How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint
In an effort to prevent degeneration of articular cartilage associated with meniscectomies, both meniscal allografts and synthetic replacements are subjects of current interest and investigation. The objectives of the current study were to (1) determine whether a transversely isotropic, linearly ela...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2003, Vol.36 (1), p.19-34 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 34 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Haut Donahue, Tammy L. Hull, M.L. Rashid, Mark M. Jacobs, Christopher R. |
description | In an effort to prevent degeneration of articular cartilage associated with meniscectomies, both meniscal allografts and synthetic replacements are subjects of current interest and investigation. The objectives of the current study were to (1) determine whether a transversely isotropic, linearly elastic, homogeneous material model of the meniscal tissue is necessary to achieve a normal contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau, (2) determine which material and boundary condition (attachments) parameters affect the contact pressure distribution most strongly, and (3) set tolerances on these parameters to restore the contact pressure distribution to within a specified error. To satisfy these objectives, a finite element model of the tibio-femoral joint of a human cadaveric knee (including both menisci) was used to study the contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau. To validate the model, the contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau was measured experimentally in the same knee used to create the model. Within physiologically reasonable bounds on five material parameters and four attachment parameters associated with a meniscal replacement, an optimization was performed under 1200
N of compressive load on the set of nine parameters to minimize the difference between the experimental and model results. The error between the experimental and model contact variables was minimized to 5.4%. The contact pressure distribution of the tibial plateau was sensitive to the circumferential modulus, axial/radial modulus, and horn stiffness, but relatively insensitive to the remaining six parameters. Consequently, both the circumferential and axial/radial moduli are important determinants of the contact pressure distribution, and hence should be matched in the design and/or selection of meniscal replacements. In addition, during surgical implantation of a meniscal replacement, the horns should be attached with high stiffness bone plugs, and the attachments of the transverse ligament and deep medial collateral ligament should be restored to minimize changes in the contact pressure distribution, and thereby possibly prevent the degradation of articular cartilage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00305-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72890524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929002003056</els_id><sourcerecordid>2745286481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-7e75f0a8cf2f0a1700d35d8dc221b64e3907e082ea6d4d368d174b0c3c3716813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks2OFCEQxztG446rj6AhMTF6aC2gu6FPxmzUNdnEg3omDBQOYzeMQK_xzXw86Z2Jm3jZE1D141-fTfOUwmsKdHjzBYDRdmQjvAT2CoBD3w73mg2VgreMS7jfbP4hZ82jnPcAIDoxPmzOKOtkP_B-0_y5jL9I2SHJxTsXMGcSHZkx-Gz0RHQp2uzqs2Sig711zLpg8vVySPGAqXisgHNoCil-62PrcI6p-k0MVaJUrmovCathPiwFLVmyD9-JJtd68lavFueDL0hwwjUimaPFaU1nzW-3zDqQHwGR7KMP5XHzwOkp45PTed58-_D-68Vle_X546eLd1et6bksrUDRO9DSOFYPKgAs7620hjG6HTrkIwgEyVAPtrN8kJaKbguGGy7oICk_b14cdWuhPxfMRc21AzhNOmBcshJMjtCz7k6QymGs8VfF5_-B-7ikUItQFHhPKaOSVao_UibFnBM6dUh-1ul3hdS6AepmA9Q6XgVM3WyAGuq_Zyf1ZTujvf11GnkF3h4BrF279phUNh6DQetTHZ-y0d8R4i-N7MNX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1035112182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Haut Donahue, Tammy L. ; Hull, M.L. ; Rashid, Mark M. ; Jacobs, Christopher R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haut Donahue, Tammy L. ; Hull, M.L. ; Rashid, Mark M. ; Jacobs, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><description>In an effort to prevent degeneration of articular cartilage associated with meniscectomies, both meniscal allografts and synthetic replacements are subjects of current interest and investigation. The objectives of the current study were to (1) determine whether a transversely isotropic, linearly elastic, homogeneous material model of the meniscal tissue is necessary to achieve a normal contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau, (2) determine which material and boundary condition (attachments) parameters affect the contact pressure distribution most strongly, and (3) set tolerances on these parameters to restore the contact pressure distribution to within a specified error. To satisfy these objectives, a finite element model of the tibio-femoral joint of a human cadaveric knee (including both menisci) was used to study the contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau. To validate the model, the contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau was measured experimentally in the same knee used to create the model. Within physiologically reasonable bounds on five material parameters and four attachment parameters associated with a meniscal replacement, an optimization was performed under 1200
