Root‐zone acidity and nitrogen source affects Typha latifolia L. growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate

The NH4+ and NO3– uptake kinetics by Typha latifolia L. were studied after prolonged hydroponics growth at constant pH 3.5, 5.0, 6.5 or 7.0 and with NH4+ or NO3– as the sole N‐source. In addition, the effects of pH and N source on H+ extrusion and adenine nucleotide content were examined. Typha lati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental botany 2002-12, Vol.53 (379), p.2441-2450
Hauptverfasser: Brix, Hans, Dyhr‐Jensen, Kirsten, Lorenzen, Bent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2450
container_issue 379
container_start_page 2441
container_title Journal of experimental botany
container_volume 53
creator Brix, Hans
Dyhr‐Jensen, Kirsten
Lorenzen, Bent
description The NH4+ and NO3– uptake kinetics by Typha latifolia L. were studied after prolonged hydroponics growth at constant pH 3.5, 5.0, 6.5 or 7.0 and with NH4+ or NO3– as the sole N‐source. In addition, the effects of pH and N source on H+ extrusion and adenine nucleotide content were examined. Typha latifolia was able to grow with both N sources at near neutral pH levels, but the plants had higher relative growth rates, higher tissue concentrations of the major nutrients, higher contents of adenine nucleotides, and higher affinity for uptake of inorganic nitrogen when grown on NH4+. Growth almost completely stopped at pH 3.5, irrespective of N source, probably as a consequence of pH effects on plasma membrane integrity and H+ influx into the root cells. Tissue concentrations of the major nutrients and adenine nucleotides were severely reduced at low pH, and the uptake capacity for inorganic nitrogen was low, and more so for NO3–‐fed than for NH4+‐fed plants. The maximum uptake rate, Vmax, was highest for NH4+ at pH 6.5 (30.9 µmol h–1 g–1 root dry weight) and for NO3– at pH 5.0 (31.7 µmol h–1 g–1 root dry weight), and less than 10% of these values at pH 3.5. The affinity for uptake as estimated by the half saturation constant, K½, was lowest at low pH for NH4+ and at high pH for NO3–. The changes in Vmax and K½ were thus consistent with the theory of increasing competition between cations and H+ at low pH and between anions and OH– at high pH. Cmin was independent of pH, but slightly higher for NO3– than for NH4+ (Cmin(NH4+) ∼ 0.8 mmol m–3; Cmin(NO3–) ∼ 2.8 mmol m–3). The growth inhibition at low pH was probably due to a reduced nutrient uptake and a consequential limitation of growth by nutrient stress. Typha latifolia seems to be well adapted to growth in wetland soils where NH4+ is the prevailing nitrogen compound, but very low pH levels around the roots are very stressful for the plant. The common occurrence of T. latifolia in very acidic areas is probably only possible because of the plant’s ability to modify pH‐conditions in the rhizosphere.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jxb/erf106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72678429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23697735</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23697735</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-c6c7ab8cb3e4c002d0c12c26e8e820355131ac9f464327dec060cee865566c193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v0zAchi0EYmVw4Q6yOOyAlM1_Yjs5jmljSEUgNCTUi-U6v2xuk7jYjlg58RH4jHwSXFIViQsnH57Hr_z6Reg5JaeU1Pxsdb88g9BSIh-gGS0lKVjJ6UM0I4SxgtRCHaEnMa4IIYII8Rgd0SwwwuUMjZ-8T79-_PzuB8DGusalLTZDgweXgr-FAUc_BptZ24JNEd9sN3cGdya51nfO4Pkpvg3-W7r7c2vcJLMGvHYDJGcj9i02fe8HN_aHVJPgKXrUmi7Cs_15jD5fXd5cXBfzD2_fXZzPCysIT4WVVpllZZccSpvLNMRSZpmECqr8fCEop8bWbSlzHdWAJZJYgEoKIaWlNT9GJ1PuJvivI8SkexctdJ0ZwI9RKyZVVbL_i1SpWtT1Tnz1j7jK_zPkEprxcmdwmqXXk2SDjzFAqzfB9SZsNSV6N5nOk-lpsiy_3CeOyx6av-p-oyy8mIRVTD4cOOOyVoqLzIuJu5jg_sBNWGupuBL6-stCf3yzkO-vFlQT_hsBnqyk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234999331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Root‐zone acidity and nitrogen source affects Typha latifolia L. growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Brix, Hans ; Dyhr‐Jensen, Kirsten ; Lorenzen, Bent</creator><creatorcontrib>Brix, Hans ; Dyhr‐Jensen, Kirsten ; Lorenzen, Bent</creatorcontrib><description>The NH4+ and NO3– uptake kinetics by Typha latifolia L. were studied after prolonged hydroponics growth at constant pH 3.5, 5.0, 6.5 or 7.0 and with NH4+ or NO3– as the sole N‐source. In