Does Pornography-Blocking Software Block Access to Health Information on the Internet?
CONTEXT The Internet has become an important tool for finding health information, especially among adolescents. Many computers have software designed to block access to Internet pornography. Because pornography-blocking software cannot perfectly discriminate between pornographic and nonpornographic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2002-12, Vol.288 (22), p.2887-2894 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2894 |
---|---|
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 2887 |
container_title | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association |
container_volume | 288 |
creator | Richardson, Caroline R Resnick, Paul J Hansen, Derek L Derry, Holly A Rideout, Victoria J |
description | CONTEXT The Internet has become an important tool for finding health information,
especially among adolescents. Many computers have software designed to block
access to Internet pornography. Because pornography-blocking software cannot
perfectly discriminate between pornographic and nonpornographic Web sites,
such products may block access to health information sites, particularly those
related to sexuality. OBJECTIVE To quantify the extent to which pornography-blocking software used in
schools and libraries limits access to health information Web sites. DESIGN AND SETTING In a simulation of adolescent Internet searching, we compiled search
results from 24 health information searches (n = 3206) and 6 pornography searches
(n = 781). We then classified the content of each site as either health information
(n = 2467), pornography (n = 516), or other (n = 1004). We also compiled a
list of top teen health information sites (n = 586). We then tested 6 blocking
products commonly used in schools and libraries and 1 blocking product used
on home computers, each at 2 or 3 levels of blocking restrictiveness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Rates of health information and pornography blocking. RESULTS At the least restrictive blocking setting, configured to block only
pornography, the products blocked a mean of only 1.4% of health information
sites. The differences between blocking products was small (range, 0.6%-2.3%).
However, about 10% of health sites found using some search terms related to
sexuality (eg, safe sex, condoms) and homosexuality (eg, gay) were blocked.
The mean pornography blocking rate was 87% (range, 84%-90%). At moderate settings,
the mean blocking rate was 5% for health information and 90% for pornography.
At the most restrictive settings, health information blocking increased substantially
(24%), but pornography blocking was only slightly higher (91%). CONCLUSIONS Blocking settings have a greater impact than choice of blocking product
on frequency of health information blocking. At their least restrictive settings,
overblocking of general health information poses a relatively minor impediment.
However, searches on some terms related to sexuality led to substantially
more health information blocking. More restrictive blocking configurations
blocked pornography only slightly more, but substantially increased blocking
of health information sites. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1001/jama.288.22.2887 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72756293</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>195607</ama_id><sourcerecordid>72756293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-b6aec35e1cca6d795ec96797228fca348853c7eb03b36ec7d2c15210999f5dbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0d1LwzAQAPAgipvTd32RIuhbZz6aJnmSOT8mCAp-vJY0u26dbTOTDNl_b9SJYDg4uPtxHBeEDgkeEozJ-UK3ekilHFL6lcQW6hPOZMq4ktuoj7GSqchk1kN73i9wfISJXdQjNBOUMdpHr1cWfPJoXWdnTi_n6_Syseat7mbJk63Ch3aQfFeSkTHgfRJsMgHdhHly11XWtTrUtktihDnEUgDXQbjYRzuVbjwcbPIAvdxcP48n6f3D7d14dJ9qJkhIy1yDYRyIMTqfCsXBqFwoQamsjGaZlJwZASVmJcvBiCk1hFOClVIVn5aGDdDZz9yls-8r8KFoa2-gaXQHduULQQXPqWIRnvyDC7tyXdytoIQwmvEsj-h4g1ZlC9Ni6epWu3Xxe64ITjdAe6ObyunO1P7PZUxhmqnojn5c_J-_ruI5FuwTEjmBTg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>211324546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Pornography-Blocking Software Block Access to Health Information on the Internet?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Richardson, Caroline R ; Resnick, Paul J ; Hansen, Derek L ; Derry, Holly A ; Rideout, Victoria J</creator><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline R ; Resnick, Paul J ; Hansen, Derek L ; Derry, Holly A ; Rideout, Victoria J</creatorcontrib><description>CONTEXT The Internet has become an important tool for finding health information,
especially among adolescents. Many computers have software designed to block
access to Internet pornography. Because pornography-blocking software cannot
perfectly discriminate between pornographic and nonpornographic Web sites,
such products may block access to health information sites, particularly those
related to sexuality. OBJECTIVE To quantify the extent to which pornography-blocking software used in
schools and libraries limits access to health information Web sites. DESIGN AND SETTING In a simulation of adolescent Internet searching, we compiled search
results from 24 health information searches (n = 3206) and 6 pornography searches
(n = 781). We then classified the content of each site as either health information
(n = 2467), pornography (n = 516), or other (n = 1004). We also compiled a
list of top teen health information sites (n = 586). We then tested 6 blocking
products commonly used in schools and libraries and 1 blocking product used
on home computers, each at 2 or 3 levels of blocking restrictiveness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Rates of health information and pornography blocking. RESULTS At the least restrictive blocking setting, configured to block only
pornography, the products blocked a mean of only 1.4% of health information
sites. The differences between blocking products was small (range, 0.6%-2.3%).
