Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance

In a previous study a set of first-generation (amber-colored) synthetic bones were tested and found to have an extremely variable interbone deformation response. Recently a second-generation (yellow-colored) fiber-reinforced epoxy femur became commercially available through Pacific Research Labs Inc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied biomaterials 1991, Vol.2 (4), p.277-280
Hauptverfasser: Szivek, J A, Gealer, R L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 280
container_issue 4
container_start_page 277
container_title Journal of applied biomaterials
container_volume 2
creator Szivek, J A
Gealer, R L
description In a previous study a set of first-generation (amber-colored) synthetic bones were tested and found to have an extremely variable interbone deformation response. Recently a second-generation (yellow-colored) fiber-reinforced epoxy femur became commercially available through Pacific Research Labs Inc. (Vashon Island, WA). The deformation response of these bones in the proximal femur was characterized in anatomical bending to determine their usefulness in hip implant studies. Composite bones of adolescent size were tested. Two size-matched cadaveric femora were tested for comparison using the same fixtures.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jab.770020410
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72753137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16139805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p238t-a88c338971ff134a385259f7de2419c003784e9383972a5e9395fe7ef401ac623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhj2AaCmMrMgTW4rPH7UzooovqRILzJGbnEtKYgc7Qeq_x4gyM91z9z466Y6QK2BLYIzf7u12qXUmJoGdkDkwqQppVjAj5yntGRPApTojM2CgAeRqTj7WoR9sbFPwNDg6viNt0IXY27HNo4hpCD7hT5YOPsdjW1PrG1rbxn5hzJ3DPkRLmym2fkdT20-dHbGhwWPR4W6XMY3W13hBTp3tEl4e64K8Pdy_rp-Kzcvj8_puUwxcmLGwxtRCmFKDcyCkFUZxVTrdIJdQ1vkKbSSWwohSc6sylcqhRicZ2HrFxYLc_O4dYvicMI1V36Yau856DFOqNNdKgND_irACURqmsnh9FKdtj001xLa38VD9_VF8AwAlcxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16139805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Szivek, J A ; Gealer, R L</creator><creatorcontrib>Szivek, J A ; Gealer, R L</creatorcontrib><description>In a previous study a set of first-generation (amber-colored) synthetic bones were tested and found to have an extremely variable interbone deformation response. Recently a second-generation (yellow-colored) fiber-reinforced epoxy femur became commercially available through Pacific Research Labs Inc. (Vashon Island, WA). The deformation response of these bones in the proximal femur was characterized in anatomical bending to determine their usefulness in hip implant studies. Composite bones of adolescent size were tested. Two size-matched cadaveric femora were tested for comparison using the same fixtures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-4861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jab.770020410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10171146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Artificial Limbs - standards ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Femur ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Materials Testing - methods ; Models, Anatomic ; Polymers ; Prostheses and Implants ; Stress, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied biomaterials, 1991, Vol.2 (4), p.277-280</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10171146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Szivek, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gealer, R L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance</title><title>Journal of applied biomaterials</title><addtitle>J Appl Biomater</addtitle><description>In a previous study a set of first-generation (amber-colored) synthetic bones were tested and found to have an extremely variable interbone deformation response. Recently a second-generation (yellow-colored) fiber-reinforced epoxy femur became commercially available through Pacific Research Labs Inc. (Vashon Island, WA). The deformation response of these bones in the proximal femur was characterized in anatomical bending to determine their usefulness in hip implant studies. Composite bones of adolescent size were tested. Two size-matched cadaveric femora were tested for comparison using the same fixtures.</description><subject>Artificial Limbs - standards</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing - methods</subject><subject>Models, Anatomic</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><issn>1045-4861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhj2AaCmMrMgTW4rPH7UzooovqRILzJGbnEtKYgc7Qeq_x4gyM91z9z466Y6QK2BLYIzf7u12qXUmJoGdkDkwqQppVjAj5yntGRPApTojM2CgAeRqTj7WoR9sbFPwNDg6viNt0IXY27HNo4hpCD7hT5YOPsdjW1PrG1rbxn5hzJ3DPkRLmym2fkdT20-dHbGhwWPR4W6XMY3W13hBTp3tEl4e64K8Pdy_rp-Kzcvj8_puUwxcmLGwxtRCmFKDcyCkFUZxVTrdIJdQ1vkKbSSWwohSc6sylcqhRicZ2HrFxYLc_O4dYvicMI1V36Yau856DFOqNNdKgND_irACURqmsnh9FKdtj001xLa38VD9_VF8AwAlcxA</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Szivek, J A</creator><creator>Gealer, R L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance</title><author>Szivek, J A ; Gealer, R L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p238t-a88c338971ff134a385259f7de2419c003784e9383972a5e9395fe7ef401ac623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Artificial Limbs - standards</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing - methods</topic><topic>Models, Anatomic</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Szivek, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gealer, R L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Szivek, J A</au><au>Gealer, R L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Biomater</addtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>280</epage><pages>277-280</pages><issn>1045-4861</issn><abstract>In a previous study a set of first-generation (amber-colored) synthetic bones were tested and found to have an extremely variable interbone deformation response. Recently a second-generation (yellow-colored) fiber-reinforced epoxy femur became commercially available through Pacific Research Labs Inc. (Vashon Island, WA). The deformation response of these bones in the proximal femur was characterized in anatomical bending to determine their usefulness in hip implant studies. Composite bones of adolescent size were tested. Two size-matched cadaveric femora were tested for comparison using the same fixtures.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>10171146</pmid><doi>10.1002/jab.770020410</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-4861
ispartof Journal of applied biomaterials, 1991, Vol.2 (4), p.277-280
issn 1045-4861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72753137
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Artificial Limbs - standards
Biomechanical Phenomena
Femur
Health technology assessment
Humans
Materials Testing - methods
Models, Anatomic
Polymers
Prostheses and Implants
Stress, Mechanical
title Comparison of the deformation response of synthetic and cadaveric femora during simulated one-legged stance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T07%3A27%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20deformation%20response%20of%20synthetic%20and%20cadaveric%20femora%20during%20simulated%20one-legged%20stance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20biomaterials&rft.au=Szivek,%20J%20A&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=280&rft.pages=277-280&rft.issn=1045-4861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jab.770020410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E16139805%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16139805&rft_id=info:pmid/10171146&rfr_iscdi=true