addition, the effects of pH and N source on H+ extrusion and adenine nucleotide content were examined. Typha latifolia was able to grow with both N sources at near neutral pH levels, but the plants had higher relative growth rates, higher tissue concentrations of the major nutrients, higher contents of adenine nucleotides, and higher affinity for uptake of inorganic nitrogen when grown on NH4+. Growth almost completely stopped at pH 3.5, irrespective of N source, probably as a consequence of pH effects on plasma membrane integrity and H+ influx into the root cells. Tissue concentrations of the major nutrients and adenine nucleotides were severely reduced at low pH, and the uptake capacity for inorganic nitrogen was low, and more so for NO3–‐fed than for NH4+‐fed plants. The maximum uptake rate, Vmax, was highest for NH4+ at pH 6.5 (30.9 µmol h–1 g–1 root dry weight) and for NO3– at pH 5.0 (31.7 µmol h–1 g–1 root dry weight), and less than 10% of these values at pH 3.5. The affinity for uptake as estimated by the half saturation constant, K½, was lowest at low pH for NH4+ and at high pH for NO3–. The changes in Vmax and K½ were thus consistent with the theory of increasing competition between cations and H+ at low pH and between anions and OH– at high pH. Cmin was independent of pH, but slightly higher for NO3– than for NH4+ (Cmin(NH4+) ∼ 0.8 mmol m–3; Cmin(NO3–) ∼ 2.8 mmol m–3). The growth inhibition at low pH was probably due to a reduced nutrient uptake and a consequential limitation of growth by nutrient stress. Typha latifolia seems to be well adapted to growth in wetland soils where NH4+ is the prevailing nitrogen compound, but very low pH levels around the roots are very stressful for the plant. The common occurrence of T. latifolia in very acidic areas is probably only possible because of the plant’s ability to modify pH‐conditions in the rhizosphere.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0957</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erf106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12432036</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEBOA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adenine nucleotides ; ammonium ; cattail ; Freshwater ; H+ extrusion ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Kinetics ; Michaelis‐Menten ; nitrate ; Nitrates - metabolism ; Nitrogen ; Nutrient solutions ; Plant growth ; Plant nutrition ; Plant roots ; Plant Roots - metabolism ; Plants ; Plants and the Environment ; Protons ; Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - metabolism ; Root growth ; Typha latifolia ; Typhaceae ; Typhaceae - growth &amp; development ; Typhaceae - metabolism ; uptake kinetics</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental botany, 2002-12, Vol.53 (379), p.2441-2450</ispartof><rights>Society for Experimental Biology 2002</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Dec 01, 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-c6c7ab8cb3e4c002d0c12c26e8e820355131ac9f464327dec060cee865566c193</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23697735$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23697735$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12432036$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brix, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyhr‐Jensen, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzen, Bent</creatorcontrib><title>Root‐zone acidity and nitrogen source affects Typha latifolia L. growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate</title><title>Journal of experimental botany</title><addtitle>J. Exp. Bot</addtitle><description>The NH4+ and NO3– uptake kinetics by Typha latifolia L. were studied after prolonged hydroponics growth at constant pH 3.5, 5.0, 6.5 or 7.0 and with NH4+ or NO3– as the sole N‐source. In addition, the effects of pH and N source on H+ extrusion and adenine nucleotide content were examined. Typha latifolia was able to grow with both N sources at near neutral pH levels, but the plants had higher relative growth rates, higher tissue concentrations of the major nutrients, higher contents of adenine nucleotides, and higher affinity for uptake of inorganic nitrogen when grown on NH4+. Growth almost completely stopped at pH 3.5, irrespective of N source, probably as a consequence of pH effects on plasma membrane integrity and H+ influx into the root