Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diagnostic molecular pathology 2002-12, Vol.11 (4), p.193-203 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 203 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Diagnostic molecular pathology |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Jeuken, Judith W. M Sprenger, Sandra H. E Wesseling, Pieter |
description | Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a CGH experiment and reviews on the technique have appeared. However, full CGH protocols are only occasionally published. In this paper a review of CGH is presented, including technique, pitfalls, and difficulties. Our own protocol is completely described and discussed, including the different optimization experiments used to establish this protocol and points requiring special attention. Although this protocol results in reliable and sensitive CGH experiments in our hands, readers should keep in mind that other laboratories may prefer other protocols. Testing different options, among others, as discussed in the current paper generates the most appropriate protocol. This paper shows the complexity of the CGH technique and may serve as a guideline for starting CGH or as a troubleshooting guide for those who perform CGH. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00019606-200212000-00002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72726352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72726352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4222-64b007a65fb3d71c5b3e020cc0362a7d5bca987df62b442e9de6bee1f3dc170f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PwzAMQCMEYmPwF1BP3ApO0iQrNzTBhjQJDnCO0tTVAv0YScs0fj2BDThxcGxFz7byQkhC4ZJCrq4AgOYSZMoAGI0HpDGAHZAxFZynGUh5GGsQLM2FoCNyEsJLJHg2FcdkRFkmcsnFmKhZ16yNN717x2SObdc4myy2hXel-4i3XXudPHpje2dNncwHV2LtWgyn5KgydcCzfZ6Q57vbp9kiXT7M72c3y9RmjLFUZgWAMlJUBS8VtaLgCAysBS6ZUaUorMmnqqwkK7KMYV6iLBBpxUtLFVR8Qi52c9e-exsw9LpxwWJdmxa7IWjFFIsPYRGc7kDruxA8VnrtXWP8VlPQX9L0jzT9K01_S4ut5_sdQ9Fg-de4txSBbAdsurpHH17rYYNer9DU_Ur_9xn8E6xYdn0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72726352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Jeuken, Judith W. M ; Sprenger, Sandra H. E ; Wesseling, Pieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeuken, Judith W. M ; Sprenger, Sandra H. E ; Wesseling, Pieter</creatorcontrib><description>Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a CGH experiment and reviews on the technique have appeared. However, full CGH protocols are only occasionally published. In this paper a review of CGH is presented, including technique, pitfalls, and difficulties. Our own protocol is completely described and discussed, including the different optimization experiments used to establish this protocol and points requiring special attention. Although this protocol results in reliable and sensitive CGH experiments in our hands, readers should keep in mind that other laboratories may prefer other protocols. Testing different options, among others, as discussed in the current paper generates the most appropriate protocol. This paper shows the complexity of the CGH technique and may serve as a guideline for starting CGH or as a troubleshooting guide for those who perform CGH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-9551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4066</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00019606-200212000-00002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12459635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Chromosome Aberrations ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; DNA, Neoplasm - isolation & purification ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - instrumentation ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods ; Microscopy - instrumentation ; Microscopy - methods ; Nucleic Acid Hybridization - methods</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic molecular pathology, 2002-12, Vol.11 (4), p.193-203</ispartof><rights>2002 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4222-64b007a65fb3d71c5b3e020cc0362a7d5bca987df62b442e9de6bee1f3dc170f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4222-64b007a65fb3d71c5b3e020cc0362a7d5bca987df62b442e9de6bee1f3dc170f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12459635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeuken, Judith W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprenger, Sandra H. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesseling, Pieter</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines</title><title>Diagnostic molecular pathology</title><addtitle>Diagn Mol Pathol</addtitle><description>Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a CGH experiment and reviews on the technique have appeared. However, full CGH protocols are only occasionally published. In this paper a review of CGH is presented, including technique, pitfalls, and difficulties. Our own protocol is completely described and discussed, including the different optimization experiments used to establish this protocol and points requiring special attention. Although this protocol results in reliable and sensitive CGH experiments in our hands, readers should keep in mind that other laboratories may prefer other protocols. Testing different options, among others, as discussed in the current paper generates the most appropriate protocol. This paper shows the complexity of the CGH technique and may serve as a guideline for starting CGH or as a troubleshooting guide for those who perform CGH.</description><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - instrumentation</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Microscopy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Microscopy - methods</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Hybridization - methods</subject><issn>1052-9551</issn><issn>1533-4066</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PwzAMQCMEYmPwF1BP3ApO0iQrNzTBhjQJDnCO0tTVAv0YScs0fj2BDThxcGxFz7byQkhC4ZJCrq4AgOYSZMoAGI0HpDGAHZAxFZynGUh5GGsQLM2FoCNyEsJLJHg2FcdkRFkmcsnFmKhZ16yNN717x2SObdc4myy2hXel-4i3XXudPHpje2dNncwHV2LtWgyn5KgydcCzfZ6Q57vbp9kiXT7M72c3y9RmjLFUZgWAMlJUBS8VtaLgCAysBS6ZUaUorMmnqqwkK7KMYV6iLBBpxUtLFVR8Qi52c9e-exsw9LpxwWJdmxa7IWjFFIsPYRGc7kDruxA8VnrtXWP8VlPQX9L0jzT9K01_S4ut5_sdQ9Fg-de4txSBbAdsurpHH17rYYNer9DU_Ur_9xn8E6xYdn0</recordid><startdate>200212</startdate><enddate>200212</enddate><creator>Jeuken, Judith W. M</creator><creator>Sprenger, Sandra H. E</creator><creator>Wesseling, Pieter</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200212</creationdate><title>Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines</title><author>Jeuken, Judith W. M ; Sprenger, Sandra H. E ; Wesseling, Pieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4222-64b007a65fb3d71c5b3e020cc0362a7d5bca987df62b442e9de6bee1f3dc170f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - instrumentation</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Microscopy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Microscopy - methods</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Hybridization - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeuken, Judith W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprenger, Sandra H. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesseling, Pieter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic molecular pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeuken, Judith W. M</au><au>Sprenger, Sandra H. E</au><au>Wesseling, Pieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic molecular pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Mol Pathol</addtitle><date>2002-12</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>193-203</pages><issn>1052-9551</issn><eissn>1533-4066</eissn><abstract>Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a CGH experiment and reviews on the technique have appeared. However, full CGH protocols are only occasionally published. In this paper a review of CGH is presented, including technique, pitfalls, and difficulties. Our own protocol is completely described and discussed, including the different optimization experiments used to establish this protocol and points requiring special attention. Although this protocol results in reliable and sensitive CGH experiments in our hands, readers should keep in mind that other laboratories may prefer other protocols. Testing different options, among others, as discussed in the current paper generates the most appropriate protocol. This paper shows the complexity of the CGH technique and may serve as a guideline for starting CGH or as a troubleshooting guide for those who perform CGH.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>12459635</pmid><doi>10.1097/00019606-200212000-00002</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-9551 |
ispartof | Diagnostic molecular pathology, 2002-12, Vol.11 (4), p.193-203 |
issn | 1052-9551 1533-4066 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72726352 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Chromosome Aberrations DNA, Neoplasm - analysis DNA, Neoplasm - isolation & purification Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - instrumentation In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods Microscopy - instrumentation Microscopy - methods Nucleic Acid Hybridization - methods |
title | Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Genomic%20Hybridization:%20Practical%20Guidelines&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20molecular%20pathology&rft.au=Jeuken,%20Judith%20W.%20M&rft.date=2002-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=193-203&rft.issn=1052-9551&rft.eissn=1533-4066&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00019606-200212000-00002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72726352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72726352&rft_id=info:pmid/12459635&rfr_iscdi=true |