Sclerotherapy vs. esophageal transection vs. distal splenorenal shunt for the clinical management of esophageal varices in patients with child class A and B liver function: A prospective randomized trial

Ninety‐six patients with good liver function (Child class A or B) and esophageal varices were randomly assigned to one of three groups given different treatments: endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (n = 32), esophageal transection (n = 32) or distal splenorenal shunt (n = 32). Five patients (5.2%) h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 1992-01, Vol.15 (1), p.63-68
Hauptverfasser: Kitano, Seigo, Iso, Yasunori, Hashizume, Makoto, Yamaga, Hirohiko, Koyanagi, Nobuhiro, Wada, Hiroya, Iwanaga, Tetsuya, Ohta, Masayuki, Sugimachi, Keizo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 68
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)
container_volume 15
creator Kitano, Seigo
Iso, Yasunori
Hashizume, Makoto
Yamaga, Hirohiko
Koyanagi, Nobuhiro
Wada, Hiroya
Iwanaga, Tetsuya
Ohta, Masayuki
Sugimachi, Keizo
description Ninety‐six patients with good liver function (Child class A or B) and esophageal varices were randomly assigned to one of three groups given different treatments: endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (n = 32), esophageal transection (n = 32) or distal splenorenal shunt (n = 32). Five patients (5.2%) had to be excluded from this study because severe chronic pancreatitis made separation of the distal splenic vein from the pancreatic bed difficult. Esophageal transection was performed for these patients. No deaths occurred during the 30 days of treatment. The 5‐yr cumulative bleeding rates were 0%, 5.9% and 12.9% in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, esophageal transection and distal splenorenal shunt groups, respectively (no statistical significance). In no case in the three groups did death occur because of variceal bleeding. Sixteen patients died, mainly because of underlying liver disease; four were in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group, five were in the esophageal transection group and seven were in the distal splenorenal shunt group. No statistically significant difference in survival rate among the three groups was found. These results show that endoscopic injection sclerotherapy is a satisfactory alternative to esophageal transection or distal splenorenal shunt for the clinical management of patients with esophageal varices. (HEPATOLOGY 1992;15:63–68).
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hep.1840150113
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72755651</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72755651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-cee689fc35acf81202af79fae457cf5ff3c8c911de25a9eeaedb0df64042f3553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EKkvhyg3JB8Qti__Em4RbqUqLVAkk4BxNnTExcpzgSbZaviJfCm931fbGyda855-f5jH2Woq1FEK973Fay7oU0ggp9RO2kkZVhdZGPGUroSpRNFI3z9kLol9CiKZU9Qk7kZWqaiFX7O83GzCNc48Jph3f0pojjVMPPxECnxNEQjv7Md5Jnac5j2kKGMeEcX_vlzhzNyaeGdwGH73N4wFiRgyYtdE9Rm4heYvEfeQTzD4biN_6uee296HLACDiZxxixz_y4LeYuFviXYQPeT6lkaZ9oi3yHK4bB_8HuxzUQ3jJnjkIhK-O5yn78eni-_lVcf3l8vP52XVhtSp1YRE3deOsNmBdLZVQ4KrGAZamss44p21tGyk7VAYaRMDuRnRuU4pSOW2MPmXvDtwc5veCNLeDJ4shQMRxoTbv1piNkdm4PhhtTk0JXTslP0DatVK0-_ba3F770F5-8OZIXm4G7B7sh7qy_vaoA-Utu7wB6-neZuRmI9Ue0xxstz7g7j-ftlcXXx9F-Ac1V7ju</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72755651</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sclerotherapy vs. esophageal transection vs. distal splenorenal shunt for the clinical management of esophageal varices in patients with child class A and B liver function: A prospective randomized trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kitano, Seigo ; Iso, Yasunori ; Hashizume, Makoto ; Yamaga, Hirohiko ; Koyanagi, Nobuhiro ; Wada, Hiroya ; Iwanaga, Tetsuya ; Ohta, Masayuki ; Sugimachi, Keizo</creator><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Seigo ; Iso, Yasunori ; Hashizume, Makoto ; Yamaga, Hirohiko ; Koyanagi, Nobuhiro ; Wada, Hiroya ; Iwanaga, Tetsuya ; Ohta, Masayuki ; Sugimachi, Keizo</creatorcontrib><description>Ninety‐six patients with good liver function (Child class A or B) and esophageal varices were randomly assigned to one of three groups given different treatments: endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (n = 32), esophageal transection (n = 32) or distal splenorenal shunt (n = 32). Five patients (5.2%) had to be excluded from this study because severe chronic pancreatitis made separation of the distal splenic vein from the pancreatic bed difficult. Esophageal transection was performed for these patients. No deaths occurred during the 30 days of treatment. The 5‐yr cumulative bleeding rates were 0%, 5.9% and 12.9% in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, esophageal transection and distal splenorenal shunt groups, respectively (no statistical significance). In no case in the three groups did death occur because of variceal bleeding. Sixteen patients died, mainly because of underlying liver disease; four were in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group, five were in the esophageal transection group and seven were in the distal splenorenal shunt group. No statistically significant difference in survival rate among the three groups was found. These results show that endoscopic injection sclerotherapy is a satisfactory alternative to esophageal transection or distal splenorenal shunt for the clinical management of patients with esophageal varices. (HEPATOLOGY 1992;15:63–68).