Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance
In a previous study a set of first-generation (amber-colored) synthetic bones were tested and found to have an extremely variable interbone deformation response. Recently a second-generation (yellow-colored) fiber-reinforced epoxy femur became commercially available through Pacific Research Labs Inc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of applied biomaterials 1991, Vol.2 (4), p.277-280 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 280 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 277 |
container_title | Journal of applied biomaterials |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Szivek, J A Gealer, R L |
description | In a previous study a set of first-generation (amber-colored) synthetic bones were tested and found to have an extremely variable interbone deformation response. Recently a second-generation (yellow-colored) fiber-reinforced epoxy femur became commercially available through Pacific Research Labs Inc. (Vashon Island, WA). The deformation response of these bones in the proximal femur was characterized in anatomical bending to determine their usefulness in hip implant studies. Composite bones of adolescent size were tested. Two size-matched cadaveric femora were tested for comparison using the same fixtures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jab.770020410 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72753137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16139805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p238t-a88c338971ff134a385259f7de2419c003784e9383972a5e9395fe7ef401ac623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhj2AaCmMrMgTW4rPH7UzooovqRILzJGbnEtKYgc7Qeq_x4gyM91z9z466Y6QK2BLYIzf7u12qXUmJoGdkDkwqQppVjAj5yntGRPApTojM2CgAeRqTj7WoR9sbFPwNDg6viNt0IXY27HNo4hpCD7hT5YOPsdjW1PrG1rbxn5hzJ3DPkRLmym2fkdT20-dHbGhwWPR4W6XMY3W13hBTp3tEl4e64K8Pdy_rp-Kzcvj8_puUwxcmLGwxtRCmFKDcyCkFUZxVTrdIJdQ1vkKbSSWwohSc6sylcqhRicZ2HrFxYLc_O4dYvicMI1V36Yau856DFOqNNdKgND_irACURqmsnh9FKdtj001xLa38VD9_VF8AwAlcxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16139805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Szivek, J A ; Gealer, R L</creator><creatorcontrib>Szivek, J A ; Gealer, R L</creatorcontrib><description>In a previous study a set of first-generation (amber-colored) synthetic bones were tested and found to have an extremely variable interbone deformation response. Recently a second-generation (yellow-colored) fiber-reinforced epoxy femur became commercially available through Pacific Research Labs Inc. (Vashon Island, WA). The deformation response of these bones in the proximal femur was characterized in anatomical bending to determine their usefulness in hip implant studies. Composite bones of adolescent size were tested. Two size-matched cadaveric femora were tested for comparison using the same fixtures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-4861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jab.770020410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10171146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Artificial Limbs - standards ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Femur ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Materials Testing - methods ; Models, Anatomic ; Polymers ; Prostheses and Implants ; Stress, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied biomaterials, 1991, Vol.2 (4), p.277-280</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10171146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szivek, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gealer, R L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance</title><title>Journal of applied biomaterials</title><addtitle>J Appl Biomater</addtitle><description>In a previous study a set of first-generation (amber-colored) synthetic bones were tested and found to have an extremely variable interbone deformation response. Recently a second-generation (yellow-colored) fiber-reinforced epoxy femur became commercially available through Pacific Research Labs Inc. (Vashon Island, WA). The deformation response of these bones in the proximal femur was characterized in anatomical bending to determine their usefulness in hip implant studies. Composite bones of adolescent size were tested. Two size-matched cadaveric femora were tested for comparison using the same fixtures.</description><subject>Artificial Limbs - standards</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing - methods</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><issn>1045-4861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhj2AaCmMrMgTW4rPH7UzooovqRILzJGbnEtKYgc7Qeq_x4gyM91z9z466Y6QK2BLYIzf7u12qXUmJoGdkDkwqQppVjAj5yntGRPApTojM2CgAeRqTj7WoR9sbFPwNDg6viNt0IXY27HNo4hpCD7hT5YOPsdjW1PrG1rbxn5hzJ3DPkRLmym2fkdT20-dHbGhwWPR4W6XMY3W13hBTp3tEl4e64K8Pdy_rp-Kzcvj8_puUwxcmLGwxtRCmFKDcyCkFUZxVTrdIJdQ1vkKbSSWwohSc6sylcqhRicZ2HrFxYLc_O4dYvicMI1V36Yau856DFOqNNdKgND_irACURqmsnh9FKdtj001xLa38VD9_VF8AwAlcxA</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Szivek, J A</creator><creator>Gealer, R L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance</title><author>Szivek, J A ; Gealer, R L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p238t-a88c338971ff134a385259f7de2419c003784e9383972a5e9395fe7ef401ac623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Artificial Limbs - standards</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing - methods</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szivek, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gealer, R L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szivek, J A</au><au>Gealer, R L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Biomater</addtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>277-280</pages><issn>1045-4861</issn><abstract>In a previous study a set of first-generation (amber-colored) synthetic bones were tested and found to have an extremely variable interbone deformation response. Recently a second-generation (yellow-colored) fiber-reinforced epoxy femur became commercially available through Pacific Research Labs Inc. (Vashon Island, WA). The deformation response of these bones in the proximal femur was characterized in anatomical bending to determine their usefulness in hip implant studies. Composite bones of adolescent size were tested. Two size-matched cadaveric femora were tested for comparison using the same fixtures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>10171146</pmid><doi>10.1002/jab.770020410</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1045-4861 |
ispartof | Journal of applied biomaterials, 1991, Vol.2 (4), p.277-280 |
issn | 1045-4861 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72753137 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Artificial Limbs - standards Biomechanical Phenomena Femur Health technology assessment Humans Materials Testing - methods Models, Anatomic Polymers Prostheses and Implants Stress, Mechanical |
title | Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T07%3A27%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20deformation%20response%20of%20synthetic%20and%20cadaveric%20femora%20during%20simulated%20one-legged%20stance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20biomaterials&rft.au=Szivek,%20J%20A&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=277-280&rft.issn=1045-4861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jab.770020410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E16139805%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16139805&rft_id=info:pmid/10171146&rfr_iscdi=true |