N of compressive load on the set of nine parameters to minimize the difference between the experimental and model results. The error between the experimental and model contact variables was minimized to 5.4%. The contact pressure distribution of the tibial plateau was sensitive to the circumferential modulus, axial/radial modulus, and horn stiffness, but relatively insensitive to the remaining six parameters. Consequently, both the circumferential and axial/radial moduli are important determinants of the contact pressure distribution, and hence should be matched in the design and/or selection of meniscal replacements. In addition, during surgical implantation of a meniscal replacement, the horns should be attached with high stiffness bone plugs, and the attachments of the transverse ligament and deep medial collateral ligament should be restored to minimize changes in the contact pressure distribution, and thereby possibly prevent the degradation of articular cartilage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00305-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12485635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Cadaver ; Computer Simulation ; Contact ; Elasticity ; Femur - anatomy & histology ; Femur - physiology ; Finite Element Analysis ; Finite element method ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Knee ; Knee Joint - anatomy & histology ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Male ; Material properties ; Menisci, Tibial - anatomy & histology ; Menisci, Tibial - physiology ; Meniscus ; Models, Biological ; Pressure ; Quality Control ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tibia - anatomy & histology ; Tibia - physiology ; Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2003, Vol.36 (1), p.19-34</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-7e75f0a8cf2f0a1700d35d8dc221b64e3907e082ea6d4d368d174b0c3c3716813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-7e75f0a8cf2f0a1700d35d8dc221b64e3907e082ea6d4d368d174b0c3c3716813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1035112182?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12485635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haut Donahue, Tammy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashid, Mark M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><title>How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>In an effort to prevent degeneration of articular cartilage associated with meniscectomies, both meniscal allografts and synthetic replacements are subjects of current interest and investigation. The objectives of the current study were to (1) determine whether a transversely isotropic, linearly elastic, homogeneous material model of the meniscal tissue is necessary to achieve a normal contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau, (2) determine which material and boundary condition (attachments) parameters affect the contact pressure distribution most strongly, and (3) set tolerances on these parameters to restore the contact pressure distribution to within a specified error. To satisfy these objectives, a finite element model of the tibio-femoral joint of a human cadaveric knee (including both menisci) was used to study the contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau. To validate the model, the contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau was measured experimentally in the same knee used to create the model. Within physiologically reasonable bounds on five material parameters and four attachment parameters associated with a meniscal replacement, an optimization was performed under 1200
N of compressive load on the set of nine parameters to minimize the difference between the experimental and model results. The error between the experimental and model contact variables was minimized to 5.4%. The contact pressure distribution of the tibial plateau was sensitive to the circumferential modulus, axial/radial modulus, and horn stiffness, but relatively insensitive to the remaining six parameters. Consequently, both the circumferential and axial/radial moduli are important determinants of the contact pressure distribution, and hence should be matched in the design and/or selection of meniscal replacements. In addition, during surgical implantation of a meniscal replacement, the horns should be attached with high stiffness bone plugs, and the attachments of the transverse ligament and deep medial collateral ligament should be restored to minimize changes in the contact pressure distribution, and thereby possibly prevent the degradation of articular cartilage.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Contact</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Femur - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Femur - physiology</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Material properties</subject><subject>Menisci, Tibial - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Menisci, Tibial - physiology</subject><subject>Meniscus</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Tibia - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Tibia - physiology</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks2OFCEQxztG446rj6AhMTF6aC2gu6FPxmzUNdnEg3omDBQOYzeMQK_xzXw86Z2Jm3jZE1D141-fTfOUwmsKdHjzBYDRdmQjvAT2CoBD3w73mg2VgreMS7jfbP4hZ82jnPcAIDoxPmzOKOtkP_B-0_y5jL9I2SHJxTsXMGcSHZkx-Gz0RHQp2uzqs2Sig711zLpg8vVySPGAqXisgHNoCil-62PrcI6p-k0MVaJUrmovCathPiwFLVmyD9-JJtd68lavFueDL0hwwjUimaPFaU1nzW-3zDqQHwGR7KMP5XHzwOkp45PTed58-_D-68Vle_X546eLd1et6bksrUDRO9DSOFYPKgAs7620hjG6HTrkIwgEyVAPtrN8kJaKbguGGy7oICk_b14cdWuhPxfMRc21AzhNOmBcshJMjtCz7k6QymGs8VfF5_-B-7ikUItQFHhPKaOSVao_UibFnBM6dUh-1ul3hdS6AepmA9Q6XgVM3WyAGuq_Zyf1ZTujvf11GnkF3h4BrF279phUNh6DQetTHZ-y0d8R4i-N7MNX</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Haut Donahue, Tammy L.