Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements

A spatial cueing paradigm was used to (a) investigate the effects of attentional orienting on spatial and temporal parameters of saccadic eye movements and (b) examine hypotheses regarding the hierarchical programming of saccade direction and amplitude. On a given trial, the subjects were presented...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vision research (Oxford) 1992-02, Vol.32 (2), p.293-304
Hauptverfasser: Crawford, T.J., Muller, H.J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 304
container_issue 2
container_start_page 293
container_title Vision research (Oxford)
container_volume 32
creator Crawford, T.J.
Muller, H.J.
description A spatial cueing paradigm was used to (a) investigate the effects of attentional orienting on spatial and temporal parameters of saccadic eye movements and (b) examine hypotheses regarding the hierarchical programming of saccade direction and amplitude. On a given trial, the subjects were presented with one of three peripheral cues: a “valid” cue provided correct information, a “neutral” cue no information and an “invalid” cue incorrect information about the location of the subsequent target (the cue was valid on about 50% of the trials). 100 or 500msec after the cue onset (stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA), the eye movement target was presented at one of six possible locations (from − 11.25° to + 11.25°, at 3.75° spacing). The results showed a significant effect of cueing on saccade latencies at the 100msec, but no effect at the 500msec SOA. The cueing benefits were restricted to the cued location; no other locations within the cued or uncued hemi-field were facilitated. The invalid trial latencies showed: (a) no advantage for targets on the same side as the cue relative to the opposite side, (b) no advantage for targets more proximal to the cue and (c) no advantage for targets sharing the same eccentricity as the cue. In a second experiment, subjects responded to the target by giving a simple manual response [simple reaction time (RT)] while keeping the eyes stationary. The results showed a significant cueing effect on simple RTs both at the 100msec and, in contrast to saccadic eye movements, the 500msec SOA. There were specific benefits for targets at the cued location relative to other targets within the same and opposite hemi-fields. Further, in contrast to saccades, there was a general advantage for targets within the same (“cued”) hemi-field over targets in the opposite hemi-field. These findings suggest that, for saccadic eye movements (overt orienting), direction and amplitude are programmed holistically; whereas in covert orienting (with eyes stationary), motor parameters (e.g. for directed hand movements) are programmed in a more hierarchical fashion.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90140-E
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72915698</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>004269899290140E</els_id><sourcerecordid>72915698</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-907a3f4113834632eb5e1386e99c2f85e337901abf613d4495eec0d514d19dda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIeRPSwmmyS3c1FkFI_oCCinkOaTDCyHzXZLfTfm7q13oRAEt5nhpkHoVOCrwkm-Q3GLEtzUYpLkV0JTBhOZ3toTMqiTHnO8n003iGH6CiET4xxwTMxQiPCC1ayfIxeXpeqc6pKVGOSDupl6-MHrAXdhaS1SfjNuw6azrVNEs9HX6smCUprZZxOYA1J3a6gjkQ4RgdWVQFOtvcEvd_P3qaP6fz54Wl6N081x7RLBS4UtYwQWlKW0wwWHOI7ByF0ZksOlBZxKbWwOaGGMcEBNDacMEOEMYpO0MXQd-nbrx5CJ2sXNFSVaqDtgywyQXjcPYJsALVvQ_Bg5dK7Wvm1JFhuTMqNJrnRJEUmf0zKWSw72_bvFzWYv6JBXczPt7kKWlXWq0a7sMM4FqwUImK3AwbRxcqBl0E7aDQY56NjaVr3_xzftpWPAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72915698</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Crawford, T.J. ; Muller, H.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crawford, T.J. ; Muller, H.J.</creatorcontrib><description>A spatial cueing paradigm was used to (a) investigate the effects of attentional orienting on spatial and temporal parameters of saccadic eye movements and (b) examine hypotheses regarding the hierarchical programming of saccade direction and amplitude. On a given trial, the subjects were presented with one of three peripheral cues: a “valid” cue provided correct information, a “neutral” cue no information and an “invalid” cue incorrect information about the location of the subsequent target (the cue was valid on about 50% of the trials). 