Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without detectable breaks

Purpose: To evaluate the causes of failure to find retinal breaks, the anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) without detectable breaks (Group I), to compare the results with detectable breaks (Group II). Methods: Forty‐five out of 258 eyes that ha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2002-12, Vol.30 (6), p.415-418
Hauptverfasser: Kocaoglan, Hülya, Ünlü, Nurten, Acar, Mehmet A, Sargin, Müge, Aslan, Bekir S, Duman, Sunay
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 418
container_issue 6
container_start_page 415
container_title Clinical & experimental ophthalmology
container_volume 30
creator Kocaoglan, Hülya
Ünlü, Nurten
Acar, Mehmet A
Sargin, Müge
Aslan, Bekir S
Duman, Sunay
description Purpose: To evaluate the causes of failure to find retinal breaks, the anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) without detectable breaks (Group I), to compare the results with detectable breaks (Group II). Methods: Forty‐five out of 258 eyes that had RD without detectable breaks were analysed retrospectively. Results: The causes of failure to find retinal breaks were aphakia/pseudophakia in 22 eyes, small pupil without any eye disease in four eyes, corneal opacity in two eyes, cataract in two eyes, vitreous haze in two eyes, choroidal detachment in one eye, and unknown cause in 12 eyes. After a single scleral buckling procedure, anatomical re‐attachment of the retina successfully occurred in 62.2% of group I and 78.9% of group II patients. After repeated surgery, final anatomical success rates were 87.2% and 90.2%, respectively. The best corrected visual acuity was 6/60 or better in 53.9% in Group I and 52.5% in Group II. Conclusion: The main cause of failure to find the retinal break was aphakia or pseudophakia. Although the rates of retinal reattachment in eyes without detectable breaks in primary buckling surgery was lower than detectable breaks and reoperations were required more frequently, final success rates were satisfactory and similar in both groups.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00571.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72681042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72681042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-8968f5dae5983fd24efb8a5afbec1f252037d09a478db469c4f266190b1cc15e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMlOwzAURS0EYv4FlBW7FNtxnERigyqGSi1dUITExnKc5zYlA9iOWv4ep6lgy8pX9rnvWQehgOARwYzfrEeEMRpmOCEjijEdYRz7uD1Ap78Ph_vMGWYn6MzaNfYUjfgxOiGU0YRG9BRNZrKRS6ihcUGrA7OCZS1du4Sm7WxgwJWNrIICnFSrHbQp3artXH8Fysm8giA3ID_sBTrSsrJwuT_P0evD_WL8FE7nj5Px3TRUDFMSphlPdVxIiLM00gVloPNUxlLnoIimMcVRUuBMsiQtcsYzxTTlnGQ4J0qRGKJzdD3M_TTtVwfWibq0CqpKNuD_LBLKUy-JejAdQGVaaw1o8WnKWppvQbDoNYq16A2J3pboNYqdRrH11av9ji6vofgr7r154HYANmUF3_8eLMb3cx98PRzqpXWw_a1L8yF4EiWxeHt-FNkLSdj7Yiay6AekFJBq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72681042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without detectable breaks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kocaoglan, Hülya ; Ünlü, Nurten ; Acar, Mehmet A ; Sargin, Müge ; Aslan, Bekir S ; Duman, Sunay</creator><creatorcontrib>Kocaoglan, Hülya ; Ünlü, Nurten ; Acar, Mehmet A ; Sargin, Müge ; Aslan, Bekir S ; Duman, Sunay</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To evaluate the causes of failure to find retinal breaks, the anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) without detectable breaks (Group I), to compare the results with detectable breaks (Group II). Methods: Forty‐five out of 258 eyes that had RD without detectable breaks were analysed retrospectively. Results: The causes of failure to find retinal breaks were aphakia/pseudophakia in 22 eyes, small pupil without any eye disease in four eyes, corneal opacity in two eyes, cataract in two eyes, vitreous haze in two eyes, choroidal detachment in one eye, and unknown cause in 12 eyes. After a single scleral buckling procedure, anatomical re‐attachment of the retina successfully occurred in 62.2% of group I and 78.9% of group II patients. After repeated surgery, final anatomical success rates were 87.2% and 90.2%, respectively. The best corrected visual acuity was 6/60 or better in 53.9% in Group I and 52.5% in Group II. Conclusion: The main cause of failure to find the retinal break was aphakia or pseudophakia. Although the rates of retinal reattachment in eyes without detectable breaks in primary buckling surgery was lower than detectable breaks and reoperations were required more frequently, final success rates were satisfactory and similar in both groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1442-6404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1442-9071</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00571.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12427232</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aphakia, Postcataract - complications ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pseudophakia - complications ; retinal break ; retinal detachment ; Retinal Detachment - complications ; Retinal Detachment - surgery ; Retinal Perforations - complications ; Retinal Perforations - diagnosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Scleral Buckling ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology, 2002-12, Vol.30 (6), p.415-418</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-8968f5dae5983fd24efb8a5afbec1f252037d09a478db469c4f266190b1cc15e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-8968f5dae5983fd24efb8a5afbec1f252037d09a478db469c4f266190b1cc15e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1442-9071.2002.00571.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1442-9071.2002.00571.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12427232$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kocaoglan, Hülya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ünlü, Nurten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acar, Mehmet A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargin, Müge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslan, Bekir S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duman, Sunay</creatorcontrib><title>Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without detectable breaks</title><title>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose: To evaluate the causes of failure to find retinal breaks, the anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) without detectable breaks (Group I), to compare the results with detectable breaks (Group II). Methods: Forty‐five out of 258 eyes that had RD without detectable breaks were analysed retrospectively. Results: The causes of failure to find retinal breaks were aphakia/pseudophakia in 22 eyes, small pupil without any eye disease in four eyes, corneal opacity in two eyes, cataract in two eyes, vitreous haze in two eyes, choroidal detachment in one eye, and unknown cause in 12 eyes. After a single scleral buckling procedure, anatomical re‐attachment of the retina successfully occurred in 62.2% of group I and 78.9% of group II patients. After repeated surgery, final anatomical success rates were 87.2% and 90.2%, respectively. The best corrected visual acuity was 6/60 or better in 53.9% in Group I and 52.5% in Group II. Conclusion: The main cause of failure to find the retinal break was aphakia or pseudophakia. Although the rates of retinal reattachment in eyes without detectable breaks in primary buckling surgery was lower than detectable breaks and reoperations were required more frequently, final success rates were satisfactory and similar in both groups.