Validation of the Hong Kong Chinese Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire in Patients with Bronchiectasis

To validate the Hong Kong Chinese version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-HK) in patients with bronchiectasis. Outpatients (93 patients; 61 women; mean age [± SD], 59.0 ± 14.2 years) were assessed at baseline by the SGRQ-HK, the Hong Kong Chinese version of the 36-item short form h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 2002-12, Vol.122 (6), p.2030-2037
Hauptverfasser: Chan, Shelley L., Chan-Yeung, Moira M., Ooi, Gaik C., Lam, Cindy L., Cheung, Tung F., Lam, Wah K., Tsang, Kenneth W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2037
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2030
container_title Chest
container_volume 122
creator Chan, Shelley L.
Chan-Yeung, Moira M.
Ooi, Gaik C.
Lam, Cindy L.
Cheung, Tung F.
Lam, Wah K.
Tsang, Kenneth W.
description To validate the Hong Kong Chinese version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-HK) in patients with bronchiectasis. Outpatients (93 patients; 61 women; mean age [± SD], 59.0 ± 14.2 years) were assessed at baseline by the SGRQ-HK, the Hong Kong Chinese version of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36-HK), and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Forty randomly selected patients also were reassessed at 2 weeks for repeatability. Seventy-two patients were further reassessed at 6 months for responsiveness. Cronbach α coefficients, which reflected internal consistency, were > 0.7 for all SGRQ-HK components except for symptoms (α = 0.59), and the intraclass correlation coefficients between baseline and the 2-week follow-up visits were between 0.80 and 0.94 (p > 0.05). SGRQ-HK component scores and total scores correlated with all the component scores of the SF-36-HK and the HADS (p < 0.02). SGRQ-HK component scores and total scores correlated with the scores of the SF-36-HK and the HADS, confirming the concurrent validity. All SGRQ-HK scores correlated negatively with FEV1, FVC, and arterial oxygen saturation (p < 0.005), while the activity score correlated with the Karnofsky performance scale and the number of bronchiectatic lobes (p < 0.001). SGRQ-HK scores positively correlated with Borg scale scores, exacerbation frequency, and 24-h sputum volumes (p < 0.03). Patients with 24-h sputum volumes of ≥ 10 mL or < 10 mL had significantly different SQRG-HK component scores and total scores (p < 0.002), although this sensitivity was not displayed by scores on the HADS or the SF-36-HK. Patients with 25% reductions in 24-h sputum volumes had significant improvements in SGRQ-HK activity scores, impact scores, and total scores (p < 0.02), but not in other quality-of-life measures or clinical parameters, indicating the responsiveness of the SGRQ-HK. The SGRQ-HK is a valid and sensitive instrument for determining quality of life in bronchiectasis patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1378/chest.122.6.2030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72769496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012369215508222</els_id><sourcerecordid>72769496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-12212b66eda0222b314aab7853127357f6a7530cbb8c52ed22d55340ec722a143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd2LEzEUxYMobl1990mCoG8z5jsd39aiu-KC3_saMpk7nSzTpCZTy_73pnagKviSEPidc0_uQegpJTXlevnKDZCnmjJWq5oRTu6hBW04rbgU_D5aEEJZxVXDztCjnG9JedNGPURnlAktl4Iv0P7Gjr6zk48Bxx5PA-CrGNb4w-FYDT5ABnwDKf8BfJ1qfAkxrQF_gbz1yU4x3eHPuxKmYMH6BNgH_KnYQpgy3vtpwG9SDG7w4CabfX6MHvR2zPBkvs_R93dvv62uquuPl-9XF9eVE0JMVfkaZa1S0FnCGGs5Fda2eik5ZZpL3SurJSeubZdOMugY66TkgoDTjFkq-Dl6efTdpvjjENBsfHYwjjZA3GWjmVaNaFQBn_8D3sZdCiWbYYQIqZTUBSJHyKWYc4LebJPf2HRnKDGHRszvRkyJbZQ5NFIkz2bfXbuB7iSYKyjAixmw2dmxTzY4n0-cEKQhip9mD3497MuKTd7YcSy2_Dh1zvvX7NdHCZQN__SQTHalEQddkbvJdNH_P_gvxhu5Mw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>200456657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Hong Kong Chinese Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire in Patients with Bronchiectasis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chan, Shelley L. ; Chan-Yeung, Moira M. ; Ooi, Gaik C. ; Lam, Cindy L. ; Cheung, Tung F. ; Lam, Wah K. ; Tsang, Kenneth W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Shelley L. ; Chan-Yeung, Moira M. ; Ooi, Gaik C. ; Lam, Cindy L. ; Cheung, Tung F. ; Lam, Wah K. ; Tsang, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[To validate the Hong Kong Chinese version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-HK) in