Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: Self-injection versus external vacuum devices
This study directly compared two nonsurgical treatments for erectile dysfunction, self-injection of papaverine/phentolamine and external vacuum devices, in terms of usage rates, effectiveness, side effects, dropout rates, and impact on patient sexual and psychologic functioning. Both alternatives we...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 1992-02, Vol.39 (2), p.139-144 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 144 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 139 |
| container_title | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Turner, Louisa A. Althof, Stanley E. Levine, Stephen B. Bodner, Donald R. Kursh, Elroy D. Resnick, Martin I. |
| description | This study directly compared two nonsurgical treatments for erectile dysfunction, self-injection of papaverine/phentolamine and external vacuum devices, in terms of usage rates, effectiveness, side effects, dropout rates, and impact on patient sexual and psychologic functioning. Both alternatives were regularly, successfully, and safely used by patients, though. dropout rates were higher for self-injection. Both produced erections of improved quality, and effected sustained improvements in frequency of intercourse, orgasm, and sexual satisfaction. Spontaneous erections also improved with both treatments. General psychiatric symptomatology was decreased, and anxiety was improved. There were no differences between the two treatments in sexual or psychologic impact. Relative contraindications and esthetic considerations are presented. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0090-4295(92)90270-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72800604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0090429592902707</els_id><sourcerecordid>72800604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8f5bd719e9189dfd4cb7302f095277300c90a852a3069db6ed39b12c1cbf37183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQQC0EKtvCPwDJB4TKITB2NnHcAxKq-JIqcaCcLcceC1eJvbWdlP57vN1VuXGaGc2b0cwj5BWD9wxY_wFAQrPlsjuX_J0ELqART8iGdVw0UsruKdk8Is_Jac43AND3vTghJ0y0fQf9htxe3-G0YjPHUH5TE-edTj7HQKOj5S7SklCXGUPJ1MVEMaEpfkJq77NbQs1juKA_cXKNDzf4UNMVU14yxT8FU9ATXbVZlplaXL3B_II8c3rK-PIYz8ivL5-vL781Vz--fr_8dNWYFlhpBteNVjCJkg3SOrs1o2iBO5D1v5qBkaCHjusWemnHHm0rR8YNM6NrBRvaM_L2sHeX4u2CuajZZ4PTpAPGJSvBh6oDthXcHkCTYs4JndolP-t0rxiovWm116j2GpXk6sG0EnXs9XH_Ms5o_w0d1Nb-m2NfZ6Mnl3QwPj9iHWcMoK3YxwOG1cXqMalsPAaD1u9dKxv9_-_4C2wym8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72800604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: Self-injection versus external vacuum devices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Turner, Louisa A. ; Althof, Stanley E. ; Levine, Stephen B. ; Bodner, Donald R. ; Kursh, Elroy D. ; Resnick, Martin I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Turner, Louisa A. ; Althof, Stanley E. ; Levine, Stephen B. ; Bodner, Donald R. ; Kursh, Elroy D. ; Resnick, Martin I.</creatorcontrib><description>This study directly compared two nonsurgical treatments for erectile dysfunction, self-injection of papaverine/phentolamine and external vacuum devices, in terms of usage rates, effectiveness, side effects, dropout rates, and impact on patient sexual and psychologic functioning. Both alternatives were regularly, successfully, and safely used by patients, though. dropout rates were higher for self-injection. Both produced erections of improved quality, and effected sustained improvements in frequency of intercourse, orgasm, and sexual satisfaction. Spontaneous erections also improved with both treatments. General psychiatric symptomatology was decreased, and anxiety was improved. There were no differences between the two treatments in sexual or psychologic impact. Relative contraindications and esthetic considerations are presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(92)90270-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1736506</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Coitus ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Erectile Dysfunction - psychology ; Erectile Dysfunction - therapy ; Follow-Up Studies ; Genital system. Reproduction ; Humans ; Injections ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Multivariate Analysis ; Papaverine - administration & dosage ; Papaverine - therapeutic use ; Patient Compliance ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Phentolamine - administration & dosage ; Phentolamine - therapeutic use ; Prospective Studies ; Self Administration ; Time Factors ; Vacuum</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 1992-02, Vol.39 (2), p.139-144</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8f5bd719e9189dfd4cb7302f095277300c90a852a3069db6ed39b12c1cbf37183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8f5bd719e9189dfd4cb7302f095277300c90a852a3069db6ed39b12c1cbf37183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(92)90270-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=5211003$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1736506$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turner, Louisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althof, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kursh, Elroy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resnick, Martin I.</creatorcontrib><title>Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: Self-injection versus external vacuum devices</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>This study directly compared two nonsurgical treatments for erectile dysfunction, self-injection of papaverine/phentolamine and external vacuum devices, in terms of usage rates, effectiveness, side effects, dropout rates, and impact on patient sexual and psychologic functioning. Both alternatives were regularly, successfully, and safely used by patients, though. dropout rates were higher for self-injection. Both produced erections of improved quality, and effected sustained improvements in frequency of intercourse, orgasm, and sexual satisfaction. Spontaneous erections also improved with both treatments. General psychiatric symptomatology was decreased, and anxiety was improved. There were no differences between the two treatments in sexual or psychologic impact. Relative contraindications and esthetic considerations are presented.