Through a glass darkly: what should public health observatories be observing?
Background Eight regional public health observatories were launched in England in February 2000, to strengthen the availability and use of health information and to support efforts to tackle health inequalities at local level. This qualitative study was carried out by the Merseyside and Cheshire Zon...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of public health (Oxford, England) England), 2002-09, Vol.24 (3), p.160-164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 164 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 160 |
container_title | Journal of public health (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Watkins, Francine Bendel, Neil Scott‐Samuel, Alex Whitehead, Margaret |
description | Background Eight regional public health observatories were launched in England in February 2000, to strengthen the availability and use of health information and to support efforts to tackle health inequalities at local level. This qualitative study was carried out by the Merseyside and Cheshire Zone of the North West Public Health Observatory to assess the needs of local users and producers of public health information. Methods Semi‐structured in‐depth interviews were carried out with 42 representatives of three major groups in Merseyside and Cheshire: community groups, public‐health‐related professionals in the local statutory and academic sectors, and information specialists within the National Health Service. Results Different groups of users and producers encountered different problems in accessing health information. Community groups had significant problems accessing and interpreting health information and were concerned about tokenism and the failure of professionals to recognize lay knowledge. Professionals experienced difficulties in accessing local information from outside their agency and had concerns over partnerships failing to work together to share information. The health information specialists stressed the danger of providing information without supporting intelligence, the difficulty of keeping track of the many local sources, and the importance of having access to local authority data sources. All three groups relied on their own networks in their search for information, and these should not be overlooked in any dissemination strategy. Conclusion Information requires skilled interpretation to become policy‐relevant public health intelligence. This research identified major problems in the communication of lay health knowledge and in the accessibility of public health intelligence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/pubmed/24.3.160 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72901381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45161833</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45161833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-780b2db31483e63874ba5c163f24faefe0d4c59d4155128a365eeb654b677b883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1v2yAYB2A0tVo_tvNuFaq03ZwAL1_upZqq9TPVLp029YLAxrFTJ07B7tb_vlSOoqqXnUDw8L7AD6EvlEwoyWG6HtzSl1PGJzChknxA-1RxmoEWZGc752wPHcS4IITljIiPaI8yDZRo2Ee3d3XohnmNLZ63NkZc2vDQPp_gv7Xtcay7oS1x6tI2Ba69bfsady768GT7LjQ-Yuc3C81qfvoJ7Va2jf7zZjxEv85_3J1dZrOfF1dn32dZAQr6TGniWOmAcg1eglbcWVFQCRXjlfWVJyUvRF5yKkS6qgUpvHdScCeVclrDIfo21l2H7nHwsTfLJha-be3Kd0M0iuWEgqb_hULlRMg8T_D4HVx0Q1ilRxjGCIDiiic0HVERuhiDr8w6NEsbng0l5jUPM-ZhGDdgUh7pxNGm7Lix9ZsAEvg6gkVMH_q2HgOiDBdU0sSSy0bXxN7_27oUlpEKlDCXf-7N7fm1mv3m9-YGXgAvPqEm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220337474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Through a glass darkly: what should public health observatories be observing?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Watkins, Francine ; Bendel, Neil ; Scott‐Samuel, Alex ; Whitehead, Margaret</creator><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Francine ; Bendel, Neil ; Scott‐Samuel, Alex ; Whitehead, Margaret</creatorcontrib><description>Background Eight regional public health observatories were launched in England in February 2000, to strengthen the availability and use of health information and to support efforts to tackle health inequalities at local level. This qualitative study was carried out by the Merseyside and Cheshire Zone of the North West Public Health Observatory to assess the needs of local users and producers of public health information. Methods Semi‐structured in‐depth interviews were carried out with 42 representatives of three major groups in Merseyside and Cheshire: community groups, public‐health‐related professionals in the local statutory and academic sectors, and information specialists within the National Health Service. Results Different groups of users and producers encountered different problems in accessing health information. Community groups had significant problems accessing and interpreting health information and were concerned about tokenism and the failure of professionals to recognize lay knowledge. Professionals experienced difficulties in accessing local information from outside their agency and had concerns over partnerships failing to work together to share information. The health information specialists stressed the danger of providing information without supporting intelligence, the difficulty of keeping track of the many local sources, and the importance of having access to local authority data sources. All three