Detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma by Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with double-echo chemical shift in-phase and opposed-phase gradient echo technique: Comparison with dynamic helical computed tomography imaging with double arterial phase

The technique of double-echo chemical shift gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the fast low-angle shot (double-echo FLASH) sequence provides in-phase and opposed-phase images in a single breath hold. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dynamic MRI with double-echo FLASH imaging for the detection of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma by comparing it with dynamic helical computed tomography (CT) imaging with double arterial phase. Twenty-nine patients with 67 hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma nodules who underwent both dynamic MRI with double-echo FLASH imaging (repetition time/echo time/flip angle: 160/3.6, 7.0/80 degrees ) and dynamic helical CT imaging with double arterial phase were enrolled in the study. For dynamic MRI, precontrast, arterial, portal venous, and equilibrium phase images were obtained before and approximately 19, 60, and 120 seconds, respectively, after intravenous injection of 0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine at a rate of 2 ml/s. For dynamic CT imaging, quadraphase images, including early arterial, late arterial, portal venous, and equilibrium phases, were obtained serially approximately 20, 30, 70, and 180 seconds, respectively, after intravenous administration of 2 ml/kg of 300 mgI/ml of nonionic contrast medium at a rate of 5 ml/s. Three masked observers independently interpreted images obtained with each technique in random order, separately and without patient identifiers. Sensitivity and positive predictive values as well as the area below the alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) for each imaging technique were calculated and compared statistically. Mean sensitivity and positive predictive values of MRI for hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma were 48% and 94%, respectively, and those of CT imaging were 47% and 91%, respectively. In 11 (38%) of the 29 patients, at least one observer judged dynamic MRI to be superior, whereas in 5 patients (17%), dynamic CT was judged to be superior. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity and positive predictive values between these techniques (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference either in mean Az values between CT (0.55) and MRI (0.57) (p = 0.61). Dynamic MRI with double-echo FLASH imaging can detect hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma as well as dynamic helical CT imaging with double arterial phase.