Research and Informed Consent in Africa — Another Look
The current practice of requiring the informed consent of research subjects is relatively new. The emphasis on a person's right to accept or refuse participation in biomedical research stems directly from the atrocities committed by Nazi "scientists" — an extreme instance of ignoring...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1992-03, Vol.326 (12), p.830-834 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 834 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 830 |
container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
container_volume | 326 |
creator | Faden, Ruth R IJsselmuiden, Carel B |
description | The current practice of requiring the informed consent of research subjects is relatively new. The emphasis on a person's right to accept or refuse participation in biomedical research stems directly from the atrocities committed by Nazi "scientists" — an extreme instance of ignoring the value of individual human beings allegedly in the pursuit of knowledge.
1
2
3
Similar but less dramatic disrespect for the subjects of medical research was common just after the Second World War and reflected the paternalistic atmosphere that pervaded medical practice at that time.
1
,
4
More recent examples of unethical research, which stimulated the development of the current theory . . . |
doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJM199203193261212 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72827707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2878217581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-2740b3d19bf032fca29f87af3e39a35de316eaab6eddde49b3393f8214accc233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkN9KHDEUh0Ox6Gr7BKUwUPBGpk1yMn9yuQzqrqwWSns9ZDIn7Kw7yZrMIN75ED6hT2KWFQWR4rk5F-f7_Th8hHxj9CejWf7r6vTikknJKTAJPGec8U9kwjKAVAia75EJpbxMRSHhgByGsKJxmJD7ZD9CZQFsQso_GFB5vUyUbZO5Nc732CaVswHtkHQ2mRrfaZU83j8kU-uGJfpk4dz1F_LZqHXAr8_7iPw7O_1bzdLF7_N5NV2kGnIxpLwQtIGWycZQ4EYrLk1ZKAMIUkHWIrAclWpybNsWhWwAJJiSM6G01hzgiBzvejfe3YwYhrrvgsb1Wll0Y6gLXvKioEUEf7wBV270Nv5Ws8hkOQi2rYMdpb0LwaOpN77rlb-rGa23Vut3rMbU9-fusYl6XjM7jfFe7u632DgTdIdW4ws13dbNLrLYGf3zqhvU0DlbudEOMXry8egr3fehtrjq__v2E_URnlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1282563413</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Research and Informed Consent in Africa — Another Look</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Faden, Ruth R ; IJsselmuiden, Carel B</creator><creatorcontrib>Faden, Ruth R ; IJsselmuiden, Carel B</creatorcontrib><description>The current practice of requiring the informed consent of research subjects is relatively new. The emphasis on a person's right to accept or refuse participation in biomedical research stems directly from the atrocities committed by Nazi "scientists" — an extreme instance of ignoring the value of individual human beings allegedly in the pursuit of knowledge.
1
2
3
Similar but less dramatic disrespect for the subjects of medical research was common just after the Second World War and reflected the paternalistic atmosphere that pervaded medical practice at that time.
1
,
4
More recent examples of unethical research, which stimulated the development of the current theory . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199203193261212</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1538731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>WALTHAM: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Africa ; Anthropology, Cultural ; Bioethics ; Communication ; Developing Countries ; Efficiency ; Ethics, Medical ; General & Internal Medicine ; Informed Consent ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Medicine, General & Internal ; Science & Technology ; Social Conditions ; Vaccination</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1992-03, Vol.326 (12), p.830-834</ispartof><rights>Copyright Massachusetts Medical Society Mar 19, 1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>95</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wosA1992HJ59200012</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-2740b3d19bf032fca29f87af3e39a35de316eaab6eddde49b3393f8214accc233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-2740b3d19bf032fca29f87af3e39a35de316eaab6eddde49b3393f8214accc233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM199203193261212$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1282563413?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,2760,2761,26107,27928,27929,52386,54068,64389,64391,64393,72473</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1538731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faden, Ruth R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IJsselmuiden, Carel B</creatorcontrib><title>Research and Informed Consent in Africa — Another Look</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>NEW ENGL J MED</addtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>The current practice of requiring the informed consent of research subjects is relatively new. The emphasis on a person's right to accept or refuse participation in biomedical research stems directly from the atrocities committed by Nazi "scientists" — an extreme instance of ignoring the value of individual human beings allegedly in the pursuit of knowledge.
