Cadaveric kidney donation beyond the age of 60 years — a comparative analysis of 1180 grafts from different donor age groups
The impact of high donor age on transplantation outcome was analysed in 1180 consecutive cadaveric grafts transplanted in adult recipients. Grafts were divided into three groups acording to donor age ( < 55 years (n = 1073, group 1), 55–59 years (n = 51, group 2), ≥ 60 years (n = 56, group 3)) an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplant international 1992-01, Vol.5, p.S47-S50 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S50 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | S47 |
container_title | Transplant international |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Sautner, Th Gnant, M. Götzinger, P. Wamser, P. Steininger, R. Mühlbacher, F. |
description | The impact of high donor age on transplantation outcome was analysed in 1180 consecutive cadaveric grafts transplanted in adult recipients. Grafts were divided into three groups acording to donor age ( < 55 years (n = 1073, group 1), 55–59 years (n = 51, group 2), ≥ 60 years (n = 56, group 3)) and transplantation outcome was compared for these groups. Criteria investigated were the incidence of primary non‐function (PNF), initial function (IF) (urine production first 24 h) and long‐term function (LTF). The impact of donor age on LTF was analysed among other potential donor, graft and recipient risk factors by the multivariate proportional hazardous model analysis (Cox model). The incidence of PNF was 5.8% (group 1), 11.8% (group 2), and 16.1% (group 3) (P = 0.002). Analysis of paired kidneys of PNF grafts in group 2 and group 3 revealed good function for all paired grafts except for one in each group. IF was anuria in 19.7% of group 1, 29.4% group 2 and 21.5% of group 3, oliguria in 18.2% of group 1, 23.5% of group 2 and 32% of group 3. Normal diuresis was found in 62.1% of group, 47.1% of group 2 and 47.3% of group 3 (P = 0.05). Independent risk factors for graft survival were year of transplantation, recipient age, panel reactive antibodies, donor age group and number of transplantation. After the exclusion of PNF grafts from the analysis, recipient age, year of transplantation and level of panel reactive antibodies remained as independent risk factors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/tri.1992.5.s1.47 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72745363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72745363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2997-853d78482efd8bdaf2cb9eaf61e84d82fce808107760b526c7f201d6b6f1b77b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFu2zAQQImiRe243TsVnLpJISlKpLoFRpMYMBCgcWaCEo8uE0l0SNmFliAf0S_Ml0SKDWTsLYcD3r3hIfSNkpSOc94Hl9KyZGmeRppy8QHNKc9YwpgQH9GclBlPiBR8hs5ivCeEMJmTz2hGecGoYOUcPS210QcIrsYPznQwYOM73Tvf4QoG3xnc_wGst4C9xQXBA-gQ8cvzP6xx7dudDiN8GIlON0N0ccIolQRvg7Z9xDb4FhtnLQTo-knuw5tuG_x-F7-gT1Y3Eb6e9gLdXf7aLK-T9c3VanmxTmpWliKReWaE5JKBNbIy2rK6KkHbgoLkRjJbgySSEiEKUuWsqIVlhJqiKiythKiyBfpx9O6Cf9xD7FXrYg1Nozvw-6gEEzzPimwEyRGsg48xgFW74FodBkWJmpqrsbmamqtcRaq4GF--n9z7qgXz_nCKPAI_j8Bf18DwX6Ha_F5Nd35LR_srfdiRew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72745363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cadaveric kidney donation beyond the age of 60 years — a comparative analysis of 1180 grafts from different donor age groups</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Sautner, Th ; Gnant, M. ; Götzinger, P. ; Wamser, P. ; Steininger, R. ; Mühlbacher, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sautner, Th ; Gnant, M. ; Götzinger, P. ; Wamser, P. ; Steininger, R. ; Mühlbacher, F.</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of high donor age on transplantation outcome was analysed in 1180 consecutive cadaveric grafts transplanted in adult recipients. Grafts were divided into three groups acording to donor age ( < 55 years (n = 1073, group 1), 55–59 years (n = 51, group 2), ≥ 60 years (n = 56, group 3)) and transplantation outcome was compared for these groups. Criteria investigated were the incidence of primary non‐function (PNF), initial function (IF) (urine production first 24 h) and long‐term function (LTF). The impact of donor age on LTF was analysed among other potential donor, graft and recipient risk factors by the multivariate proportional hazardous model analysis (Cox model). The incidence of PNF was 5.8% (group 1), 11.8% (group 2), and 16.1% (group 3) (P = 0.002). Analysis of paired kidneys of PNF grafts in group 2 and group 3 revealed good function for all paired grafts except for one in each group. IF was anuria in 19.7% of group 1, 29.4% group 2 and 21.5% of group 3, oliguria in 18.2% of group 1, 23.5% of group 2 and 32% of group 3. Normal diuresis was found in 62.1% of group, 47.1% of group 2 and 47.3% of group 3 (P = 0.05). Independent