A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis

summary  The purpose of this study was to develop a new three‐dimensional (3D) mimic model of an osseointegrated implant for finite element analysis (FEA) and to evaluate stress distributions in comparison with a model commonly used in most studies as a control. Based on the 3D computer graphic data...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oral rehabilitation 2003-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-45
Hauptverfasser: Akagawa, Y., Sato, Y., Teixeira, E. R., Shindoi, N., Wadamoto, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 45
container_issue 1
container_start_page 41
container_title Journal of oral rehabilitation
container_volume 30
creator Akagawa, Y.
Sato, Y.
Teixeira, E. R.
Shindoi, N.
Wadamoto, M.
description summary  The purpose of this study was to develop a new three‐dimensional (3D) mimic model of an osseointegrated implant for finite element analysis (FEA) and to evaluate stress distributions in comparison with a model commonly used in most studies as a control. Based on the 3D computer graphic data obtained by serial in vivo bucco‐lingual peri‐implant bone structure at 75 μm interval in monkey, a mimic FEA model with trabecular structure and a control model with uniform cancellous bone were constructed. A vertical load of 143 N was applied at the top of the implant and induced stress was evaluated at the peri‐implant bone. In the mimic model, stress was distributed at both cortical and cancellous bones (1–5 MPa) in bucco‐lingual central planes, but concentrated at the cortical crest (3–7 MPa) in the mesio‐distal central plane. In contrast, the control model presented stress concentration at the cortical crest around the implant (5–14 MPa), with less stress (0–1 MPa) at the peri‐implant cancellous bone in both planes. The findings, that stress distribution at the peri‐implant bone were quite different between the mimic and control models, suggest the need to carefully interpret stress distribution in previous studies with models of uniform cancellous peri‐implant bone.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01002.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72895462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72895462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4702-e37b10f6912bc81c2fc7dff4b8cb238baeddd425011a99bed778fb93303194893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtv3CAURlHUKpk8_kLFqjs7F7AN3lSKojZJNeoo7ygbhM11y9SPKXjUmX9f3Bml265AH989wCGEMkgZZMX5MmWiyBOuMp5yAJECA-Dp5oDM3g7ekRkIyBOm-MsROQ5hCQBK5PKQHDGeqVwoPiP3F7RznavpEAIOrh_xuzcjWuq6VWv6kXaDxZY2g6fjD4-YWNdhH9zQm5i63o1IscWYjdTEbBtcOCXvG9MGPNuvJ-Txy-eHy-tkvri6ubyYJ3UmgScoZMWgKUrGq1qxmje1tE2TVaquuFCVQWttxnNgzJRlhVZK1VSlECBYmalSnJCPO-7KD7_WGEbduVBjG9-NwzpoyVWZZwWPRbUr1j5-02OjV951xm81Az0J1Us9edOTNz0J1X-F6k0c_bC_Y111aP8N7g3Gwqdd4bdrcfvfYP11sbibthGQ7AAujLh5Axj_UxdSyFw_f7vST_fidi5fX_St-AOb5JT_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72895462</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Akagawa, Y. ; Sato, Y. ; Teixeira, E. R. ; Shindoi, N. ; Wadamoto, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Akagawa, Y. ; Sato, Y. ; Teixeira, E. R. ; Shindoi, N. ; Wadamoto, M.</creatorcontrib><description>summary  The purpose of this study was to develop a new three‐dimensional (3D) mimic model of an osseointegrated implant for finite element analysis (FEA) and to evaluate stress distributions in comparison with a model commonly used in most studies as a control. Based on the 3D computer graphic data obtained by serial in vivo bucco‐lingual peri‐implant bone structure at 75 μm interval in monkey, a mimic FEA model with trabecular structure and a control model with uniform cancellous bone were constructed. A vertical load of 143 N was applied at the top of the implant and induced stress was evaluated at the peri‐implant bone. In the mimic model, stress was distributed at both cortical and cancellous bones (1–5 MPa) in bucco‐lingual central planes, but concentrated at the cortical crest (3–7 MPa) in the mesio‐distal central plane. In contrast, the control model presented stress concentration at the cortical crest around the implant (5–14 MPa), with less stress (0–1 MPa) at the peri‐implant cancellous bone in both planes. The findings, that stress distribution at the peri‐implant bone were quite different between the mimic and control models, suggest the need to carefully interpret stress distribution in previous studies with models of uniform cancellous peri‐implant bone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-182X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01002.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12485382</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>3D-FEA ; Animals ; Bicuspid ; cancellous bone ; Computer Simulation ; Dental Implants ; Dentistry ; Female ; Finite Element Analysis ; Haplorhini ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; implant ; mandible ; Models, Anatomic ; monkey ; Osseointegration ; Stress, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2003-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-45</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4702-e37b10f6912bc81c2fc7dff4b8cb238baeddd425011a99bed778fb93303194893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4702-e37b10f6912bc81c2fc7dff4b8cb238baeddd425011a99bed778fb93303194893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2842.2003.01002.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2842.2003.01002.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12485382$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akagawa, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, E. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shindoi, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadamoto, M.