Mean pressure obtained by modified rapid pull-through technique used to assess lower esophageal sphincter function
Lower esophageal sphincter pressure, length of sphincter, and contraction of the crural diaphragm are determinants of esophageal function. Mean pressure manometrics in modified rapid pull-through reflects these three factors. Reproducibility and interobserver variability were studied to assess this...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Digestive diseases and sciences 2002-11, Vol.47 (11), p.2549-2553 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2553 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2549 |
container_title | Digestive diseases and sciences |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Alonso, P Estévez, E Aba, C González-Conde, B Yáñez, J Vázquez-Iglesias, J L |
description | Lower esophageal sphincter pressure, length of sphincter, and contraction of the crural diaphragm are determinants of esophageal function. Mean pressure manometrics in modified rapid pull-through reflects these three factors. Reproducibility and interobserver variability were studied to assess this method's efficacy and were compared with the maximum expiratory pressure in station pull-through in 44 individuals divided into three groups: achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux, and healthy volunteers. Mean pressure in rapid pull-through showed high reproducibility, no significant differences (14.4 +/- 8.4 vs 12.6 +/- 8.2 mm Hg) between two measurements, and a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.9). Interobserver variability was lower than that seen for maximum expiratory pressure (P < 0.001). Mean pressure was lower than maximum expiratory pressure in patients with achalasia (21.1 +/- 7 vs 30.7 +/- 8.6 mm Hg). Both methods showed identical sensitivity to establish a hypotensive sphincter in patients with reflux (73%). We think that mean pressure obtained by rapid pull-through is a good methodology to assess lower esophageal sphincter competence. It is rapid, simple, shows good reproducibility and low interobserver variability, and is clinically valid. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1020576529685 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72743936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72743936</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p234t-2cc921249e50f85219f7203ac96b93df5f1a1deaf8a619d42ed86d76e63bb9203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkDtPwzAUhS0EoqUwsyGLgS3gR-zEbFXFSypigTly4pvGVRoHOxbqv8eIsjCdo6tPR58uQpeU3FLC-N3yPgURhRRMyVIcoTkVBc-YkOUxmhMqU6dUztBZCFtCiCqoPEUzynLBuMrnyL-CHvDoIYToAbt60nYAg-s93jljW5u616M1eIx9n02dd3HT4QmabrCfEXAMiZgc1iGkDdy7L_AYghs7vQHd4zB2dmimdGxjSuuGc3TS6j7AxSEX6OPx4X31nK3fnl5Wy3U2Mp5PGWsaxZKoAkHaUjCq2oIRrhsla8VNK1qqqQHdllpSZXIGppSmkCB5XatELtDN7-7oXTINU7WzoYG-1wO4GKqCFTlXXCbw-h-4ddEPya1iNOdcFPkPdHWAYr0DU43e7rTfV3-v5N-oDXc8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214335746</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mean pressure obtained by modified rapid pull-through technique used to assess lower esophageal sphincter function</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Alonso, P ; Estévez, E ; Aba, C ; González-Conde, B ; Yáñez, J ; Vázquez-Iglesias, J L</creator><creatorcontrib>Alonso, P ; Estévez, E ; Aba, C ; González-Conde, B ; Yáñez, J ; Vázquez-Iglesias, J L</creatorcontrib><description>Lower esophageal sphincter pressure, length of sphincter, and contraction of the crural diaphragm are determinants of esophageal function. Mean pressure manometrics in modified rapid pull-through reflects these three factors. Reproducibility and interobserver variability were studied to assess this method's efficacy and were compared with the maximum expiratory pressure in station pull-through in 44 individuals divided into three groups: achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux, and healthy volunteers. Mean pressure in rapid pull-through showed high reproducibility, no significant differences (14.4 +/- 8.4 vs 12.6 +/- 8.2 mm Hg) between two measurements, and a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.9). Interobserver variability was lower than that seen for maximum expiratory pressure (P < 0.001). Mean pressure was lower than maximum expiratory pressure in patients with achalasia (21.1 +/- 7 vs 30.7 +/- 8.6 mm Hg). Both methods showed identical sensitivity to establish a hypotensive sphincter in patients with reflux (73%). We think that mean pressure obtained by rapid pull-through is a good methodology to assess lower esophageal sphincter competence. It is rapid, simple, shows good reproducibility and low interobserver variability, and is clinically valid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2116</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1020576529685</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12452394</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DDSCDJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Esophageal Achalasia - physiopathology ; Esophagogastric Junction - physiology ; Female ; Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology ; Humans ; Male ; Manometry - methods ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation</subject><ispartof>Digestive diseases and sciences, 2002-11, Vol.47 (11), p.2549-2553</ispartof><rights>Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers Nov 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12452394$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alonso, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estévez, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aba, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Conde, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yáñez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vázquez-Iglesias, J L</creatorcontrib><title>Mean pressure obtained by modified rapid pull-through technique used to assess lower esophageal sphincter function</title><title>Digestive diseases and sciences</title><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><description>Lower esophageal sphincter pressure, length of sphincter, and contraction of the crural diaphragm are determinants of esophageal function. Mean pressure manometrics in modified rapid pull-through reflects these