Preemptive Strategy for Ganciclovir Administration Against Cytomegalovirus in Liver Transplantation Recipients

In utilizing a preemptive strategy to minimize the occurrence of symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following liver transplant, only patients with proven CMV activity by direct detection are treated. We applied the following preemptive strategy for CMV infection to 49 sequential liver trans...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of transplantation 2002-11, Vol.2 (10), p.955-958
Hauptverfasser: Daly, Jennifer S., Kopasz, Andrea, Anandakrishnan, Raji, Robins, Terry, Mehta2, Savant, Halvorsen, Michelle, Katz, Eliezer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 958
container_issue 10
container_start_page 955
container_title American journal of transplantation
container_volume 2
creator Daly, Jennifer S.
Kopasz, Andrea
Anandakrishnan, Raji
Robins, Terry
Mehta2, Savant
Halvorsen, Michelle
Katz, Eliezer
description In utilizing a preemptive strategy to minimize the occurrence of symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following liver transplant, only patients with proven CMV activity by direct detection are treated. We applied the following preemptive strategy for CMV infection to 49 sequential liver transplant recipients between 1998 and 2001. Patients were monitored for CMV activity using CMV p65 antigen assay for the first 10 months of the study. Thereafter, we changed the detection method to a quantitative PCR for plasma CMV‐DNA. All patients were monitored post transplant, weekly for the first 3 months and then monthly. Only patients with detected CMV activity were treated with ganciclovir. Patients were divided into four groups, based on donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV status. In seven out of 49 patients (14.3%) CMV activity was detected: four in group D +/R –, and three in group D –/R –. Five out of these seven patients had asymptomatic CMV infection. Symptomatic CMV infection developed only in two of these seven patients, to give total rate of 4.1% (2/49). All seven patients developed CMV IgG antibody. ‘Transient’ CMV replication detected by PCR in five patients in group D +/R+ was not defined as infection. No patients developed organ‐invasive CMV disease. The cost of anti‐CMV treatment using the preemptive strategy was $1000/patient/1st year. Using preemptive strategy, early detection of CMV infection was achieved, allowing timely treatment. The use of ganciclovir for CMV infection in only 4.3% of the patients should have a positive impact on minimizing the risk of ganciclovir‐resistant virus, and should reduce the cost of CMV prevention strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.21012.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72766391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18811896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-fcae54cb88e1000c5a9a259dadf809ab325495623168b2ae44003997637f82c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9PwkAQxTdGI4p-BbMnb9T913Z7MSFEUUOiUTxvlmVKlrTbulsQvr0tEDzqaSaZ33szmYcQpiSihIu7ZUQTQgYJFTxihLCIUUJZtDlBF8fB6bHncQ9dhrAkhKZMsnPUo0xIRoW8QO7NA5R1Y9eAPxqvG1hscV55PNbOWFNUa-vxcF5aZ0M3tpXDw4W2LjR4tG2qEhZ6B60Ctg5PWh-Pp167UBfaNXvBOxhbW3BNuEJnuS4CXB9qH30-PkxHT4PJ6_h5NJwMjBApG-RGQyzMTEqghBAT60yzOJvreS5JpmecxSKLE8ZpImdMgxCE8CxLE57mkhnJ--h271v76msFoVGlDQaK9iaoVkGlLE0SntE_QSolpTJLWlDuQeOrEDzkqva21H6rKFFdKGqpun-r7veqC0XtQlGbVnpz2LGalTD_FR5SaIH7PfBtC9j-21gNX6a7lv8ATJKccQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18811896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preemptive Strategy for Ganciclovir Administration Against Cytomegalovirus in Liver Transplantation Recipients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Daly, Jennifer S. ; Kopasz, Andrea ; Anandakrishnan, Raji ; Robins, Terry ; Mehta2, Savant ; Halvorsen, Michelle ; Katz, Eliezer</creator><creatorcontrib>Daly, Jennifer S. ; Kopasz, Andrea ; Anandakrishnan, Raji ; Robins, Terry ; Mehta2, Savant ; Halvorsen, Michelle ; Katz, Eliezer</creatorcontrib><description>In utilizing a preemptive strategy to minimize the occurrence of symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following liver transplant, only patients with proven CMV activity by direct detection are treated. We applied the following preemptive strategy for CMV infection to 49 sequential liver transplant recipients between 1998 and 2001. Patients were monitored for CMV activity using CMV p65 antigen assay for the first 10 months of the study. Thereafter, we changed the detection method to a quantitative PCR for plasma CMV‐DNA. All patients were monitored post transplant, weekly for the first 3 months and then monthly. Only patients with detected CMV activity were treated with ganciclovir. Patients were divided into four groups, based on donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV status. In seven out of 49 patients (14.3%) CMV activity was detected: four in group D +/R –, and three in group D –/R –. Five out of these seven patients had asymptomatic CMV infection. Symptomatic CMV infection developed only in two of these seven patients, to give total rate of 4.1% (2/49). All seven patients developed CMV IgG antibody. ‘Transient’ CMV replication detected by PCR in five patients in group D +/R+ was not defined as infection. No patients developed organ‐invasive CMV disease. The cost of anti‐CMV treatment using the preemptive strategy was $1000/patient/1st year. Using preemptive strategy, early detection of CMV infection was achieved, allowing timely treatment. The use of ganciclovir for CMV infection in only 4.3% of the patients should have a positive impact on minimizing the risk of ganciclovir‐resistant virus, and should reduce the cost of CMV prevention strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.21012.