</creatorcontrib><title>A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis</title><title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><description>summary  The purpose of this study was to develop a new three‐dimensional (3D) mimic model of an osseointegrated implant for finite element analysis (FEA) and to evaluate stress distributions in comparison with a model commonly used in most studies as a control. Based on the 3D computer graphic data obtained by serial in vivo bucco‐lingual peri‐implant bone structure at 75 μm interval in monkey, a mimic FEA model with trabecular structure and a control model with uniform cancellous bone were constructed. A vertical load of 143 N was applied at the top of the implant and induced stress was evaluated at the peri‐implant bone. In the mimic model, stress was distributed at both cortical and cancellous bones (1–5 MPa) in bucco‐lingual central planes, but concentrated at the cortical crest (3–7 MPa) in the mesio‐distal central plane. In contrast, the control model presented stress concentration at the cortical crest around the implant (5–14 MPa), with less stress (0–1 MPa) at the peri‐implant cancellous bone in both planes. The findings, that stress distribution at the peri‐implant bone were quite different between the mimic and control models, suggest the need to carefully interpret stress distribution in previous studies with models of uniform cancellous peri‐implant bone.</description><subject>3D-FEA</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bicuspid</subject><subject>cancellous bone</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Haplorhini</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>implant</subject><subject>mandible</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>monkey</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><issn>0305-182X</issn><issn>1365-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtv3CAURlHUKpk8_kLFqjs7F7AN3lSKojZJNeoo7ygbhM11y9SPKXjUmX9f3Bml265AH989wCGEMkgZZMX5MmWiyBOuMp5yAJECA-Dp5oDM3g7ekRkIyBOm-MsROQ5hCQBK5PKQHDGeqVwoPiP3F7RznavpEAIOrh_xuzcjWuq6VWv6kXaDxZY2g6fjD4-YWNdhH9zQm5i63o1IscWYjdTEbBtcOCXvG9MGPNuvJ-Txy-eHy-tkvri6ubyYJ3UmgScoZMWgKUrGq1qxmje1tE2TVaquuFCVQWttxnNgzJRlhVZK1VSlECBYmalSnJCPO-7KD7_WGEbduVBjG9-NwzpoyVWZZwWPRbUr1j5-02OjV951xm81Az0J1Us9edOTNz0J1X-F6k0c_bC_Y111aP8N7g3Gwqdd4bdrcfvfYP11sbibthGQ7AAujLh5Axj_UxdSyFw_f7vST_fidi5fX_St-AOb5JT_</recordid><startdate>200301</startdate><enddate>200301</enddate><creator>Akagawa, Y.</creator><creator>Sato, Y.</creator><creator>Teixeira, E. R.</creator><creator>Shindoi, N.</creator><creator>Wadamoto, M.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200301</creationdate><title>A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis</title><author>Akagawa, Y. ; Sato, Y. ; Teixeira, E. R. ; Shindoi, N. ; Wadamoto, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4702-e37b10f6912bc81c2fc7dff4b8cb238baeddd425011a99bed778fb93303194893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>3D-FEA</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bicuspid</topic><topic>cancellous bone</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Haplorhini</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>implant</topic><topic>mandible</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>monkey</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akagawa, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, E. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shindoi, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wadamoto, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akagawa, Y.</au><au>Sato, Y.</au><au>Teixeira, E. R.</au><au>Shindoi, N.</au><au>Wadamoto, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Oral Rehabil</addtitle><date>2003-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>41-45</pages><issn>0305-182X</issn><eissn>1365-2842</eissn><abstract>summary  The purpose of this study was to develop a new three‐dimensional (3D) mimic model of an osseointegrated implant for finite element analysis (FEA) and to evaluate stress distributions in comparison with a model commonly used in most studies as a control. Based on the 3D computer graphic data obtained by serial in vivo bucco‐lingual peri‐implant bone structure at 75 μm interval in monkey, a mimic FEA model with trabecular structure and a control model with uniform cancellous bone were constructed. A vertical load of 143 N was applied at the top of the implant and induced stress was evaluated at the peri‐implant bone. In the mimic model, stress was distributed at both cortical and cancellous bones (1–5 MPa) in bucco‐lingual central planes, but concentrated at the cortical crest (3–7 MPa) in the mesio‐distal central plane. In contrast, the control model presented stress concentration at the cortical crest around the implant (5–14 MPa), with less stress (0–1 MPa) at the peri‐implant cancellous bone in both planes. The findings, that stress distribution at the peri‐implant bone were quite different between the mimic and control models, suggest the need to carefully interpret stress distribution in previous studies with models of uniform cancellous peri‐implant bone.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>12485382</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01002.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-182X
ispartof Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2003-01, Vol.30 (1), p.41-45
issn 0305-182X
1365-2842
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72895462
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 3D-FEA
Animals
Bicuspid
cancellous bone
Computer Simulation
Dental Implants
Dentistry
Female
Finite Element Analysis
Haplorhini
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
implant
mandible
Models, Anatomic
monkey
Osseointegration
Stress, Mechanical
title A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A32%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20mimic%20osseointegrated%20implant%20model%20for%20three-dimensional%20finite%20element%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Akagawa,%20Y.&rft.date=2003-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=41-45&rft.issn=0305-182X&rft.eissn=1365-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01002.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72895462%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72895462&rft_id=info:pmid/12485382&rfr_iscdi=true