Empirical studies of the reliability of surgical navigation systems

Empirical studies of the reliability of surgical navigation systems

A number of studies demonstrate the clinical relevance of systems for computer assisted surgery (CAS systems). As however studies on human error in medicine indicate, reliability of the results strongly depends on aspects of usability and error tolerance of the system. This paper presents studies wh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biomedizinische Technik 2002, Vol.47 Suppl 1 Pt 1, p.37-40
Hauptverfasser: Zimolong, A, Wu, T, de Siebenthal, J, Stockheim, M, Zimolong, B, Radermacher, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:ger
Schlagworte:
Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Competence
Computer Systems
Education, Medical, Continuing
General Surgery - education
Humans
Medical Errors
Reproducibility of Results
Risk
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 40
container_issue
container_start_page 37
container_title Biomedizinische Technik
container_volume 47 Suppl 1 Pt 1
creator Zimolong, A
Wu, T
de Siebenthal, J
Stockheim, M
Zimolong, B
Radermacher, K
description A number of studies demonstrate the clinical relevance of systems for computer assisted surgery (CAS systems). As however studies on human error in medicine indicate, reliability of the results strongly depends on aspects of usability and error tolerance of the system. This paper presents studies which aim to assess these aspects of reliability of CAS systems. In a clinical study, interaction with a CAS system by 16 expert and novice surgeons was observed and assessed. From 133 recorded incidents 41% were rated to have significant impact on the clinical result or to inhibit successful completion of the task, which indicates a low degree of error tolerance of the system. These findings are supported by the results obtained from questionnaire, were learnability and error tolerance were judged to be not sufficient.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72730096</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72730096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p546-42c9b0d08469a02e71a5bfcad83b00a07728cf433a2ffb0a3defee8a5be024d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1z0tLw0AUBeBZKLZW_4Jk5S5wM49MspRSH1Bw0324k7lTRyYPMxMh_96q7erA4ePAuWJrgELkSlVqxW5j_ASQStVww1YFl6rQZblm2103-sm3GLKYZuspZoPL0gdlEwWPxgeflt8qztPxj_X47Y-Y_NBncYmJunjHrh2GSPfn3LDD8-6wfc337y9v26d9PipZ5pK3tQELlSxrBE66QGVci7YSBgBBa161TgqB3DkDKCw5ouqECLi0SmzY4__sOA1fM8XUdD62FAL2NMyx0VwLgLo8wYcznE1Hthkn3-G0NJfX4gcFKFOW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72730096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical studies of the reliability of surgical navigation systems</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Zimolong, A ; Wu, T ; de Siebenthal, J ; Stockheim, M ; Zimolong, B ; Radermacher, K</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimolong, A ; Wu, T ; de Siebenthal, J ; Stockheim, M ; Zimolong, B ; Radermacher, K</creatorcontrib><description>A number of studies demonstrate the clinical relevance of systems for computer assisted surgery (CAS systems). As however studies on human error in medicine indicate, reliability of the results strongly depends on aspects of usability and error tolerance of the system. This paper presents studies which aim to assess these aspects of reliability of CAS systems. In a clinical study, interaction with a CAS system by 16 expert and novice surgeons was observed and assessed. From 133 recorded incidents 41% were rated to have significant impact on the clinical result or to inhibit successful completion of the task, which indicates a low degree of error tolerance of the system. These findings are supported by the results obtained from questionnaire, were learnability and error tolerance were judged to be not sufficient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-5585</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12451766</identifier><language>ger</language><publisher>Germany</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Clinical Competence ; Computer Systems ; Education, Medical, Continuing ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Medical Errors ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Biomedizinische Technik, 2002, Vol.47 Suppl 1 Pt 1, p.37-40</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12451766$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimolong, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Siebenthal, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockheim, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimolong, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radermacher, K</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical studies of the reliability of surgical navigation systems</title><title>Biomedizinische Technik</title><addtitle>Biomed Tech (Berl)</addtitle><description>A number of studies demonstrate the clinical relevance of systems for computer assisted surgery (CAS systems). As however studies on human error in medicine indicate, reliability of the results strongly depends on aspects of usability and error tolerance of the system. This paper presents studies which aim to assess these aspects of reliability of CAS systems. In a clinical study, interaction with a CAS system by 16 expert and novice surgeons was observed and assessed. From 133 recorded incidents 41% were rated to have significant impact on the clinical result or to inhibit successful completion of the task, which indicates a low degree of error tolerance of the system. These findings are supported by the results obtained from questionnaire, were learnability and error tolerance were judged to be not sufficient.