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests (12.9% vs. 5.0%;
p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Frequent use of endotracheal intubation for airway protection during EGD for upper GI bleeding requiring intensive care unit admission did not significantly change the relatively high frequency of acquired pneumonia or cardiopulmonary events, but may have prevented the rare fatal episode of massive aspiration. Endotracheal intubation may benefit selected patients with upper GI bleeding, but its specific role remains unclear, and alternative methods of airway protection should be investigated. (Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:58-61.)</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>12518132</pmid><doi>10.1067/mge.2003.46</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-5107 |
ispartof | Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2003, Vol.57 (1), p.58-61 |
issn | 0016-5107 1097-6779 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72944387 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Digestive system. Abdomen Endoscopy Endoscopy, Digestive System - methods Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - complications Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - diagnosis Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - therapy Humans Intensive Care Units Intubation, Intratracheal - methods Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Other diseases. Semiology Pneumonia, Aspiration - prevention & control Retrospective Studies Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus |
title | Endotracheal intubation for airway protection during endoscopy for severe upper GI hemorrhage |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T15%3A21%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endotracheal%20intubation%20for%20airway%20protection%20during%20endoscopy%20for%20severe%20upper%20GI%20hemorrhage&rft.jtitle=Gastrointestinal%20endoscopy&rft.au=Rudolph,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=58&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=58-61&rft.issn=0016-5107&rft.eissn=1097-6779&rft.coden=GAENBQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mge.2003.46&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72944387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72944387&rft_id=info:pmid/12518132&rft_els_id=S0016510703701151&rfr_iscdi=true |