Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards

OBJECTIVEThe routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Critical care medicine 2002-11, Vol.30 (11), p.2588-2592
Hauptverfasser: Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh, Johnson, E William, Low, Lewis L, Kaufman, Larry J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2592
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2588
container_title Critical care medicine
container_volume 30
creator Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh
Johnson, E William
Low, Lewis L
Kaufman, Larry J
description OBJECTIVEThe routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receive the prevailing standard of change in body position every 2 hrs. To determine prevailing attitudes about patient positioning among ICU physicians. DESIGNProspective longitudinal observational study. E-mail survey of ICU physicians. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSConvenience sample of mixed medical/surgical ICU patients at three tertiary care hospitals in two different cities in the United States. Random sampling of ICU professionals from a directory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESChanges in body position recorded at 15-min intervals. RESULTSSeventy-four patients were observed for a total of 566 total patient hours of observation, with a mean observation time per patient of 7.7 hrs (range, 5–12). On average, 49.3% of the observed time, patients remained without a change in body position for >2 hrs. Only two of 74 patients (2.7%) had a demonstrable change in body position every 2 hrs. A total of 80–90% of respondents to the survey agreed that turning every 2 hrs was the accepted standard and that it prevented complications, but only 57% believed it was being achieved in their ICUs. CONCLUSIONSThe majority of critically ill patients may not be receiving the prevailing standard of changes in body position every 2 hrs. This warrants a reappraisal of our care of critically ill patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00003246-200211000-00031
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72695887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72695887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-7a4f358477314f62b7a5cbabb5dedd49b1f2a287377d7301168ea2fed54385db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EotuFv4B8gVtaf8YJN1gBrVSpFzhbjj2hhqwTPE6r_nvc7kJP9cUa63lnRo8JoZydcdabc1aPFKptBGOC81o1Dy_8BdlwLWshevmSbBjrWSNVL0_IKeIvxrjSRr4mJ1woxY3RG3L9eQ73dJkxljinmH7SeaQxFUgYb4F6l4EurkRIBT_S3RRT9G6iS3a-RA_0FjKuSLG4FFwO-Ia8Gt2E8PZ4b8mPr1--7y6aq-tvl7tPV42XXcsb49QodaeMkVyNrRiM035ww6ADhKD6gY_Cic5IY4KRjPO2AydGCFrJTodBbsmHQ98lz39WwGL3ET1Mk0swr2iNaHvd1QZb0h1An2fEDKNdcty7fG85sw8y7T-Z9r9M-yizRt8dZ6zDHsJT8GivAu-PgMNqZcwu-YhPnGKPW1ROHbi7eSpV2O9pvYNsb8BN5cY-95nyL9kAi_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72695887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh ; Johnson, E William ; Low, Lewis L ; Kaufman, Larry J</creator><creatorcontrib>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh ; Johnson, E William ; Low, Lewis L ; Kaufman, Larry J</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVEThe routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receive the prevailing standard of change in body position every 2 hrs. To determine prevailing attitudes about patient positioning among ICU physicians. DESIGNProspective longitudinal observational study. E-mail survey of ICU physicians. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSConvenience sample of mixed medical/surgical ICU patients at three tertiary care hospitals in two different cities in the United States. Random sampling of ICU professionals from a directory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESChanges in body position recorded at 15-min intervals. RESULTSSeventy-four patients were observed for a total of 566 total patient hours of observation, with a mean observation time per patient of 7.7 hrs (range, 5–12). On average, 49.3% of the observed time, patients remained without a change in body position for &gt;2 hrs. Only two of 74 patients (2.7%) had a demonstrable change in body position every 2 hrs. A total of 80–90% of respondents to the survey agreed that turning every 2 hrs was the accepted standard and that it prevented complications, but only 57% believed it was being achieved in their ICUs. CONCLUSIONSThe majority of critically ill patients may not be receiving the prevailing standard of changes in body position every 2 hrs. This warrants a reappraisal of our care of critically ill patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3493</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200211000-00031</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12441775</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CCMDC7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Critical Care - methods ; Critical Care - standards ; Humans ; Immobilization - adverse effects ; Intensive care medicine ; Intensive Care Units ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous ; Posture ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Health Care ; United States</subject><ispartof>Critical care medicine, 2002-11, Vol.30 (11), p.2588-2592</ispartof><rights>2002 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-7a4f358477314f62b7a5cbabb5dedd49b1f2a287377d7301168ea2fed54385db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-7a4f358477314f62b7a5cbabb5dedd49b1f2a287377d7301168ea2fed54385db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14026958$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12441775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, E William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Low, Lewis L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Larry J</creatorcontrib><title>Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards</title><title>Critical care medicine</title><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVEThe routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receive the prevailing standard of change in body position every 2 hrs. To determine prevailing attitudes about patient positioning among ICU physicians. DESIGNProspective longitudinal observational study. E-mail survey of ICU physicians. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSConvenience sample of mixed medical/surgical ICU patients at three tertiary care hospitals in two different cities in the United States. Random sampling of ICU professionals from a directory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESChanges in body position recorded at 15-min intervals. RESULTSSeventy-four patients were observed for a total of 566 total patient hours of observation, with a mean observation time per patient of 7.7 hrs (range, 5–12). On average, 49.3% of the observed time, patients remained without a change in body position for &gt;2 hrs. Only two of 74 patients (2.7%) had a demonstrable change in body position every 2 hrs. A total of 80–90% of respondents to the survey agreed that turning every 2 hrs was the accepted standard and that it prevented complications, but only 57% believed it was being achieved in their ICUs. CONCLUSIONSThe majority of critically ill patients may not be receiving the prevailing standard of changes in body position every 2 hrs. This warrants a reappraisal of our care of critically ill patients.</description><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Critical Care - methods</subject><subject>Critical Care - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immobilization - adverse effects</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0090-3493</issn><issn>1530-0293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhi0EotuFv4B8gVtaf8YJN1gBrVSpFzhbjj2hhqwTPE6r_nvc7kJP9cUa63lnRo8JoZydcdabc1aPFKptBGOC81o1Dy_8BdlwLWshevmSbBjrWSNVL0_IKeIvxrjSRr4mJ1woxY3RG3L9eQ73dJkxljinmH7SeaQxFUgYb4F6l4EurkRIBT_S3RRT9G6iS3a-RA_0FjKuSLG4FFwO-Ia8Gt2E8PZ4b8mPr1--7y6aq-tvl7tPV42XXcsb49QodaeMkVyNrRiM035ww6ADhKD6gY_Cic5IY4KRjPO2AydGCFrJTodBbsmHQ98lz39WwGL3ET1Mk0swr2iNaHvd1QZb0h1An2fEDKNdcty7fG85sw8y7T-Z9r9M-yizRt8dZ6zDHsJT8GivAu-PgMNqZcwu-YhPnGKPW1ROHbi7eSpV2O9pvYNsb8BN5cY-95nyL9kAi_w</recordid><startdate>200211</startdate><enddate>200211</enddate><creator>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh</creator><creator>Johnson, E William</creator><creator>Low, Lewis L</creator><creator>Kaufman, Larry J</creator><general>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200211</creationdate><title>Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards</title><author>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh ; Johnson, E William ; Low, Lewis L ; Kaufman, Larry J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3861-7a4f358477314f62b7a5cbabb5dedd49b1f2a287377d7301168ea2fed54385db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Critical Care - methods</topic><topic>Critical Care - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immobilization - adverse effects</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, E William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Low, Lewis L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Larry J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krishnagopalan, Sreenandh</au><au>Johnson, E William</au><au>Low, Lewis L</au><au>Kaufman, Larry J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards</atitle><jtitle>Critical care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Crit Care Med</addtitle><date>2002-11</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2588</spage><epage>2592</epage><pages>2588-2592</pages><issn>0090-3493</issn><eissn>1530-0293</eissn><coden>CCMDC7</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVEThe routine turning of immobilized critically ill patients at a minimum of every 2 hrs has become the accepted standard of care. There has never been an objective assessment of whether this standard is achieved routinely. To determine if immobilized patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) receive the prevailing standard of change in body position every 2 hrs. To determine prevailing attitudes about patient positioning among ICU physicians. DESIGNProspective longitudinal observational study. E-mail survey of ICU physicians. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTSConvenience sample of mixed medical/surgical ICU patients at three tertiary care hospitals in two different cities in the United States. Random sampling of ICU professionals from a directory. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESChanges in body position recorded at 15-min intervals. RESULTSSeventy-four patients were observed for a total of 566 total patient hours of observation, with a mean observation time per patient of 7.7 hrs (range, 5–12). On average, 49.3% of the observed time, patients remained without a change in body position for &gt;2 hrs. Only two of 74 patients (2.7%) had a demonstrable change in body position every 2 hrs. A total of 80–90% of respondents to the survey agreed that turning every 2 hrs was the accepted standard and that it prevented complications, but only 57% believed it was being achieved in their ICUs. CONCLUSIONSThe majority of critically ill patients may not be receiving the prevailing standard of changes in body position every 2 hrs. This warrants a reappraisal of our care of critically ill patients.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>12441775</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003246-200211000-00031</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-3493
ispartof Critical care medicine, 2002-11, Vol.30 (11), p.2588-2592
issn 0090-3493
1530-0293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72695887
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Critical Care - methods
Critical Care - standards
Humans
Immobilization - adverse effects
Intensive care medicine
Intensive Care Units
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous
Posture
Prospective Studies
Quality of Health Care
United States
title Body positioning of intensive care patients: Clinical practice versus standards
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A18%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Body%20positioning%20of%20intensive%20care%20patients:%20Clinical%20practice%20versus%20standards&rft.jtitle=Critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Krishnagopalan,%20Sreenandh&rft.date=2002-11&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2588&rft.epage=2592&rft.pages=2588-2592&rft.issn=0090-3493&rft.eissn=1530-0293&rft.coden=CCMDC7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003246-200211000-00031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72695887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72695887&rft_id=info:pmid/12441775&rfr_iscdi=true