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coitus</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction - psychology</subject><subject>Erectile Dysfunction - therapy</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Genital system. Reproduction</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Papaverine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Papaverine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Phentolamine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Phentolamine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Self Administration</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQQC0EKtvCPwDJB4TKITB2NnHcAxKq-JIqcaCcLcceC1eJvbWdlP57vN1VuXGaGc2b0cwj5BWD9wxY_wFAQrPlsjuX_J0ELqART8iGdVw0UsruKdk8Is_Jac43AND3vTghJ0y0fQf9htxe3-G0YjPHUH5TE-edTj7HQKOj5S7SklCXGUPJ1MVEMaEpfkJq77NbQs1juKA_cXKNDzf4UNMVU14yxT8FU9ATXbVZlplaXL3B_II8c3rK-PIYz8ivL5-vL781Vz--fr_8dNWYFlhpBteNVjCJkg3SOrs1o2iBO5D1v5qBkaCHjusWemnHHm0rR8YNM6NrBRvaM_L2sHeX4u2CuajZZ4PTpAPGJSvBh6oDthXcHkCTYs4JndolP-t0rxiovWm116j2GpXk6sG0EnXs9XH_Ms5o_w0d1Nb-m2NfZ6Mnl3QwPj9iHWcMoK3YxwOG1cXqMalsPAaD1u9dKxv9_-_4C2wym8U</recordid><startdate>199202</startdate><enddate>199202</enddate><creator>Turner, Louisa A.</creator><creator>Althof, Stanley E.</creator><creator>Levine, Stephen B.</creator><creator>Bodner, Donald R.</creator><creator>Kursh, Elroy D.</creator><creator>Resnick, Martin I.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199202</creationdate><title>Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: Self-injection versus external vacuum devices</title><author>Turner, Louisa A. ; Althof, Stanley E. ; Levine, Stephen B. ; Bodner, Donald R. ; Kursh, Elroy D. ; Resnick, Martin I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c301t-8f5bd719e9189dfd4cb7302f095277300c90a852a3069db6ed39b12c1cbf37183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coitus</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction - psychology</topic><topic>Erectile Dysfunction - therapy</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Genital system. Reproduction</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Papaverine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Papaverine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Phentolamine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Phentolamine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Self Administration</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turner, Louisa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Althof, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Stephen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodner, Donald R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kursh, Elroy D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resnick, Martin I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turner, Louisa A.</au><au>Althof, Stanley E.</au><au>Levine, Stephen B.</au><au>Bodner, Donald R.</au><au>Kursh, Elroy D.</au><au>Resnick, Martin I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: Self-injection versus external vacuum devices</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>1992-02</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>139-144</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>This study directly compared two nonsurgical treatments for erectile dysfunction, self-injection of papaverine/phentolamine and external vacuum devices, in terms of usage rates, effectiveness, side effects, dropout rates, and impact on patient sexual and psychologic functioning. Both alternatives were regularly, successfully, and safely used by patients, though. dropout rates were higher for self-injection. Both produced erections of improved quality, and effected sustained improvements in frequency of intercourse, orgasm, and sexual satisfaction. Spontaneous erections also improved with both treatments. General psychiatric symptomatology was decreased, and anxiety was improved. There were no differences between the two treatments in sexual or psychologic impact. Relative contraindications and esthetic considerations are presented.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>1736506</pmid><doi>10.1016/0090-4295(92)90270-7</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0090-4295 |
| ispartof | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 1992-02, Vol.39 (2), p.139-144 |
| issn | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72800604 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Coitus Drug Therapy, Combination Erectile Dysfunction - psychology Erectile Dysfunction - therapy Follow-Up Studies Genital system. Reproduction Humans Injections Male Medical sciences Multivariate Analysis Papaverine - administration & dosage Papaverine - therapeutic use Patient Compliance Pharmacology. Drug treatments Phentolamine - administration & dosage Phentolamine - therapeutic use Prospective Studies Self Administration Time Factors Vacuum |
| title | Twelve-month comparison of two treatments for erectile dysfunction: Self-injection versus external vacuum devices |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A53%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Twelve-month%20comparison%20of%20two%20treatments%20for%20erectile%20dysfunction:%20Self-injection%20versus%20external%20vacuum%20devices&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Turner,%20Louisa%20A.&rft.date=1992-02&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=139-144&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0090-4295(92)90270-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72800604%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72800604&rft_id=info:pmid/1736506&rft_els_id=0090429592902707&rfr_iscdi=true |