patients with bronchiectasis. Outpatients (93 patients; 61 women; mean age [± SD], 59.0 ± 14.2 years) were assessed at baseline by the SGRQ-HK, the Hong Kong Chinese version of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36-HK), and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Forty randomly selected patients also were reassessed at 2 weeks for repeatability. Seventy-two patients were further reassessed at 6 months for responsiveness. Cronbach α coefficients, which reflected internal consistency, were > 0.7 for all SGRQ-HK components except for symptoms (α = 0.59), and the intraclass correlation coefficients between baseline and the 2-week follow-up visits were between 0.80 and 0.94 (p > 0.05). SGRQ-HK component scores and total scores correlated with all the component scores of the SF-36-HK and the HADS (p < 0.02). SGRQ-HK component scores and total scores correlated with the scores of the SF-36-HK and the HADS, confirming the concurrent validity. All SGRQ-HK scores correlated negatively with FEV1, FVC, and arterial oxygen saturation (p < 0.005), while the activity score correlated with the Karnofsky performance scale and the number of bronchiectatic lobes (p < 0.001). SGRQ-HK scores positively correlated with Borg scale scores, exacerbation frequency, and 24-h sputum volumes (p < 0.03). Patients with 24-h sputum volumes of ≥ 10 mL or < 10 mL had significantly different SQRG-HK component scores and total scores (p < 0.002), although this sensitivity was not displayed by scores on the HADS or the SF-36-HK. Patients with 25% reductions in 24-h sputum volumes had significant improvements in SGRQ-HK activity scores, impact scores, and total scores (p < 0.02), but not in other quality-of-life measures or clinical parameters, indicating the responsiveness of the SGRQ-HK. The SGRQ-HK is a valid and sensitive instrument for determining quality of life in bronchiectasis patients.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1378/chest.122.6.2030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12475843</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHETBF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Northbrook, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bilingualism ; Biological and medical sciences ; bronchiectasis ; Bronchiectasis - physiopathology ; China - ethnology ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Dyspnea ; Female ; Health surveys ; Hong Kong ; hospital anxious and depression scale ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; MOS short form-36 ; Oxygen saturation ; Patients ; Pneumology ; Quality of Life ; Questionnaires ; Respiratory Physiological Phenomena ; Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; St. George Respiratory Questionnaire ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><ispartof>Chest, 2002-12, Vol.122 (6), p.2030-2037</ispartof><rights>2002 The American College of Chest Physicians</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American College of Chest Physicians Dec 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-12212b66eda0222b314aab7853127357f6a7530cbb8c52ed22d55340ec722a143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-12212b66eda0222b314aab7853127357f6a7530cbb8c52ed22d55340ec722a143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14409063$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12475843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Shelley L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan-Yeung, Moira M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ooi, Gaik C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Cindy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Tung F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Wah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Hong Kong Chinese Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire in Patients with Bronchiectasis</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description><![CDATA[To validate the Hong Kong Chinese version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-HK) in patients with bronchiectasis. Outpatients (93 patients; 61 women; mean age [± SD], 59.0 ± 14.2 years) were assessed at baseline by the SGRQ-HK, the Hong Kong Chinese version of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36-HK), and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Forty randomly selected patients also were reassessed at 2 weeks for repeatability. Seventy-two patients were further reassessed at 6 months for responsiveness. Cronbach