Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease
Assessment programs recently designed to follow‐up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Movement disorders 2002-11, Vol.17 (6), p.1294-1301 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1301 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1294 |
container_title | Movement disorders |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine Bourdet, Catherine Grandmougin, Thierry Hantraye, Philippe Cesaro, Pierre Degos, Jean-Denis Peschanski, Marc Lisovoski, Fabrice |
description | Assessment programs recently designed to follow‐up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between the electrophysiological results and those of clinical assessment. We address this issue in a cohort of 36 patients at relatively early stages of the disease (I and II). Electrophysiological studies comprised the recording of palmar sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), blink reflexes (BRs), thenar long latency reflexes (LLRs), cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and electromyographic silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (SPs). Results were analyzed with reference to disease duration and staging and to specific cognitive, psychiatric, and motor alteration. SEPs were the most and very sensitive markers, because they were abnormal in 94% of patients. Except for LLRs, alteration of electrophysiological results increased in parallel to the evolution of the disease. Except for LLRs and SSR latency, electrophysiological results correlated with those of specific clinical examinations. In particular, an increased BR latency or a reduced amplitude of the N20 component of SEPs correlated with the extent of bradykinesia, whereas a reduced amplitude of SSRs or of the N30 component of SEPs correlated with hyperkinesia. Overall, electrophysiological tests, in particular SEPs and BRs, appeared sensitive and interesting in the follow‐up of HD patients and correlated with various clinical parameters, suggesting that these easy to perform and noninvasive repeatable examinations could be added fruitfully to the assessment programs for HD. © 2002 Movement Disorder Society |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mds.10273 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72738295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21145256</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-654f65cb9ab2c4a060ab187989fd1aef9cc07bdb2cca2134eb6398cfc7715fa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhq0KRLeFA38A-QTqIdRjx3FyhKUfSKU9LIjeLMeZdA35WDLetvvv63YXOCFO80rzzKvRw9hrEO9BCHncN5SCNGqPzUAryEqpzTM2E2WpMwWl3mcHRD-EANBQvGD7IPNCCwMztpx3YQjedXzCDm_d4JGPLU_Zx2lcLTcUxm68eSIiUiQeBh6XyB0REvU4xEd-5WJIkfhdiEt-vh5iGG7iOLwj3gRCR_iSPW9dR_hqNw_Zt9OTr_Pz7OLq7PP8w0XmVSVUVui8LbSvK1dLnztRCFdDaaqyahtw2FbeC1M3aemdBJVjXaiq9K03BnTrjDpkb7e9q2n8tU4f2z6Qx65zA45rsiZpKmWl_wtKgFxLXSTwaAv6aSSasLWrKfRu2lgQ9tG_Tf7tk__EvtmVrusem7_kTngCjrfAXehw8-8m--XT4ndltr0IFPH-z4WbftrCKKPt98szu6j09cdTyO1CPQDFYaB5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21145256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal ; Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine ; Bourdet, Catherine ; Grandmougin, Thierry ; Hantraye, Philippe ; Cesaro, Pierre ; Degos, Jean-Denis ; Peschanski, Marc ; Lisovoski, Fabrice</creator><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal ; Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine ; Bourdet, Catherine ; Grandmougin, Thierry ; Hantraye, Philippe ; Cesaro, Pierre ; Degos, Jean-Denis ; Peschanski, Marc ; Lisovoski, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><description>Assessment programs recently designed to follow‐up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between the electrophysiological results and those of clinical assessment. We address this issue in a cohort of 36 patients at relatively early stages of the disease (I and II). Electrophysiological studies comprised the recording of palmar sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), blink reflexes (BRs), thenar long latency reflexes (LLRs), cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and electromyographic silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (SPs). Results were analyzed with reference to disease duration and staging and to specific cognitive, psychiatric, and motor alteration. SEPs were the most and very sensitive markers, because they were abnormal in 94% of patients. Except for LLRs, alteration of electrophysiological results increased in parallel to the evolution of the disease. Except for LLRs and SSR latency, electrophysiological results correlated with those of specific clinical examinations. In particular, an increased BR latency or a reduced amplitude of the N20 component of SEPs correlated with the extent of bradykinesia, whereas a reduced amplitude of SSRs or of the N30 component of SEPs correlated with hyperkinesia. Overall, electrophysiological tests, in particular SEPs and BRs, appeared sensitive and interesting in the follow‐up of HD patients and correlated with various clinical parameters, suggesting that these easy to perform and noninvasive repeatable examinations could be added fruitfully to the assessment programs for HD. © 2002 Movement Disorder Society</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-3185</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-8257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mds.10273</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12465071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adult ; Blinking - physiology ; Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology ; clinical neurophysiology ; Disease Progression ; Electric Stimulation ; Electrodiagnosis ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Electromyography ; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Galvanic Skin Response - physiology ; Humans ; Huntington Disease - diagnosis ; Huntington Disease - genetics ; Huntington Disease - physiopathology ; Huntington's disease ; Hypokinesia - diagnosis ; Hypokinesia - physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; movement disorders ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Reflex, Stretch - physiology ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Movement disorders, 2002-11, Vol.17 (6), p.1294-1301</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2002 Movement Disorders Society</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 Movement Disorder Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-654f65cb9ab2c4a060ab187989fd1aef9cc07bdb2cca2134eb6398cfc7715fa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-654f65cb9ab2c4a060ab187989fd1aef9cc07bdb2cca2134eb6398cfc7715fa73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmds.10273$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmds.10273$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12465071$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdet, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandmougin, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hantraye, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesaro, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degos, Jean-Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peschanski, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisovoski, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease</title><title>Movement disorders</title><addtitle>Mov. Disord</addtitle><description>Assessment programs recently designed to follow‐up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between the electrophysiological results and those of clinical assessment. We address this issue in a cohort of 36 patients at relatively early stages of the disease (I and II). Electrophysiological studies comprised the recording of palmar sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), blink reflexes (BRs), thenar long latency reflexes (LLRs), cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and electromyographic silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (SPs). Results were analyzed with reference to disease duration and staging and to specific cognitive, psychiatric, and motor alteration. SEPs were the most and very sensitive markers, because they were abnormal in 94% of patients. Except for LLRs, alteration of electrophysiological results increased in parallel to the evolution of the disease. Except for LLRs and SSR latency, electrophysiological results correlated with those of specific clinical examinations. In particular, an increased BR latency or a reduced amplitude of the N20 component of SEPs correlated with the extent of bradykinesia, whereas a reduced amplitude of SSRs or of the N30 component of SEPs correlated with hyperkinesia. Overall, electrophysiological tests, in particular SEPs and BRs, appeared sensitive and interesting in the follow‐up of HD patients and correlated with various clinical parameters, suggesting that these easy to perform and noninvasive repeatable examinations could be added fruitfully to the assessment programs for HD. © 2002 Movement Disorder Society</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Blinking - physiology</subject><subject>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>clinical neurophysiology</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Galvanic Skin Response - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Huntington Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Huntington Disease - genetics</subject><subject>Huntington Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Huntington's disease</subject><subject>Hypokinesia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hypokinesia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>movement disorders</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Reflex, Stretch - physiology</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</subject><issn>0885-3185</issn><issn>1531-8257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhq0KRLeFA38A-QTqIdRjx3FyhKUfSKU9LIjeLMeZdA35WDLetvvv63YXOCFO80rzzKvRw9hrEO9BCHncN5SCNGqPzUAryEqpzTM2E2WpMwWl3mcHRD-EANBQvGD7IPNCCwMztpx3YQjedXzCDm_d4JGPLU_Zx2lcLTcUxm68eSIiUiQeBh6XyB0REvU4xEd-5WJIkfhdiEt-vh5iGG7iOLwj3gRCR_iSPW9dR_hqNw_Zt9OTr_Pz7OLq7PP8w0XmVSVUVui8LbSvK1dLnztRCFdDaaqyahtw2FbeC1M3aemdBJVjXaiq9K03BnTrjDpkb7e9q2n8tU4f2z6Qx65zA45rsiZpKmWl_wtKgFxLXSTwaAv6aSSasLWrKfRu2lgQ9tG_Tf7tk__EvtmVrusem7_kTngCjrfAXehw8-8m--XT4ndltr0IFPH-z4WbftrCKKPt98szu6j09cdTyO1CPQDFYaB5</recordid><startdate>200211</startdate><enddate>200211</enddate><creator>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal</creator><creator>Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine</creator><creator>Bourdet, Catherine</creator><creator>Grandmougin, Thierry</creator><creator>Hantraye, Philippe</creator><creator>Cesaro, Pierre</creator><creator>Degos, Jean-Denis</creator><creator>Peschanski, Marc</creator><creator>Lisovoski, Fabrice</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200211</creationdate><title>Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease</title><author>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal ; Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine ; Bourdet, Catherine ; Grandmougin, Thierry ; Hantraye, Philippe ; Cesaro, Pierre ; Degos, Jean-Denis ; Peschanski, Marc ; Lisovoski, Fabrice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3903-654f65cb9ab2c4a060ab187989fd1aef9cc07bdb2cca2134eb6398cfc7715fa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Blinking - physiology</topic><topic>Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>clinical neurophysiology</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Galvanic Skin Response - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Huntington Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Huntington Disease - genetics</topic><topic>Huntington Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Huntington's disease</topic><topic>Hypokinesia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hypokinesia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>movement disorders</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Reflex, Stretch - physiology</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourdet, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grandmougin, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hantraye, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cesaro, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degos, Jean-Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peschanski, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisovoski, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Movement disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal</au><au>Bachoud-Levi, Anne-Catherine</au><au>Bourdet, Catherine</au><au>Grandmougin, Thierry</au><au>Hantraye, Philippe</au><au>Cesaro, Pierre</au><au>Degos, Jean-Denis</au><au>Peschanski, Marc</au><au>Lisovoski, Fabrice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease</atitle><jtitle>Movement disorders</jtitle><addtitle>Mov. Disord</addtitle><date>2002-11</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1294</spage><epage>1301</epage><pages>1294-1301</pages><issn>0885-3185</issn><eissn>1531-8257</eissn><abstract>Assessment programs recently designed to follow‐up patients with Huntington's disease (HD) in therapeutic trials have not included electrophysiological testing in the list of mandatory examinations. This omission is likely due to the current lack of data establishing a clear correlation between the electrophysiological results and those of clinical assessment. We address this issue in a cohort of 36 patients at relatively early stages of the disease (I and II). Electrophysiological studies comprised the recording of palmar sympathetic skin responses (SSRs), blink reflexes (BRs), thenar long latency reflexes (LLRs), cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), and electromyographic silent periods evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (SPs). Results were analyzed with reference to disease duration and staging and to specific cognitive, psychiatric, and motor alteration. SEPs were the most and very sensitive markers, because they were abnormal in 94% of patients. Except for LLRs, alteration of electrophysiological results increased in parallel to the evolution of the disease. Except for LLRs and SSR latency, electrophysiological results correlated with those of specific clinical examinations. In particular, an increased BR latency or a reduced amplitude of the N20 component of SEPs correlated with the extent of bradykinesia, whereas a reduced amplitude of SSRs or of the N30 component of SEPs correlated with hyperkinesia. Overall, electrophysiological tests, in particular SEPs and BRs, appeared sensitive and interesting in the follow‐up of HD patients and correlated with various clinical parameters, suggesting that these easy to perform and noninvasive repeatable examinations could be added fruitfully to the assessment programs for HD. © 2002 Movement Disorder Society</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>12465071</pmid><doi>10.1002/mds.10273</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-3185 |
ispartof | Movement disorders, 2002-11, Vol.17 (6), p.1294-1301 |
issn | 0885-3185 1531-8257 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72738295 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adult Blinking - physiology Cerebral Cortex - physiopathology clinical neurophysiology Disease Progression Electric Stimulation Electrodiagnosis Electromagnetic Fields Electromyography Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology Female Follow-Up Studies Galvanic Skin Response - physiology Humans Huntington Disease - diagnosis Huntington Disease - genetics Huntington Disease - physiopathology Huntington's disease Hypokinesia - diagnosis Hypokinesia - physiopathology Male Middle Aged movement disorders Reaction Time - physiology Reflex, Stretch - physiology Sensitivity and Specificity Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology |
title | Clinical relevance of electrophysiological tests in the assessment of patients with Huntington's disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T23%3A47%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20relevance%20of%20electrophysiological%20tests%20in%20the%20assessment%20of%20patients%20with%20Huntington's%20disease&rft.jtitle=Movement%20disorders&rft.au=Lefaucheur,%20Jean-Pascal&rft.date=2002-11&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1294&rft.epage=1301&rft.pages=1294-1301&rft.issn=0885-3185&rft.eissn=1531-8257&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mds.10273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21145256%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21145256&rft_id=info:pmid/12465071&rfr_iscdi=true |