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-9139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840150113</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1727801</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HPTLD9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices - mortality ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices - physiopathology ; Esophageal and Gastric Varices - therapy ; Esophagus - surgery ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Humans ; Liver - physiopathology ; Medical sciences ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Sclerotherapy ; Splenorenal Shunt, Surgical ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 1992-01, Vol.15 (1), p.63-68</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1992 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-cee689fc35acf81202af79fae457cf5ff3c8c911de25a9eeaedb0df64042f3553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-cee689fc35acf81202af79fae457cf5ff3c8c911de25a9eeaedb0df64042f3553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhep.1840150113$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhep.1840150113$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5166123$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1727801$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Seigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iso, Yasunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashizume, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaga, Hirohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyanagi, Nobuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Hiroya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwanaga, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohta, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimachi, Keizo</creatorcontrib><title>Sclerotherapy vs. esophageal transection vs. distal splenorenal shunt for the clinical management of esophageal varices in patients with child class A and B liver function: A prospective randomized trial</title><title>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</title><addtitle>Hepatology</addtitle><description>Ninety‐six patients with good liver function (Child class A or B) and esophageal varices were randomly assigned to one of three groups given different treatments: endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (n = 32), esophageal transection (n = 32) or distal splenorenal shunt (n = 32). Five patients (5.2%) had to be excluded from this study because severe chronic pancreatitis made separation of the distal splenic vein from the pancreatic bed difficult. Esophageal transection was performed for these patients. No deaths occurred during the 30 days of treatment. The 5‐yr cumulative bleeding rates were 0%, 5.9% and 12.9% in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, esophageal transection and distal splenorenal shunt groups, respectively (no statistical significance). In no case in the three groups did death occur because of variceal bleeding. Sixteen patients died, mainly because of underlying liver disease; four were in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group, five were in the esophageal transection group and seven were in the distal splenorenal shunt group. No statistically significant difference in survival rate among the three groups was found. These results show that endoscopic injection sclerotherapy is a satisfactory alternative to esophageal transection or distal splenorenal shunt for the clinical management of patients with esophageal varices. (HEPATOLOGY 1992;15:63–68).</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - mortality</subject><subject>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - physiopathology</subject><subject>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - therapy</subject><subject>Esophagus - surgery</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver - physiopathology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Sclerotherapy</subject><subject>Splenorenal Shunt, Surgical</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0270-9139</issn><issn>1527-3350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EKkvhyg3JB8Qti__Em4RbqUqLVAkk4BxNnTExcpzgSbZaviJfCm931fbGyda855-f5jH2Woq1FEK973Fay7oU0ggp9RO2kkZVhdZGPGUroSpRNFI3z9kLol9CiKZU9Qk7kZWqaiFX7O83GzCNc48Jph3f0pojjVMPPxECnxNEQjv7Md5Jnac5j2kKGMeEcX_vlzhzNyaeGdwGH73N4wFiRgyYtdE9Rm4heYvEfeQTzD4biN_6uee296HLACDiZxxixz_y4LeYuFviXYQPeT6lkaZ9oi3yHK4bB_8HuxzUQ3jJnjkIhK-O5yn78eni-_lVcf3l8vP52XVhtSp1YRE3deOsNmBdLZVQ4KrGAZamss44p21tGyk7VAYaRMDuRnRuU4pSOW2MPmXvDtwc5veCNLeDJ4shQMRxoTbv1piNkdm4PhhtTk0JXTslP0DatVK0-_ba3F770F5-8OZIXm4G7B7sh7qy_vaoA-Utu7wB6-neZuRmI9Ue0xxstz7g7j-ftlcXXx9F-Ac1V7ju</recordid><startdate>199201</startdate><enddate>199201</enddate><creator>Kitano, Seigo</creator><creator>Iso, Yasunori</creator><creator>Hashizume, Makoto</creator><creator>Yamaga, Hirohiko</creator><creator>Koyanagi, Nobuhiro</creator><creator>Wada, Hiroya</creator><creator>Iwanaga, Tetsuya</creator><creator>Ohta, Masayuki</creator><creator>Sugimachi, Keizo</creator><general>W.B. Saunders</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199201</creationdate><title>Sclerotherapy vs. esophageal