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Computer Systems</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Continuing</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Errors</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><issn>0013-5585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1z0tLw0AUBeBZKLZW_4Jk5S5wM49MspRSH1Bw0324k7lTRyYPMxMh_96q7erA4ePAuWJrgELkSlVqxW5j_ASQStVww1YFl6rQZblm2103-sm3GLKYZuspZoPL0gdlEwWPxgeflt8qztPxj_X47Y-Y_NBncYmJunjHrh2GSPfn3LDD8-6wfc337y9v26d9PipZ5pK3tQELlSxrBE66QGVci7YSBgBBa161TgqB3DkDKCw5ouqECLi0SmzY4__sOA1fM8XUdD62FAL2NMyx0VwLgLo8wYcznE1Hthkn3-G0NJfX4gcFKFOW</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Zimolong, A</creator><creator>Wu, T</creator><creator>de Siebenthal, J</creator><creator>Stockheim, M</creator><creator>Zimolong, B</creator><creator>Radermacher, K</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>Empirical studies of the reliability of surgical navigation systems</title><author>Zimolong, A ; Wu, T ; de Siebenthal, J ; Stockheim, M ; Zimolong, B ; Radermacher, K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p546-42c9b0d08469a02e71a5bfcad83b00a07728cf433a2ffb0a3defee8a5be024d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>ger</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Computer Systems</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Continuing</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Errors</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimolong, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Siebenthal, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockheim, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimolong, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radermacher, K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biomedizinische Technik</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimolong, A</au><au>Wu, T</au><au>de Siebenthal, J</au><au>Stockheim, M</au><au>Zimolong, B</au><au>Radermacher, K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical studies of the reliability of surgical navigation systems</atitle><jtitle>Biomedizinische Technik</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Tech (Berl)</addtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>47 Suppl 1 Pt 1</volume><spage>37</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>37-40</pages><issn>0013-5585</issn><abstract>A number of studies demonstrate the clinical relevance of systems for computer assisted surgery (CAS systems). As however studies on human error in medicine indicate, reliability of the results strongly depends on aspects of usability and error tolerance of the system. This paper presents studies which aim to assess these aspects of reliability of CAS systems. In a clinical study, interaction with a CAS system by 16 expert and novice surgeons was observed and assessed. From 133 recorded incidents 41% were rated to have significant impact on the clinical result or to inhibit successful completion of the task, which indicates a low degree of error tolerance of the system. These findings are supported by the results obtained from questionnaire, were learnability and error tolerance were judged to be not sufficient.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pmid>12451766</pmid><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-5585
ispartof Biomedizinische Technik, 2002, Vol.47 Suppl 1 Pt 1, p.37-40
issn 0013-5585
language ger
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72730096
source MEDLINE; De Gruyter journals
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Competence
Computer Systems
Education, Medical, Continuing
General Surgery - education
Humans
Medical Errors
Reproducibility of Results
Risk
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
title Empirical studies of the reliability of surgical navigation systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A16%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20studies%20of%20the%20reliability%20of%20surgical%20navigation%20systems&rft.jtitle=Biomedizinische%20Technik&rft.au=Zimolong,%20A&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=47%20Suppl%201%20Pt%201&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=37-40&rft.issn=0013-5585&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72730096%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72730096&rft_id=info:pmid/12451766&rfr_iscdi=true