1
2
3
Similar but less dramatic disrespect for the subjects of medical research was common just after the Second World War and reflected the paternalistic atmosphere that pervaded medical practice at that time.
1
,
4
More recent examples of unethical research, which stimulated the development of the current theory . . .</description><subject>Africa</subject><subject>Anthropology, Cultural</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>General & Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Medicine, General & Internal</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Social Conditions</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EZCTM</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkN9KHDEUh0Ox6Gr7BKUwUPBGpk1yMn9yuQzqrqwWSns9ZDIn7Kw7yZrMIN75ED6hT2KWFQWR4rk5F-f7_Th8hHxj9CejWf7r6vTikknJKTAJPGec8U9kwjKAVAia75EJpbxMRSHhgByGsKJxmJD7ZD9CZQFsQso_GFB5vUyUbZO5Nc732CaVswHtkHQ2mRrfaZU83j8kU-uGJfpk4dz1F_LZqHXAr8_7iPw7O_1bzdLF7_N5NV2kGnIxpLwQtIGWycZQ4EYrLk1ZKAMIUkHWIrAclWpybNsWhWwAJJiSM6G01hzgiBzvejfe3YwYhrrvgsb1Wll0Y6gLXvKioEUEf7wBV270Nv5Ws8hkOQi2rYMdpb0LwaOpN77rlb-rGa23Vut3rMbU9-fusYl6XjM7jfFe7u632DgTdIdW4ws13dbNLrLYGf3zqhvU0DlbudEOMXry8egr3fehtrjq__v2E_URnlA</recordid><startdate>19920319</startdate><enddate>19920319</enddate><creator>Faden, Ruth R</creator><creator>IJsselmuiden, Carel B</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><general>Massachusetts Medical Soc</general><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>EZCTM</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920319</creationdate><title>Research and Informed Consent in Africa — Another Look</title><author>Faden, Ruth R ; IJsselmuiden, Carel B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-2740b3d19bf032fca29f87af3e39a35de316eaab6eddde49b3393f8214accc233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Africa</topic><topic>Anthropology, Cultural</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>General & Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Medicine, General & Internal</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Social Conditions</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faden, Ruth R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IJsselmuiden, Carel B</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 1992</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faden, Ruth R</au><au>IJsselmuiden, Carel B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Research and Informed Consent in Africa — Another Look</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><stitle>NEW ENGL J MED</stitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1992-03-19</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>326</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>830</spage><epage>834</epage><pages>830-834</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>The current practice of requiring the informed consent of research subjects is relatively new. The emphasis on a person's right to accept or refuse participation in biomedical research stems directly from the atrocities committed by Nazi "scientists" — an extreme instance of ignoring the value of individual human beings allegedly in the pursuit of knowledge.
1
2
3
Similar but less dramatic disrespect for the subjects of medical research was common just after the Second World War and reflected the paternalistic atmosphere that pervaded medical practice at that time.
1
,
4
More recent examples of unethical research, which stimulated the development of the current theory . . .</abstract><cop>WALTHAM</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>1538731</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM199203193261212</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 1992-03, Vol.326 (12), p.830-834 |
issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72827707 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; New England Journal of Medicine |
subjects | Africa Anthropology, Cultural Bioethics Communication Developing Countries Efficiency Ethics, Medical General & Internal Medicine Informed Consent Life Sciences & Biomedicine Medicine, General & Internal Science & Technology Social Conditions Vaccination |
title | Research and Informed Consent in Africa — Another Look |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T12%3A41%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Research%20and%20Informed%20Consent%20in%20Africa%20%E2%80%94%20Another%20Look&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Faden,%20Ruth%20R&rft.date=1992-03-19&rft.volume=326&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=830&rft.epage=834&rft.pages=830-834&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM199203193261212&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2878217581%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1282563413&rft_id=info:pmid/1538731&rfr_iscdi=true |