Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objective. Keliximab studies have provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of a non‐depleting CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clenoliximab, an immunoglobulin G4 derivative of keliximab, has substantially reduced potential to deplete CD4 cells. In in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of rheumatology 2003-01, Vol.42 (1), p.54-61
Hauptverfasser: Hepburn, T. W., Totoritis, M. C., Davis, C. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue 1
container_start_page 54
container_title British journal of rheumatology
container_volume 42
creator Hepburn, T. W.
Totoritis, M. C.
Davis, C. B.
description Objective. Keliximab studies have provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of a non‐depleting CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clenoliximab, an immunoglobulin G4 derivative of keliximab, has substantially reduced potential to deplete CD4 cells. In initial studies of clenoliximab, we investigated the hypothesis that the decrease in cell surface CD4 is the result of antibody‐mediated stripping from the cell surface. Methods. Patients received single or multiple intravenous infusions of clenoliximab as follows: 0.05, 0.2, 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg/kg (n=3–5/group); 150 or 350 mg weekly×4; or 350 or 700 mg every other week×2 (n=12/group). Blood was collected for up to 16 weeks and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using immunoassay and flow cytometry. Results. CD4 count was largely unaffected by clenoliximab treatment. Dose‐dependent CD4 coating, down‐modulation and stripping were observed. Maximal down‐modulation persisted for an increasing period as dose increased, while soluble CD4–clenoliximab complexes accumulated. The amount of CD4 in soluble complex was as much as 20 times the amount of cell‐associated CD4. For the same total dose, administration of higher doses, less frequently, resulted in pharmacodynamic profiles similar to those of lower doses administered more frequently. Conclusion. Decrease in the density of CD4 on the T‐lymphocyte surface is caused by antibody‐mediated stripping.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rheumatology/keg030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72943947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20492234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-50bad991489abaf8658b26e3f04e21791e4935d5c48ecff43c78f113ee392f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EoqXwBEjIQoJbqP8m8bFaYAuthBAIIS6W44x33SZxsB1BbjwCz8iTkNUuLeLCaUaa33z6Zj6EHlPyghLFT-MWpt7k0IXNfHoNG8LJHXRMRckKwjm7e9MzcYQepHRFCJGU1_fREWWSqJLyY7Q5G7JvQjv_-vGzh9abDC1OOfpx9MMGB4dXLwV2MfS4m_txG-ycAVvoOpym6IwF7Ac8muxhyAl_83mL_xjzLTYxb6PPPj1E95zpEjw61BP04fWrj6vz4vLd-s3q7LKwglW5kKQxrVJU1Mo0xtWlrBtWAndEAKOVoiAUl620ogbrnOC2qh2lHIAr5vgJer5XHWP4OkHKuvdpZ9YMEKakK6YEV6L6L8iIUIxxsYBP_wGvwhSH5QRNlSxlWdZ0gfgesjGkFMHpMfrexFlTondZ6b-z0vuslq0nB-mpWV5_u3MIZwGeHQCTrOlcNIP16ZYToqxZuTum2HM-Zfh-MzfxWi_TSurzz1-0eCvery_WF_oT_w22LrKe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195656681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hepburn, T. W. ; Totoritis, M. C. ; Davis, C. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hepburn, T. W. ; Totoritis, M. C. ; Davis, C. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. Keliximab studies have provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of a non‐depleting CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clenoliximab, an immunoglobulin G4 derivative of keliximab, has substantially reduced potential to deplete CD4 cells. In initial studies of clenoliximab, we investigated the hypothesis that the decrease in cell surface CD4 is the result of antibody‐mediated stripping from the cell surface. Methods. Patients received single or multiple intravenous infusions of clenoliximab as follows: 0.05, 0.2, 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg/kg (n=3–5/group); 150 or 350 mg weekly×4; or 350 or 700 mg every other week×2 (n=12/group). Blood was collected for up to 16 weeks and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using immunoassay and flow cytometry. Results. CD4 count was largely unaffected by clenoliximab treatment. Dose‐dependent CD4 coating, down‐modulation and stripping were observed. Maximal down‐modulation persisted for an increasing period as dose increased, while soluble CD4–clenoliximab complexes accumulated. The amount of CD4 in soluble complex was as much as 20 times the amount of cell‐associated CD4. For the same total dose, administration of higher doses, less frequently, resulted in pharmacodynamic profiles similar to those of lower doses administered more frequently. Conclusion. Decrease in the density of