Comparison of Etomidate, Ketamine, Midazolam, Propofol, and Thiopental on Function and Metabolism of Isolated Hearts

The authors examined direct myocardial and coronary vascular responses to the anesthetic induction agents etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental and compared their effects on attenuating autoregulation of coronary flow as assessed by changes in oxygen supply/demand relationships. S...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 1992-04, Vol.74 (4), p.547-558
Hauptverfasser: Stowe, David F., Bosnjak, Zeljko J., Kampine, John P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 558
container_issue 4
container_start_page 547
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 74
creator Stowe, David F.
Bosnjak, Zeljko J.
Kampine, John P.
description The authors examined direct myocardial and coronary vascular responses to the anesthetic induction agents etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental and compared their effects on attenuating autoregulation of coronary flow as assessed by changes in oxygen supply/demand relationships. Spontaneous heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time during a trial pacing, left ventricular pressure (LVP), coronary flow (CF), percent oxygen extraction, oxygen delivery, and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVo2) were examined in 55 isolated guinea pig hearts divided into five groups of 11 each. Hearts were perfused at constant pressure with one of the drugs administered at steady-state concentrations increasing from 0.5 μM to 1 mM. Adenosine was given to test maximal CF. At concentrations below 10 μM no significant changes were observed; beyond 50 μM for midazolam, etomidate, and propofol, and 100 μM for thiopental and ketamine, each agent caused progressive but differential decreases in heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time (leading to atrioventricular dissociation), LVP, +dLVP/dtrnax, percent oxygen extraction, and MVo2. The concentrations (μM) at which +dLVP/dtmax was reduced by 50% were as followsetomidate, 82 ± 2 (mean ± SEM); propofol, 91 ± 4; midazolam, 105 ± 8; thiopental, 156 ± 11; and ketamine, 323 ± 7; the rank order of potency was etomidate = propofol = midazolam > thiopental > ketamine; results were similar for LVP. At the 100 μM concentration, CF was decreased 11% ± 2% by ketamine and 5% ± 3% by thiopental but was increased 17% ± 6% by etomidate, 21% ± 5% by midazolam, and near maximally to 57% ± 10% by propofol; MVo2 was decreased 8% ± 4% by thiopental, 10% ± 5% by ketamine, 19% ± 5% by midazolam, 29% ± 7% by etomidate, and 37% ± 5% by propofol; oxygen delivery/MVo2 was unchanged by thiopental and ketamine but was increased 62% ± 7% by midazolam, 71% ± 9% by etomidate, and 150% ± 15% by propofol. Between 100 μM and 1 mM, thiopental and ketamine did not increase CF but decreased MVo2 and percent oxygen extraction, whereas propofol maximally increased CF and decreased MVo2 and midazolam and etomidate had intermediate effects. These results indicate that on a molar basis, propofol, and less so midazolam and etomidate, depress cardiac function moderately more than thiopental and ketamine, and that propofol markedly attenuates autoregulation by causing coronary vasodilation. With doses used to induce anesthesia, propofol and thiopental appe
doi_str_mv 10.1213/00000539-199204000-00015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72869847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72869847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4505-d0b43fa0cba0cb5fbac24f80ec9d6f09e18c6d938c275a9f09205bcb1ea703d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1v3CAQRVGrdJvmJ1TiUPW0bgEbG47VKmmiJkoO6RmNMWhpsXEBK0p_fXF2m56KNGJ4HzPSAyFMySfKaP2ZrIfXsqJSMtKUR1WK8hO0oZy1VceleIU2BasrJqV8g96m9GOVENGeolPKeUMZ26C8C-MM0aUw4WDxRQ6jGyCbLf5mMoxuKt1tQX4HD-MW38cwBxv8FsM04Ie9C7OZMnhc7JfLpLMrzUrdFncfvEvjOvY6FXs2A74yEHN6h15b8MmcH-8z9P3y4mF3Vd3cfb3efbmpdMMJrwbSN7UFovu1uO1Bs8YKYrQcWkukoUK3g6yFZh0HWRBGeK97aqAj9SDqM_TxMHeO4ddiUlajS9p4D5MJS1IdE60UTVeE4iDUMaQUjVVzdCPEJ0WJWgNXfwNXL4Gr58CL9f1xx9KPZvhnPCRc-A9HHpIGbyNM2qUXGaetZM-y5iB7DD6bmH765dFEtTfg817977vrP3SFmKM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72869847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Etomidate, Ketamine, Midazolam, Propofol, and Thiopental on Function and Metabolism of Isolated Hearts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Stowe, David F. ; Bosnjak, Zeljko J. ; Kampine, John P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stowe, David F. ; Bosnjak, Zeljko J. ; Kampine, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>The authors examined direct myocardial and coronary vascular responses to the anesthetic induction agents etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental and compared their effects on attenuating autoregulation of coronary flow as assessed