Prediction of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal White Women With Peripheral Bone Densitometry: Evidence From the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment

Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for fracture. Although the current “gold standard” test is DXA of the hip and spine, this method is not universally available. No large studies have evaluated the ability of new, less expensive peripheral technologies to predict fracture. We studied th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and mineral research 2002-12, Vol.17 (12), p.2222-2230
Hauptverfasser: Miller, Paul D., Siris, Ethel S., Barrett‐Connor, Elizabeth, Faulkner, Kenneth G., Wehren, Lois E., Abbott, Thomas A., Chen, Ya‐Ting, Berger, Marc L., Santora, Arthur C., Sherwood, Louis M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2230
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2222
container_title Journal of bone and mineral research
container_volume 17
creator Miller, Paul D.
Siris, Ethel S.
Barrett‐Connor, Elizabeth
Faulkner, Kenneth G.
Wehren, Lois E.
Abbott, Thomas A.
Chen, Ya‐Ting
Berger, Marc L.
Santora, Arthur C.
Sherwood, Louis M.
description Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for fracture. Although the current “gold standard” test is DXA of the hip and spine, this method is not universally available. No large studies have evaluated the ability of new, less expensive peripheral technologies to predict fracture. We studied the association between BMD measurements at peripheral sites and subsequent fracture risk at the hip, wrist/forearm, spine, and rib in 149,524 postmenopausal white women, without prior diagnosis of osteoporosis. At enrollment, each participant completed a risk assessment questionnaire and had BMD testing at the heel, forearm, or finger. Main outcomes were new fractures of the hip, wrist/forearm, spine, or rib within the first 12 months after testing. After 1 year, 2259 women reported 2340 new fractures. Based on manufacturers' normative data and multivariable adjusted analyses, women who had T scores ≤ −2.5 SD were 2.15 (finger) to 3.94 (heel ultrasound [US]) times more likely to fracture than women with normal BMD. All measurement sites/devices predicted fracture equally well, and risk prediction was similar whether calculated from the manufacturers' young normal values (T scores) or using SDs from the mean age of the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) population. The areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for hip fracture were comparable with those published using measurements at hip sites. We conclude that low BMD found by peripheral technologies, regardless of the site measured, is associated with at least a twofold increased risk of fracture within 1 year, even at skeletal sites other than the one measured.
doi_str_mv 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2222
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72752188</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18636744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-92df3233a76908a704e50198ec68064e52e769b1ffcb19fdd87c01ba9e5884b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEokPhDRDyBnYJ_ovtsKItLT8qdFSBZmk5zo3GJYlT2wHNe_DAeDQjdQneWL73u-fI9xTFS4Irwurm7V07hopiTCsiK0Irms-jYkVqykouFHlcrLBSvMSckZPiWYx3GGNRC_G0OCGUi6YhYlX8WQfonE3OT8j36CoYm5YA6NbFn8hNaO1jGmHys1miGdBm6xKgjc8ltHFpi9YQ3LyFkHvnfgL0AaboUu6nsHuHLn-5DiYLWdePKG0BfTN7q0zfxAR-9sFHFw9uZzFCjFk5PS-e9GaI8OJ4nxY_ri6_X3wqr28-fr44uy4tF7IuG9r1jDJmpGiwMhJzqDFpFFihsMgPCrnTkr63LWn6rlPSYtKaBuq8mJax0-LNQXcO_n6BmPToooVhMBP4JWpJZU2JUv8EiRJMSM4zyA-gzR-LAXo9BzeasNME631seh-b3semidSE6n1seezVUX9pR-geho45ZeD1ETDRmqEPZrIuPnAcsybHm7n3B-63G2D3X-b6y_nX21rkzUlCSc3-Ah9Ztkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18636744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal White Women With Peripheral Bone Densitometry: Evidence From the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Miller, Paul D. ; Siris, Ethel S. ; Barrett‐Connor, Elizabeth ; Faulkner, Kenneth G. ; Wehren, Lois E. ; Abbott, Thomas A. ; Chen, Ya‐Ting ; Berger, Marc L. ; Santora, Arthur C. ; Sherwood, Louis M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, Paul D. ; Siris, Ethel S. ; Barrett‐Connor, Elizabeth ; Faulkner, Kenneth G. ; Wehren, Lois E. ; Abbott, Thomas A. ; Chen, Ya‐Ting ; Berger, Marc L. ; Santora, Arthur C. ; Sherwood, Louis M.</creatorcontrib><description>Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for fracture. Although the current “gold standard” test is DXA of the hip and spine, this method is not universally available. No large studies have evaluated the ability of new, less expensive peripheral technologies to predict fracture. We studied the association between BMD measurements at peripheral sites and subsequent fracture risk at the hip, wrist/forearm, spine, and rib in 149,524 postmenopausal white women, without prior diagnosis of osteoporosis. At enrollment, each participant completed a risk assessment questionnaire and had BMD testing at the heel, forearm, or finger. Main outcomes were new fractures of the hip, wrist/forearm, spine, or rib within the first 12 months after testing. After 1 year, 2259 women reported 2340 new fractures. Based on manufacturers' normative data and multivariable adjusted analyses, women who had T scores ≤ −2.5 SD were 2.15 (finger) to 3.94 (heel ultrasound [US]) times more likely to fracture than women with normal BMD. All measurement sites/devices predicted fracture equally well, and risk prediction was similar whether calculated from the manufacturers' young normal values (T scores) or using SDs from the mean age of the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) population. The areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for hip fracture were comparable with those published using measurements at hip sites. We conclude that low BMD found by peripheral technologies, regardless of the site measured, is associated with at least a twofold increased risk of fracture within 1 year, even at skeletal sites other than the one measured.