The efficacy and safety of the cytobrush during pregnancy
The safety and efficacy of abrasive cytology, using the cytobrush, were evaluated in 300 pregnant patients. When compared to conventional cytology obtained with a cotton-tipped applicator there was no difference in adverse pregnancy events. Smear adequacy (containing endocervical cells) was statisti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Gynecologic oncology 1992-03, Vol.44 (3), p.260-262 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 262 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 260 |
| container_title | Gynecologic oncology |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Orr, James W. Barrett, Jeffrey M. Orr, Pamela F. Holloway, Robert W. Holimon, James L. |
| description | The safety and efficacy of abrasive cytology, using the cytobrush, were evaluated in 300 pregnant patients. When compared to conventional cytology obtained with a cotton-tipped applicator there was no difference in adverse pregnancy events. Smear adequacy (containing endocervical cells) was statistically (
P < 0.01) and clinically increased from 21 to 86%. The use of abrasive cervical cytology was associated with a twofold increase in the incidence of abnormal smears. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0090-8258(92)90053-L |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72828802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>009082589290053L</els_id><sourcerecordid>72828802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5ccdbb95c9b40df935f53d45c218e4eb87f2f858e92fc6c746e2949ddc85b6a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4UeRPRQTdKkm1wEWfyCghc9h3Qy0chuuyat0H9v11305mkO7zMvMw8hJ4xeMcrKa0o1zRWX6kLzS02pLPJqh0wY1TIvldS7ZPKLHJDDlD4opQVlfJ_sMymYKNSE6Jd3zND7ABaGzDYuS9ZjN2Stz7oxgqFr69in98z1MTRv2SriW2MbGI7InreLhMfbOSWv93cv88e8en54mt9WOQjFulwCuLrWEnQtqPO6kF4WTkjgTKHAWs0890oq1NxDCTNRItdCOwdK1qWlxZScb3pXsf3sMXVmGRLgYmEbbPtkZlxxpSgfQbEBIbYpRfRmFcPSxsEwatbGzFqHWeswmpsfY6Ya1063_X29RPe3tFE05mfb3CawCx_H50P6xSTXYzcbsZsNhqOLr4DRJAjYALoQETrj2vD_Hd_-oIbO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72828802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The efficacy and safety of the cytobrush during pregnancy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Orr, James W. ; Barrett, Jeffrey M. ; Orr, Pamela F. ; Holloway, Robert W. ; Holimon, James L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Orr, James W. ; Barrett, Jeffrey M. ; Orr, Pamela F. ; Holloway, Robert W. ; Holimon, James L.</creatorcontrib><description>The safety and efficacy of abrasive cytology, using the cytobrush, were evaluated in 300 pregnant patients. When compared to conventional cytology obtained with a cotton-tipped applicator there was no difference in adverse pregnancy events. Smear adequacy (containing endocervical cells) was statistically (
P < 0.01) and clinically increased from 21 to 86%. The use of abrasive cervical cytology was associated with a twofold increase in the incidence of abnormal smears.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(92)90053-L</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1541438</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GYNOA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cervix Uteri - cytology ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis ; Tumors ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Vaginal Smears - adverse effects ; Vaginal Smears - instrumentation ; Vaginal Smears - methods</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 1992-03, Vol.44 (3), p.260-262</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5ccdbb95c9b40df935f53d45c218e4eb87f2f858e92fc6c746e2949ddc85b6a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5ccdbb95c9b40df935f53d45c218e4eb87f2f858e92fc6c746e2949ddc85b6a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/009082589290053L$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5291011$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1541438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Orr, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Pamela F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holloway, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holimon, James L.</creatorcontrib><title>The efficacy and safety of the cytobrush during pregnancy</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>The safety and efficacy of abrasive cytology, using the cytobrush, were evaluated in 300 pregnant patients. When compared to conventional cytology obtained with a cotton-tipped applicator there was no difference in adverse pregnancy events. Smear adequacy (containing endocervical cells) was statistically (
P < 0.01) and clinically increased from 21 to 86%. The use of abrasive cervical cytology was associated with a twofold increase in the incidence of abnormal smears.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cervix Uteri - cytology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - adverse effects</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - instrumentation</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - methods</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouq7-A4UeRPRQTdKkm1wEWfyCghc9h3Qy0chuuyat0H9v11305mkO7zMvMw8hJ4xeMcrKa0o1zRWX6kLzS02pLPJqh0wY1TIvldS7ZPKLHJDDlD4opQVlfJ_sMymYKNSE6Jd3zND7ABaGzDYuS9ZjN2Stz7oxgqFr69in98z1MTRv2SriW2MbGI7InreLhMfbOSWv93cv88e8en54mt9WOQjFulwCuLrWEnQtqPO6kF4WTkjgTKHAWs0890oq1NxDCTNRItdCOwdK1qWlxZScb3pXsf3sMXVmGRLgYmEbbPtkZlxxpSgfQbEBIbYpRfRmFcPSxsEwatbGzFqHWeswmpsfY6Ya1063_X29RPe3tFE05mfb3CawCx_H50P6xSTXYzcbsZsNhqOLr4DRJAjYALoQETrj2vD_Hd_-oIbO</recordid><startdate>19920301</startdate><enddate>19920301</enddate><creator>Orr, James W.</creator><creator>Barrett, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Orr, Pamela F.</creator><creator>Holloway, Robert W.</creator><creator>Holimon, James L.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920301</creationdate><title>The efficacy and safety of the cytobrush during pregnancy</title><author>Orr, James W. ; Barrett, Jeffrey M. ; Orr, Pamela F. ; Holloway, Robert W. ; Holimon, James L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5ccdbb95c9b40df935f53d45c218e4eb87f2f858e92fc6c746e2949ddc85b6a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cervix Uteri - cytology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - adverse effects</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - instrumentation</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Orr, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orr, Pamela F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holloway, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holimon, James L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Orr, James W.</au><au>Barrett, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Orr, Pamela F.</au><au>Holloway, Robert W.</au><au>Holimon, James L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The efficacy and safety of the cytobrush during pregnancy</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>1992-03-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>260</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>260-262</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><coden>GYNOA3</coden><abstract>The safety and efficacy of abrasive cytology, using the cytobrush, were evaluated in 300 pregnant patients. When compared to conventional cytology obtained with a cotton-tipped applicator there was no difference in adverse pregnancy events. Smear adequacy (containing endocervical cells) was statistically (
P < 0.01) and clinically increased from 21 to 86%. The use of abrasive cervical cytology was associated with a twofold increase in the incidence of abnormal smears.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>1541438</pmid><doi>10.1016/0090-8258(92)90053-L</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-8258 |
| ispartof | Gynecologic oncology, 1992-03, Vol.44 (3), p.260-262 |
| issn | 0090-8258 1095-6859 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72828802 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Cervix Uteri - cytology Female Female genital diseases Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Medical sciences Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications, Infectious - diagnosis Tumors Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis Vaginal Smears - adverse effects Vaginal Smears - instrumentation Vaginal Smears - methods |
| title | The efficacy and safety of the cytobrush during pregnancy |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T04%3A37%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20the%20cytobrush%20during%20pregnancy&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Orr,%20James%20W.&rft.date=1992-03-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=260&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=260-262&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.coden=GYNOA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0090-8258(92)90053-L&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72828802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72828802&rft_id=info:pmid/1541438&rft_els_id=009082589290053L&rfr_iscdi=true |