by changes in oxygen supply/demand relationships. Spontaneous heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time during a trial pacing, left ventricular pressure (LVP), coronary flow (CF), percent oxygen extraction, oxygen delivery, and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVo2) were examined in 55 isolated guinea pig hearts divided into five groups of 11 each. Hearts were perfused at constant pressure with one of the drugs administered at steady-state concentrations increasing from 0.5 μM to 1 mM. Adenosine was given to test maximal CF. At concentrations below 10 μM no significant changes were observed; beyond 50 μM for midazolam, etomidate, and propofol, and 100 μM for thiopental and ketamine, each agent caused progressive but differential decreases in heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time (leading to atrioventricular dissociation), LVP, +dLVP/dtrnax, percent oxygen extraction, and MVo2. The concentrations (μM) at which +dLVP/dtmax was reduced by 50% were as followsetomidate, 82 ± 2 (mean ± SEM); propofol, 91 ± 4; midazolam, 105 ± 8; thiopental, 156 ± 11; and ketamine, 323 ± 7; the rank order of potency was etomidate = propofol = midazolam &gt; thiopental &gt; ketamine; results were similar for LVP. At the 100 μM concentration, CF was decreased 11% ± 2% by ketamine and 5% ± 3% by thiopental but was increased 17% ± 6% by etomidate, 21% ± 5% by midazolam, and near maximally to 57% ± 10% by propofol; MVo2 was decreased 8% ± 4% by thiopental, 10% ± 5% by ketamine, 19% ± 5% by midazolam, 29% ± 7% by etomidate, and 37% ± 5% by propofol; oxygen delivery/MVo2 was unchanged by thiopental and ketamine but was increased 62% ± 7% by midazolam, 71% ± 9% by etomidate, and 150% ± 15% by propofol. Between 100 μM and 1 mM, thiopental and ketamine did not increase CF but decreased MVo2 and percent oxygen extraction, whereas propofol maximally increased CF and decreased MVo2 and midazolam and etomidate had intermediate effects. These results indicate that on a molar basis, propofol, and less so midazolam and etomidate, depress cardiac function moderately more than thiopental and ketamine, and that propofol markedly attenuates autoregulation by causing coronary vasodilation. With doses used to induce anesthesia, propofol and thiopental appear to depress cardiac function more than ketamine or etomidate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199204000-00015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1554122</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Adenosine - pharmacology ; Anesthetics - pharmacology ; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Animals ; Atrioventricular Node - drug effects ; Atrioventricular Node - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coronary Circulation - drug effects ; Etomidate - pharmacology ; Guinea Pigs ; Heart - drug effects ; Heart - physiology ; In Vitro Techniques ; Ketamine - pharmacology ; Medical sciences ; Midazolam - pharmacology ; Myocardial Contraction - drug effects ; Myocardium - metabolism ; Neuropharmacology ; Oxygen Consumption - drug effects ; Perfusion ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Propofol - pharmacology ; Thiopental - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 1992-04, Vol.74 (4), p.547-558</ispartof><rights>1992 International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4505-d0b43fa0cba0cb5fbac24f80ec9d6f09e18c6d938c275a9f09205bcb1ea703d83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-199204000-00015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4595,27901,27902,65434</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5169222$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1554122$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stowe, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosnjak, Zeljko J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kampine, John P.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Etomidate, Ketamine, Midazolam, Propofol, and Thiopental on Function and Metabolism of Isolated Hearts</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>The authors examined direct myocardial and coronary vascular responses to the anesthetic induction agents etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental and compared their effects on attenuating autoregulation of coronary flow as assessed by changes in oxygen supply/demand relationships. Spontaneous heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time during a trial pacing, left ventricular pressure (LVP), coronary flow (CF), percent oxygen extraction, oxygen delivery, and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVo2) were examined in 55 isolated guinea pig hearts divided into five groups of 11 each. Hearts were perfused at constant pressure with one of the drugs administered at steady-state concentrations increasing from 0.5 