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-0431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2222</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12469916</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBMREJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Density ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; fracture risk ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment ; Osteoporosis - epidemiology ; Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease ; peripheral bone densitometry ; postmenopausal ; Postmenopause ; Risk Assessment ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents ; white</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and mineral research, 2002-12, Vol.17 (12), p.2222-2230</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 ASBMR</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-92df3233a76908a704e50198ec68064e52e769b1ffcb19fdd87c01ba9e5884b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-92df3233a76908a704e50198ec68064e52e769b1ffcb19fdd87c01ba9e5884b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1359%2Fjbmr.2002.17.12.2222$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1359%2Fjbmr.2002.17.12.2222$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14039000$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12469916$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siris, Ethel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett‐Connor, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faulkner, Kenneth G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wehren, Lois E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ya‐Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Marc L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santora, Arthur C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherwood, Louis M.</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal White Women With Peripheral Bone Densitometry: Evidence From the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment</title><title>Journal of bone and mineral research</title><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><description>Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for fracture. Although the current “gold standard” test is DXA of the hip and spine, this method is not universally available. No large studies have evaluated the ability of new, less expensive peripheral technologies to predict fracture. We studied the association between BMD measurements at peripheral sites and subsequent fracture risk at the hip, wrist/forearm, spine, and rib in 149,524 postmenopausal white women, without prior diagnosis of osteoporosis. At enrollment, each participant completed a risk assessment questionnaire and had BMD testing at the heel, forearm, or finger. Main outcomes were new fractures of the hip, wrist/forearm, spine, or rib within the first 12 months after testing. After 1 year, 2259 women reported 2340 new fractures. Based on manufacturers' normative data and multivariable adjusted analyses, women who had T scores ≤ −2.5 SD were 2.15 (finger) to 3.94 (heel ultrasound [US]) times more likely to fracture than women with normal BMD. All measurement sites/devices predicted fracture equally well, and risk prediction was similar whether calculated from the manufacturers' young normal values (T scores) or using SDs from the mean age of the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) population. The areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for hip fracture were comparable with those published using measurements at hip sites. We conclude that low BMD found by peripheral technologies, regardless of the site measured, is associated with at least a twofold increased risk of fracture within 1 year, even at skeletal sites other than the one measured.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fracture risk</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease</subject><subject>peripheral bone densitometry</subject><subject>postmenopausal</subject><subject>Postmenopause</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>white</subject><issn>0884-0431</issn><issn>1523-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEokPhDRDyBnYJ_ovtsKItLT8qdFSBZmk5zo3GJYlT2wHNe_DAeDQjdQneWL73u-fI9xTFS4Irwurm7V07hopiTCsiK0Irms-jYkVqykouFHlcrLBSvMSckZPiWYx3GGNRC_G0OCGUi6YhYlX8WQfonE3OT8j36CoYm5YA6NbFn8hNaO1jGmHys1miGdBm6xKgjc8ltHFpi9YQ3LyFkHvnfgL0AaboUu6nsHuHLn-5DiYLWdePKG0BfTN7q0zfxAR-9sFHFw9uZzFCjFk5PS-e9GaI8OJ4nxY_ri6_X3wqr28-fr44uy4tF7IuG9r1jDJmpGiwMhJzqDFpFFihsMgPCrnTkr63LWn6rlPSYtKaBuq8mJax0-LNQXcO_n6BmPToooVhMBP4JWpJZU2JUv8EiRJMSM4zyA-gzR-LAXo9BzeasNME631seh-b3semidSE6n1seezVUX9pR-geho45ZeD1ETDRmqEPZrIuPnAcsybHm7n3B-63G2D3X-b6y_nX21rkzUlCSc3-Ah9Ztkw</recordid><startdate>200212</startdate><enddate>200212</enddate><creator>Miller, Paul D.</creator><creator>Siris, Ethel S.</creator><creator>Barrett‐Connor, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Faulkner, Kenneth G.</creator><creator>Wehren, Lois E.</creator><creator>Abbott, Thomas A.</creator><creator>Chen, Ya‐Ting</creator><creator>Berger, Marc L.</creator><creator>Santora, Arthur C.</creator><creator>Sherwood, Louis M.