Local Differences in the Trabecular Bone Structure of the Proximal Femur Depicted with High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging and Multisection CT

The authors performed this study to investigate structural variations in the trabecular bone of the proximal femur at high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and high-resolution multisection computed tomography (CT). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 36 proximal human femur specimen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic radiology 2002-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1395-1406
Hauptverfasser: Issever, Ahi Sema, Vieth, Volker, Lotter, Albrecht, Meier, Norbert, Laib, Andres, Newitt, David, Majumdar, Sharmila, Link, Thomas M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1406
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1395
container_title Academic radiology
container_volume 9
creator Issever, Ahi Sema
Vieth, Volker
Lotter, Albrecht
Meier, Norbert
Laib, Andres
Newitt, David
Majumdar, Sharmila
Link, Thomas M
description The authors performed this study to investigate structural variations in the trabecular bone of the proximal femur at high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and high-resolution multisection computed tomography (CT). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 36 proximal human femur specimens by using dual x-ray absorptiometry. High-resolution MR imaging was performed at 1.5 T with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.195 × 0.195 mm and a section thickness of 0.3 and 0.9 mm. Multisection CT was performed with an ultra-high-resolution protocol; images were obtained with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.25 mm and a section thickness of 1 mm. In a subset of these specimens, micro CT was performed with an isotropic spatial resolution of 30 μm. Identical regions of interest (ROIs) were used to analyze images obtained with MR imaging, multisection CT, and micro CT. Trabecular bone structural parameters were obtained, and the parameters from the individual imaging modalities and BMD were correlated. Significant differences concerning the trabecular microarchitecture between the individual ROIs were demonstrated with multisection CT and MR imaging. A number of the correlations between structural parameters derived with multisection CT, MR imaging, micro CT, and BMD measurements were significant. For MR imaging, threshold technique and section thickness had an effect on structural parameters. Structural parameters obtained in the proximal femur with multisection CT and high-resolution MR imaging show regional differences. These techniques may be useful for depicting the trabecular architecture in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80667-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72838754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1076633203806670</els_id><sourcerecordid>32012706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8ae700c571c4c1ade4914cb25a0f8645eb99f6c69307321b1aec281e8e3e4c0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcmO1DAQhi0EYoaGRwD5hIZDwI7jJSfE9KxSj0DTzdlynEq3URI3XlgeYt550gviOKcqqb6qkv4PobeUfKSEik9LSqQoBGPlGWEfFBFCFuQZOqVKqqIilXg-9f-QE_Qqxh-EUC4Ue4lOaMk5Y5yeooeFt6bHF67rIMBoIWI34rQBvAqmAZt7E_C5HwEvU8g25QDYd3vgW_B_3DAtX8GQA76ArbMJWvzbpQ2-cetNsdya5Exf3EP0fU7Oj_juHt8OZu3GNTZji-9yn1wEu5_NV6_Ri870Ed4c6wx9v7pczW-Kxdfr2_mXRWFZXaZCGZCEWC6prSw1LVQ1rWxTckM6JSoOTV13woqaEclK2lADtlQUFDCoLOnYDL0_3N0G_zNDTHpw0ULfmxF8jlqWiinJqydBVhJaSiImkB9AG3yMATq9DVM44a-mRO-E6b0wvbOhCdN7YVMzQ--OD3IzQPt_62hoAj4fAJjy-OUg6GjdTlTrwpSbbr174sUjMwWmSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>32012706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Local Differences in the Trabecular Bone Structure of the Proximal Femur Depicted with High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging and Multisection CT</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Issever, Ahi Sema ; Vieth, Volker ; Lotter, Albrecht ; Meier, Norbert ; Laib, Andres ; Newitt, David ; Majumdar, Sharmila ; Link, Thomas M</creator><creatorcontrib>Issever, Ahi Sema ; Vieth, Volker ; Lotter, Albrecht ; Meier, Norbert ; Laib, Andres ; Newitt, David ; Majumdar, Sharmila ; Link, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><description>The authors performed this study to investigate structural variations in the trabecular bone of the proximal femur at high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and high-resolution multisection computed tomography (CT). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 36 proximal human femur specimens by using dual x-ray absorptiometry. High-resolution MR imaging was performed at 1.5 T with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.195 × 0.195 mm and a section thickness of 0.3 and 0.9 mm. Multisection CT was performed with an ultra-high-resolution protocol; images were obtained with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.25 mm and a section thickness of 1 mm. In a subset of these specimens, micro CT was performed with an isotropic spatial resolution of 30 μm. Identical regions of interest (ROIs) were used to analyze images obtained with MR imaging, multisection CT, and micro CT. Trabecular bone structural parameters were obtained, and the parameters from the individual imaging modalities and BMD were correlated. Significant differences concerning the trabecular microarchitecture between the individual ROIs were demonstrated with multisection CT and MR imaging. A number