risk factors for graft survival were year of transplantation, recipient age, panel reactive antibodies, donor age group and number of transplantation. After the exclusion of PNF grafts from the analysis, recipient age, year of transplantation and level of panel reactive antibodies remained as independent risk factors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-0874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/tri.1992.5.s1.47</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14621729</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Distribution ; Age Factors ; Cadaver ; Female ; Graft Survival - physiology ; High donor age ; Humans ; Ischemia ; Kidney ; Kidney transplantation ; Kidney Transplantation - physiology ; Kidney Transplantation - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Organ Preservation - methods ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Time Factors ; Tissue Donors - statistics & numerical data ; Treatment Failure ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Transplant international, 1992-01, Vol.5, p.S47-S50</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2997-853d78482efd8bdaf2cb9eaf61e84d82fce808107760b526c7f201d6b6f1b77b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14621729$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sautner, Th</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnant, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Götzinger, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wamser, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steininger, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mühlbacher, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Cadaveric kidney donation beyond the age of 60 years — a comparative analysis of 1180 grafts from different donor age groups</title><title>Transplant international</title><addtitle>Transpl Int</addtitle><description>The impact of high donor age on transplantation outcome was analysed in 1180 consecutive cadaveric grafts transplanted in adult recipients. Grafts were divided into three groups acording to donor age ( < 55 years (n = 1073, group 1), 55–59 years (n = 51, group 2), ≥ 60 years (n = 56, group 3)) and transplantation outcome was compared for these groups. Criteria investigated were the incidence of primary non‐function (PNF), initial function (IF) (urine production first 24 h) and long‐term function (LTF). The impact of donor age on LTF was analysed among other potential donor, graft and recipient risk factors by the multivariate proportional hazardous model analysis (Cox model). The incidence of PNF was 5.8% (group 1), 11.8% (group 2), and 16.1% (group 3) (P = 0.002). Analysis of paired kidneys of PNF grafts in group 2 and group 3 revealed good function for all paired grafts except for one in each group. IF was anuria in 19.7% of group 1, 29.4% group 2 and 21.5% of group 3, oliguria in 18.2% of group 1, 23.5% of group 2 and 32% of group 3. Normal diuresis was found in 62.1% of group, 47.1% of group 2 and 47.3% of group 3 (P = 0.05). Independent risk factors for graft survival were year of transplantation, recipient age, panel reactive antibodies, donor age group and number of transplantation. After the exclusion of PNF grafts from the analysis, recipient age, year of transplantation and level of panel reactive antibodies remained as independent risk factors.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Survival - physiology</subject><subject>High donor age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemia</subject><subject>Kidney</subject><subject>Kidney transplantation</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - physiology</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Organ Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissue Donors - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0934-0874</issn><issn>1432-2277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLFu2zAQQImiRe243TsVnLpJISlKpLoFRpMYMBCgcWaCEo8uE0l0SNmFliAf0S_Ml0SKDWTsLYcD3r3hIfSNkpSOc94Hl9KyZGmeRppy8QHNKc9YwpgQH9GclBlPiBR8hs5ivCeEMJmTz2hGecGoYOUcPS210QcIrsYPznQwYOM73Tvf4QoG3xnc_wGst4C9xQXBA-gQ8cvzP6xx7dudDiN8GIlON0N0ccIolQRvg7Z9xDb4FhtnLQTo-knuw5tuG_x-F7-gT1Y3Eb6e9gLdXf7aLK-T9c3VanmxTmpWliKReWaE5JKBNbIy2rK6KkHbgoLkRjJbgySSEiEKUuWsqIVlhJqiKiythKiyBfpx9O6Cf9xD7FXrYg1Nozvw-6gEEzzPimwEyRGsg48xgFW74FodBkWJmpqrsbmamqtcRaq4GF--n9z7qgXz_nCKPAI_j8Bf18DwX6Ha_F5Nd35LR_srfdiRew</recordid><startdate>199201</startdate><enddate>199201</enddate><creator>Sautner, Th</creator><creator>Gnant, M.</creator><creator>Götzinger, P.</creator><creator>Wamser, P.</creator><creator>Steininger, R.</creator><creator>Mühlbacher, F.