The relationship between perception and production in songbird vocal imitation: what learned calls can teach us
Songbirds produce calls as well as song. This paper summarizes four studies of the zebra finch long call, used by both sexes in similar behavioral contexts. Female long calls are acoustically simpler than male long calls, which include acoustic features learned during development. Production of thes...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Comparative Physiology 2002-12, Vol.188 (11-12), p.897-908 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 908 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11-12 |
container_start_page | 897 |
container_title | Journal of Comparative Physiology |
container_volume | 188 |
creator | Vicario, D S Raksin, J N Naqvi, N H Thande, N Simpson, H B |
description | Songbirds produce calls as well as song. This paper summarizes four studies of the zebra finch long call, used by both sexes in similar behavioral contexts. Female long calls are acoustically simpler than male long calls, which include acoustic features learned during development. Production of these male-typical features requires an intact nucleus robustus archistriatalis, the sexually-dimorphic source of the telencephalic projection to brainstem vocal effectors. In experiments that quantified the long calls produced in response to long call playbacks, intact adult zebra finch males, but not females, show a categorical preference for the long calls of females over those of males. Experiments with synthetic stimuli showed that males classify long call stimuli that they hear by gender, using both spectral and temporal information, but that females use only temporal information. Juvenile males ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00359-002-0354-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72746145</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72746145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-cc3c0ff93f735dedf0012f6ee3c49cf43e64a4c7691636d6162e2b2fd5865593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFP5CAUx8lGs466H8CLITHxVuUBpcWbMa67iYmXuRMGHjs1HVqh1fjtZZxJNvHiBXjwe_8AP0LOgF0BY811ZkzUumKMV2UhK_6DLEAKXoGo4YAsmJCsamotj8hxzs-sgMDhJzkCLhuQrV6QYblGmrC3UzfEvO5GusLpDTHSEZPDcbtNbfR0TIOf3WfZRZqH-G_VJU9fB2d72m266TPhhr6t7UR7tCmip-Wsz2WMdELr1nTOp-Qw2D7jr_18Qpa_75d3f6rHp4e_d7ePlRNaT5VzwrEQtAiNqD36wBjwoBCFk9oFKVBJK12jNCihvALFka948HWr6lqLE3K5iy3XfpkxT2bTZYd9byMOczYNb6QCWX8LQtsAaAUFvPgCPg9ziuUNBnQLWpQfbQsFO8qlIeeEwYyp29j0boCZrTOzc2aKCrN1ZnjpOd8nz6sN-v8de0niA9tJknA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1981934718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The relationship between perception and production in songbird vocal imitation: what learned calls can teach us</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Vicario, D S ; Raksin, J N ; Naqvi, N H ; Thande, N ; Simpson, H B</creator><creatorcontrib>Vicario, D S ; Raksin, J N ; Naqvi, N H ; Thande, N ; Simpson, H B</creatorcontrib><description>Songbirds produce calls as well as song. This paper summarizes four studies of the zebra finch long call, used by both sexes in similar behavioral contexts. Female long calls are acoustically simpler than male long calls, which include acoustic features learned during development. Production of these male-typical features requires an intact nucleus robustus archistriatalis, the sexually-dimorphic source of the telencephalic projection to brainstem vocal effectors. In experiments that quantified the long calls produced in response to long call playbacks, intact adult zebra finch males, but not females, show a categorical preference for the long calls of females over those of males. Experiments with synthetic stimuli showed that males classify long call stimuli that they hear by gender, using both spectral and temporal information, but that females use only temporal information. Juvenile males (<45 days) did not show the categorical preference, but it emerged during the same period when the robustus archistriatalis matures anatomically and the first male-typical vocalizations are produced. Adult males with robustus archistriatalis lesions lost the categorical preference for female long calls, suggesting that the robustus archistriatalis plays a role in long call discrimination. These results demonstrate that calls complement song as a potent tool for studying the neurobiology of vocal communication.