Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards
OBJECTIVEThe routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical care medicine 2002-11, Vol.30 (11), p.2588-2592 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2592 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2588 |
container_title | Critical care medicine |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh Johnson, E William Low, Lewis L Kaufman, Larry J |
description | OBJECTIVEThe routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receive the prevailing standard of change in body position every 2 hrs. To determine prevailing attitudes about patient positioning among ICU physicians.
DESIGNProspective longitudinal observational study. E-mail survey of ICU physicians.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSConvenience sample of mixed medical/surgical ICU patients at three tertiary care hospitals in two different cities in the United States. Random sampling of ICU professionals from a directory.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESChanges in body position recorded at 15-min intervals.
RESULTSSeventy-four patients were observed for a total of 566 total patient hours of observation, with a mean observation time per patient of 7.7 hrs (range, 5–12). On average, 49.3% of the observed time, patients remained without a change in body position for >2 hrs. Only two of 74 patients (2.7%) had a demonstrable change in body position every 2 hrs. A total of 80–90% of respondents to the survey agreed that turning every 2 hrs was the accepted standard and that it prevented complications, but only 57% believed it was being achieved in their ICUs.
CONCLUSIONSThe majority of critically ill patients may not be receiving the prevailing standard of changes in body position every 2 hrs. This warrants a reappraisal of our care of critically ill patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00003246-200211000-00031 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72695887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72695887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-7a4f358477314f62b7a5cbabb5dedd49b1f2a287377d7301168ea2fed54385db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EotuFv4B8gVtaf8YJN1gBrVSpFzhbjj2hhqwTPE6r_nvc7kJP9cUa63lnRo8JoZydcdabc1aPFKptBGOC81o1Dy_8BdlwLWshevmSbBjrWSNVL0_IKeIvxrjSRr4mJ1woxY3RG3L9eQ73dJkxljinmH7SeaQxFUgYb4F6l4EurkRIBT_S3RRT9G6iS3a-RA_0FjKuSLG4FFwO-Ia8Gt2E8PZ4b8mPr1--7y6aq-tvl7tPV42XXcsb49QodaeMkVyNrRiM035ww6ADhKD6gY_Cic5IY4KRjPO2AydGCFrJTodBbsmHQ98lz39WwGL3ET1Mk0swr2iNaHvd1QZb0h1An2fEDKNdcty7fG85sw8y7T-Z9r9M-yizRt8dZ6zDHsJT8GivAu-PgMNqZcwu-YhPnGKPW1ROHbi7eSpV2O9pvYNsb8BN5cY-95nyL9kAi_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72695887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh ; Johnson, E William ; Low, Lewis L ; Kaufman, Larry J</creator><creatorcontrib>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh ; Johnson, E William ; Low, Lewis L ; Kaufman, Larry J</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVEThe routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receive the prevailing standard of change in body position every 2 hrs. To determine prevailing attitudes about patient positioning among ICU physicians.
DESIGNProspective longitudinal observational study. E-mail survey of ICU physicians.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSConvenience sample of mixed medical/surgical ICU patients at three tertiary care hospitals in two different cities in the United States. Random sampling of ICU professionals from a directory.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESChanges in body position recorded at 15-min intervals.
RESULTSSeventy-four patients were observed for a total of 566 total patient hours of observation, with a mean observation time per patient of 7.7 hrs (range, 5–12). On average, 49.3% of the observed time, patients remained without a change in body position for >2 hrs. Only two of 74 patients (2.7%) had a demonstrable change in body position every 2 hrs. A total of 80–90% of respondents to the survey agreed that turning every 2 hrs was the accepted standard and that it prevented complications, but only 57% believed it was being achieved in their ICUs.
CONCLUSIONSThe majority of critically ill patients may not be receiving the prevailing standard of changes in body position every 2 hrs. This warrants a reappraisal of our care of critically ill patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200211000-00031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12441775</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCMDC7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Critical Care - methods ; Critical Care - standards ; Humans ; Immobilization - adverse effects ; Intensive care medicine ; Intensive Care Units ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Posture ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Health Care ; United States</subject><ispartof>Critical care medicine, 2002-11, Vol.30 (11), p.2588-2592</ispartof><rights>2002 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-7a4f358477314f62b7a5cbabb5dedd49b1f2a287377d7301168ea2fed54385db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-7a4f358477314f62b7a5cbabb5dedd49b1f2a287377d7301168ea2fed54385db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14026958$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12441775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, E William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Low, Lewis L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Larry J</creatorcontrib><title>Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards</title><title>Critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVEThe routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receive the prevailing standard of change in body position every 2 hrs. To determine prevailing attitudes about patient positioning among ICU physicians.