μM to 1 mM. Adenosine was given to test maximal CF. At concentrations below 10 μM no significant changes were observed; beyond 50 μM for midazolam, etomidate, and propofol, and 100 μM for thiopental and ketamine, each agent caused progressive but differential decreases in heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time (leading to atrioventricular dissociation), LVP, +dLVP/dtrnax, percent oxygen extraction, and MVo2. The concentrations (μM) at which +dLVP/dtmax was reduced by 50% were as followsetomidate, 82 ± 2 (mean ± SEM); propofol, 91 ± 4; midazolam, 105 ± 8; thiopental, 156 ± 11; and ketamine, 323 ± 7; the rank order of potency was etomidate = propofol = midazolam &gt; thiopental &gt; ketamine; results were similar for LVP. At the 100 μM concentration, CF was decreased 11% ± 2% by ketamine and 5% ± 3% by thiopental but was increased 17% ± 6% by etomidate, 21% ± 5% by midazolam, and near maximally to 57% ± 10% by propofol; MVo2 was decreased 8% ± 4% by thiopental, 10% ± 5% by ketamine, 19% ± 5% by midazolam, 29% ± 7% by etomidate, and 37% ± 5% by propofol; oxygen delivery/MVo2 was unchanged by thiopental and ketamine but was increased 62% ± 7% by midazolam, 71% ± 9% by etomidate, and 150% ± 15% by propofol. Between 100 μM and 1 mM, thiopental and ketamine did not increase CF but decreased MVo2 and percent oxygen extraction, whereas propofol maximally increased CF and decreased MVo2 and midazolam and etomidate had intermediate effects. These results indicate that on a molar basis, propofol, and less so midazolam and etomidate, depress cardiac function moderately more than thiopental and ketamine, and that propofol markedly attenuates autoregulation by causing coronary vasodilation. With doses used to induce anesthesia, propofol and thiopental appear to depress cardiac function more than ketamine or etomidate.</description><subject>Adenosine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anesthetics - pharmacology</subject><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Atrioventricular Node - drug effects</subject><subject>Atrioventricular Node - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coronary Circulation - drug effects</subject><subject>Etomidate - pharmacology</subject><subject>Guinea Pigs</subject><subject>Heart - drug effects</subject><subject>Heart - physiology</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Ketamine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Midazolam - pharmacology</subject><subject>Myocardial Contraction - drug effects</subject><subject>Myocardium - metabolism</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - drug effects</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Propofol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Thiopental - pharmacology</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1v3CAQRVGrdJvmJ1TiUPW0bgEbG47VKmmiJkoO6RmNMWhpsXEBK0p_fXF2m56KNGJ4HzPSAyFMySfKaP2ZrIfXsqJSMtKUR1WK8hO0oZy1VceleIU2BasrJqV8g96m9GOVENGeolPKeUMZ26C8C-MM0aUw4WDxRQ6jGyCbLf5mMoxuKt1tQX4HD-MW38cwBxv8FsM04Ie9C7OZMnhc7JfLpLMrzUrdFncfvEvjOvY6FXs2A74yEHN6h15b8MmcH-8z9P3y4mF3Vd3cfb3efbmpdMMJrwbSN7UFovu1uO1Bs8YKYrQcWkukoUK3g6yFZh0HWRBGeK97aqAj9SDqM_TxMHeO4ddiUlajS9p4D5MJS1IdE60UTVeE4iDUMaQUjVVzdCPEJ0WJWgNXfwNXL4Gr58CL9f1xx9KPZvhnPCRc-A9HHpIGbyNM2qUXGaetZM-y5iB7DD6bmH765dFEtTfg817977vrP3SFmKM</recordid><startdate>199204</startdate><enddate>199204</enddate><creator>Stowe, David F.</creator><creator>Bosnjak, Zeljko J.</creator><creator>Kampine, John P.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199204</creationdate><title>Comparison of Etomidate, Ketamine, Midazolam, Propofol, and Thiopental on Function and Metabolism of Isolated Hearts</title><author>Stowe, David F. ; Bosnjak, Zeljko J. ; Kampine, John P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4505-d0b43fa0cba0cb5fbac24f80ec9d6f09e18c6d938c275a9f09205bcb1ea703d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Adenosine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anesthetics - pharmacology</topic><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Atrioventricular Node - drug effects</topic><topic>Atrioventricular Node - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coronary Circulation - drug effects</topic><topic>Etomidate - pharmacology</topic><topic>Guinea Pigs</topic><topic>Heart - drug effects</topic><topic>Heart - physiology</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Ketamine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Midazolam - pharmacology</topic><topic>Myocardial Contraction - drug effects</topic><topic>Myocardium - metabolism</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - drug effects</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Propofol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Thiopental - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stowe, David F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosnjak, Zeljko J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kampine, John P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stowe, David F.