of the correlations between structural parameters derived with multisection CT, MR imaging, micro CT, and BMD measurements were significant. For MR imaging, threshold technique and section thickness had an effect on structural parameters. Structural parameters obtained in the proximal femur with multisection CT and high-resolution MR imaging show regional differences. These techniques may be useful for depicting the trabecular architecture in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-6332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4046</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80667-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12553351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Density - physiology ; Computed tomography (CT), high-resolution ; Female ; Femur - diagnostic imaging ; Femur - pathology ; Femur - ultrastructure ; femur, CT ; femur, MR ; Humans ; magnetic resonance (MR), high resolution ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; osteoporosis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sex Factors ; Statistics as Topic ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Academic radiology, 2002-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1395-1406</ispartof><rights>2002 Acad Radiol</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8ae700c571c4c1ade4914cb25a0f8645eb99f6c69307321b1aec281e8e3e4c0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8ae700c571c4c1ade4914cb25a0f8645eb99f6c69307321b1aec281e8e3e4c0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80667-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12553351$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Issever, Ahi Sema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieth, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotter, Albrecht</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laib, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newitt, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majumdar, Sharmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Link, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><title>Local Differences in the Trabecular Bone Structure of the Proximal Femur Depicted with High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging and Multisection CT</title><title>Academic radiology</title><addtitle>Acad Radiol</addtitle><description>The authors performed this study to investigate structural variations in the trabecular bone of the proximal femur at high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and high-resolution multisection computed tomography (CT). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 36 proximal human femur specimens by using dual x-ray absorptiometry. High-resolution MR imaging was performed at 1.5 T with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.195 × 0.195 mm and a section thickness of 0.3 and 0.9 mm. Multisection CT was performed with an ultra-high-resolution protocol; images were obtained with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.25 mm and a section thickness of 1 mm. In a subset of these specimens, micro CT was performed with an isotropic spatial resolution of 30 μm. Identical regions of interest (ROIs) were used to analyze images obtained with MR imaging, multisection CT, and micro CT. Trabecular bone structural parameters were obtained, and the parameters from the individual imaging modalities and BMD were correlated. Significant differences concerning the trabecular microarchitecture between the individual ROIs were demonstrated with multisection CT and MR imaging. A number of the correlations between structural parameters derived with multisection CT, MR imaging, micro CT, and BMD measurements were significant. For MR imaging, threshold technique and section thickness had an effect on structural parameters. Structural parameters obtained in the proximal femur with multisection CT and high-resolution MR imaging show regional differences. These techniques may be useful for depicting the trabecular architecture in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Computed tomography (CT), high-resolution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femur - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femur - pathology</subject><subject>Femur - ultrastructure</subject><subject>femur, CT</subject><subject>femur, MR</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>magnetic resonance (MR), high resolution</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>osteoporosis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1076-6332</issn><issn>1878-4046</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcmO1DAQhi0EYoaGRwD5hIZDwI7jJSfE9KxSj0DTzdlynEq3URI3XlgeYt550gviOKcqqb6qkv4PobeUfKSEik9LSqQoBGPlGWEfFBFCFuQZOqVKqqIilXg-9f-QE_Qqxh-EUC4Ue4lOaMk5Y5yeooeFt6bHF67rIMBoIWI34rQBvAqmAZt7E_C5HwEvU8g25QDYd3vgW_B_3DAtX8GQA76ArbMJWvzbpQ2-cetNsdya5Exf3EP0fU7Oj_juHt8OZu3GNTZji-9yn1wEu5_NV6_Ri870Ed4c6wx9v7pczW-Kxdfr2_mXRWFZXaZCGZCEWC6prSw1LVQ1rWxTckM6JSoOTV13woqaEclK2lADtlQUFDCoLOnYDL0_3N0G_zNDTHpw0ULfmxF8jlqWiinJqydBVhJaSiImkB9AG3yMATq9DVM44a-mRO-E6b0wvbOhCdN7YVMzQ--OD3IzQPt_62hoAj4fAJjy-OUg6GjdTlTrwpSbbr174sUjMwWmSg</recordid><startdate>20021201</startdate><enddate>20021201</enddate><creator>Issever, Ahi Sema</creator><creator>Vieth, Volker</creator><creator>Lotter, Albrecht</creator><creator>Meier, Norbert</creator><creator>Laib, Andres</creator><creator>Newitt, David</creator><creator>Majumdar, Sharmila</creator><creator>Link, Thomas M</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021201</creationdate><title>Local