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-7594</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00359-002-0354-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12471489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Age Factors ; Animals ; Birds ; Brain - physiology ; Brain - physiopathology ; Brain - surgery ; Brain stem ; Communication ; Discrimination (Psychology) ; Female ; Females ; Imitative Behavior - physiology ; Learning - physiology ; Lesions ; Male ; Males ; Nervous system ; Neural Pathways - cytology ; Neural Pathways - physiology ; Neurosciences ; Perception - physiology ; Playbacks ; Sex Characteristics ; Song ; Songbirds ; Songbirds - physiology ; Sound Spectrography ; Stimuli ; Teaching ; Telencephalon ; Time Factors ; Vocalization behavior ; Vocalization, Animal ; Voice</subject><ispartof>Journal of Comparative Physiology, 2002-12, Vol.188 (11-12), p.897-908</ispartof><rights>Journal of Comparative Physiology A is a copyright of Springer, (2002). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-cc3c0ff93f735dedf0012f6ee3c49cf43e64a4c7691636d6162e2b2fd5865593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12471489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vicario, D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raksin, J N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naqvi, N H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thande, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, H B</creatorcontrib><title>The relationship between perception and production in songbird vocal imitation: what learned calls can teach us</title><title>Journal of Comparative Physiology</title><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol</addtitle><description>Songbirds produce calls as well as song. This paper summarizes four studies of the zebra finch long call, used by both sexes in similar behavioral contexts. Female long calls are acoustically simpler than male long calls, which include acoustic features learned during development. Production of these male-typical features requires an intact nucleus robustus archistriatalis, the sexually-dimorphic source of the telencephalic projection to brainstem vocal effectors. In experiments that quantified the long calls produced in response to long call playbacks, intact adult zebra finch males, but not females, show a categorical preference for the long calls of females over those of males. Experiments with synthetic stimuli showed that males classify long call stimuli that they hear by gender, using both spectral and temporal information, but that females use only temporal information. Juvenile males (<45 days) did not show the categorical preference, but it emerged during the same period when the robustus archistriatalis matures anatomically and the first male-typical vocalizations are produced. Adult males with robustus archistriatalis lesions lost the categorical preference for female long calls, suggesting that the robustus archistriatalis plays a role in long call discrimination. These results demonstrate that calls complement song as a potent tool for studying the neurobiology of vocal communication.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Brain - surgery</subject><subject>Brain stem</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Imitative Behavior - physiology</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - cytology</subject><subject>Neural Pathways - physiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Playbacks</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Song</subject><subject>Songbirds</subject><subject>Songbirds - physiology</subject><subject>Sound Spectrography</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Telencephalon</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vocalization behavior</subject><subject>Vocalization, Animal</subject><subject>Voice</subject><issn>0340-7594</issn><issn>1432-1351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFP5CAUx8lGs466H8CLITHxVuUBpcWbMa67iYmXuRMGHjs1HVqh1fjtZZxJNvHiBXjwe_8AP0LOgF0BY811ZkzUumKMV2UhK_6DLEAKXoGo4YAsmJCsamotj8hxzs-sgMDhJzkCLhuQrV6QYblGmrC3UzfEvO5GusLpDTHSEZPDcbtNbfR0TIOf3WfZRZqH-G_VJU9fB2d72m266TPhhr6t7UR7tCmip-Wsz2WMdELr1nTOp-Qw2D7jr_18Qpa_75d3f6rHp4e_d7ePlRNaT5VzwrEQtAiNqD36wBjwoBCFk9oFKVBJK12jNCihvALFka948HWr6lqLE3K5iy3XfpkxT2bTZYd9byMOczYNb6QCWX8LQtsAaAUFvPgCPg9ziuUNBnQLWpQfbQsFO8qlIeeEwYyp29j0boCZrTOzc2aKCrN1ZnjpOd8nz6sN-v8de0niA9tJknA</recordid><startdate>200212</startdate><enddate>200212</enddate><creator>Vicario, D S</creator><creator>Raksin, J N</creator><creator>Naqvi, N H</creator><creator>Thande, N</creator><creator>Simpson, H B</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200212</creationdate><title>The relationship between perception and production in songbird vocal imitation: what learned calls can teach us</title><author>Vicario, D S ; Raksin, J N ; Naqvi, N H ; Thande, N ; Simpson, H B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-cc3c0ff93f735dedf0012f6ee3c49cf43e64a4c7691636d6162e2b2fd5865593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Brain - surgery</topic><topic>Brain stem</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Imitative