α coefficients, which reflected internal consistency, were > 0.7 for all SGRQ-HK components except for symptoms (α = 0.59), and the intraclass correlation coefficients between baseline and the 2-week follow-up visits were between 0.80 and 0.94 (p > 0.05). SGRQ-HK component scores and total scores correlated with all the component scores of the SF-36-HK and the HADS (p < 0.02). SGRQ-HK component scores and total scores correlated with the scores of the SF-36-HK and the HADS, confirming the concurrent validity. All SGRQ-HK scores correlated negatively with FEV1, FVC, and arterial oxygen saturation (p < 0.005), while the activity score correlated with the Karnofsky performance scale and the number of bronchiectatic lobes (p < 0.001). SGRQ-HK scores positively correlated with Borg scale scores, exacerbation frequency, and 24-h sputum volumes (p < 0.03). Patients with 24-h sputum volumes of ≥ 10 mL or < 10 mL had significantly different SQRG-HK component scores and total scores (p < 0.002), although this sensitivity was not displayed by scores on the HADS or the SF-36-HK. Patients with 25% reductions in 24-h sputum volumes had significant improvements in SGRQ-HK activity scores, impact scores, and total scores (p < 0.02), but not in other quality-of-life measures or clinical parameters, indicating the responsiveness of the SGRQ-HK. The SGRQ-HK is a valid and sensitive instrument for determining quality of life in bronchiectasis patients.]]></description><subject>Bilingualism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>bronchiectasis</subject><subject>Bronchiectasis - physiopathology</subject><subject>China - ethnology</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Dyspnea</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>hospital anxious and depression scale</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>MOS short form-36</subject><subject>Oxygen saturation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pneumology</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Respiratory Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>St. George Respiratory Questionnaire</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kd2LEzEUxYMobl1990mCoG8z5jsd39aiu-KC3_saMpk7nSzTpCZTy_73pnagKviSEPidc0_uQegpJTXlevnKDZCnmjJWq5oRTu6hBW04rbgU_D5aEEJZxVXDztCjnG9JedNGPURnlAktl4Iv0P7Gjr6zk48Bxx5PA-CrGNb4w-FYDT5ABnwDKf8BfJ1qfAkxrQF_gbz1yU4x3eHPuxKmYMH6BNgH_KnYQpgy3vtpwG9SDG7w4CabfX6MHvR2zPBkvs_R93dvv62uquuPl-9XF9eVE0JMVfkaZa1S0FnCGGs5Fda2eik5ZZpL3SurJSeubZdOMugY66TkgoDTjFkq-Dl6efTdpvjjENBsfHYwjjZA3GWjmVaNaFQBn_8D3sZdCiWbYYQIqZTUBSJHyKWYc4LebJPf2HRnKDGHRszvRkyJbZQ5NFIkz2bfXbuB7iSYKyjAixmw2dmxTzY4n0-cEKQhip9mD3497MuKTd7YcSy2_Dh1zvvX7NdHCZQN__SQTHalEQddkbvJdNH_P_gvxhu5Mw</recordid><startdate>20021201</startdate><enddate>20021201</enddate><creator>Chan, Shelley L.</creator><creator>Chan-Yeung, Moira M.</creator><creator>Ooi, Gaik C.</creator><creator>Lam, Cindy L.</creator><creator>Cheung, Tung F.</creator><creator>Lam, Wah K.</creator><creator>Tsang, Kenneth W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American College of Chest Physicians</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021201</creationdate><title>Validation of the Hong Kong Chinese Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire in Patients with Bronchiectasis</title><author>Chan, Shelley L. ; Chan-Yeung, Moira M. ; Ooi, Gaik C. ; Lam, Cindy L. ; Cheung, Tung F. ; Lam, Wah K. ; Tsang, Kenneth W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-12212b66eda0222b314aab7853127357f6a7530cbb8c52ed22d55340ec722a143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Bilingualism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>bronchiectasis</topic><topic>Bronchiectasis - physiopathology</topic><topic>China - ethnology</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Dyspnea</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>hospital anxious and depression scale</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>MOS short form-36</topic><topic>Oxygen saturation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pneumology</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Respiratory Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>St. George Respiratory Questionnaire</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Shelley L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan-Yeung, Moira M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ooi, Gaik C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Cindy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Tung F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Wah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsang, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Shelley L.