However, about 10% of health sites found using some search terms related to
sexuality (eg, safe sex, condoms) and homosexuality (eg, gay) were blocked.
The mean pornography blocking rate was 87% (range, 84%-90%). At moderate settings,
the mean blocking rate was 5% for health information and 90% for pornography.
At the most restrictive settings, health information blocking increased substantially
(24%), but pornography blocking was only slightly higher (91%). CONCLUSIONS Blocking settings have a greater impact than choice of blocking product
on frequency of health information blocking. At their least restrictive settings,
overblocking of general health information poses a relatively minor impediment.
However, searches on some terms related to sexuality led to substantially
more health information blocking. More restrictive blocking configurations
blocked pornography only slightly more, but substantially increased blocking
of health information sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-7484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2887</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12472332</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMAAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Access to Information ; Adolescent ; Biological and medical sciences ; Computer Simulation ; Erotica ; Filtering software ; Health ; Health Education ; Humans ; Internet ; Medical Informatics ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Pornography & obscenity ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Security Measures ; Sexuality ; Software ; Websites</subject><ispartof>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2002-12, Vol.288 (22), p.2887-2894</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Medical Association Dec 11, 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-b6aec35e1cca6d795ec96797228fca348853c7eb03b36ec7d2c15210999f5dbc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/10.1001/jama.288.22.2887$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/10.1001/jama.288.22.2887$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,780,784,3340,27924,27925,76489,76492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14390249$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12472332$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resnick, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Derek L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derry, Holly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rideout, Victoria J</creatorcontrib><title>Does Pornography-Blocking Software Block Access to Health Information on the Internet?</title><title>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</title><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><description>CONTEXT The Internet has become an important tool for finding health information,
especially among adolescents. Many computers have software designed to block
access to Internet pornography. Because pornography-blocking software cannot
perfectly discriminate between pornographic and nonpornographic Web sites,
such products may block access to health information sites, particularly those
related to sexuality. OBJECTIVE To quantify the extent to which pornography-blocking software used in
schools and libraries limits access to health information Web sites. DESIGN AND SETTING In a simulation of adolescent Internet searching, we compiled search
results from 24 health information searches (n = 3206) and 6 pornography searches
(n = 781). We then classified the content of each site as either health information
(n = 2467), pornography (n = 516), or other (n = 1004). We also compiled a
list of top teen health information sites (n = 586). We then tested 6 blocking
products commonly used in schools and libraries and 1 blocking product used
on home computers, each at 2 or 3 levels of blocking restrictiveness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Rates of health information and pornography blocking. RESULTS At the least restrictive blocking setting, configured to block only
pornography, the products blocked a mean of only 1.4% of health information
sites. The differences between blocking products was small (range, 0.6%-2.3%).
However, about 10% of health sites found using some search terms related to
sexuality (eg, safe sex, condoms) and homosexuality (eg, gay) were blocked.
The mean pornography blocking rate was 87% (range, 84%-90%). At moderate settings,
the mean blocking rate was 5% for health information and 90% for pornography.
At the most restrictive settings, health information blocking increased substantially
(24%), but pornography blocking was only slightly higher (91%). CONCLUSIONS Blocking settings have a greater impact than choice of blocking product
on frequency of health information blocking. At their least restrictive settings,
overblocking of general health information poses a relatively minor impediment.