Differences in the Trabecular Bone Structure of the Proximal Femur Depicted with High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging and Multisection CT</title><author>Issever, Ahi Sema ; Vieth, Volker ; Lotter, Albrecht ; Meier, Norbert ; Laib, Andres ; Newitt, David ; Majumdar, Sharmila ; Link, Thomas M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-8ae700c571c4c1ade4914cb25a0f8645eb99f6c69307321b1aec281e8e3e4c0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Computed tomography (CT), high-resolution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femur - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femur - pathology</topic><topic>Femur - ultrastructure</topic><topic>femur, CT</topic><topic>femur, MR</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>magnetic resonance (MR), high resolution</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>osteoporosis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Issever, Ahi Sema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vieth, Volker</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotter, Albrecht</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Norbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laib, Andres</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newitt, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majumdar, Sharmila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Link, Thomas M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Issever, Ahi Sema</au><au>Vieth, Volker</au><au>Lotter, Albrecht</au><au>Meier, Norbert</au><au>Laib, Andres</au><au>Newitt, David</au><au>Majumdar, Sharmila</au><au>Link, Thomas M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Local Differences in the Trabecular Bone Structure of the Proximal Femur Depicted with High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging and Multisection CT</atitle><jtitle>Academic radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Acad Radiol</addtitle><date>2002-12-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1395</spage><epage>1406</epage><pages>1395-1406</pages><issn>1076-6332</issn><eissn>1878-4046</eissn><abstract>The authors performed this study to investigate structural variations in the trabecular bone of the proximal femur at high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and high-resolution multisection computed tomography (CT). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 36 proximal human femur specimens by using dual x-ray absorptiometry. High-resolution MR imaging was performed at 1.5 T with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.195 × 0.195 mm and a section thickness of 0.3 and 0.9 mm. Multisection CT was performed with an ultra-high-resolution protocol; images were obtained with an in-plane spatial resolution of 0.25 mm and a section thickness of 1 mm. In a subset of these specimens, micro CT was performed with an isotropic spatial resolution of 30 μm. Identical regions of interest (ROIs) were used to analyze images obtained with MR imaging, multisection CT, and micro CT. Trabecular bone structural parameters were obtained, and the parameters from the individual imaging modalities and BMD were correlated. Significant differences concerning the trabecular microarchitecture between the individual ROIs were demonstrated with multisection CT and MR imaging. A number of the correlations between structural parameters derived with multisection CT, MR imaging, micro CT, and BMD measurements were significant. For MR imaging, threshold technique and section thickness had an effect on structural parameters. Structural parameters obtained in the proximal femur with multisection CT and high-resolution MR imaging show regional differences. These techniques may be useful for depicting the trabecular architecture in the diagnosis of osteoporosis.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12553351</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80667-0</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-6332
ispartof Academic radiology, 2002-12, Vol.9 (12), p.1395-1406
issn 1076-6332
1878-4046
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72838754
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Density - physiology
Computed tomography (CT), high-resolution
Female
Femur - diagnostic imaging
Femur - pathology
Femur - ultrastructure
femur, CT
femur, MR
Humans
magnetic resonance (MR), high resolution
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
osteoporosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sex Factors
Statistics as Topic
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Local Differences in the Trabecular Bone Structure of the Proximal Femur Depicted with High-Spatial-Resolution MR Imaging and Multisection CT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A43%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Local%20Differences%20in%20the%20Trabecular%20Bone%20Structure%20of%20the%20Proximal%20Femur%20Depicted%20with%20High-Spatial-Resolution%20MR%20Imaging%20and%20Multisection%20CT&rft.jtitle=Academic%20radiology&rft.au=Issever,%20Ahi%20Sema&rft.date=2002-12-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1395&rft.epage=1406&rft.pages=1395-1406&rft.issn=1076-6332&rft.eissn=1878-4046&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80667-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E32012706%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=32012706&rft_id=info:pmid/12553351&rft_els_id=S1076633203806670&rfr_iscdi=true