100 or 500msec after the cue onset (stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA), the eye movement target was presented at one of six possible locations (from − 11.25° to + 11.25°, at 3.75° spacing). The results showed a significant effect of cueing on saccade latencies at the 100msec, but no effect at the 500msec SOA. The cueing benefits were restricted to the cued location; no other locations within the cued or uncued hemi-field were facilitated. The invalid trial latencies showed: (a) no advantage for targets on the same side as the cue relative to the opposite side, (b) no advantage for targets more proximal to the cue and (c) no advantage for targets sharing the same eccentricity as the cue. In a second experiment, subjects responded to the target by giving a simple manual response [simple reaction time (RT)] while keeping the eyes stationary. The results showed a significant cueing effect on simple RTs both at the 100msec and, in contrast to saccadic eye movements, the 500msec SOA. There were specific benefits for targets at the cued location relative to other targets within the same and opposite hemi-fields. Further, in contrast to saccades, there was a general advantage for targets within the same (“cued”) hemi-field over targets in the opposite hemi-field. These findings suggest that, for saccadic eye movements (overt orienting), direction and amplitude are programmed holistically; whereas in covert orienting (with eyes stationary), motor parameters (e.g. for directed hand movements) are programmed in a more hierarchical fashion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(92)90140-E</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1574846</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VISRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cues ; Fixation, Ocular ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Manual reaction time ; Perception ; Pre-motor ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Rotation ; Saccade accuracy ; Saccade latency ; Saccades - physiology ; Spatial cueing ; Time Factors ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Vision research (Oxford), 1992-02, Vol.32 (2), p.293-304</ispartof><rights>1992 Pergamon Press plc</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-907a3f4113834632eb5e1386e99c2f85e337901abf613d4495eec0d514d19dda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-907a3f4113834632eb5e1386e99c2f85e337901abf613d4495eec0d514d19dda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/004269899290140E$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5094899$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1574846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crawford, T.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, H.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements</title><title>Vision research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><description>A spatial cueing paradigm was used to (a) investigate the effects of attentional orienting on spatial and temporal parameters of saccadic eye movements and (b) examine hypotheses regarding the hierarchical programming of saccade direction and amplitude. On a given trial, the subjects were presented with one of three peripheral cues: a “valid” cue provided correct information, a “neutral” cue no information and an “invalid” cue incorrect information about the location of the subsequent target (the cue was valid on about 50% of the trials). 100 or 500msec after the cue onset (stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA), the eye movement target was presented at one of six possible locations (from − 11.25° to + 11.25°, at 3.75° spacing). The results showed a significant effect of cueing on saccade latencies at the 100msec, but no effect at the 500msec SOA. The cueing benefits were restricted to the cued location; no other locations within the cued or uncued hemi-field were facilitated. The invalid trial latencies showed: (a) no advantage for targets on the same side as the cue relative to the opposite side, (b) no advantage for targets more proximal to the cue and (c) no advantage for targets sharing the same eccentricity as the cue. In a second experiment, subjects responded to the target by giving a simple manual response [simple reaction time (RT)] while keeping the eyes stationary. The results showed a significant cueing effect on simple RTs both at the 100msec and, in contrast to saccadic eye movements, the 500msec SOA. There were specific benefits for targets at the cued location relative to other targets within the same and opposite hemi-fields. Further, in contrast to saccades, there was a general advantage for targets within the same (“cued”) hemi-field over targets in the opposite hemi-field. These findings suggest that, for saccadic eye movements (overt orienting), direction and amplitude are programmed holistically; whereas in covert orienting (with eyes stationary), motor parameters (e.g. for directed hand movements) are programmed in a more hierarchical fashion.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Manual reaction time</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Pre-motor</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Saccade accuracy</subject><subject>Saccade latency</subject><subject>Saccades - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial cueing</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>0042-6989</issn><issn>1878-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotVb_gcIeRPSwmmyS3c1FkFI_oCCinkOaTDCyHzXZLfTfm7q13oRAEt5nhpkHoVOCrwkm-Q3GLEtzUYpLkV0JTBhOZ3toTMqiTHnO8n003iGH6CiET4xxwTMxQiPCC1ayfIxeXpeqc6pKVGOSDupl6-MHrAXdhaS1SfjNuw6azrVNEs9HX6smCUprZZxOYA1J3a6gjkQ4RgdWVQFOtvcEvd_P3qaP6fz54Wl6N081x7RLBS4UtYwQWlKW0wwWHOI7ByF0ZksOlBZxKbWwOaGGMcEBNDacMEOEMYpO0MXQd-nbrx5CJ2sXNFSVaqDtgywyQXjcPYJsALVvQ_Bg5dK7Wvm1JFhuTMqNJrnRJEUmf0zKWSw72_bvFzWYv6JBXczPt7kKWlXWq0a7sMM4FqwUImK3AwbRxcqBl0E7aDQY56NjaVr3_xzftpWPAA</recordid><startdate>19920201</startdate><enddate>19920201</enddate><creator>Crawford, T.J.