Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diagnostic molecular pathology 2002-12, Vol.11 (4), p.193-203
Hauptverfasser: Jeuken, Judith W. M, Sprenger, Sandra H. E, Wesseling, Pieter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 203
container_issue 4
container_start_page 193
container_title Diagnostic molecular pathology
container_volume 11
creator Jeuken, Judith W. M
Sprenger, Sandra H. E
Wesseling, Pieter
description Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a CGH experiment and reviews on the technique have appeared. However, full CGH protocols are only occasionally published. In this paper a review of CGH is presented, including technique, pitfalls, and difficulties. Our own protocol is completely described and discussed, including the different optimization experiments used to establish this protocol and points requiring special attention. Although this protocol results in reliable and sensitive CGH experiments in our hands, readers should keep in mind that other laboratories may prefer other protocols. Testing different options, among others, as discussed in the current paper generates the most appropriate protocol. This paper shows the complexity of the CGH technique and may serve as a guideline for starting CGH or as a troubleshooting guide for those who perform CGH.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00019606-200212000-00002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72726352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72726352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4222-64b007a65fb3d71c5b3e020cc0362a7d5bca987df62b442e9de6bee1f3dc170f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1PwzAMQCMEYmPwF1BP3ApO0iQrNzTBhjQJDnCO0tTVAv0YScs0fj2BDThxcGxFz7byQkhC4ZJCrq4AgOYSZMoAGI0HpDGAHZAxFZynGUh5GGsQLM2FoCNyEsJLJHg2FcdkRFkmcsnFmKhZ16yNN717x2SObdc4myy2hXel-4i3XXudPHpje2dNncwHV2LtWgyn5KgydcCzfZ6Q57vbp9kiXT7M72c3y9RmjLFUZgWAMlJUBS8VtaLgCAysBS6ZUaUorMmnqqwkK7KMYV6iLBBpxUtLFVR8Qi52c9e-exsw9LpxwWJdmxa7IWjFFIsPYRGc7kDruxA8VnrtXWP8VlPQX9L0jzT9K01_S4ut5_sdQ9Fg-de4txSBbAdsurpHH17rYYNer9DU_Ur_9xn8E6xYdn0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72726352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Jeuken, Judith W. M ; Sprenger, Sandra H. E ; Wesseling, Pieter</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeuken, Judith W. M ; Sprenger, Sandra H. E ; Wesseling, Pieter</creatorcontrib><description>Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a CGH experiment and reviews on the technique have appeared. However, full CGH protocols are only occasionally published. In this paper a review of CGH is presented, including technique, pitfalls, and difficulties. Our own protocol is completely described and discussed, including the different optimization experiments used to establish this protocol and points requiring special attention. Although this protocol results in reliable and sensitive CGH experiments in our hands, readers should keep in mind that other laboratories may prefer other protocols. Testing different options, among others, as discussed in the current paper generates the most appropriate protocol. This paper shows the complexity of the CGH technique and may serve as a guideline for starting CGH or as a troubleshooting guide for those who perform CGH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-9551</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4066</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00019606-200212000-00002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12459635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Chromosome Aberrations ; DNA, Neoplasm - analysis ; DNA, Neoplasm - isolation &amp; purification ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - instrumentation ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods ; Microscopy - instrumentation ; Microscopy - methods ; Nucleic Acid Hybridization - methods</subject><ispartof>Diagnostic molecular pathology, 2002-12, Vol.11 (4), p.193-203</ispartof><rights>2002 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4222-64b007a65fb3d71c5b3e020cc0362a7d5bca987df62b442e9de6bee1f3dc170f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4222-64b007a65fb3d71c5b3e020cc0362a7d5bca987df62b442e9de6bee1f3dc170f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12459635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeuken, Judith W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprenger, Sandra H. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesseling, Pieter</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines</title><title>Diagnostic molecular pathology</title><addtitle>Diagn Mol Pathol</addtitle><description>Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a CGH experiment and reviews on the technique have appeared. However, full CGH protocols are only occasionally published. In this paper a review of CGH is presented, including technique, pitfalls, and difficulties. Our own protocol is completely described and discussed, including the different optimization experiments used to establish this protocol and points requiring special attention. Although this protocol results in reliable and sensitive CGH experiments in our hands, readers should keep in mind that other laboratories may prefer other protocols. Testing different options, among others, as discussed in the current paper generates the most appropriate protocol. This paper shows the complexity of the CGH technique and may serve as a guideline for starting CGH or as a troubleshooting guide for those who perform CGH.