three factors. Reproducibility and interobserver variability were studied to assess this method's efficacy and were compared with the maximum expiratory pressure in station pull-through in 44 individuals divided into three groups: achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux, and healthy volunteers. Mean pressure in rapid pull-through showed high reproducibility, no significant differences (14.4 +/- 8.4 vs 12.6 +/- 8.2 mm Hg) between two measurements, and a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.9). Interobserver variability was lower than that seen for maximum expiratory pressure (P < 0.001). Mean pressure was lower than maximum expiratory pressure in patients with achalasia (21.1 +/- 7 vs 30.7 +/- 8.6 mm Hg). Both methods showed identical sensitivity to establish a hypotensive sphincter in patients with reflux (73%). We think that mean pressure obtained by rapid pull-through is a good methodology to assess lower esophageal sphincter competence. It is rapid, simple, shows good reproducibility and low interobserver variability, and is clinically valid.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Esophageal Achalasia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Esophagogastric Junction - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manometry - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><issn>0163-2116</issn><issn>1573-2568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkDtPwzAUhS0EoqUwsyGLgS3gR-zEbFXFSypigTly4pvGVRoHOxbqv8eIsjCdo6tPR58uQpeU3FLC-N3yPgURhRRMyVIcoTkVBc-YkOUxmhMqU6dUztBZCFtCiCqoPEUzynLBuMrnyL-CHvDoIYToAbt60nYAg-s93jljW5u616M1eIx9n02dd3HT4QmabrCfEXAMiZgc1iGkDdy7L_AYghs7vQHd4zB2dmimdGxjSuuGc3TS6j7AxSEX6OPx4X31nK3fnl5Wy3U2Mp5PGWsaxZKoAkHaUjCq2oIRrhsla8VNK1qqqQHdllpSZXIGppSmkCB5XatELtDN7-7oXTINU7WzoYG-1wO4GKqCFTlXXCbw-h-4ddEPya1iNOdcFPkPdHWAYr0DU43e7rTfV3-v5N-oDXc8</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>Alonso, P</creator><creator>Estévez, E</creator><creator>Aba, C</creator><creator>González-Conde, B</creator><creator>Yáñez, J</creator><creator>Vázquez-Iglesias, J L</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>Mean pressure obtained by modified rapid pull-through technique used to assess lower esophageal sphincter function</title><author>Alonso, P ; Estévez, E ; Aba, C ; González-Conde, B ; Yáñez, J ; Vázquez-Iglesias, J L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p234t-2cc921249e50f85219f7203ac96b93df5f1a1deaf8a619d42ed86d76e63bb9203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Esophageal Achalasia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Esophagogastric Junction - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manometry - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alonso, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estévez, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aba, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Conde, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yáñez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vázquez-Iglesias, J L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alonso, P</au><au>Estévez, E</au><au>Aba, C</au><au>González-Conde, B</au><au>Yáñez, J</au><au>Vázquez-Iglesias, J L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mean pressure obtained by modified rapid pull-through technique used to assess lower esophageal sphincter function</atitle><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Dig Dis Sci</addtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2549</spage><epage>2553</epage><pages>2549-2553</pages><issn>0163-2116</issn><eissn>1573-2568</eissn><coden>DDSCDJ</coden><abstract>Lower esophageal sphincter pressure, length of sphincter, and contraction of the crural diaphragm are determinants of esophageal function. Mean pressure manometrics in modified rapid pull-through reflects these three factors. Reproducibility and interobserver variability were studied to assess this method's efficacy and were compared with the maximum expiratory pressure in station pull-through in 44 individuals divided into three groups: achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux, and healthy volunteers. Mean pressure in rapid pull-through showed high reproducibility, no significant differences (14.4 +/- 8.4 vs 12.6 +/- 8.2 mm Hg) between two measurements, and a high correlation coefficient (r = 0.9). Interobserver variability was lower than that seen for maximum expiratory pressure (P < 0.001). Mean pressure was lower than maximum expiratory pressure in patients with achalasia (21.1 +/- 7 vs 30.7 +/- 8.6 mm Hg). Both methods showed identical sensitivity to establish a hypotensive sphincter in patients with reflux (73%). We think that mean pressure obtained by rapid pull-through is a good methodology to assess lower esophageal sphincter competence. It is rapid, simple, shows good reproducibility and low interobserver variability, and is clinically valid.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>12452394</pmid><doi>10.1023/A:1020576529685</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0163-2116 |
ispartof | Digestive diseases and sciences, 2002-11, Vol.47 (11), p.2549-2553 |
issn | 0163-2116 1573-2568 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72743936 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Esophageal Achalasia - physiopathology Esophagogastric Junction - physiology Female Gastroesophageal Reflux - physiopathology Humans Male Manometry - methods Middle Aged Observer Variation |
title | Mean pressure obtained by modified rapid pull-through technique used to assess lower esophageal sphincter function |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T00%3A05%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mean%20pressure%20obtained%20by%20modified%20rapid%20pull-through%20technique%20used%20to%20assess%20lower%20esophageal%20sphincter%20function&rft.jtitle=Digestive%20diseases%20and%20sciences&rft.au=Alonso,%20P&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2549&rft.epage=2553&rft.pages=2549-2553&rft.issn=0163-2116&rft.eissn=1573-2568&rft.coden=DDSCDJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1020576529685&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72743936%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214335746&rft_id=info:pmid/12452394&rfr_iscdi=true |