DESIGNProspective longitudinal observational study. E-mail survey of ICU physicians.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSConvenience sample of mixed medical/surgical ICU patients at three tertiary care hospitals in two different cities in the United States. Random sampling of ICU professionals from a directory.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESChanges in body position recorded at 15-min intervals.
RESULTSSeventy-four patients were observed for a total of 566 total patient hours of observation, with a mean observation time per patient of 7.7 hrs (range, 5–12). On average, 49.3% of the observed time, patients remained without a change in body position for >2 hrs. Only two of 74 patients (2.7%) had a demonstrable change in body position every 2 hrs. A total of 80–90% of respondents to the survey agreed that turning every 2 hrs was the accepted standard and that it prevented complications, but only 57% believed it was being achieved in their ICUs.
CONCLUSIONSThe majority of critically ill patients may not be receiving the prevailing standard of changes in body position every 2 hrs. This warrants a reappraisal of our care of critically ill patients.</description><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Critical Care - methods</subject><subject>Critical Care - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immobilization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0090-3493</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EotuFv4B8gVtaf8YJN1gBrVSpFzhbjj2hhqwTPE6r_nvc7kJP9cUa63lnRo8JoZydcdabc1aPFKptBGOC81o1Dy_8BdlwLWshevmSbBjrWSNVL0_IKeIvxrjSRr4mJ1woxY3RG3L9eQ73dJkxljinmH7SeaQxFUgYb4F6l4EurkRIBT_S3RRT9G6iS3a-RA_0FjKuSLG4FFwO-Ia8Gt2E8PZ4b8mPr1--7y6aq-tvl7tPV42XXcsb49QodaeMkVyNrRiM035ww6ADhKD6gY_Cic5IY4KRjPO2AydGCFrJTodBbsmHQ98lz39WwGL3ET1Mk0swr2iNaHvd1QZb0h1An2fEDKNdcty7fG85sw8y7T-Z9r9M-yizRt8dZ6zDHsJT8GivAu-PgMNqZcwu-YhPnGKPW1ROHbi7eSpV2O9pvYNsb8BN5cY-95nyL9kAi_w</recordid><startdate>200211</startdate><enddate>200211</enddate><creator>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh</creator><creator>Johnson, E William</creator><creator>Low, Lewis L</creator><creator>Kaufman, Larry J</creator><general>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200211</creationdate><title>Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards</title><author>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh ; Johnson, E William ; Low, Lewis L ; Kaufman, Larry J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-7a4f358477314f62b7a5cbabb5dedd49b1f2a287377d7301168ea2fed54385db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Critical Care - methods</topic><topic>Critical Care - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immobilization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, E William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Low, Lewis L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Larry J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh</au><au>Johnson, E William</au><au>Low, Lewis L</au><au>Kaufman, Larry J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards</atitle><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>2002-11</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2588</spage><epage>2592</epage><pages>2588-2592</pages><issn>0090-3493</issn><eissn>1530-0293</eissn><coden>CCMDC7</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVEThe routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receive the prevailing standard of change in body position every 2 hrs. To determine prevailing attitudes about patient positioning among ICU physicians.
DESIGNProspective longitudinal observational study. E-mail survey of ICU physicians.
SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSConvenience sample of mixed medical/surgical ICU patients at three tertiary care hospitals in two different cities in the United States. Random sampling of ICU professionals from a directory.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESChanges in body position recorded at 15-min intervals.
RESULTSSeventy-four patients were observed for a total of 566 total patient hours of observation, with a mean observation time per patient of 7.7 hrs (range, 5–12). On average, 49.3% of the observed time, patients remained without a change in body position for >2 hrs. Only two of 74 patients (2.7%) had a demonstrable change in body position every 2 hrs. A total of 80–90% of respondents to the survey agreed that turning every 2 hrs was the accepted standard and that it prevented complications, but only 57% believed it was being achieved in their ICUs.
CONCLUSIONSThe majority of critically ill patients may not be receiving the prevailing standard of changes in body position every 2 hrs. This warrants a reappraisal of our care of critically ill patients.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>12441775</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003246-200211000-00031</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-3493 |
ispartof | Critical care medicine, 2002-11, Vol.30 (11), p.2588-2592 |
issn | 0090-3493 1530-0293 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72695887 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Critical Care - methods Critical Care - standards Humans Immobilization - adverse effects Intensive care medicine Intensive Care Units Medical sciences Miscellaneous Posture Prospective Studies Quality of Health Care United States |
title | Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A18%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Body%20positioning%20of%20intensive%20care%20patients:%20Clinical%20practice%20versus%20standards&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Krishnagopalan,%20Sreenandh&rft.date=2002-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2588&rft.epage=2592&rft.pages=2588-2592&rft.issn=0090-3493&rft.eissn=1530-0293&rft.coden=CCMDC7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003246-200211000-00031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72695887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72695887&rft_id=info:pmid/12441775&rfr_iscdi=true |