cells. Tissue concentrations of the major nutrients and adenine nucleotides were severely reduced at low pH, and the uptake capacity for inorganic nitrogen was low, and more so for NO3–‐fed than for NH4+‐fed plants. The maximum uptake rate, Vmax, was highest for NH4+ at pH 6.5 (30.9 µmol h–1 g–1 root dry weight) and for NO3– at pH 5.0 (31.7 µmol h–1 g–1 root dry weight), and less than 10% of these values at pH 3.5. The affinity for uptake as estimated by the half saturation constant, K½, was lowest at low pH for NH4+ and at high pH for NO3–. The changes in Vmax and K½ were thus consistent with the theory of increasing competition between cations and H+ at low pH and between anions and OH– at high pH. Cmin was independent of pH, but slightly higher for NO3– than for NH4+ (Cmin(NH4+) ∼ 0.8 mmol m–3; Cmin(NO3–) ∼ 2.8 mmol m–3). The growth inhibition at low pH was probably due to a reduced nutrient uptake and a consequential limitation of growth by nutrient stress. Typha latifolia seems to be well adapted to growth in wetland soils where NH4+ is the prevailing nitrogen compound, but very low pH levels around the roots are very stressful for the plant. The common occurrence of T. latifolia in very acidic areas is probably only possible because of the plant’s ability to modify pH‐conditions in the rhizosphere.</description><subject>Adenine nucleotides</subject><subject>ammonium</subject><subject>cattail</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>H+ extrusion</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Michaelis‐Menten</subject><subject>nitrate</subject><subject>Nitrates - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nutrient solutions</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant nutrition</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plant Roots - metabolism</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and the Environment</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - metabolism</subject><subject>Root growth</subject><subject>Typha latifolia</subject><subject>Typhaceae</subject><subject>Typhaceae - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Typhaceae - metabolism</subject><subject>uptake kinetics</subject><issn>0022-0957</issn><issn>1460-2431</issn><issn>1460-2431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v0zAchi0EYmVw4Q6yOOyAlM1_Yjs5jmljSEUgNCTUi-U6v2xuk7jYjlg58RH4jHwSXFIViQsnH57Hr_z6Reg5JaeU1Pxsdb88g9BSIh-gGS0lKVjJ6UM0I4SxgtRCHaEnMa4IIYII8Rgd0SwwwuUMjZ-8T79-_PzuB8DGusalLTZDgweXgr-FAUc_BptZ24JNEd9sN3cGdya51nfO4Pkpvg3-W7r7c2vcJLMGvHYDJGcj9i02fe8HN_aHVJPgKXrUmi7Cs_15jD5fXd5cXBfzD2_fXZzPCysIT4WVVpllZZccSpvLNMRSZpmECqr8fCEop8bWbSlzHdWAJZJYgEoKIaWlNT9GJ1PuJvivI8SkexctdJ0ZwI9RKyZVVbL_i1SpWtT1Tnz1j7jK_zPkEprxcmdwmqXXk2SDjzFAqzfB9SZsNSV6N5nOk-lpsiy_3CeOyx6av-p-oyy8mIRVTD4cOOOyVoqLzIuJu5jg_sBNWGupuBL6-stCf3yzkO-vFlQT_hsBnqyk</recordid><startdate>20021201</startdate><enddate>20021201</enddate><creator>Brix, Hans</creator><creator>Dyhr‐Jensen, Kirsten</creator><creator>Lorenzen, Bent</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021201</creationdate><title>Root‐zone acidity and nitrogen source affects Typha latifolia L. growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate</title><author>Brix, Hans ; Dyhr‐Jensen, Kirsten ; Lorenzen, Bent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c503t-c6c7ab8cb3e4c002d0c12c26e8e820355131ac9f464327dec060cee865566c193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adenine nucleotides</topic><topic>ammonium</topic><topic>cattail</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>H+ extrusion</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Michaelis‐Menten</topic><topic>nitrate</topic><topic>Nitrates - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nutrient solutions</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant nutrition</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plant Roots - metabolism</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and the Environment</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - metabolism</topic><topic>Root growth</topic><topic>Typha latifolia</topic><topic>Typhaceae</topic><topic>Typhaceae - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Typhaceae - metabolism</topic><topic>uptake kinetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brix, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dyhr‐Jensen, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorenzen, Bent</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brix, Hans</au><au>Dyhr‐Jensen, Kirsten</au><au>Lorenzen, Bent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Root‐zone acidity and nitrogen source affects Typha latifolia L. growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental botany</jtitle><addtitle>J. Exp. Bot</addtitle><date>2002-12-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>379</issue><spage>2441</spage><epage>2450</epage><pages>2441-2450</pages><issn>0022-0957</issn><issn>1460-2431</issn><eissn>1460-2431</eissn><coden>JEBOA6</coden><abstract>The NH4+ and NO3– uptake kinetics by Typha latifolia L. were studied after prolonged hydroponics growth at constant pH 3.5, 5.0, 6.5 or 7.0 and with NH4+ or NO3– as the sole N‐source. In addition, the effects of pH and N source on H+ extrusion and adenine nucleotide content were examined. Typha latifolia was able to grow with both N sources at near neutral pH levels, but the plants had higher relative growth rates, higher tissue concentrations of the major nutrients, higher contents of adenine nucleotides, and higher affinity for uptake of inorganic nitrogen when grown on NH4+. Growth almost completely stopped at pH 3.5, irrespective of N source, probably as a consequence of pH effects on plasma membrane integrity and H+ influx into the root cells. Tissue concentrations of the major nutrients and adenine nucleotides were severely reduced at low pH, and the uptake capacity for inorganic nitrogen was low, and more so for NO3–‐fed than for NH4+‐fed plants. The maximum uptake rate, Vmax, was highest for NH4+ at pH 6.5 (30.9 µmol h–1 g–1 root dry weight) and for NO3– at pH 5.0 (31.7 µmol h–1 g–1 root dry weight), and less than 10% of these values at pH 3.5. The affinity for uptake as estimated by the half saturation constant, K½, was lowest at low pH for NH4+ and at high pH for NO3–. The changes in Vmax and K½ were thus consistent with the theory of increasing competition between cations and H+ at low pH and between anions and OH– at high pH. Cmin was independent of pH, but slightly higher for NO3– than for NH4+ (Cmin(NH4+) ∼ 0.8 mmol m–3; Cmin(NO3–) ∼ 2.8 mmol m–3). The growth inhibition at low pH was probably due to a reduced nutrient uptake and a consequential limitation of growth by nutrient stress. Typha latifolia seems to be well adapted to growth in wetland soils where NH4+ is the prevailing nitrogen compound, but very low pH levels around the roots are very stressful for the plant. The common occurrence of T. latifolia in very acidic areas is probably only possible because of the plant’s ability to modify pH‐conditions in the rhizosphere.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>12432036</pmid><doi>10.1093/jxb/erf106</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0957
ispartof Journal of experimental botany, 2002-12, Vol.53 (379), p.2441-2450
issn 0022-0957
1460-2431
1460-2431
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72678429
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adenine nucleotides
ammonium
cattail
Freshwater
H+ extrusion
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Kinetics
Michaelis‐Menten
nitrate
Nitrates - metabolism
Nitrogen
Nutrient solutions
Plant growth
Plant nutrition
Plant roots
Plant Roots - metabolism
Plants
Plants and the Environment
Protons
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds - metabolism
Root growth
Typha latifolia
Typhaceae
Typhaceae - growth & development
Typhaceae - metabolism
uptake kinetics
title Root‐zone acidity and nitrogen source affects Typha latifolia L. growth and uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T14%3A41%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Root%E2%80%90zone%20acidity%20and%20nitrogen%20source%20affects%20Typha%20latifolia%20L.%20growth%20and%20uptake%20kinetics%20of%20ammonium%20and%20nitrate&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20botany&rft.au=Brix,%20Hans&rft.date=2002-12-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=379&rft.spage=2441&rft.epage=2450&rft.pages=2441-2450&rft.issn=0022-0957&rft.eissn=1460-2431&rft.coden=JEBOA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jxb/erf106&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23697735%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234999331&rft_id=info:pmid/12432036&rft_jstor_id=23697735&rfr_iscdi=true