Evaluation of the shelf life of sterile instrument packs

No published studies have specifically addressed the shelf life of sterile packaging materials commonly used in dentistry. This study examined the effect of time on the sterile integrity: paper envelopes, peel pouches, and nylon sleeves. Seven thousand two hundred sample packs, each containing three...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology oral medicine, oral pathology, 1991-12, Vol.72 (6), p.650-654
Hauptverfasser: Butt, William E., Bradley, Donald V., Mayhew, Robert B., Schwartz, Richard S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 654
container_issue 6
container_start_page 650
container_title Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology
container_volume 72
creator Butt, William E.
Bradley, Donald V.
Mayhew, Robert B.
Schwartz, Richard S.
description No published studies have specifically addressed the shelf life of sterile packaging materials commonly used in dentistry. This study examined the effect of time on the sterile integrity: paper envelopes, peel pouches, and nylon sleeves. Seven thousand two hundred sample packs, each containing three glass rods, were prepared and steam sterilized. After sterilization, half the packs (control packs) were immediately opened and the contents were analyzed for bacterial contamination. The other half (test packs) were randomly sorted and stored in dental treatment operatories. At monthly intervals for 12 months, 100 packs of each type were similarly opened and analyzed. The contamination rates between the control packs were not significantly different from one another. Differences in contamination rates between control packs and test packs for both the paper envelopes (0.4% and 0.7%) and the peel pouches (0.2% and 0.2%) were also insignificant. However, a significant difference ( p < 0.01) between control and test packs (0.3% and 1.5%) was found for the nylon sleeves. This increase was not time related and was attributed to difficulty in removing the glass rods from the nylon packs in a sterile manner. The most important finding was the absence of a trend toward an increased rate of contamination over time for any pack type. This indicates that when these materials are placed in covered storage in dental operatories, a 12-month storage period is not detrimental to their sterile integrity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0030-4220(91)90004-V
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72706942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>003042209190004V</els_id><sourcerecordid>72706942</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-7bfbd8786472d4e15c1f80a397e34f4890364251f5f9062a9836cd12e0937da73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLw0AQgBdRaq3-A4UcRPQQ3Vey2YsgpT6g4EV7XbabWbqaJnV3U_Dfm5hSb56GmfnmwYfQOcG3BJP8DmOGU04pvpbkRmKMebo4QGNSiCKlRGSHaLxHjtFJCB9dKnjORmhECkI552NUzLa6anV0TZ00NokrSMIKKptUzkJfCRG8qyBxdYi-XUMdk402n-EUHVldBTjbxQl6f5y9TZ_T-evTy_RhnhrOREzF0i7L7qOcC1pyIJkhtsCaSQGMW15IzHJOM2IzK3FOtSxYbkpCAUsmSi3YBF0Neze--WohRLV2wUBV6RqaNihBBc4lpx3IB9D4JgQPVm28W2v_rQhWvTDV21C9DSWJ-hWmFt3YxW5_u1xD-Tc0GOr6l7u-DkZX1uvauLDHMpxltOiv3w8YdC62DrwKxkFtoHQeTFRl4_7_4wevkoTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72706942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the shelf life of sterile instrument packs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Butt, William E. ; Bradley, Donald V. ; Mayhew, Robert B. ; Schwartz, Richard S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Butt, William E. ; Bradley, Donald V. ; Mayhew, Robert B. ; Schwartz, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><description>No published studies have specifically addressed the shelf life of sterile packaging materials commonly used in dentistry. This study examined the effect of time on the sterile integrity: paper envelopes, peel pouches, and nylon sleeves. Seven thousand two hundred sample packs, each containing three glass rods, were prepared and steam sterilized. After sterilization, half the packs (control packs) were immediately opened and the contents were analyzed for bacterial contamination. The other half (test packs) were randomly sorted and stored in dental treatment operatories. At monthly intervals for 12 months, 100 packs of each type were similarly opened and analyzed. The contamination rates between the control packs were not significantly different from one another. Differences in contamination rates between control packs and test packs for both the paper envelopes (0.4% and 0.7%) and the peel pouches (0.2% and 0.2%) were also insignificant. However, a significant difference ( p &lt; 0.01) between control and test packs (0.3% and 1.5%) was found for the nylon sleeves. This increase was not time related and was attributed to difficulty in removing the glass rods from the nylon packs in a sterile manner. The most important finding was the absence of a trend toward an increased rate of contamination over time for any pack type. This indicates that when these materials are placed in covered storage in dental operatories, a 12-month storage period is not detrimental to their sterile integrity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-4220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-2175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(91)90004-V</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1812444</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OSOMAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Saint Louis, MO: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Dental Instruments ; Dentistry ; Equipment Contamination ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Nylons ; Sterilization ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, 1991-12, Vol.72 (6), p.650-654</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-7bfbd8786472d4e15c1f80a397e34f4890364251f5f9062a9836cd12e0937da73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-7bfbd8786472d4e15c1f80a397e34f4890364251f5f9062a9836cd12e0937da73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5055282$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1812444$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butt, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Donald V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayhew, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the shelf life of sterile instrument packs</title><title>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology</title><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol</addtitle><description>No published studies have specifically addressed the shelf life of sterile packaging materials commonly used in dentistry. This