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aphakia, Postcataract - complications</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pseudophakia - complications</subject><subject>retinal break</subject><subject>retinal detachment</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - complications</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - surgery</subject><subject>Retinal Perforations - complications</subject><subject>Retinal Perforations - diagnosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scleral Buckling</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>1442-6404</issn><issn>1442-9071</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMlOwzAURS0EYv4FlBW7FNtxnERigyqGSi1dUITExnKc5zYlA9iOWv4ep6lgy8pX9rnvWQehgOARwYzfrEeEMRpmOCEjijEdYRz7uD1Ap78Ph_vMGWYn6MzaNfYUjfgxOiGU0YRG9BRNZrKRS6ihcUGrA7OCZS1du4Sm7WxgwJWNrIICnFSrHbQp3artXH8Fysm8giA3ID_sBTrSsrJwuT_P0evD_WL8FE7nj5Px3TRUDFMSphlPdVxIiLM00gVloPNUxlLnoIimMcVRUuBMsiQtcsYzxTTlnGQ4J0qRGKJzdD3M_TTtVwfWibq0CqpKNuD_LBLKUy-JejAdQGVaaw1o8WnKWppvQbDoNYq16A2J3pboNYqdRrH11av9ji6vofgr7r154HYANmUF3_8eLMb3cx98PRzqpXWw_a1L8yF4EiWxeHt-FNkLSdj7Yiay6AekFJBq</recordid><startdate>200212</startdate><enddate>200212</enddate><creator>Kocaoglan, Hülya</creator><creator>Ünlü, Nurten</creator><creator>Acar, Mehmet A</creator><creator>Sargin, Müge</creator><creator>Aslan, Bekir S</creator><creator>Duman, Sunay</creator><general>Blackwell Science Pty</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200212</creationdate><title>Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without detectable breaks</title><author>Kocaoglan, Hülya ; Ünlü, Nurten ; Acar, Mehmet A ; Sargin, Müge ; Aslan, Bekir S ; Duman, Sunay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-8968f5dae5983fd24efb8a5afbec1f252037d09a478db469c4f266190b1cc15e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aphakia, Postcataract - complications</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pseudophakia - complications</topic><topic>retinal break</topic><topic>retinal detachment</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - complications</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - surgery</topic><topic>Retinal Perforations - complications</topic><topic>Retinal Perforations - diagnosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scleral Buckling</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kocaoglan, Hülya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ünlü, Nurten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acar, Mehmet A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sargin, Müge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aslan, Bekir S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duman, Sunay</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kocaoglan, Hülya</au><au>Ünlü, Nurten</au><au>Acar, Mehmet A</au><au>Sargin, Müge</au><au>Aslan, Bekir S</au><au>Duman, Sunay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without detectable breaks</atitle><jtitle>Clinical &amp; experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2002-12</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>415</spage><epage>418</epage><pages>415-418</pages><issn>1442-6404</issn><eissn>1442-9071</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate the causes of failure to find retinal breaks, the anatomical and functional outcomes of patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) without detectable breaks (Group I), to compare the results with detectable breaks (Group II). Methods: Forty‐five out of 258 eyes that had RD without detectable breaks were analysed retrospectively. Results: The causes of failure to find retinal breaks were aphakia/pseudophakia in 22 eyes, small pupil without any eye disease in four eyes, corneal opacity in two eyes, cataract in two eyes, vitreous haze in two eyes, choroidal detachment in one eye, and unknown cause in 12 eyes. After a single scleral buckling procedure, anatomical re‐attachment of the retina successfully occurred in 62.2% of group I and 78.9% of group II patients. After repeated surgery, final anatomical success rates were 87.2% and 90.2%, respectively. The best corrected visual acuity was 6/60 or better in 53.9% in Group I and 52.5% in Group II. Conclusion: The main cause of failure to find the retinal break was aphakia or pseudophakia. Although the rates of retinal reattachment in eyes without detectable breaks in primary buckling surgery was lower than detectable breaks and reoperations were required more frequently, final success rates were satisfactory and similar in both groups.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Pty</pub><pmid>12427232</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00571.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1442-6404
ispartof Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2002-12, Vol.30 (6), p.415-418
issn 1442-6404
1442-9071
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72681042
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aphakia, Postcataract - complications
Child
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pseudophakia - complications
retinal break
retinal detachment
Retinal Detachment - complications
Retinal Detachment - surgery
Retinal Perforations - complications
Retinal Perforations - diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
Scleral Buckling
Visual Acuity
title Management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without detectable breaks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A28%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20of%20rhegmatogenous%20retinal%20detachment%20without%20detectable%20breaks&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20&%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Kocaoglan,%20H%C3%BClya&rft.date=2002-12&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=415&rft.epage=418&rft.pages=415-418&rft.issn=1442-6404&rft.eissn=1442-9071&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1442-9071.2002.00571.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72681042%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72681042&rft_id=info:pmid/12427232&rfr_iscdi=true