Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Objective. Keliximab studies have provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of a non‐depleting CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clenoliximab, an immunoglobulin G4 derivative of keliximab, has substantially reduced potential to deplete CD4 cells. In in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of rheumatology 2003-01, Vol.42 (1), p.54-61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 54 |
container_title | British journal of rheumatology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Hepburn, T. W. Totoritis, M. C. Davis, C. B. |
description | Objective. Keliximab studies have provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of a non‐depleting CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clenoliximab, an immunoglobulin G4 derivative of keliximab, has substantially reduced potential to deplete CD4 cells. In initial studies of clenoliximab, we investigated the hypothesis that the decrease in cell surface CD4 is the result of antibody‐mediated stripping from the cell surface. Methods. Patients received single or multiple intravenous infusions of clenoliximab as follows: 0.05, 0.2, 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg/kg (n=3–5/group); 150 or 350 mg weekly×4; or 350 or 700 mg every other week×2 (n=12/group). Blood was collected for up to 16 weeks and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using immunoassay and flow cytometry. Results. CD4 count was largely unaffected by clenoliximab treatment. Dose‐dependent CD4 coating, down‐modulation and stripping were observed. Maximal down‐modulation persisted for an increasing period as dose increased, while soluble CD4–clenoliximab complexes accumulated. The amount of CD4 in soluble complex was as much as 20 times the amount of cell‐associated CD4. For the same total dose, administration of higher doses, less frequently, resulted in pharmacodynamic profiles similar to those of lower doses administered more frequently. Conclusion. Decrease in the density of CD4 on the T‐lymphocyte surface is caused by antibody‐mediated stripping. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rheumatology/keg030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72943947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20492234</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-50bad991489abaf8658b26e3f04e21791e4935d5c48ecff43c78f113ee392f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EoqXwBEjIQoJbqP8m8bFaYAuthBAIIS6W44x33SZxsB1BbjwCz8iTkNUuLeLCaUaa33z6Zj6EHlPyghLFT-MWpt7k0IXNfHoNG8LJHXRMRckKwjm7e9MzcYQepHRFCJGU1_fREWWSqJLyY7Q5G7JvQjv_-vGzh9abDC1OOfpx9MMGB4dXLwV2MfS4m_txG-ycAVvoOpym6IwF7Ac8muxhyAl_83mL_xjzLTYxb6PPPj1E95zpEjw61BP04fWrj6vz4vLd-s3q7LKwglW5kKQxrVJU1Mo0xtWlrBtWAndEAKOVoiAUl620ogbrnOC2qh2lHIAr5vgJer5XHWP4OkHKuvdpZ9YMEKakK6YEV6L6L8iIUIxxsYBP_wGvwhSH5QRNlSxlWdZ0gfgesjGkFMHpMfrexFlTondZ6b-z0vuslq0nB-mpWV5_u3MIZwGeHQCTrOlcNIP16ZYToqxZuTum2HM-Zfh-MzfxWi_TSurzz1-0eCvery_WF_oT_w22LrKe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195656681</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hepburn, T. W. ; Totoritis, M. C. ; Davis, C. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hepburn, T. W. ; Totoritis, M. C. ; Davis, C. B.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective. Keliximab studies have provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of a non‐depleting CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clenoliximab, an immunoglobulin G4 derivative of keliximab, has substantially reduced potential to deplete CD4 cells. In initial studies of clenoliximab, we investigated the hypothesis that the decrease in cell surface CD4 is the result of antibody‐mediated stripping from the cell surface. Methods. Patients received single or multiple intravenous infusions of clenoliximab as follows: 0.05, 0.2, 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg/kg (n=3–5/group); 150 or 350 mg weekly×4; or 350 or 700 mg every other week×2 (n=12/group). Blood was collected for up to 16 weeks and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using immunoassay and flow cytometry. Results. CD4 count was largely unaffected by clenoliximab treatment. Dose‐dependent CD4 coating, down‐modulation and stripping were observed. Maximal down‐modulation persisted for an increasing period as dose increased, while soluble CD4–clenoliximab complexes accumulated. The amount of CD4 in soluble complex was as much as 20 times the amount of cell‐associated CD4. For the same total dose, administration of higher doses, less frequently, resulted in pharmacodynamic profiles similar to those of lower doses administered more frequently. Conclusion. Decrease in the density of CD4 on the T‐lymphocyte surface is caused by antibody‐mediated stripping.