Behavior - physiology</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - cytology</topic><topic>Neural Pathways - physiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Playbacks</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Song</topic><topic>Songbirds</topic><topic>Songbirds - physiology</topic><topic>Sound Spectrography</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Telencephalon</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vocalization behavior</topic><topic>Vocalization, Animal</topic><topic>Voice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vicario, D S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raksin, J N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naqvi, N H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thande, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, H B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Comparative Physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vicario, D S</au><au>Raksin, J N</au><au>Naqvi, N H</au><au>Thande, N</au><au>Simpson, H B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The relationship between perception and production in songbird vocal imitation: what learned calls can teach us</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Comparative Physiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol</addtitle><date>2002-12</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>188</volume><issue>11-12</issue><spage>897</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>897-908</pages><issn>0340-7594</issn><eissn>1432-1351</eissn><abstract>Songbirds produce calls as well as song. This paper summarizes four studies of the zebra finch long call, used by both sexes in similar behavioral contexts. Female long calls are acoustically simpler than male long calls, which include acoustic features learned during development. Production of these male-typical features requires an intact nucleus robustus archistriatalis, the sexually-dimorphic source of the telencephalic projection to brainstem vocal effectors. In experiments that quantified the long calls produced in response to long call playbacks, intact adult zebra finch males, but not females, show a categorical preference for the long calls of females over those of males. Experiments with synthetic stimuli showed that males classify long call stimuli that they hear by gender, using both spectral and temporal information, but that females use only temporal information. Juvenile males (<45 days) did not show the categorical preference, but it emerged during the same period when the robustus archistriatalis matures anatomically and the first male-typical vocalizations are produced. Adult males with robustus archistriatalis lesions lost the categorical preference for female long calls, suggesting that the robustus archistriatalis plays a role in long call discrimination. These results demonstrate that calls complement song as a potent tool for studying the neurobiology of vocal communication.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>12471489</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00359-002-0354-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-7594 |
ispartof | Journal of Comparative Physiology, 2002-12, Vol.188 (11-12), p.897-908 |
issn | 0340-7594 1432-1351 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72746145 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Age Factors Animals Birds Brain - physiology Brain - physiopathology Brain - surgery Brain stem Communication Discrimination (Psychology) Female Females Imitative Behavior - physiology Learning - physiology Lesions Male Males Nervous system Neural Pathways - cytology Neural Pathways - physiology Neurosciences Perception - physiology Playbacks Sex Characteristics Song Songbirds Songbirds - physiology Sound Spectrography Stimuli Teaching Telencephalon Time Factors Vocalization behavior Vocalization, Animal Voice |
title | The relationship between perception and production in songbird vocal imitation: what learned calls can teach us |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T02%3A11%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20relationship%20between%20perception%20and%20production%20in%20songbird%20vocal%20imitation:%20what%20learned%20calls%20can%20teach%20us&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Comparative%20Physiology&rft.au=Vicario,%20D%20S&rft.date=2002-12&rft.volume=188&rft.issue=11-12&rft.spage=897&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=897-908&rft.issn=0340-7594&rft.eissn=1432-1351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00359-002-0354-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72746145%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1981934718&rft_id=info:pmid/12471489&rfr_iscdi=true |