</creator><creator>Hull, M.L.</creator><creator>Rashid, Mark M.</creator><creator>Jacobs, Christopher R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint</title><author>Haut Donahue, Tammy L. ; Hull, M.L. ; Rashid, Mark M. ; Jacobs, Christopher R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-7e75f0a8cf2f0a1700d35d8dc221b64e3907e082ea6d4d368d174b0c3c3716813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Contact</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Femur - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Femur - physiology</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Material properties</topic><topic>Menisci, Tibial - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Menisci, Tibial - physiology</topic><topic>Meniscus</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Tibia - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Tibia - physiology</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haut Donahue, Tammy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashid, Mark M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haut Donahue, Tammy L.</au><au>Hull, M.L.</au><au>Rashid, Mark M.</au><au>Jacobs, Christopher R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>19-34</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>In an effort to prevent degeneration of articular cartilage associated with meniscectomies, both meniscal allografts and synthetic replacements are subjects of current interest and investigation. The objectives of the current study were to (1) determine whether a transversely isotropic, linearly elastic, homogeneous material model of the meniscal tissue is necessary to achieve a normal contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau, (2) determine which material and boundary condition (attachments) parameters affect the contact pressure distribution most strongly, and (3) set tolerances on these parameters to restore the contact pressure distribution to within a specified error. To satisfy these objectives, a finite element model of the tibio-femoral joint of a human cadaveric knee (including both menisci) was used to study the contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau. To validate the model, the contact pressure distribution on the tibial plateau was measured experimentally in the same knee used to create the model. Within physiologically reasonable bounds on five material parameters and four attachment parameters associated with a meniscal replacement, an optimization was performed under 1200
N of compressive load on the set of nine parameters to minimize the difference between the experimental and model results. The error between the experimental and model contact variables was minimized to 5.4%. The contact pressure distribution of the tibial plateau was sensitive to the circumferential modulus, axial/radial modulus, and horn stiffness, but relatively insensitive to the remaining six parameters. Consequently, both the circumferential and axial/radial moduli are important determinants of the contact pressure distribution, and hence should be matched in the design and/or selection of meniscal replacements. In addition, during surgical implantation of a meniscal replacement, the horns should be attached with high stiffness bone plugs, and the attachments of the transverse ligament and deep medial collateral ligament should be restored to minimize changes in the contact pressure distribution, and thereby possibly prevent the degradation of articular cartilage.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12485635</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00305-6</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2003, Vol.36 (1), p.19-34 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72890524 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adult Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Cadaver Computer Simulation Contact Elasticity Femur - anatomy & histology Femur - physiology Finite Element Analysis Finite element method Humans In Vitro Techniques Knee Knee Joint - anatomy & histology Knee Joint - physiology Male Material properties Menisci, Tibial - anatomy & histology Menisci, Tibial - physiology Meniscus Models, Biological Pressure Quality Control Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Stress, Mechanical Tibia - anatomy & histology Tibia - physiology Weight-Bearing - physiology |
title | How the stiffness of meniscal attachments and meniscal material properties affect tibio-femoral contact pressure computed using a validated finite element model of the human knee joint |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A41%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20the%20stiffness%20of%20meniscal%20attachments%20and%20meniscal%20material%20properties%20affect%20tibio-femoral%20contact%20pressure%20computed%20using%20a%20validated%20finite%20element%20model%20of%20the%20human%20knee%20joint&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Haut%20Donahue,%20Tammy%20L.&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=19-34&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00305-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2745286481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1035112182&rft_id=info:pmid/12485635&rft_els_id=S0021929002003056&rfr_iscdi=true |