CD4 on the T‐lymphocyte surface is caused by antibody‐mediated stripping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-0324</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-0332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2172</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12509613</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJRHDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration &amp; dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacology ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blotting, Western - methods ; Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents ; CD4 ; CD4 Antigens - analysis ; CD4 Antigens - immunology ; CD4 Lymphocyte Count ; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Flow Cytometry ; Humans ; Immunoassay ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Pharmacodynamics ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Receptor stripping ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; T cell</subject><ispartof>British journal of rheumatology, 2003-01, Vol.42 (1), p.54-61</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jan 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-50bad991489abaf8658b26e3f04e21791e4935d5c48ecff43c78f113ee392f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14468267$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12509613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hepburn, T. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totoritis, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, C. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><title>British journal of rheumatology</title><addtitle>Rheumatology</addtitle><description>Objective. Keliximab studies have provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of a non‐depleting CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clenoliximab, an immunoglobulin G4 derivative of keliximab, has substantially reduced potential to deplete CD4 cells. In initial studies of clenoliximab, we investigated the hypothesis that the decrease in cell surface CD4 is the result of antibody‐mediated stripping from the cell surface. Methods. Patients received single or multiple intravenous infusions of clenoliximab as follows: 0.05, 0.2, 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg/kg (n=3–5/group); 150 or 350 mg weekly×4; or 350 or 700 mg every other week×2 (n=12/group). Blood was collected for up to 16 weeks and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using immunoassay and flow cytometry. Results. CD4 count was largely unaffected by clenoliximab treatment. Dose‐dependent CD4 coating, down‐modulation and stripping were observed. Maximal down‐modulation persisted for an increasing period as dose increased, while soluble CD4–clenoliximab complexes accumulated. The amount of CD4 in soluble complex was as much as 20 times the amount of cell‐associated CD4. For the same total dose, administration of higher doses, less frequently, resulted in pharmacodynamic profiles similar to those of lower doses administered more frequently. Conclusion. Decrease in the density of CD4 on the T‐lymphocyte surface is caused by antibody‐mediated stripping.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacology</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blotting, Western - methods</subject><subject>Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents</subject><subject>CD4</subject><subject>CD4 Antigens - analysis</subject><subject>CD4 Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>CD4 Lymphocyte Count</subject><subject>CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Pharmacodynamics</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Receptor stripping</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>T cell</subject><issn>1462-0324</issn><issn>1460-2172</issn><issn>1462-0332</issn><issn>1460-2172</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EoqXwBEjIQoJbqP8m8bFaYAuthBAIIS6W44x33SZxsB1BbjwCz8iTkNUuLeLCaUaa33z6Zj6EHlPyghLFT-MWpt7k0IXNfHoNG8LJHXRMRckKwjm7e9MzcYQepHRFCJGU1_fREWWSqJLyY7Q5G7JvQjv_-vGzh9abDC1OOfpx9MMGB4dXLwV2MfS4m_txG-ycAVvoOpym6IwF7Ac8muxhyAl_83mL_xjzLTYxb6PPPj1E95zpEjw61BP04fWrj6vz4vLd-s3q7LKwglW5kKQxrVJU1Mo0xtWlrBtWAndEAKOVoiAUl620ogbrnOC2qh2lHIAr5vgJer5XHWP4OkHKuvdpZ9YMEKakK6YEV6L6L8iIUIxxsYBP_wGvwhSH5QRNlSxlWdZ0gfgesjGkFMHpMfrexFlTondZ6b-z0vuslq0nB-mpWV5_u3MIZwGeHQCTrOlcNIP16ZYToqxZuTum2HM-Zfh-MzfxWi_TSurzz1-0eCvery_WF_oT_w22LrKe</recordid><startdate>200301</startdate><enddate>200301</enddate><creator>Hepburn, T. W.</creator><creator>Totoritis, M. C.</creator><creator>Davis, C. B.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200301</creationdate><title>Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><author>Hepburn, T. W. ; Totoritis, M. C. ; Davis, C. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-50bad991489abaf8658b26e3f04e21791e4935d5c48ecff43c78f113ee392f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacology</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blotting, Western - methods</topic><topic>Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents</topic><topic>CD4</topic><topic>CD4 Antigens - analysis</topic><topic>CD4 Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>CD4 Lymphocyte Count</topic><topic>CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Pharmacodynamics</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Receptor stripping</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>T cell</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hepburn, T. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totoritis, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, C. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hepburn, T. W.</au><au>Totoritis, M. C.</au><au>Davis, C. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</atitle><jtitle>British journal of rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Rheumatology</addtitle><date>2003-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>54</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>54-61</pages><issn>1462-0324</issn><issn>1460-2172</issn><eissn>1462-0332</eissn><eissn>1460-2172</eissn><coden>BJRHDF</coden><abstract>Objective. Keliximab studies have provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of a non‐depleting CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clenoliximab, an immunoglobulin G4 derivative of keliximab, has substantially reduced potential to deplete CD4 cells. In initial studies of clenoliximab, we investigated the hypothesis that the decrease in cell surface CD4 is the result of antibody‐mediated stripping from the cell surface. Methods. Patients received single or multiple intravenous infusions of clenoliximab as follows: 0.05, 0.2, 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg/kg (n=3–5/group); 150 or 350 mg weekly×4; or 350 or 700 mg every other week×2 (n=12/group). Blood was collected for up to 16 weeks and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using immunoassay and flow cytometry. Results. CD4 count was largely unaffected by clenoliximab treatment. Dose‐dependent CD4 coating, down‐modulation and stripping were observed. Maximal down‐modulation persisted for an increasing period as dose increased, while soluble CD4–clenoliximab complexes accumulated. The amount of CD4 in soluble complex was as much as 20 times the amount of cell‐associated CD4. For the same total dose, administration of higher doses, less frequently, resulted in pharmacodynamic profiles similar to those of lower doses administered more frequently. Conclusion. Decrease in the density of CD4 on the T‐lymphocyte surface is caused by antibody‐mediated stripping.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>12509613</pmid><doi>10.1093/rheumatology/keg030</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-0324
ispartof British journal of rheumatology, 2003-01, Vol.42 (1), p.54-61
issn 1462-0324
1460-2172
1462-0332
1460-2172
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72943947
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage
Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics
Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacology
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology
Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Blotting, Western - methods
Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents
CD4
CD4 Antigens - analysis
CD4 Antigens - immunology
CD4 Lymphocyte Count
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology
Double-Blind Method
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Flow Cytometry
Humans
Immunoassay
Infusions, Intravenous
Male
Medical sciences
Monoclonal antibodies
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Receptor stripping
Rheumatoid arthritis
T cell
title Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A25%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibody%E2%80%90mediated%20stripping%20of%20CD4%20from%20lymphocyte%20cell%20surface%20in%20patients%20with%20rheumatoid%20arthritis&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20rheumatology&rft.au=Hepburn,%20T.%20W.&rft.date=2003-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=54&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=54-61&rft.issn=1462-0324&rft.eissn=1462-0332&rft.coden=BJRHDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rheumatology/keg030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20492234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195656681&rft_id=info:pmid/12509613&rfr_iscdi=true