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-0324</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1462-0332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2172</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12509613</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJRHDF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacology ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blotting, Western - methods ; Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents ; CD4 ; CD4 Antigens - analysis ; CD4 Antigens - immunology ; CD4 Lymphocyte Count ; CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Flow Cytometry ; Humans ; Immunoassay ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Pharmacodynamics ; Pharmacokinetics ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Receptor stripping ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; T cell</subject><ispartof>British journal of rheumatology, 2003-01, Vol.42 (1), p.54-61</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Jan 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-50bad991489abaf8658b26e3f04e21791e4935d5c48ecff43c78f113ee392f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14468267$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12509613$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hepburn, T. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totoritis, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, C. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><title>British journal of rheumatology</title><addtitle>Rheumatology</addtitle><description>Objective. Keliximab studies have provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of a non‐depleting CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clenoliximab, an immunoglobulin G4 derivative of keliximab, has substantially reduced potential to deplete CD4 cells. In initial studies of clenoliximab, we investigated the hypothesis that the decrease in cell surface CD4 is the result of antibody‐mediated stripping from the cell surface. Methods. Patients received single or multiple intravenous infusions of clenoliximab as follows: 0.05, 0.2, 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg/kg (n=3–5/group); 150 or 350 mg weekly×4; or 350 or 700 mg every other week×2 (n=12/group). Blood was collected for up to 16 weeks and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using immunoassay and flow cytometry. Results. CD4 count was largely unaffected by clenoliximab treatment. Dose‐dependent CD4 coating, down‐modulation and stripping were observed. Maximal down‐modulation persisted for an increasing period as dose increased, while soluble CD4–clenoliximab complexes accumulated. The amount of CD4 in soluble complex was as much as 20 times the amount of cell‐associated CD4. For the same total dose, administration of higher doses, less frequently, resulted in pharmacodynamic profiles similar to those of lower doses administered more frequently. Conclusion. Decrease in the density of CD4 on the T‐lymphocyte surface is caused by antibody‐mediated stripping.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacology</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blotting, Western - methods</subject><subject>Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents</subject><subject>CD4</subject><subject>CD4 Antigens - analysis</subject><subject>CD4 Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>CD4 Lymphocyte Count</subject><subject>CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flow Cytometry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoassay</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Pharmacodynamics</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Receptor stripping</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>T cell</subject><issn>1462-0324</issn><issn>1460-2172</issn><issn>1462-0332</issn><issn>1460-2172</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxi0EoqXwBEjIQoJbqP8m8bFaYAuthBAIIS6W44x33SZxsB1BbjwCz8iTkNUuLeLCaUaa33z6Zj6EHlPyghLFT-MWpt7k0IXNfHoNG8LJHXRMRckKwjm7e9MzcYQepHRFCJGU1_fREWWSqJLyY7Q5G7JvQjv_-vGzh9abDC1OOfpx9MMGB4dXLwV2MfS4m_txG-ycAVvoOpym6IwF7Ac8muxhyAl_83mL_xjzLTYxb6PPPj1E95zpEjw61BP04fWrj6vz4vLd-s3q7LKwglW5kKQxrVJU1Mo0xtWlrBtWAndEAKOVoiAUl620ogbrnOC2qh2lHIAr5vgJer5XHWP4OkHKuvdpZ9YMEKakK6YEV6L6L8iIUIxxsYBP_wGvwhSH5QRNlSxlWdZ0gfgesjGkFMHpMfrexFlTondZ6b-z0vuslq0nB-mpWV5_u3MIZwGeHQCTrOlcNIP16ZYToqxZuTum2HM-Zfh-MzfxWi_TSurzz1-0eCvery_WF_oT_w22LrKe</recordid><startdate>200301</startdate><enddate>200301</enddate><creator>Hepburn, T. W.</creator><creator>Totoritis, M. C.</creator><creator>Davis, C. B.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200301</creationdate><title>Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</title><author>Hepburn, T. W. ; Totoritis, M. C. ; Davis, C. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-50bad991489abaf8658b26e3f04e21791e4935d5c48ecff43c78f113ee392f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacology</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blotting, Western - methods</topic><topic>Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents</topic><topic>CD4</topic><topic>CD4 Antigens - analysis</topic><topic>CD4 Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>CD4 Lymphocyte Count</topic><topic>CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flow Cytometry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoassay</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Pharmacodynamics</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Receptor stripping</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>T cell</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hepburn, T. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totoritis, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, C. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hepburn, T. W.</au><au>Totoritis, M. C.</au><au>Davis, C. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis</atitle><jtitle>British journal of rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Rheumatology</addtitle><date>2003-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>54</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>54-61</pages><issn>1462-0324</issn><issn>1460-2172</issn><eissn>1462-0332</eissn><eissn>1460-2172</eissn><coden>BJRHDF</coden><abstract>Objective. Keliximab studies have provided evidence of the therapeutic potential of a non‐depleting CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clenoliximab, an immunoglobulin G4 derivative of keliximab, has substantially reduced potential to deplete CD4 cells. In initial studies of clenoliximab, we investigated the hypothesis that the decrease in cell surface CD4 is the result of antibody‐mediated stripping from the cell surface. Methods. Patients received single or multiple intravenous infusions of clenoliximab as follows: 0.05, 0.2, 1, 5, 10 or 15 mg/kg (n=3–5/group); 150 or 350 mg weekly×4; or 350 or 700 mg every other week×2 (n=12/group). Blood was collected for up to 16 weeks and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted using immunoassay and flow cytometry. Results. CD4 count was largely unaffected by clenoliximab treatment. Dose‐dependent CD4 coating, down‐modulation and stripping were observed. Maximal down‐modulation persisted for an increasing period as dose increased, while soluble CD4–clenoliximab complexes accumulated. The amount of CD4 in soluble complex was as much as 20 times the amount of cell‐associated CD4. For the same total dose, administration of higher doses, less frequently, resulted in pharmacodynamic profiles similar to those of lower doses administered more frequently. Conclusion. Decrease in the density of CD4 on the T‐lymphocyte surface is caused by antibody‐mediated stripping.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>12509613</pmid><doi>10.1093/rheumatology/keg030</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-0324 |
ispartof | British journal of rheumatology, 2003-01, Vol.42 (1), p.54-61 |
issn | 1462-0324 1460-2172 1462-0332 1460-2172 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72943947 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacokinetics Antibodies, Monoclonal - pharmacology Arthritis, Rheumatoid - immunology Arthritis, Rheumatoid - therapy Biological and medical sciences Blotting, Western - methods Bones, joints and connective tissue. Antiinflammatory agents CD4 CD4 Antigens - analysis CD4 Antigens - immunology CD4 Lymphocyte Count CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes - immunology Double-Blind Method Drug Administration Schedule Female Flow Cytometry Humans Immunoassay Infusions, Intravenous Male Medical sciences Monoclonal antibodies Pharmacodynamics Pharmacokinetics Pharmacology. Drug treatments Receptor stripping Rheumatoid arthritis T cell |
title | Antibody‐mediated stripping of CD4 from lymphocyte cell surface in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T15%3A25%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibody%E2%80%90mediated%20stripping%20of%20CD4%20from%20lymphocyte%20cell%20surface%20in%20patients%20with%20rheumatoid%20arthritis&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20rheumatology&rft.au=Hepburn,%20T.%20W.&rft.date=2003-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=54&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=54-61&rft.issn=1462-0324&rft.eissn=1462-0332&rft.coden=BJRHDF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rheumatology/keg030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20492234%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195656681&rft_id=info:pmid/12509613&rfr_iscdi=true |