study examined the effect of time on the sterile integrity: paper envelopes, peel pouches, and nylon sleeves. Seven thousand two hundred sample packs, each containing three glass rods, were prepared and steam sterilized. After sterilization, half the packs (control packs) were immediately opened and the contents were analyzed for bacterial contamination. The other half (test packs) were randomly sorted and stored in dental treatment operatories. At monthly intervals for 12 months, 100 packs of each type were similarly opened and analyzed. The contamination rates between the control packs were not significantly different from one another. Differences in contamination rates between control packs and test packs for both the paper envelopes (0.4% and 0.7%) and the peel pouches (0.2% and 0.2%) were also insignificant. However, a significant difference ( p &lt; 0.01) between control and test packs (0.3% and 1.5%) was found for the nylon sleeves. This increase was not time related and was attributed to difficulty in removing the glass rods from the nylon packs in a sterile manner. The most important finding was the absence of a trend toward an increased rate of contamination over time for any pack type. This indicates that when these materials are placed in covered storage in dental operatories, a 12-month storage period is not detrimental to their sterile integrity.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Dental Instruments</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Equipment Contamination</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Nylons</subject><subject>Sterilization</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0030-4220</issn><issn>1878-2175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLw0AQgBdRaq3-A4UcRPQQ3Vey2YsgpT6g4EV7XbabWbqaJnV3U_Dfm5hSb56GmfnmwYfQOcG3BJP8DmOGU04pvpbkRmKMebo4QGNSiCKlRGSHaLxHjtFJCB9dKnjORmhECkI552NUzLa6anV0TZ00NokrSMIKKptUzkJfCRG8qyBxdYi-XUMdk402n-EUHVldBTjbxQl6f5y9TZ_T-evTy_RhnhrOREzF0i7L7qOcC1pyIJkhtsCaSQGMW15IzHJOM2IzK3FOtSxYbkpCAUsmSi3YBF0Neze--WohRLV2wUBV6RqaNihBBc4lpx3IB9D4JgQPVm28W2v_rQhWvTDV21C9DSWJ-hWmFt3YxW5_u1xD-Tc0GOr6l7u-DkZX1uvauLDHMpxltOiv3w8YdC62DrwKxkFtoHQeTFRl4_7_4wevkoTE</recordid><startdate>19911201</startdate><enddate>19911201</enddate><creator>Butt, William E.</creator><creator>Bradley, Donald V.</creator><creator>Mayhew, Robert B.</creator><creator>Schwartz, Richard S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Mosby</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911201</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the shelf life of sterile instrument packs</title><author>Butt, William E. ; Bradley, Donald V. ; Mayhew, Robert B. ; Schwartz, Richard S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-7bfbd8786472d4e15c1f80a397e34f4890364251f5f9062a9836cd12e0937da73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Dental Instruments</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Equipment Contamination</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Nylons</topic><topic>Sterilization</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butt, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Donald V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayhew, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Richard S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butt, William E.</au><au>Bradley, Donald V.</au><au>Mayhew, Robert B.</au><au>Schwartz, Richard S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the shelf life of sterile instrument packs</atitle><jtitle>Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol</addtitle><date>1991-12-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>650</spage><epage>654</epage><pages>650-654</pages><issn>0030-4220</issn><eissn>1878-2175</eissn><coden>OSOMAE</coden><abstract>No published studies have specifically addressed the shelf life of sterile packaging materials commonly used in dentistry. This study examined the effect of time on the sterile integrity: paper envelopes, peel pouches, and nylon sleeves. Seven thousand two hundred sample packs, each containing three glass rods, were prepared and steam sterilized. After sterilization, half the packs (control packs) were immediately opened and the contents were analyzed for bacterial contamination. The other half (test packs) were randomly sorted and stored in dental treatment operatories. At monthly intervals for 12 months, 100 packs of each type were similarly opened and analyzed. The contamination rates between the control packs were not significantly different from one another. Differences in contamination rates between control packs and test packs for both the paper envelopes (0.4% and 0.7%) and the peel pouches (0.2% and 0.2%) were also insignificant. However, a significant difference ( p &lt; 0.01) between control and test packs (0.3% and 1.5%) was found for the nylon sleeves. This increase was not time related and was attributed to difficulty in removing the glass rods from the nylon packs in a sterile manner. The most important finding was the absence of a trend toward an increased rate of contamination over time for any pack type. This indicates that when these materials are placed in covered storage in dental operatories, a 12-month storage period is not detrimental to their sterile integrity.</abstract><cop>Saint Louis, MO</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>1812444</pmid><doi>10.1016/0030-4220(91)90004-V</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-4220
ispartof Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, 1991-12, Vol.72 (6), p.650-654
issn 0030-4220
1878-2175
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72706942
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Chi-Square Distribution
Colony Count, Microbial
Dental Instruments
Dentistry
Equipment Contamination
Humans
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Nylons
Sterilization
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Time Factors
title Evaluation of the shelf life of sterile instrument packs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A50%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20shelf%20life%20of%20sterile%20instrument%20packs&rft.jtitle=Oral%20surgery,%20oral%20medicine,%20oral%20pathology&rft.au=Butt,%20William%20E.&rft.date=1991-12-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=650&rft.epage=654&rft.pages=650-654&rft.issn=0030-4220&rft.eissn=1878-2175&rft.coden=OSOMAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90004-V&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72706942%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72706942&rft_id=info:pmid/1812444&rft_els_id=003042209190004V&rfr_iscdi=true