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12482148</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Cytomegalovirus - genetics ; Cytomegalovirus - isolation &amp; purification ; Cytomegalovirus infection ; Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Ganciclovir - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous ; liver transplantation ; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects ; Liver Transplantation - mortality ; Massachusetts ; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; preemptive strategy ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2002-11, Vol.2 (10), p.955-958</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-fcae54cb88e1000c5a9a259dadf809ab325495623168b2ae44003997637f82c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-fcae54cb88e1000c5a9a259dadf809ab325495623168b2ae44003997637f82c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1034%2Fj.1600-6143.2002.21012.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1034%2Fj.1600-6143.2002.21012.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12482148$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Daly, Jennifer S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopasz, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anandakrishnan, Raji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robins, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta2, Savant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvorsen, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Eliezer</creatorcontrib><title>Preemptive Strategy for Ganciclovir Administration Against Cytomegalovirus in Liver Transplantation Recipients</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>In utilizing a preemptive strategy to minimize the occurrence of symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following liver transplant, only patients with proven CMV activity by direct detection are treated. We applied the following preemptive strategy for CMV infection to 49 sequential liver transplant recipients between 1998 and 2001. Patients were monitored for CMV activity using CMV p65 antigen assay for the first 10 months of the study. Thereafter, we changed the detection method to a quantitative PCR for plasma CMV‐DNA. All patients were monitored post transplant, weekly for the first 3 months and then monthly. Only patients with detected CMV activity were treated with ganciclovir. Patients were divided into four groups, based on donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV status. In seven out of 49 patients (14.3%) CMV activity was detected: four in group D +/R –, and three in group D –/R –. Five out of these seven patients had asymptomatic CMV infection. Symptomatic CMV infection developed only in two of these seven patients, to give total rate of 4.1% (2/49). All seven patients developed CMV IgG antibody. ‘Transient’ CMV replication detected by PCR in five patients in group D +/R+ was not defined as infection. No patients developed organ‐invasive CMV disease. The cost of anti‐CMV treatment using the preemptive strategy was $1000/patient/1st year. Using preemptive strategy, early detection of CMV infection was achieved, allowing timely treatment. The use of ganciclovir for CMV infection in only 4.3% of the patients should have a positive impact on minimizing the risk of ganciclovir‐resistant virus, and should reduce the cost of CMV prevention strategies.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus - genetics</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus infection</subject><subject>Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Ganciclovir - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - mortality</subject><subject>Massachusetts</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>preemptive strategy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9PwkAQxTdGI4p-BbMnb9T913Z7MSFEUUOiUTxvlmVKlrTbulsQvr0tEDzqaSaZ33szmYcQpiSihIu7ZUQTQgYJFTxihLCIUUJZtDlBF8fB6bHncQ9dhrAkhKZMsnPUo0xIRoW8QO7NA5R1Y9eAPxqvG1hscV55PNbOWFNUa-vxcF5aZ0M3tpXDw4W2LjR4tG2qEhZ6B60Ctg5PWh-Pp167UBfaNXvBOxhbW3BNuEJnuS4CXB9qH30-PkxHT4PJ6_h5NJwMjBApG-RGQyzMTEqghBAT60yzOJvreS5JpmecxSKLE8ZpImdMgxCE8CxLE57mkhnJ--h271v76msFoVGlDQaK9iaoVkGlLE0SntE_QSolpTJLWlDuQeOrEDzkqva21H6rKFFdKGqpun-r7veqC0XtQlGbVnpz2LGalTD_FR5SaIH7PfBtC9j-21gNX6a7lv8ATJKccQ</recordid><startdate>200211</startdate><enddate>200211</enddate><creator>Daly, Jennifer S.