</au><au>Bosnjak, Zeljko J.</au><au>Kampine, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Etomidate, Ketamine, Midazolam, Propofol, and Thiopental on Function and Metabolism of Isolated Hearts</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>1992-04</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>558</epage><pages>547-558</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>The authors examined direct myocardial and coronary vascular responses to the anesthetic induction agents etomidate, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, and thiopental and compared their effects on attenuating autoregulation of coronary flow as assessed by changes in oxygen supply/demand relationships. Spontaneous heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time during a trial pacing, left ventricular pressure (LVP), coronary flow (CF), percent oxygen extraction, oxygen delivery, and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVo2) were examined in 55 isolated guinea pig hearts divided into five groups of 11 each. Hearts were perfused at constant pressure with one of the drugs administered at steady-state concentrations increasing from 0.5 μM to 1 mM. Adenosine was given to test maximal CF. At concentrations below 10 μM no significant changes were observed; beyond 50 μM for midazolam, etomidate, and propofol, and 100 μM for thiopental and ketamine, each agent caused progressive but differential decreases in heart rate, atrioventricular conduction time (leading to atrioventricular dissociation), LVP, +dLVP/dtrnax, percent oxygen extraction, and MVo2. The concentrations (μM) at which +dLVP/dtmax was reduced by 50% were as followsetomidate, 82 ± 2 (mean ± SEM); propofol, 91 ± 4; midazolam, 105 ± 8; thiopental, 156 ± 11; and ketamine, 323 ± 7; the rank order of potency was etomidate = propofol = midazolam &gt; thiopental &gt; ketamine; results were similar for LVP. At the 100 μM concentration, CF was decreased 11% ± 2% by ketamine and 5% ± 3% by thiopental but was increased 17% ± 6% by etomidate, 21% ± 5% by midazolam, and near maximally to 57% ± 10% by propofol; MVo2 was decreased 8% ± 4% by thiopental, 10% ± 5% by ketamine, 19% ± 5% by midazolam, 29% ± 7% by etomidate, and 37% ± 5% by propofol; oxygen delivery/MVo2 was unchanged by thiopental and ketamine but was increased 62% ± 7% by midazolam, 71% ± 9% by etomidate, and 150% ± 15% by propofol. Between 100 μM and 1 mM, thiopental and ketamine did not increase CF but decreased MVo2 and percent oxygen extraction, whereas propofol maximally increased CF and decreased MVo2 and midazolam and etomidate had intermediate effects. These results indicate that on a molar basis, propofol, and less so midazolam and etomidate, depress cardiac function moderately more than thiopental and ketamine, and that propofol markedly attenuates autoregulation by causing coronary vasodilation. With doses used to induce anesthesia, propofol and thiopental appear to depress cardiac function more than ketamine or etomidate.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>1554122</pmid><doi>10.1213/00000539-199204000-00015</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 1992-04, Vol.74 (4), p.547-558
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72869847
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adenosine - pharmacology
Anesthetics - pharmacology
Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
Animals
Atrioventricular Node - drug effects
Atrioventricular Node - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Coronary Circulation - drug effects
Etomidate - pharmacology
Guinea Pigs
Heart - drug effects
Heart - physiology
In Vitro Techniques
Ketamine - pharmacology
Medical sciences
Midazolam - pharmacology
Myocardial Contraction - drug effects
Myocardium - metabolism
Neuropharmacology
Oxygen Consumption - drug effects
Perfusion
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Propofol - pharmacology
Thiopental - pharmacology
title Comparison of Etomidate, Ketamine, Midazolam, Propofol, and Thiopental on Function and Metabolism of Isolated Hearts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A36%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Etomidate,%20Ketamine,%20Midazolam,%20Propofol,%20and%20Thiopental%20on%20Function%20and%20Metabolism%20of%20Isolated%20Hearts&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Stowe,%20David%20F.&rft.date=1992-04&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=558&rft.pages=547-558&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/00000539-199204000-00015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72869847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72869847&rft_id=info:pmid/1554122&rfr_iscdi=true