transection vs. distal splenorenal shunt for the clinical management of esophageal varices in patients with child class A and B liver function: A prospective randomized trial</title><author>Kitano, Seigo ; Iso, Yasunori ; Hashizume, Makoto ; Yamaga, Hirohiko ; Koyanagi, Nobuhiro ; Wada, Hiroya ; Iwanaga, Tetsuya ; Ohta, Masayuki ; Sugimachi, Keizo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3243-cee689fc35acf81202af79fae457cf5ff3c8c911de25a9eeaedb0df64042f3553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - mortality</topic><topic>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - physiopathology</topic><topic>Esophageal and Gastric Varices - therapy</topic><topic>Esophagus - surgery</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver - physiopathology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Sclerotherapy</topic><topic>Splenorenal Shunt, Surgical</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Seigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iso, Yasunori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashizume, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaga, Hirohiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyanagi, Nobuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Hiroya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwanaga, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohta, Masayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sugimachi, Keizo</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kitano, Seigo</au><au>Iso, Yasunori</au><au>Hashizume, Makoto</au><au>Yamaga, Hirohiko</au><au>Koyanagi, Nobuhiro</au><au>Wada, Hiroya</au><au>Iwanaga, Tetsuya</au><au>Ohta, Masayuki</au><au>Sugimachi, Keizo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sclerotherapy vs. esophageal transection vs. distal splenorenal shunt for the clinical management of esophageal varices in patients with child class A and B liver function: A prospective randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)</jtitle><addtitle>Hepatology</addtitle><date>1992-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>63-68</pages><issn>0270-9139</issn><eissn>1527-3350</eissn><coden>HPTLD9</coden><abstract>Ninety‐six patients with good liver function (Child class A or B) and esophageal varices were randomly assigned to one of three groups given different treatments: endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (n = 32), esophageal transection (n = 32) or distal splenorenal shunt (n = 32). Five patients (5.2%) had to be excluded from this study because severe chronic pancreatitis made separation of the distal splenic vein from the pancreatic bed difficult. Esophageal transection was performed for these patients. No deaths occurred during the 30 days of treatment. The 5‐yr cumulative bleeding rates were 0%, 5.9% and 12.9% in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy, esophageal transection and distal splenorenal shunt groups, respectively (no statistical significance). In no case in the three groups did death occur because of variceal bleeding. Sixteen patients died, mainly because of underlying liver disease; four were in the endoscopic injection sclerotherapy group, five were in the esophageal transection group and seven were in the distal splenorenal shunt group. No statistically significant difference in survival rate among the three groups was found. These results show that endoscopic injection sclerotherapy is a satisfactory alternative to esophageal transection or distal splenorenal shunt for the clinical management of patients with esophageal varices. (HEPATOLOGY 1992;15:63–68).</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>W.B. Saunders</pub><pmid>1727801</pmid><doi>10.1002/hep.1840150113</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-9139
ispartof Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 1992-01, Vol.15 (1), p.63-68
issn 0270-9139
1527-3350
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72755651
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Esophageal and Gastric Varices - mortality
Esophageal and Gastric Varices - physiopathology
Esophageal and Gastric Varices - therapy
Esophagus - surgery
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Humans
Liver - physiopathology
Medical sciences
Prospective Studies
Recurrence
Sclerotherapy
Splenorenal Shunt, Surgical
Survival Analysis
Time Factors
title Sclerotherapy vs. esophageal transection vs. distal splenorenal shunt for the clinical management of esophageal varices in patients with child class A and B liver function: A prospective randomized trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T03%3A21%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sclerotherapy%20vs.%20esophageal%20transection%20vs.%20distal%20splenorenal%20shunt%20for%20the%20clinical%20management%20of%20esophageal%20varices%20in%20patients%20with%20child%20class%20A%20and%20B%20liver%20function:%20A%20prospective%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Hepatology%20(Baltimore,%20Md.)&rft.au=Kitano,%20Seigo&rft.date=1992-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=63-68&rft.issn=0270-9139&rft.eissn=1527-3350&rft.coden=HPTLD9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hep.1840150113&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72755651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72755651&rft_id=info:pmid/1727801&rfr_iscdi=true