Maximal strength-training effects on force-velocity and force-power relationships explain increases in aerobic performance in humans

Maximal strength-training with an emphasis on maximal mobilization during cross-country skiing increases exercise economy when double-poling. The aim of this experiment was to investigate whether the mechanism of this increase is a change in the force-velocity relationship and the mechanical power o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of applied physiology 2002-12, Vol.88 (3), p.255-263
Hauptverfasser: Østerås, Håvard, Helgerud, Jan, Hoff, Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 263
container_issue 3
container_start_page 255
container_title European journal of applied physiology
container_volume 88
creator Østerås, Håvard
Helgerud, Jan
Hoff, Jan
description Maximal strength-training with an emphasis on maximal mobilization during cross-country skiing increases exercise economy when double-poling. The aim of this experiment was to investigate whether the mechanism of this increase is a change in the force-velocity relationship and the mechanical power output. A group of 19 cross-country skiers having an average peak oxygen uptake of 255 ml x kg(-0.67) body mass x min(-1) or 61 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) were randomly assigned to either a high resistance-training group (n=10) or a control group (n=9). Upper body endurance was tested on a ski ergometer. The high-resistance-training group trained for 15 min on three occasions a week for 9 weeks. Training consisted of three series of five repetitions using 85% of one repetition maximum (1RM), with emphasis on high velocity in the concentric part of the movement. Upper body exercise economy, 1RM and time to exhaustion increased significantly in the high resistance-training group, but was unchanged in the control group. Peak power and the velocities for a given load increased significantly, except for the two lowest loads. We conclude that the increased exercise economy after a period of upper body high resistance-training can be partly explained by a specific change in the force-velocity relationship and the mechanical power output.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00421-002-0717-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72725056</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18692450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-ef1a31d911d30fcbc9981395303507cb7665d45b43f728c77857fa5962df50013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMo7rr6AbxI8OAtWkk6neQoi_9gxYueQzpd2emlJ2mTbt25-8HNMIOCF0_1KN57UPUj5DmH1xxAv6kAneAMQDDQXLPDA3LJO2lZL4V--Edze0Ge1HoHAEZw85hccNEpI3t7SX599vfT3s-0rgXT7bpja_FTmtItxRgxrJXmRGMuAdkPnHOY1gP1aTyvlvwTCy04-3XKqe6mpVK8X-ZWQacUCvqKtSnqseRhCnTB0pJ7nwIe17utyfqUPIp-rvjsPK_It_fvvl5_ZDdfPny6fnvDQifkyjByL_loOR8lxDAEaw2XVkmQCnQYdN-rsVNDJ6MWJmhtlI5e2V6MUQFweUVenXqXkr9vWFe3n2rAefYJ81adFlooUP1_jdz0tr0QmvHlP8a7vJXUjnDGSi21NbKZ-MkUSq61YHRLaT8vB8fBHUG6E0jXQLojSHdomRfn4m3Y4_g3cSYnfwMOoprO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>893737983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maximal strength-training effects on force-velocity and force-power relationships explain increases in aerobic performance in humans</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Østerås, Håvard ; Helgerud, Jan ; Hoff, Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>Østerås, Håvard ; Helgerud, Jan ; Hoff, Jan</creatorcontrib><description>Maximal strength-training with an emphasis on maximal mobilization during cross-country skiing increases exercise economy when double-poling. The aim of this experiment was to investigate whether the mechanism of this increase is a change in the force-velocity relationship and the mechanical power output. A group of 19 cross-country skiers having an average peak oxygen uptake of 255 ml x kg(-0.67) body mass x min(-1) or 61 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) were randomly assigned to either a high resistance-training group (n=10) or a control group (n=9). Upper body endurance was tested on a ski ergometer. The high-resistance-training group trained for 15 min on three occasions a week for 9 weeks. Training consisted of three series of five repetitions using 85% of one repetition maximum (1RM), with emphasis on high velocity in the concentric part of the movement. Upper body exercise economy, 1RM and time to exhaustion increased significantly in the high resistance-training group, but was unchanged in the control group. Peak power and the velocities for a given load increased significantly, except for the two lowest loads. We conclude that the increased exercise economy after a period of upper body high resistance-training can be partly explained by a specific change in the force-velocity relationship and the mechanical power output.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-6319</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-6327</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0717-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12458369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anaerobic threshold ; Cross country skiing ; Ergometry ; Exercise ; Humans ; Male ; Maximum oxygen consumption ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Oxygen Consumption ; Physical Education and Training ; Physical Endurance ; Physical fitness ; Reference Values ; Skiing ; Velocity ; Weight Lifting - physiology</subject><ispartof>European journal of applied physiology, 2002-12, Vol.88 (3), p.255-263</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-ef1a31d911d30fcbc9981395303507cb7665d45b43f728c77857fa5962df50013</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12458369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Østerås, Håvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helgerud, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Maximal strength-training effects on force-velocity and force-power relationships explain increases in aerobic performance in humans</title><title>European journal of applied physiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Appl Physiol</addtitle><description>Maximal strength-training with an emphasis on maximal mobilization during cross-country skiing increases exercise economy when double-poling. The aim of this experiment was to investigate whether the mechanism of this increase is a change in the force-velocity relationship and the mechanical power output. A group of 19 cross-country skiers having an average peak oxygen uptake of 255 ml x kg(-0.67) body mass x min(-1) or 61 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) were randomly assigned to either a high resistance-training group (n=10) or a control group (n=9). Upper body endurance was tested on a ski ergometer. The high-resistance-training group trained for 15 min on three occasions a week for 9 weeks. Training consisted of three series of five repetitions using 85% of one repetition maximum (1RM), with emphasis on high velocity in the concentric part of the movement. Upper body exercise economy, 1RM and time to exhaustion increased significantly in the high resistance-training group, but was unchanged in the control group. Peak power and the velocities for a given load increased significantly, except for the two lowest loads. We conclude that the increased exercise economy after a period of upper body high resistance-training can be partly explained by a specific change in the force-velocity relationship and the mechanical power output.