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)</general><general>American Society for Bone and Mineral Research</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200212</creationdate><title>Prediction of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal White Women With Peripheral Bone Densitometry: Evidence From the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment</title><author>Miller, Paul D. ; Siris, Ethel S. ; Barrett‐Connor, Elizabeth ; Faulkner, Kenneth G. ; Wehren, Lois E. ; Abbott, Thomas A. ; Chen, Ya‐Ting ; Berger, Marc L. ; Santora, Arthur C. ; Sherwood, Louis M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4675-92df3233a76908a704e50198ec68064e52e769b1ffcb19fdd87c01ba9e5884b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fracture risk</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease</topic><topic>peripheral bone densitometry</topic><topic>postmenopausal</topic><topic>Postmenopause</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>white</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Paul D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siris, Ethel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett‐Connor, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faulkner, Kenneth G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wehren, Lois E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Thomas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Ya‐Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Marc L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santora, Arthur C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherwood, Louis M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Paul D.</au><au>Siris, Ethel S.</au><au>Barrett‐Connor, Elizabeth</au><au>Faulkner, Kenneth G.</au><au>Wehren, Lois E.</au><au>Abbott, Thomas A.</au><au>Chen, Ya‐Ting</au><au>Berger, Marc L.</au><au>Santora, Arthur C.</au><au>Sherwood, Louis M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal White Women With Peripheral Bone Densitometry: Evidence From the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><date>2002-12</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2222</spage><epage>2230</epage><pages>2222-2230</pages><issn>0884-0431</issn><eissn>1523-4681</eissn><coden>JBMREJ</coden><abstract>Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for fracture. Although the current “gold standard” test is DXA of the hip and spine, this method is not universally available. No large studies have evaluated the ability of new, less expensive peripheral technologies to predict fracture. We studied the association between BMD measurements at peripheral sites and subsequent fracture risk at the hip, wrist/forearm, spine, and rib in 149,524 postmenopausal white women, without prior diagnosis of osteoporosis. At enrollment, each participant completed a risk assessment questionnaire and had BMD testing at the heel, forearm, or finger. Main outcomes were new fractures of the hip, wrist/forearm, spine, or rib within the first 12 months after testing. After 1 year, 2259 women reported 2340 new fractures. Based on manufacturers' normative data and multivariable adjusted analyses, women who had T scores ≤ −2.5 SD were 2.15 (finger) to 3.94 (heel ultrasound [US]) times more likely to fracture than women with normal BMD. All measurement sites/devices predicted fracture equally well, and risk prediction was similar whether calculated from the manufacturers' young normal values (T scores) or using SDs from the mean age of the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) population. The areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for hip fracture were comparable with those published using measurements at hip sites. We conclude that low BMD found by peripheral technologies, regardless of the site measured, is associated with at least a twofold increased risk of fracture within 1 year, even at skeletal sites other than the one measured.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)</pub><pmid>12469916</pmid><doi>10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2222</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-0431
ispartof Journal of bone and mineral research, 2002-12, Vol.17 (12), p.2222-2230
issn 0884-0431
1523-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72752188
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Density
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Female
fracture risk
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment
Osteoporosis - epidemiology
Osteoporosis. Osteomalacia. Paget disease
peripheral bone densitometry
postmenopausal
Postmenopause
Risk Assessment
Surveys and Questionnaires
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
white
title Prediction of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal White Women With Peripheral Bone Densitometry: Evidence From the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A53%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20Fracture%20Risk%20in%20Postmenopausal%20White%20Women%20With%20Peripheral%20Bone%20Densitometry:%20Evidence%20From%20the%20National%20Osteoporosis%20Risk%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20mineral%20research&rft.au=Miller,%20Paul%20D.&rft.date=2002-12&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2222&rft.epage=2230&rft.pages=2222-2230&rft.issn=0884-0431&rft.eissn=1523-4681&rft.coden=JBMREJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.12.2222&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18636744%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18636744&rft_id=info:pmid/12469916&rfr_iscdi=true