Continued Utility of the Contraction Stress Test?

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical obstetrics and gynecology 2002-12, Vol.45 (4), p.1005-1014
1. Verfasser: HUDDLESTON, JOHN F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1014
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1005
container_title Clinical obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 45
creator HUDDLESTON, JOHN F
description
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00003081-200212000-00007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72687171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72687171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-c6fb666c59534bdeea92b05f9cf271bf1a697596a79b1223aa6ea06e674b75173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kTFPwzAQhS0EoqXwF1AmNoPPju14QqiigFSJgXa2nPSiBtKk2I6q_nsSWmDCw5307t096TMhCbBbYEbfsf4JlgHljHHoC6ODpE_IGKTgVErOTsm4lww1nMGIXITwzhikUsM5GQFPRZbpbExg2jaxajpcJctY1VXcJ22ZxDUmw8C7IlZtk7xFjyEkCwzx_pKcla4OeHXsE7KcPS6mz3T--vQyfZjTQkilaaHKXClVSCNFmq8QneE5k6UpSq4hL8Epo6VRTpscOBfOKXRModJpriVoMSE3h7tb3352fbLdVKHAunYNtl2wmqtMg4bemB2MhW9D8Fjara82zu8tMDvgsj-47C-ub2nIuD5mdPkGV3-LRz69IT0Ydm0d0YePutuht2t0dVzb_75BfAFrb3NB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72687171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Continued Utility of the Contraction Stress Test?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>HUDDLESTON, JOHN F</creator><creatorcontrib>HUDDLESTON, JOHN F</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5520</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00003081-200212000-00007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12438878</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiotocography - methods ; Female ; Fetal Diseases - diagnosis ; Fetal Monitoring - methods ; Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology ; Humans ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy, High-Risk ; Uterine Contraction - physiology</subject><ispartof>Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2002-12, Vol.45 (4), p.1005-1014</ispartof><rights>2002 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-c6fb666c59534bdeea92b05f9cf271bf1a697596a79b1223aa6ea06e674b75173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-c6fb666c59534bdeea92b05f9cf271bf1a697596a79b1223aa6ea06e674b75173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12438878$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HUDDLESTON, JOHN F</creatorcontrib><title>Continued Utility of the Contraction Stress Test?</title><title>Clinical obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Clin Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><subject>Cardiotocography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fetal Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy, High-Risk</subject><subject>Uterine Contraction - physiology</subject><issn>0009-9201</issn><issn>1532-5520</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kTFPwzAQhS0EoqXwF1AmNoPPju14QqiigFSJgXa2nPSiBtKk2I6q_nsSWmDCw5307t096TMhCbBbYEbfsf4JlgHljHHoC6ODpE_IGKTgVErOTsm4lww1nMGIXITwzhikUsM5GQFPRZbpbExg2jaxajpcJctY1VXcJ22ZxDUmw8C7IlZtk7xFjyEkCwzx_pKcla4OeHXsE7KcPS6mz3T--vQyfZjTQkilaaHKXClVSCNFmq8QneE5k6UpSq4hL8Epo6VRTpscOBfOKXRModJpriVoMSE3h7tb3352fbLdVKHAunYNtl2wmqtMg4bemB2MhW9D8Fjara82zu8tMDvgsj-47C-ub2nIuD5mdPkGV3-LRz69IT0Ydm0d0YePutuht2t0dVzb_75BfAFrb3NB</recordid><startdate>200212</startdate><enddate>200212</enddate><creator>HUDDLESTON, JOHN F</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200212</creationdate><title>Continued Utility of the Contraction Stress Test?</title><author>HUDDLESTON, JOHN F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3567-c6fb666c59534bdeea92b05f9cf271bf1a697596a79b1223aa6ea06e674b75173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Cardiotocography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fetal Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy, High-Risk</topic><topic>Uterine Contraction - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HUDDLESTON, JOHN F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HUDDLESTON, JOHN F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Continued Utility of the Contraction Stress Test?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2002-12</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1005</spage><epage>1014</epage><pages>1005-1014</pages><issn>0009-9201</issn><eissn>1532-5520</eissn><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>12438878</pmid><doi>10.1097/00003081-200212000-00007</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9201
ispartof Clinical obstetrics and gynecology, 2002-12, Vol.45 (4), p.1005-1014
issn 0009-9201
1532-5520
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72687171
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Cardiotocography - methods
Female
Fetal Diseases - diagnosis
Fetal Monitoring - methods
Heart Rate, Fetal - physiology
Humans
Predictive Value of Tests
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, High-Risk
Uterine Contraction - physiology
title Continued Utility of the Contraction Stress Test?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A29%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Continued%20Utility%20of%20the%20Contraction%20Stress%20Test?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=HUDDLESTON,%20JOHN%20F&rft.date=2002-12&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1005&rft.epage=1014&rft.pages=1005-1014&rft.issn=0009-9201&rft.eissn=1532-5520&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00003081-200212000-00007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72687171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72687171&rft_id=info:pmid/12438878&rfr_iscdi=true