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anaerobic threshold</subject><subject>Cross country skiing</subject><subject>Ergometry</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximum oxygen consumption</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption</subject><subject>Physical Education and Training</subject><subject>Physical Endurance</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Skiing</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Weight Lifting - physiology</subject><issn>1439-6319</issn><issn>1439-6327</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU-LFDEQxYMo7rr6AbxI8OAtWkk6neQoi_9gxYueQzpd2emlJ2mTbt25-8HNMIOCF0_1KN57UPUj5DmH1xxAv6kAneAMQDDQXLPDA3LJO2lZL4V--Edze0Ge1HoHAEZw85hccNEpI3t7SX599vfT3s-0rgXT7bpja_FTmtItxRgxrJXmRGMuAdkPnHOY1gP1aTyvlvwTCy04-3XKqe6mpVK8X-ZWQacUCvqKtSnqseRhCnTB0pJ7nwIe17utyfqUPIp-rvjsPK_It_fvvl5_ZDdfPny6fnvDQifkyjByL_loOR8lxDAEaw2XVkmQCnQYdN-rsVNDJ6MWJmhtlI5e2V6MUQFweUVenXqXkr9vWFe3n2rAefYJ81adFlooUP1_jdz0tr0QmvHlP8a7vJXUjnDGSi21NbKZ-MkUSq61YHRLaT8vB8fBHUG6E0jXQLojSHdomRfn4m3Y4_g3cSYnfwMOoprO</recordid><startdate>20021201</startdate><enddate>20021201</enddate><creator>Østerås, Håvard</creator><creator>Helgerud, Jan</creator><creator>Hoff, Jan</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021201</creationdate><title>Maximal strength-training effects on force-velocity and force-power relationships explain increases in aerobic performance in humans</title><author>Østerås, Håvard ; Helgerud, Jan ; Hoff, Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-ef1a31d911d30fcbc9981395303507cb7665d45b43f728c77857fa5962df50013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anaerobic threshold</topic><topic>Cross country skiing</topic><topic>Ergometry</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximum oxygen consumption</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption</topic><topic>Physical Education and Training</topic><topic>Physical Endurance</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Skiing</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Weight Lifting - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Østerås, Håvard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helgerud, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoff, Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of applied physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Østerås, Håvard</au><au>Helgerud, Jan</au><au>Hoff, Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maximal strength-training effects on force-velocity and force-power relationships explain increases in aerobic performance in humans</atitle><jtitle>European journal of applied physiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Appl Physiol</addtitle><date>2002-12-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>263</epage><pages>255-263</pages><issn>1439-6319</issn><eissn>1439-6327</eissn><abstract>Maximal strength-training with an emphasis on maximal mobilization during cross-country skiing increases exercise economy when double-poling. The aim of this experiment was to investigate whether the mechanism of this increase is a change in the force-velocity relationship and the mechanical power output. A group of 19 cross-country skiers having an average peak oxygen uptake of 255 ml x kg(-0.67) body mass x min(-1) or 61 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1) were randomly assigned to either a high resistance-training group (n=10) or a control group (n=9). Upper body endurance was tested on a ski ergometer. The high-resistance-training group trained for 15 min on three occasions a week for 9 weeks. Training consisted of three series of five repetitions using 85% of one repetition maximum (1RM), with emphasis on high velocity in the concentric part of the movement. Upper body exercise economy, 1RM and time to exhaustion increased significantly in the high resistance-training group, but was unchanged in the control group. Peak power and the velocities for a given load increased significantly, except for the two lowest loads. We conclude that the increased exercise economy after a period of upper body high resistance-training can be partly explained by a specific change in the force-velocity relationship and the mechanical power output.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>12458369</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00421-002-0717-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1439-6319
ispartof European journal of applied physiology, 2002-12, Vol.88 (3), p.255-263
issn 1439-6319
1439-6327
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72725056
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Anaerobic threshold
Cross country skiing
Ergometry
Exercise
Humans
Male
Maximum oxygen consumption
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Oxygen Consumption
Physical Education and Training
Physical Endurance
Physical fitness
Reference Values
Skiing
Velocity
Weight Lifting - physiology
title Maximal strength-training effects on force-velocity and force-power relationships explain increases in aerobic performance in humans
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A02%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maximal%20strength-training%20effects%20on%20force-velocity%20and%20force-power%20relationships%20explain%20increases%20in%20aerobic%20performance%20in%20humans&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20applied%20physiology&rft.au=%C3%98ster%C3%A5s,%20H%C3%A5vard&rft.date=2002-12-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=263&rft.pages=255-263&rft.issn=1439-6319&rft.eissn=1439-6327&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00421-002-0717-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18692450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=893737983&rft_id=info:pmid/12458369&rfr_iscdi=true