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199201</creationdate><title>Cadaveric kidney donation beyond the age of 60 years — a comparative analysis of 1180 grafts from different donor age groups</title><author>Sautner, Th ; Gnant, M. ; Götzinger, P. ; Wamser, P. ; Steininger, R. ; Mühlbacher, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2997-853d78482efd8bdaf2cb9eaf61e84d82fce808107760b526c7f201d6b6f1b77b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Survival - physiology</topic><topic>High donor age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemia</topic><topic>Kidney</topic><topic>Kidney transplantation</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - physiology</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Organ Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissue Donors - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sautner, Th</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gnant, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Götzinger, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wamser, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steininger, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mühlbacher, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplant international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sautner, Th</au><au>Gnant, M.</au><au>Götzinger, P.</au><au>Wamser, P.</au><au>Steininger, R.</au><au>Mühlbacher, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cadaveric kidney donation beyond the age of 60 years — a comparative analysis of 1180 grafts from different donor age groups</atitle><jtitle>Transplant international</jtitle><addtitle>Transpl Int</addtitle><date>1992-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>5</volume><spage>S47</spage><epage>S50</epage><pages>S47-S50</pages><issn>0934-0874</issn><eissn>1432-2277</eissn><abstract>The impact of high donor age on transplantation outcome was analysed in 1180 consecutive cadaveric grafts transplanted in adult recipients. Grafts were divided into three groups acording to donor age ( < 55 years (n = 1073, group 1), 55–59 years (n = 51, group 2), ≥ 60 years (n = 56, group 3)) and transplantation outcome was compared for these groups. Criteria investigated were the incidence of primary non‐function (PNF), initial function (IF) (urine production first 24 h) and long‐term function (LTF). The impact of donor age on LTF was analysed among other potential donor, graft and recipient risk factors by the multivariate proportional hazardous model analysis (Cox model). The incidence of PNF was 5.8% (group 1), 11.8% (group 2), and 16.1% (group 3) (P = 0.002). Analysis of paired kidneys of PNF grafts in group 2 and group 3 revealed good function for all paired grafts except for one in each group. IF was anuria in 19.7% of group 1, 29.4% group 2 and 21.5% of group 3, oliguria in 18.2% of group 1, 23.5% of group 2 and 32% of group 3. Normal diuresis was found in 62.1% of group, 47.1% of group 2 and 47.3% of group 3 (P = 0.05). Independent risk factors for graft survival were year of transplantation, recipient age, panel reactive antibodies, donor age group and number of transplantation. After the exclusion of PNF grafts from the analysis, recipient age, year of transplantation and level of panel reactive antibodies remained as independent risk factors.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>14621729</pmid><doi>10.1111/tri.1992.5.s1.47</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0934-0874 |
ispartof | Transplant international, 1992-01, Vol.5, p.S47-S50 |
issn | 0934-0874 1432-2277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72745363 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adult Age Distribution Age Factors Cadaver Female Graft Survival - physiology High donor age Humans Ischemia Kidney Kidney transplantation Kidney Transplantation - physiology Kidney Transplantation - statistics & numerical data Male Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Organ Preservation - methods Proportional Hazards Models Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Time Factors Tissue Donors - statistics & numerical data Treatment Failure Treatment Outcome |
title | Cadaveric kidney donation beyond the age of 60 years — a comparative analysis of 1180 grafts from different donor age groups |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A55%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cadaveric%20kidney%20donation%20beyond%20the%20age%20of%2060%20years%20%E2%80%94%20a%20comparative%20analysis%20of%201180%20grafts%20from%20different%20donor%20age%20groups&rft.jtitle=Transplant%20international&rft.au=Sautner,%20Th&rft.date=1992-01&rft.volume=5&rft.spage=S47&rft.epage=S50&rft.pages=S47-S50&rft.issn=0934-0874&rft.eissn=1432-2277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/tri.1992.5.s1.47&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72745363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72745363&rft_id=info:pmid/14621729&rfr_iscdi=true |