groups relied on their own networks in their search for information, and these should not be overlooked in any dissemination strategy. Conclusion Information requires skilled interpretation to become policy‐relevant public health intelligence. This research identified major problems in the communication of lay health knowledge and in the accessibility of public health intelligence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-3842</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0957-4832</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3850</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3782</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/24.3.160</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12831083</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHMZZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>access ; Access to Information ; Community Health Planning ; England ; Health inequalities ; Health information ; Health Services Research ; Humans ; information ; Information Dissemination ; Interviews as Topic ; Local communities ; Needs Assessment ; Observation ; Public health ; Public Health Informatics ; public health observatories ; Public Health Practice ; Social Justice ; Socioeconomic Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2002-09, Vol.24 (3), p.160-164</ispartof><rights>Faculty of Public Health Medicine 2002</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Sep 1, 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45161833$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45161833$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,27911,27912,30987,58004,58237</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12831083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Francine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendel, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott‐Samuel, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, Margaret</creatorcontrib><title>Through a glass darkly: what should public health observatories be observing?</title><title>Journal of public health (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>J Public Health</addtitle><description>Background Eight regional public health observatories were launched in England in February 2000, to strengthen the availability and use of health information and to support efforts to tackle health inequalities at local level. This qualitative study was carried out by the Merseyside and Cheshire Zone of the North West Public Health Observatory to assess the needs of local users and producers of public health information. Methods Semi‐structured in‐depth interviews were carried out with 42 representatives of three major groups in Merseyside and Cheshire: community groups, public‐health‐related professionals in the local statutory and academic sectors, and information specialists within the National Health Service. Results Different groups of users and producers encountered different problems in accessing health information. Community groups had significant problems accessing and interpreting health information and were concerned about tokenism and the failure of professionals to recognize lay knowledge. Professionals experienced difficulties in accessing local information from outside their agency and had concerns over partnerships failing to work together to share information. The health information specialists stressed the danger of providing information without supporting intelligence, the difficulty of keeping track of the many local sources, and the importance of having access to local authority data sources. All three groups relied on their own networks in their search for information, and these should not be overlooked in any dissemination strategy. Conclusion Information requires skilled interpretation to become policy‐relevant public health intelligence. This research identified major problems in the communication of lay health knowledge and in the accessibility of public health intelligence.</description><subject>access</subject><subject>Access to Information</subject><subject>Community Health Planning</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Health inequalities</subject><subject>Health information</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>information</subject><subject>Information Dissemination</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Local communities</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Public Health Informatics</subject><subject>public health observatories</subject><subject>Public Health Practice</subject><subject>Social Justice</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><issn>1741-3842</issn><issn>0957-4832</issn><issn>1741-3850</issn><issn>1464-3782</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1v2yAYB2A0tVo_tvNuFaq03ZwAL1_upZqq9TPVLp029YLAxrFTJ07B7tb_vlSOoqqXnUDw8L7AD6EvlEwoyWG6HtzSl1PGJzChknxA-1RxmoEWZGc752wPHcS4IITljIiPaI8yDZRo2Ee3d3XohnmNLZ63NkZc2vDQPp_gv7Xtcay7oS1x6tI2Ba69bfsady768GT7LjQ-Yuc3C81qfvoJ7Va2jf7zZjxEv85_3J1dZrOfF1dn32dZAQr6TGniWOmAcg1eglbcWVFQCRXjlfWVJyUvRF5yKkS6qgUpvHdScCeVclrDIfo21l2H7nHwsTfLJha-be3Kd0M0iuWEgqb_hULlRMg8T_D4HVx0Q1ilRxjGCIDiiic0HVERuhiDr8w6NEsbng0l5jUPM-ZhGDdgUh7pxNGm7Lix9ZsAEvg6gkVMH_q2HgOiDBdU0sSSy0bXxN7_27oUlpEKlDCXf-7N7fm1mv3m9-YGXgAvPqEm</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>Watkins, Francine</creator><creator>Bendel, Neil</creator><creator>Scott‐Samuel, Alex</creator><creator>Whitehead, Margaret</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>Through a glass darkly: what should public health observatories be observing?