Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease

Assessment programs recently designed to follow‐up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Movement disorders 2002-11, Vol.17 (6), p.1294-1301
Hauptverfasser: Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal, Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine, Bourdet, Catherine, Grandmougin, Thierry, Hantraye, Philippe, Cesaro, Pierre, Degos, Jean-Denis, Peschanski, Marc, Lisovoski, Fabrice
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1301
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1294
container_title Movement disorders
container_volume 17
creator Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal
Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine
Bourdet, Catherine
Grandmougin, Thierry
Hantraye, Philippe
Cesaro, Pierre
Degos, Jean-Denis
Peschanski, Marc
Lisovoski, Fabrice
description Assessment programs recently designed to follow‐up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between the electrophysiological results and those of clinical assessment. We address this issue in a cohort of 36 patients at relatively early stages of the disease (I and II). Electrophysiological studies comprised the recording of palmar sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), blink reflexes (BRs), thenar long latency reflexes (LLRs), cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and electromyographic silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (SPs). Results were analyzed with reference to disease duration and staging and to specific cognitive, psychiatric, and motor alteration. SEPs were the most and very sensitive markers, because they were abnormal in 94% of patients. Except for LLRs, alteration of electrophysiological results increased in parallel to the evolution of the disease. Except for LLRs and SSR latency, electrophysiological results correlated with those of specific clinical examinations. In particular, an increased BR latency or a reduced amplitude of the N20 component of SEPs correlated with the extent of bradykinesia, whereas a reduced amplitude of SSRs or of the N30 component of SEPs correlated with hyperkinesia. Overall, electrophysiological tests, in particular SEPs and BRs, appeared sensitive and interesting in the follow‐up of HD patients and correlated with various clinical parameters, suggesting that these easy to perform and noninvasive repeatable examinations could be added fruitfully to the assessment programs for HD. © 2002 Movement Disorder Society
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mds.10273
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72738295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21145256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-654f65cb9ab2c4a060ab187989fd1aef9cc07bdb2cca2134eb6398cfc7715fa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhq0KRLeFA38A-QTqIdRjx3FyhKUfSKU9LIjeLMeZdA35WDLetvvv63YXOCFO80rzzKvRw9hrEO9BCHncN5SCNGqPzUAryEqpzTM2E2WpMwWl3mcHRD-EANBQvGD7IPNCCwMztpx3YQjedXzCDm_d4JGPLU_Zx2lcLTcUxm68eSIiUiQeBh6XyB0REvU4xEd-5WJIkfhdiEt-vh5iGG7iOLwj3gRCR_iSPW9dR_hqNw_Zt9OTr_Pz7OLq7PP8w0XmVSVUVui8LbSvK1dLnztRCFdDaaqyahtw2FbeC1M3aemdBJVjXaiq9K03BnTrjDpkb7e9q2n8tU4f2z6Qx65zA45rsiZpKmWl_wtKgFxLXSTwaAv6aSSasLWrKfRu2lgQ9tG_Tf7tk__EvtmVrusem7_kTngCjrfAXehw8-8m--XT4ndltr0IFPH-z4WbftrCKKPt98szu6j09cdTyO1CPQDFYaB5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21145256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal ; Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine ; Bourdet, Catherine ; Grandmougin, Thierry ; Hantraye, Philippe ; Cesaro, Pierre ; Degos, Jean-Denis ; Peschanski, Marc ; Lisovoski, Fabrice</creator><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal ; Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine ; Bourdet, Catherine ; Grandmougin, Thierry ; Hantraye, Philippe ; Cesaro, Pierre ; Degos, Jean-Denis ; Peschanski, Marc ; Lisovoski, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment programs recently designed to follow‐up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between the electrophysiological results and those of clinical assessment. We address this issue in a cohort of 36 patients at relatively early stages of the disease (I and II). Electrophysiological studies comprised the recording of palmar sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), blink reflexes (BRs), thenar long latency reflexes (LLRs), cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and electromyographic silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (SPs). Results were analyzed with reference to disease duration and staging and to specific cognitive, psychiatric, and motor alteration. SEPs were the most and very sensitive markers, because they were abnormal in 94% of patients. Except for LLRs, alteration of electrophysiological results increased in parallel to the evolution of the disease. Except for LLRs and SSR latency, electrophysiological results correlated with those of specific clinical examinations. In particular, an increased BR latency or a reduced amplitude of the N20 component of SEPs correlated with the extent of bradykinesia, whereas a reduced amplitude of SSRs or of the N30 component of SEPs correlated with hyperkinesia. Overall, electrophysiological tests, in particular SEPs and BRs, appeared sensitive and interesting in the follow‐up of HD patients and correlated with various clinical parameters, suggesting that these easy to perform and noninvasive repeatable examinations could be added fruitfully to the assessment programs for HD. © 2002 Movement Disorder