</creator><creator>Muller, H.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920201</creationdate><title>Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements</title><author>Crawford, T.J. ; Muller, H.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-907a3f4113834632eb5e1386e99c2f85e337901abf613d4495eec0d514d19dda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Manual reaction time</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Pre-motor</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Saccade accuracy</topic><topic>Saccade latency</topic><topic>Saccades - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial cueing</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crawford, T.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, H.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crawford, T.J.</au><au>Muller, H.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements</atitle><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><date>1992-02-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>304</epage><pages>293-304</pages><issn>0042-6989</issn><eissn>1878-5646</eissn><coden>VISRAM</coden><abstract>A spatial cueing paradigm was used to (a) investigate the effects of attentional orienting on spatial and temporal parameters of saccadic eye movements and (b) examine hypotheses regarding the hierarchical programming of saccade direction and amplitude. On a given trial, the subjects were presented with one of three peripheral cues: a “valid” cue provided correct information, a “neutral” cue no information and an “invalid” cue incorrect information about the location of the subsequent target (the cue was valid on about 50% of the trials). 100 or 500msec after the cue onset (stimulus onset asynchrony, SOA), the eye movement target was presented at one of six possible locations (from − 11.25° to + 11.25°, at 3.75° spacing). The results showed a significant effect of cueing on saccade latencies at the 100msec, but no effect at the 500msec SOA. The cueing benefits were restricted to the cued location; no other locations within the cued or uncued hemi-field were facilitated. The invalid trial latencies showed: (a) no advantage for targets on the same side as the cue relative to the opposite side, (b) no advantage for targets more proximal to the cue and (c) no advantage for targets sharing the same eccentricity as the cue. In a second experiment, subjects responded to the target by giving a simple manual response [simple reaction time (RT)] while keeping the eyes stationary. The results showed a significant cueing effect on simple RTs both at the 100msec and, in contrast to saccadic eye movements, the 500msec SOA. There were specific benefits for targets at the cued location relative to other targets within the same and opposite hemi-fields. Further, in contrast to saccades, there was a general advantage for targets within the same (“cued”) hemi-field over targets in the opposite hemi-field. These findings suggest that, for saccadic eye movements (overt orienting), direction and amplitude are programmed holistically; whereas in covert orienting (with eyes stationary), motor parameters (e.g. for directed hand movements) are programmed in a more hierarchical fashion.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>1574846</pmid><doi>10.1016/0042-6989(92)90140-E</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-6989
ispartof Vision research (Oxford), 1992-02, Vol.32 (2), p.293-304
issn 0042-6989
1878-5646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72915698
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Attention
Attention - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Cues
Fixation, Ocular
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Manual reaction time
Perception
Pre-motor
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Rotation
Saccade accuracy
Saccade latency
Saccades - physiology
Spatial cueing
Time Factors
Vision
title Spatial and temporal effects of spatial attention on human saccadic eye movements
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A59%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20and%20temporal%20effects%20of%20spatial%20attention%20on%20human%20saccadic%20eye%20movements&rft.jtitle=Vision%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Crawford,%20T.J.&rft.date=1992-02-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=304&rft.pages=293-304&rft.issn=0042-6989&rft.eissn=1878-5646&rft.coden=VISRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0042-6989(92)90140-E&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72915698%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72915698&rft_id=info:pmid/1574846&rft_els_id=004269899290140E&rfr_iscdi=true