</title><author>Watkins, Francine ; Bendel, Neil ; Scott‐Samuel, Alex ; Whitehead, Margaret</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-780b2db31483e63874ba5c163f24faefe0d4c59d4155128a365eeb654b677b883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>access</topic><topic>Access to Information</topic><topic>Community Health Planning</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Health inequalities</topic><topic>Health information</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>information</topic><topic>Information Dissemination</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Local communities</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Public Health Informatics</topic><topic>public health observatories</topic><topic>Public Health Practice</topic><topic>Social Justice</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watkins, Francine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bendel, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott‐Samuel, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitehead, Margaret</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of public health (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watkins, Francine</au><au>Bendel, Neil</au><au>Scott‐Samuel, Alex</au><au>Whitehead, Margaret</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Through a glass darkly: what should public health observatories be observing?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public health (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>J Public Health</addtitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>160</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>160-164</pages><issn>1741-3842</issn><issn>0957-4832</issn><eissn>1741-3850</eissn><eissn>1464-3782</eissn><coden>JPHMZZ</coden><abstract>Background Eight regional public health observatories were launched in England in February 2000, to strengthen the availability and use of health information and to support efforts to tackle health inequalities at local level. This qualitative study was carried out by the Merseyside and Cheshire Zone of the North West Public Health Observatory to assess the needs of local users and producers of public health information. Methods Semi‐structured in‐depth interviews were carried out with 42 representatives of three major groups in Merseyside and Cheshire: community groups, public‐health‐related professionals in the local statutory and academic sectors, and information specialists within the National Health Service. Results Different groups of users and producers encountered different problems in accessing health information. Community groups had significant problems accessing and interpreting health information and were concerned about tokenism and the failure of professionals to recognize lay knowledge. Professionals experienced difficulties in accessing local information from outside their agency and had concerns over partnerships failing to work together to share information. The health information specialists stressed the danger of providing information without supporting intelligence, the difficulty of keeping track of the many local sources, and the importance of having access to local authority data sources. All three groups relied on their own networks in their search for information, and these should not be overlooked in any dissemination strategy. Conclusion Information requires skilled interpretation to become policy‐relevant public health intelligence. This research identified major problems in the communication of lay health knowledge and in the accessibility of public health intelligence.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>12831083</pmid><doi>10.1093/pubmed/24.3.160</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1741-3842 |
ispartof | Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2002-09, Vol.24 (3), p.160-164 |
issn | 1741-3842 0957-4832 1741-3850 1464-3782 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72901381 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | access Access to Information Community Health Planning England Health inequalities Health information Health Services Research Humans information Information Dissemination Interviews as Topic Local communities Needs Assessment Observation Public health Public Health Informatics public health observatories Public Health Practice Social Justice Socioeconomic Factors |
title | Through a glass darkly: what should public health observatories be observing? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T11%3A14%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Through%20a%20glass%20darkly:%20what%20should%20public%20health%20observatories%20be%20observing?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20health%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Watkins,%20Francine&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=160&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=160-164&rft.issn=1741-3842&rft.eissn=1741-3850&rft.coden=JPHMZZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/pubmed/24.3.160&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45161833%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220337474&rft_id=info:pmid/12831083&rft_jstor_id=45161833&rfr_iscdi=true |