</creator><creator>Kopasz, Andrea</creator><creator>Anandakrishnan, Raji</creator><creator>Robins, Terry</creator><creator>Mehta2, Savant</creator><creator>Halvorsen, Michelle</creator><creator>Katz, Eliezer</creator><general>Munksgaard International Publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200211</creationdate><title>Preemptive Strategy for Ganciclovir Administration Against Cytomegalovirus in Liver Transplantation Recipients</title><author>Daly, Jennifer S. ; Kopasz, Andrea ; Anandakrishnan, Raji ; Robins, Terry ; Mehta2, Savant ; Halvorsen, Michelle ; Katz, Eliezer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4472-fcae54cb88e1000c5a9a259dadf809ab325495623168b2ae44003997637f82c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus - genetics</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus infection</topic><topic>Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Ganciclovir - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - mortality</topic><topic>Massachusetts</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>preemptive strategy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Daly, Jennifer S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kopasz, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anandakrishnan, Raji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robins, Terry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta2, Savant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halvorsen, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Eliezer</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Daly, Jennifer S.</au><au>Kopasz, Andrea</au><au>Anandakrishnan, Raji</au><au>Robins, Terry</au><au>Mehta2, Savant</au><au>Halvorsen, Michelle</au><au>Katz, Eliezer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preemptive Strategy for Ganciclovir Administration Against Cytomegalovirus in Liver Transplantation Recipients</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2002-11</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>955</spage><epage>958</epage><pages>955-958</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>In utilizing a preemptive strategy to minimize the occurrence of symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection following liver transplant, only patients with proven CMV activity by direct detection are treated. We applied the following preemptive strategy for CMV infection to 49 sequential liver transplant recipients between 1998 and 2001. Patients were monitored for CMV activity using CMV p65 antigen assay for the first 10 months of the study. Thereafter, we changed the detection method to a quantitative PCR for plasma CMV‐DNA. All patients were monitored post transplant, weekly for the first 3 months and then monthly. Only patients with detected CMV activity were treated with ganciclovir. Patients were divided into four groups, based on donor (D) and recipient (R) CMV status. In seven out of 49 patients (14.3%) CMV activity was detected: four in group D +/R –, and three in group D –/R –. Five out of these seven patients had asymptomatic CMV infection. Symptomatic CMV infection developed only in two of these seven patients, to give total rate of 4.1% (2/49). All seven patients developed CMV IgG antibody. ‘Transient’ CMV replication detected by PCR in five patients in group D +/R+ was not defined as infection. No patients developed organ‐invasive CMV disease. The cost of anti‐CMV treatment using the preemptive strategy was $1000/patient/1st year. Using preemptive strategy, early detection of CMV infection was achieved, allowing timely treatment. The use of ganciclovir for CMV infection in only 4.3% of the patients should have a positive impact on minimizing the risk of ganciclovir‐resistant virus, and should reduce the cost of CMV prevention strategies.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Munksgaard International Publishers</pub><pmid>12482148</pmid><doi>10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.21012.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1600-6135
ispartof American journal of transplantation, 2002-11, Vol.2 (10), p.955-958
issn 1600-6135
1600-6143
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72766391
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administration, Oral
Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use
Costs and Cost Analysis
Cytomegalovirus - genetics
Cytomegalovirus - isolation & purification
Cytomegalovirus infection
Cytomegalovirus Infections - prevention & control
Ganciclovir - therapeutic use
Humans
Injections, Intravenous
liver transplantation
Liver Transplantation - adverse effects
Liver Transplantation - mortality
Massachusetts
Monitoring, Physiologic - methods
Polymerase Chain Reaction
preemptive strategy
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Time Factors
title Preemptive Strategy for Ganciclovir Administration Against Cytomegalovirus in Liver Transplantation Recipients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A05%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preemptive%20Strategy%20for%20Ganciclovir%20Administration%20Against%20Cytomegalovirus%20in%20Liver%20Transplantation%20Recipients&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Daly,%20Jennifer%20S.&rft.date=2002-11&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=955&rft.epage=958&rft.pages=955-958&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.21012.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18811896%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18811896&rft_id=info:pmid/12482148&rfr_iscdi=true