</description><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Neoplasm - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - instrumentation</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Microscopy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Microscopy - methods</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Hybridization - methods</subject><issn>1052-9551</issn><issn>1533-4066</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1PwzAMQCMEYmPwF1BP3ApO0iQrNzTBhjQJDnCO0tTVAv0YScs0fj2BDThxcGxFz7byQkhC4ZJCrq4AgOYSZMoAGI0HpDGAHZAxFZynGUh5GGsQLM2FoCNyEsJLJHg2FcdkRFkmcsnFmKhZ16yNN717x2SObdc4myy2hXel-4i3XXudPHpje2dNncwHV2LtWgyn5KgydcCzfZ6Q57vbp9kiXT7M72c3y9RmjLFUZgWAMlJUBS8VtaLgCAysBS6ZUaUorMmnqqwkK7KMYV6iLBBpxUtLFVR8Qi52c9e-exsw9LpxwWJdmxa7IWjFFIsPYRGc7kDruxA8VnrtXWP8VlPQX9L0jzT9K01_S4ut5_sdQ9Fg-de4txSBbAdsurpHH17rYYNer9DU_Ur_9xn8E6xYdn0</recordid><startdate>200212</startdate><enddate>200212</enddate><creator>Jeuken, Judith W. M</creator><creator>Sprenger, Sandra H. E</creator><creator>Wesseling, Pieter</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200212</creationdate><title>Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines</title><author>Jeuken, Judith W. M ; Sprenger, Sandra H. E ; Wesseling, Pieter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4222-64b007a65fb3d71c5b3e020cc0362a7d5bca987df62b442e9de6bee1f3dc170f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Neoplasm - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - instrumentation</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Microscopy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Microscopy - methods</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Hybridization - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeuken, Judith W. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sprenger, Sandra H. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wesseling, Pieter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diagnostic molecular pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeuken, Judith W. M</au><au>Sprenger, Sandra H. E</au><au>Wesseling, Pieter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostic molecular pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Diagn Mol Pathol</addtitle><date>2002-12</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>193</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>193-203</pages><issn>1052-9551</issn><eissn>1533-4066</eissn><abstract>Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique used to identify copy number changes throughout a genome. Until now, hundreds of CGH studies have been published reporting chromosomal imbalances in a large variety of human neoplasms. Additionally, technical improvements of specific steps in a CGH experiment and reviews on the technique have appeared. However, full CGH protocols are only occasionally published. In this paper a review of CGH is presented, including technique, pitfalls, and difficulties. Our own protocol is completely described and discussed, including the different optimization experiments used to establish this protocol and points requiring special attention. Although this protocol results in reliable and sensitive CGH experiments in our hands, readers should keep in mind that other laboratories may prefer other protocols. Testing different options, among others, as discussed in the current paper generates the most appropriate protocol. This paper shows the complexity of the CGH technique and may serve as a guideline for starting CGH or as a troubleshooting guide for those who perform CGH.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>12459635</pmid><doi>10.1097/00019606-200212000-00002</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-9551
ispartof Diagnostic molecular pathology, 2002-12, Vol.11 (4), p.193-203
issn 1052-9551
1533-4066
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72726352
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Chromosome Aberrations
DNA, Neoplasm - analysis
DNA, Neoplasm - isolation & purification
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - instrumentation
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods
Microscopy - instrumentation
Microscopy - methods
Nucleic Acid Hybridization - methods
title Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Genomic%20Hybridization:%20Practical%20Guidelines&rft.jtitle=Diagnostic%20molecular%20pathology&rft.au=Jeuken,%20Judith%20W.%20M&rft.date=2002-12&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=193-203&rft.issn=1052-9551&rft.eissn=1533-4066&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00019606-200212000-00002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72726352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72726352&rft_id=info:pmid/12459635&rfr_iscdi=true