However, searches on some terms related to sexuality led to substantially
more health information blocking. More restrictive blocking configurations
blocked pornography only slightly more, but substantially increased blocking
of health information sites.</description><subject>Access to Information</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Erotica</subject><subject>Filtering software</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Medical Informatics</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Pornography & obscenity</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Security Measures</subject><subject>Sexuality</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>0098-7484</issn><issn>1538-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0d1LwzAQAPAgipvTd32RIuhbZz6aJnmSOT8mCAp-vJY0u26dbTOTDNl_b9SJYDg4uPtxHBeEDgkeEozJ-UK3ekilHFL6lcQW6hPOZMq4ktuoj7GSqchk1kN73i9wfISJXdQjNBOUMdpHr1cWfPJoXWdnTi_n6_Syseat7mbJk63Ch3aQfFeSkTHgfRJsMgHdhHly11XWtTrUtktihDnEUgDXQbjYRzuVbjwcbPIAvdxcP48n6f3D7d14dJ9qJkhIy1yDYRyIMTqfCsXBqFwoQamsjGaZlJwZASVmJcvBiCk1hFOClVIVn5aGDdDZz9yls-8r8KFoa2-gaXQHduULQQXPqWIRnvyDC7tyXdytoIQwmvEsj-h4g1ZlC9Ni6epWu3Xxe64ITjdAe6ObyunO1P7PZUxhmqnojn5c_J-_ruI5FuwTEjmBTg</recordid><startdate>20021211</startdate><enddate>20021211</enddate><creator>Richardson, Caroline R</creator><creator>Resnick, Paul J</creator><creator>Hansen, Derek L</creator><creator>Derry, Holly A</creator><creator>Rideout, Victoria J</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021211</creationdate><title>Does Pornography-Blocking Software Block Access to Health Information on the Internet?</title><author>Richardson, Caroline R ; Resnick, Paul J ; Hansen, Derek L ; Derry, Holly A ; Rideout, Victoria J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-b6aec35e1cca6d795ec96797228fca348853c7eb03b36ec7d2c15210999f5dbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Access to Information</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Erotica</topic><topic>Filtering software</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Medical Informatics</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Pornography & obscenity</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Security Measures</topic><topic>Sexuality</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Caroline R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Resnick, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Derek L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derry, Holly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rideout, Victoria J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richardson, Caroline R</au><au>Resnick, Paul J</au><au>Hansen, Derek L</au><au>Derry, Holly A</au><au>Rideout, Victoria J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Pornography-Blocking Software Block Access to Health Information on the Internet?</atitle><jtitle>JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA</addtitle><date>2002-12-11</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>288</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>2887</spage><epage>2894</epage><pages>2887-2894</pages><issn>0098-7484</issn><eissn>1538-3598</eissn><coden>JAMAAP</coden><abstract>CONTEXT The Internet has become an important tool for finding health information,
especially among adolescents. Many computers have software designed to block
access to Internet pornography. Because pornography-blocking software cannot
perfectly discriminate between pornographic and nonpornographic Web sites,
such products may block access to health information sites, particularly those
related to sexuality. OBJECTIVE To quantify the extent to which pornography-blocking software used in
schools and libraries limits access to health information Web sites. DESIGN AND SETTING In a simulation of adolescent Internet searching, we compiled search
results from 24 health information searches (n = 3206) and 6 pornography searches
(n = 781). We then classified the content of each site as either health information
(n = 2467), pornography (n = 516), or other (n = 1004). We also compiled a
list of top teen health information sites (n = 586). We then tested 6 blocking
products commonly used in schools and libraries and 1 blocking product used
on home computers, each at 2 or 3 levels of blocking restrictiveness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Rates of health information and pornography blocking. RESULTS At the least restrictive blocking setting, configured to block only
pornography, the products blocked a mean of only 1.4% of health information
sites. The differences between blocking products was small (range, 0.6%-2.3%).
However, about 10% of health sites found using some search terms related to
sexuality (eg, safe sex, condoms) and homosexuality (eg, gay) were blocked.
The mean pornography blocking rate was 87% (range, 84%-90%). At moderate settings,
the mean blocking rate was 5% for health information and 90% for pornography.
At the most restrictive settings, health information blocking increased substantially
(24%), but pornography blocking was only slightly higher (91%). CONCLUSIONS Blocking settings have a greater impact than choice of blocking product
on frequency of health information blocking. At their least restrictive settings,
overblocking of general health information poses a relatively minor impediment.
However, searches on some terms related to sexuality led to substantially
more health information blocking. More restrictive blocking configurations
blocked pornography only slightly more, but substantially increased blocking
of health information sites.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>12472332</pmid><doi>10.1001/jama.288.22.2887</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-7484 |
ispartof | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2002-12, Vol.288 (22), p.2887-2894 |
issn | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72756293 |
source | MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals |
subjects | Access to Information Adolescent Biological and medical sciences Computer Simulation Erotica Filtering software Health Health Education Humans Internet Medical Informatics Medical sciences Miscellaneous Pornography & obscenity Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Security Measures Sexuality Software Websites |
title | Does Pornography-Blocking Software Block Access to Health Information on the Internet? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Pornography-Blocking%20Software%20Block%20Access%20to%20Health%20Information%20on%20the%20Internet?&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20:%20the%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Richardson,%20Caroline%20R&rft.date=2002-12-11&rft.volume=288&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=2887&rft.epage=2894&rft.pages=2887-2894&rft.issn=0098-7484&rft.eissn=1538-3598&rft.coden=JAMAAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jama.288.22.2887&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72756293%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=211324546&rft_id=info:pmid/12472332&rft_ama_id=195607&rfr_iscdi=true |