Isokinetic trunk-strength deficits in people with and without low-back pain: a comparative study with consideration of effort
The purposes of this study were to determine (a) the degree and distribution of isokinetic trunk strength deficits in people with chronic low-back pain (CLBP) and (b) to what degree subject effort during testing affects those deficits. We measured the isokinetic trunk strengths of three subject grou...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of spinal disorders 1991-03, Vol.4 (1), p.68-72 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 72 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 68 |
container_title | Journal of spinal disorders |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | REID, S HAZARD, R. G FENWICK, J. W |
description | The purposes of this study were to determine (a) the degree and distribution of isokinetic trunk strength deficits in people with chronic low-back pain (CLBP) and (b) to what degree subject effort during testing affects those deficits. We measured the isokinetic trunk strengths of three subject groups on the Cybex Trunk Extension/Flexion machine. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 155 men and women with CLBP who were divided into maximal (n = 115) and submaximal (n = 40) groups according to their torque/position curve variability. Group 3 was made up of 32 back-healthy men and women who served as controls. The results demonstrated that men had higher flexion and extension torques than women did for all groups. The control group had higher flexion and extension torques than the maximal-effort CLBP group did. The extensors had a proportionally greater deficit than the flexors did in this LBP group. Comparing the two groups with CLBP, the maximal-effort group had higher flexion and extension torques than the submaximal effort group did, and the extensors showed a greater deficit. Degree of effort during testing does affect the results. Therapists should consider extensor strengthening and reeducation exercises when designing exercise programs to restore normal function in people with chronic CLBP. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72700254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72700254</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-17aa8e3a13bed0a4d32a9e8f0fca39fb3e9ef85479bdf3a4557ff462aee03d0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU1LxDAQhoMo67r6E4Rc9FZIm6ZtvMnix8KCFz2XaTLRuG1Sm9TFg__d6hY8zTDPM3N454gsU8HTJONMHJMlq6RIGK_EKTkL4Z2xLM0FX5BFWnFZFHJJvjfB76zDaBWNw-h2SYgDutf4RjUaq2wM1Drao-9bpHs7zcHpv8aPkbZ-nzSgdrQH624oUOW7HgaI9hNpiKP-Ouwo74LV-Au8o95QNMYP8ZycGGgDXsx1RV7u757Xj8n26WGzvt0mfcaLmKQlQIUcUt6gZpBrnoHEyjCjgEvTcJRoKpGXstGGQy5EaUxeZIDIuGaKr8j14W4_-I8RQ6w7GxS2LTj0Y6jLrJyyEfkkXs7i2HSo636wHQxf9ZzXxK9mDkFBawZwyoZ_TVYiy6cP_ABcUHhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72700254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Isokinetic trunk-strength deficits in people with and without low-back pain: a comparative study with consideration of effort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>REID, S ; HAZARD, R. G ; FENWICK, J. W</creator><creatorcontrib>REID, S ; HAZARD, R. G ; FENWICK, J. W</creatorcontrib><description>The purposes of this study were to determine (a) the degree and distribution of isokinetic trunk strength deficits in people with chronic low-back pain (CLBP) and (b) to what degree subject effort during testing affects those deficits. We measured the isokinetic trunk strengths of three subject groups on the Cybex Trunk Extension/Flexion machine. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 155 men and women with CLBP who were divided into maximal (n = 115) and submaximal (n = 40) groups according to their torque/position curve variability. Group 3 was made up of 32 back-healthy men and women who served as controls. The results demonstrated that men had higher flexion and extension torques than women did for all groups. The control group had higher flexion and extension torques than the maximal-effort CLBP group did. The extensors had a proportionally greater deficit than the flexors did in this LBP group. Comparing the two groups with CLBP, the maximal-effort group had higher flexion and extension torques than the submaximal effort group did, and the extensors showed a greater deficit. Degree of effort during testing does affect the results. Therapists should consider extensor strengthening and reeducation exercises when designing exercise programs to restore normal function in people with chronic CLBP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-0385</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-2305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1839669</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSDIEW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Back Pain - physiopathology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chronic Disease ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Diseases of the spine ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Muscle Contraction ; Muscles - physiopathology ; Physical Exertion ; Space life sciences</subject><ispartof>Journal of spinal disorders, 1991-03, Vol.4 (1), p.68-72</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19852415$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1839669$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>REID, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAZARD, R. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FENWICK, J. W</creatorcontrib><title>Isokinetic trunk-strength deficits in people with and without low-back pain: a comparative study with consideration of effort</title><title>Journal of spinal disorders</title><addtitle>J Spinal Disord</addtitle><description>The purposes of this study were to determine (a) the degree and distribution of isokinetic trunk strength deficits in people with chronic low-back pain (CLBP) and (b) to what degree subject effort during testing affects those deficits. We measured the isokinetic trunk strengths of three subject groups on the Cybex Trunk Extension/Flexion machine. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 155 men and women with CLBP who were divided into maximal (n = 115) and submaximal (n = 40) groups according to their torque/position curve variability. Group 3 was made up of 32 back-healthy men and women who served as controls. The results demonstrated that men had higher flexion and extension torques than women did for all groups. The control group had higher flexion and extension torques than the maximal-effort CLBP group did. The extensors had a proportionally greater deficit than the flexors did in this LBP group. Comparing the two groups with CLBP, the maximal-effort group had higher flexion and extension torques than the submaximal effort group did, and the extensors showed a greater deficit. Degree of effort during testing does affect the results. Therapists should consider extensor strengthening and reeducation exercises when designing exercise programs to restore normal function in people with chronic CLBP.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Diseases of the spine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction</subject><subject>Muscles - physiopathology</subject><subject>Physical Exertion</subject><subject>Space life sciences</subject><issn>0895-0385</issn><issn>1531-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkU1LxDAQhoMo67r6E4Rc9FZIm6ZtvMnix8KCFz2XaTLRuG1Sm9TFg__d6hY8zTDPM3N454gsU8HTJONMHJMlq6RIGK_EKTkL4Z2xLM0FX5BFWnFZFHJJvjfB76zDaBWNw-h2SYgDutf4RjUaq2wM1Drao-9bpHs7zcHpv8aPkbZ-nzSgdrQH624oUOW7HgaI9hNpiKP-Ouwo74LV-Au8o95QNMYP8ZycGGgDXsx1RV7u757Xj8n26WGzvt0mfcaLmKQlQIUcUt6gZpBrnoHEyjCjgEvTcJRoKpGXstGGQy5EaUxeZIDIuGaKr8j14W4_-I8RQ6w7GxS2LTj0Y6jLrJyyEfkkXs7i2HSo636wHQxf9ZzXxK9mDkFBawZwyoZ_TVYiy6cP_ABcUHhw</recordid><startdate>19910301</startdate><enddate>19910301</enddate><creator>REID, S</creator><creator>HAZARD, R. G</creator><creator>FENWICK, J. W</creator><general>Lippincott Williams and Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910301</creationdate><title>Isokinetic trunk-strength deficits in people with and without low-back pain: a comparative study with consideration of effort</title><author>REID, S ; HAZARD, R. G ; FENWICK, J. W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-17aa8e3a13bed0a4d32a9e8f0fca39fb3e9ef85479bdf3a4557ff462aee03d0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Diseases of the spine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction</topic><topic>Muscles - physiopathology</topic><topic>Physical Exertion</topic><topic>Space life sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>REID, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAZARD, R. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FENWICK, J. W</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of spinal disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>REID, S</au><au>HAZARD, R. G</au><au>FENWICK, J. W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Isokinetic trunk-strength deficits in people with and without low-back pain: a comparative study with consideration of effort</atitle><jtitle>Journal of spinal disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Spinal Disord</addtitle><date>1991-03-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>68</spage><epage>72</epage><pages>68-72</pages><issn>0895-0385</issn><eissn>1531-2305</eissn><coden>JSDIEW</coden><abstract>The purposes of this study were to determine (a) the degree and distribution of isokinetic trunk strength deficits in people with chronic low-back pain (CLBP) and (b) to what degree subject effort during testing affects those deficits. We measured the isokinetic trunk strengths of three subject groups on the Cybex Trunk Extension/Flexion machine. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of 155 men and women with CLBP who were divided into maximal (n = 115) and submaximal (n = 40) groups according to their torque/position curve variability. Group 3 was made up of 32 back-healthy men and women who served as controls. The results demonstrated that men had higher flexion and extension torques than women did for all groups. The control group had higher flexion and extension torques than the maximal-effort CLBP group did. The extensors had a proportionally greater deficit than the flexors did in this LBP group. Comparing the two groups with CLBP, the maximal-effort group had higher flexion and extension torques than the submaximal effort group did, and the extensors showed a greater deficit. Degree of effort during testing does affect the results. Therapists should consider extensor strengthening and reeducation exercises when designing exercise programs to restore normal function in people with chronic CLBP.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams and Wilkins</pub><pmid>1839669</pmid><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-0385 |
ispartof | Journal of spinal disorders, 1991-03, Vol.4 (1), p.68-72 |
issn | 0895-0385 1531-2305 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72700254 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Back Pain - physiopathology Biological and medical sciences Chronic Disease Diseases of the osteoarticular system Diseases of the spine Female Humans Male Medical sciences Muscle Contraction Muscles - physiopathology Physical Exertion Space life sciences |
title | Isokinetic trunk-strength deficits in people with and without low-back pain: a comparative study with consideration of effort |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A11%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Isokinetic%20trunk-strength%20deficits%20in%20people%20with%20and%20without%20low-back%20pain:%20a%20comparative%20study%20with%20consideration%20of%20effort&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20spinal%20disorders&rft.au=REID,%20S&rft.date=1991-03-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=68&rft.epage=72&rft.pages=68-72&rft.issn=0895-0385&rft.eissn=1531-2305&rft.coden=JSDIEW&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E72700254%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72700254&rft_id=info:pmid/1839669&rfr_iscdi=true |