</au><au>Chan-Yeung, Moira M.</au><au>Ooi, Gaik C.</au><au>Lam, Cindy L.</au><au>Cheung, Tung F.</au><au>Lam, Wah K.</au><au>Tsang, Kenneth W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Hong Kong Chinese Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire in Patients with Bronchiectasis</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>2002-12-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2030</spage><epage>2037</epage><pages>2030-2037</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><coden>CHETBF</coden><abstract><![CDATA[To validate the Hong Kong Chinese version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-HK) in patients with bronchiectasis. Outpatients (93 patients; 61 women; mean age [± SD], 59.0 ± 14.2 years) were assessed at baseline by the SGRQ-HK, the Hong Kong Chinese version of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36-HK), and the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). Forty randomly selected patients also were reassessed at 2 weeks for repeatability. Seventy-two patients were further reassessed at 6 months for responsiveness. Cronbach α coefficients, which reflected internal consistency, were > 0.7 for all SGRQ-HK components except for symptoms (α = 0.59), and the intraclass correlation coefficients between baseline and the 2-week follow-up visits were between 0.80 and 0.94 (p > 0.05). SGRQ-HK component scores and total scores correlated with all the component scores of the SF-36-HK and the HADS (p < 0.02). SGRQ-HK component scores and total scores correlated with the scores of the SF-36-HK and the HADS, confirming the concurrent validity. All SGRQ-HK scores correlated negatively with FEV1, FVC, and arterial oxygen saturation (p < 0.005), while the activity score correlated with the Karnofsky performance scale and the number of bronchiectatic lobes (p < 0.001). SGRQ-HK scores positively correlated with Borg scale scores, exacerbation frequency, and 24-h sputum volumes (p < 0.03). Patients with 24-h sputum volumes of ≥ 10 mL or < 10 mL had significantly different SQRG-HK component scores and total scores (p < 0.002), although this sensitivity was not displayed by scores on the HADS or the SF-36-HK. Patients with 25% reductions in 24-h sputum volumes had significant improvements in SGRQ-HK activity scores, impact scores, and total scores (p < 0.02), but not in other quality-of-life measures or clinical parameters, indicating the responsiveness of the SGRQ-HK. The SGRQ-HK is a valid and sensitive instrument for determining quality of life in bronchiectasis patients.]]></abstract><cop>Northbrook, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12475843</pmid><doi>10.1378/chest.122.6.2030</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 2002-12, Vol.122 (6), p.2030-2037
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72769496
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Bilingualism
Biological and medical sciences
bronchiectasis
Bronchiectasis - physiopathology
China - ethnology
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Dyspnea
Female
Health surveys
Hong Kong
hospital anxious and depression scale
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
MOS short form-36
Oxygen saturation
Patients
Pneumology
Quality of Life
Questionnaires
Respiratory Physiological Phenomena
Respiratory system : syndromes and miscellaneous diseases
Sensitivity and Specificity
St. George Respiratory Questionnaire
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
title Validation of the Hong Kong Chinese Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire in Patients with Bronchiectasis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A09%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Hong%20Kong%20Chinese%20Version%20of%20the%20St.%20George%20Respiratory%20Questionnaire%20in%20Patients%20with%20Bronchiectasis&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Chan,%20Shelley%20L.&rft.date=2002-12-01&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2030&rft.epage=2037&rft.pages=2030-2037&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft.coden=CHETBF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1378/chest.122.6.2030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72769496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=200456657&rft_id=info:pmid/12475843&rft_els_id=S0012369215508222&rfr_iscdi=true