Society</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-8257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mds.10273</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12465071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blinking - physiology ; Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology ; clinical neurophysiology ; Disease Progression ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrodiagnosis ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Electromyography ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Galvanic Skin Response - physiology ; Humans ; Huntington Disease - diagnosis ; Huntington Disease - genetics ; Huntington Disease - physiopathology ; Huntington's disease ; Hypokinesia - diagnosis ; Hypokinesia - physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; movement disorders ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Reflex, Stretch - physiology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Movement disorders, 2002-11, Vol.17 (6), p.1294-1301</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 Movement Disorders Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Movement Disorder Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-654f65cb9ab2c4a060ab187989fd1aef9cc07bdb2cca2134eb6398cfc7715fa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-654f65cb9ab2c4a060ab187989fd1aef9cc07bdb2cca2134eb6398cfc7715fa73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmds.10273$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmds.10273$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12465071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdet, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandmougin, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hantraye, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesaro, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degos, Jean-Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peschanski, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisovoski, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease</title><title>Movement disorders</title><addtitle>Mov. Disord</addtitle><description>Assessment programs recently designed to follow‐up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between the electrophysiological results and those of clinical assessment. We address this issue in a cohort of 36 patients at relatively early stages of the disease (I and II). Electrophysiological studies comprised the recording of palmar sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), blink reflexes (BRs), thenar long latency reflexes (LLRs), cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and electromyographic silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (SPs). Results were analyzed with reference to disease duration and staging and to specific cognitive, psychiatric, and motor alteration. SEPs were the most and very sensitive markers, because they were abnormal in 94% of patients. Except for LLRs, alteration of electrophysiological results increased in parallel to the evolution of the disease. Except for LLRs and SSR latency, electrophysiological results correlated with those of specific clinical examinations. In particular, an increased BR latency or a reduced amplitude of the N20 component of SEPs correlated with the extent of bradykinesia, whereas a reduced amplitude of SSRs or of the N30 component of SEPs correlated with hyperkinesia. Overall, electrophysiological tests, in particular SEPs and BRs, appeared sensitive and interesting in the follow‐up of HD patients and correlated with various clinical parameters, suggesting that these easy to perform and noninvasive repeatable examinations could be added fruitfully to the assessment programs for HD. © 2002 Movement Disorder Society</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blinking - physiology</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>clinical neurophysiology</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Galvanic Skin Response - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Huntington Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Huntington Disease - genetics</subject><subject>Huntington Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Huntington's disease</subject><subject>Hypokinesia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hypokinesia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>movement disorders</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Reflex, Stretch - physiology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</subject><issn>0885-3185</issn><issn>1531-8257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhq0KRLeFA38A-QTqIdRjx3FyhKUfSKU9LIjeLMeZdA35WDLetvvv63YXOCFO80rzzKvRw9hrEO9BCHncN5SCNGqPzUAryEqpzTM2E2WpMwWl3mcHRD-EANBQvGD7IPNCCwMztpx3YQjedXzCDm_d4JGPLU_Zx2lcLTcUxm68eSIiUiQeBh6XyB0REvU4xEd-5WJIkfhdiEt-vh5iGG7iOLwj3gRCR_iSPW9dR_hqNw_Zt9OTr_Pz7OLq7PP8w0XmVSVUVui8LbSvK1dLnztRCFdDaaqyahtw2FbeC1M3aemdBJVjXaiq9K03BnTrjDpkb7e9q2n8tU4f2z6Qx65zA45rsiZpKmWl_wtKgFxLXSTwaAv6aSSasLWrKfRu2lgQ9tG_Tf7tk__EvtmVrusem7_kTngCjrfAXehw8-8m--XT4ndltr0IFPH-z4WbftrCKKPt98szu6j09cdTyO1CPQDFYaB5</recordid><startdate>200211</startdate><enddate>200211</enddate><creator>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal</creator><creator>Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine</creator><creator>Bourdet, Catherine</creator><creator>Grandmougin, Thierry</creator><creator>Hantraye, Philippe</creator><creator>Cesaro, Pierre</creator><creator>Degos, Jean-Denis</creator><creator>Peschanski, Marc</creator><creator>Lisovoski, Fabrice</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200211</creationdate><title>Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease</title><author>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal ; Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine ; Bourdet, Catherine ; Grandmougin, Thierry ; Hantraye, Philippe ; Cesaro, Pierre ; Degos, Jean-Denis ; Peschanski, Marc ; Lisovoski, Fabrice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-654f65cb9ab2c4a060ab187989fd1aef9cc07bdb2cca2134eb6398cfc7715fa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blinking - physiology</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>clinical neurophysiology</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Galvanic Skin Response - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Huntington Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Huntington Disease - genetics</topic><topic>Huntington Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Huntington's disease</topic><topic>Hypokinesia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hypokinesia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>movement disorders</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Reflex, Stretch - physiology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdet, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandmougin, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hantraye, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesaro, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degos, Jean-Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peschanski, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisovoski, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Movement disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal</au><au>Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine</au><au>Bourdet, Catherine</au><au>Grandmougin, Thierry</au><au>Hantraye, Philippe</au><au>Cesaro, Pierre</au><au>Degos, Jean-Denis</au><au>Peschanski, Marc</au><au>Lisovoski, Fabrice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease</atitle><jtitle>Movement disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Mov. Disord</addtitle><date>2002-11</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1294</spage><epage>1301</epage><pages>1294-1301</pages><issn>0885-3185</issn><eissn>1531-8257</eissn><abstract>Assessment programs recently designed to follow‐up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between the electrophysiological results and those of clinical assessment. We address this issue in a cohort of 36 patients at relatively early stages of the disease (I and II). Electrophysiological studies comprised the recording of palmar sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), blink reflexes (BRs), thenar long latency reflexes (LLRs), cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and electromyographic silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (SPs). Results were analyzed with reference to disease duration and staging and to specific cognitive, psychiatric, and motor alteration. SEPs were the most and very sensitive markers, because they were abnormal in 94% of patients. Except for LLRs, alteration of electrophysiological results increased in parallel to the evolution of the disease. Except for LLRs and SSR latency, electrophysiological results correlated with those of specific clinical examinations. In particular, an increased BR latency or a reduced amplitude of the N20 component of SEPs correlated with the extent of bradykinesia, whereas a reduced amplitude of SSRs or of the N30 component of SEPs correlated with hyperkinesia. Overall, electrophysiological tests, in particular SEPs and BRs, appeared sensitive and interesting in the follow‐up of HD patients and correlated with various clinical parameters, suggesting that these easy to perform and noninvasive repeatable examinations could be added fruitfully to the assessment programs for HD. © 2002 Movement Disorder Society</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>12465071</pmid><doi>10.1002/mds.10273</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-3185
ispartof Movement disorders, 2002-11, Vol.17 (6), p.1294-1301
issn 0885-3185
1531-8257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72738295
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Blinking - physiology
Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology
clinical neurophysiology
Disease Progression
Electric Stimulation
Electrodiagnosis
Electromagnetic Fields
Electromyography
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Galvanic Skin Response - physiology
Humans
Huntington Disease - diagnosis
Huntington Disease - genetics
Huntington Disease - physiopathology
Huntington's disease
Hypokinesia - diagnosis
Hypokinesia - physiopathology
Male
Middle Aged
movement disorders
Reaction Time - physiology
Reflex, Stretch - physiology
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology
title Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A47%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20relevance%20of%20electrophysiological%20tests%20in%20the%20assessment%20of%20patients%20with%20Huntington's%20disease&rft.jtitle=Movement%20disorders&rft.au=Lefaucheur,%20Jean-Pascal&rft.date=2002-11&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1294&rft.epage=1301&rft.pages=1294-1301&rft.issn=0885-3185&rft.eissn=1531-8257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mds.10273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21145256%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21145256&rft_id=info:pmid/12465071&rfr_iscdi=true