Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise
Clark BC, Manini TM, Mayer JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Graves JE. Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1547-52. Objective: To evaluate the effects of exercise intensity and multiple sets on muscle activation patte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2002-11, Vol.83 (11), p.1547-1552 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1552 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1547 |
container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Clark, Brian C. Manini, Todd M. Mayer, John M. Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. Graves, James E. |
description | Clark BC, Manini TM, Mayer JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Graves JE. Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1547-52. Objective: To evaluate the effects of exercise intensity and multiple sets on muscle activation patterns during trunk extension exercise. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based musculoskeletal research laboratory. Participants: Twenty volunteers recruited from a university setting. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Electromyographic activity was recorded from the L3–4 paraspinal region, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscles during multiple sets of trunk extension exercise at intensities representing 40%, 50%, and 70% of peak isometric force. Results: As exercise intensity increased, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased to a greater extent than the activity of the paraspinal region. At the 50% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity was significantly greater than the paraspinal region electromyographic activity, whereas at the 70% intensity no differences were found between muscles. During multiple sets of exercise at the same intensity a muscle by set interaction was observed. This interaction revealed that with respect to other muscle groups, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased between sets 1 and 2, whereas electromyographic decrements occurred in the paraspinal region. During exercise at the 40% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity increased to a greater extent between sets 1 and 2 when compared with the paraspinal region. Conclusion: Exercise intensity and multiple sets result in alterations in muscle recruitment patterns of the lumbar and hip extensor muscles. These findings raise questions as to the efficacy of added loading and multiple sets during trunk extension exercise. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/apmr.2002.34828 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72675471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999302002496</els_id><sourcerecordid>72675471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ad43ad12280b2dea7cf32ec34a9c255787b76e50feeb335ba6640d194ceb9ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1TAMgCMEYo_BmRvKBW59S5ymaY9oGgxpEheQuEVp4u4F2qQk7cT79-TtVdoJcbItf7asz4S85WzPmRRXZp7SHhiDvahbaJ-RHZcCqhb4j-dkxxgTVdd14oK8yvlnKRsp-EtywaEGECB2pL8Z0S4pTsd4n8x88JYau_gHvxxpHOhyQDquU28SNcHRg58p_lkw5JgydWvy4Z66YzBTmVvSGn5tbR9DyTBZn_E1eTGYMeObLV6S759uvl3fVndfP3-5_nhX2VqxpeLG1cI4DtCyHhwaZQcBaEVtOgtSqlb1qkHJBsReCNmbpqmZ411tse-MFZfkw3nvnOLvFfOiJ58tjqMJGNesFTRK1or_F-StaiSHE3h1Bm2KOScc9Jz8ZNJRc6ZP_vXJvz7514_-y8S7bfXaT-ie-E14Ad5vgMnWjEMyoTh64moGrANVuO7MYTH24DHpbD0Gi86n8jDtov_nEX8BSOWj2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18765121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Clark, Brian C. ; Manini, Todd M. ; Mayer, John M. ; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. ; Graves, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clark, Brian C. ; Manini, Todd M. ; Mayer, John M. ; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. ; Graves, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>Clark BC, Manini TM, Mayer JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Graves JE. Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1547-52. Objective: To evaluate the effects of exercise intensity and multiple sets on muscle activation patterns during trunk extension exercise. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based musculoskeletal research laboratory. Participants: Twenty volunteers recruited from a university setting. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Electromyographic activity was recorded from the L3–4 paraspinal region, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscles during multiple sets of trunk extension exercise at intensities representing 40%, 50%, and 70% of peak isometric force. Results: As exercise intensity increased, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased to a greater extent than the activity of the paraspinal region. At the 50% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity was significantly greater than the paraspinal region electromyographic activity, whereas at the 70% intensity no differences were found between muscles. During multiple sets of exercise at the same intensity a muscle by set interaction was observed. This interaction revealed that with respect to other muscle groups, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased between sets 1 and 2, whereas electromyographic decrements occurred in the paraspinal region. During exercise at the 40% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity increased to a greater extent between sets 1 and 2 when compared with the paraspinal region. Conclusion: Exercise intensity and multiple sets result in alterations in muscle recruitment patterns of the lumbar and hip extensor muscles. These findings raise questions as to the efficacy of added loading and multiple sets during trunk extension exercise. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34828</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12422323</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Back - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Buttocks - physiology ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment ; Electromyography ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Exercise Therapy - methods ; Female ; Hip - physiology ; Humans ; Isometric Contraction - physiology ; Low Back Pain - etiology ; Low Back Pain - physiopathology ; Low Back Pain - prevention & control ; Lumbosacral Region - physiology ; Lumbrosacral region ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscles ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Rehabilitation ; Spine ; Thigh - physiology ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2002-11, Vol.83 (11), p.1547-1552</ispartof><rights>2002 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ad43ad12280b2dea7cf32ec34a9c255787b76e50feeb335ba6640d194ceb9ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ad43ad12280b2dea7cf32ec34a9c255787b76e50feeb335ba6640d194ceb9ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.34828$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14020927$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12422323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clark, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manini, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Clark BC, Manini TM, Mayer JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Graves JE. Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1547-52. Objective: To evaluate the effects of exercise intensity and multiple sets on muscle activation patterns during trunk extension exercise. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based musculoskeletal research laboratory. Participants: Twenty volunteers recruited from a university setting. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Electromyographic activity was recorded from the L3–4 paraspinal region, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscles during multiple sets of trunk extension exercise at intensities representing 40%, 50%, and 70% of peak isometric force. Results: As exercise intensity increased, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased to a greater extent than the activity of the paraspinal region. At the 50% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity was significantly greater than the paraspinal region electromyographic activity, whereas at the 70% intensity no differences were found between muscles. During multiple sets of exercise at the same intensity a muscle by set interaction was observed. This interaction revealed that with respect to other muscle groups, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased between sets 1 and 2, whereas electromyographic decrements occurred in the paraspinal region. During exercise at the 40% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity increased to a greater extent between sets 1 and 2 when compared with the paraspinal region. Conclusion: Exercise intensity and multiple sets result in alterations in muscle recruitment patterns of the lumbar and hip extensor muscles. These findings raise questions as to the efficacy of added loading and multiple sets during trunk extension exercise. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Back - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Buttocks - physiology</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hip - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - prevention & control</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region - physiology</subject><subject>Lumbrosacral region</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Thigh - physiology</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1TAMgCMEYo_BmRvKBW59S5ymaY9oGgxpEheQuEVp4u4F2qQk7cT79-TtVdoJcbItf7asz4S85WzPmRRXZp7SHhiDvahbaJ-RHZcCqhb4j-dkxxgTVdd14oK8yvlnKRsp-EtywaEGECB2pL8Z0S4pTsd4n8x88JYau_gHvxxpHOhyQDquU28SNcHRg58p_lkw5JgydWvy4Z66YzBTmVvSGn5tbR9DyTBZn_E1eTGYMeObLV6S759uvl3fVndfP3-5_nhX2VqxpeLG1cI4DtCyHhwaZQcBaEVtOgtSqlb1qkHJBsReCNmbpqmZ411tse-MFZfkw3nvnOLvFfOiJ58tjqMJGNesFTRK1or_F-StaiSHE3h1Bm2KOScc9Jz8ZNJRc6ZP_vXJvz7514_-y8S7bfXaT-ie-E14Ad5vgMnWjEMyoTh64moGrANVuO7MYTH24DHpbD0Gi86n8jDtov_nEX8BSOWj2A</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>Clark, Brian C.</creator><creator>Manini, Todd M.</creator><creator>Mayer, John M.</creator><creator>Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.</creator><creator>Graves, James E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise</title><author>Clark, Brian C. ; Manini, Todd M. ; Mayer, John M. ; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. ; Graves, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ad43ad12280b2dea7cf32ec34a9c255787b76e50feeb335ba6640d194ceb9ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Back - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Buttocks - physiology</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hip - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - prevention & control</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region - physiology</topic><topic>Lumbrosacral region</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Thigh - physiology</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clark, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manini, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clark, Brian C.</au><au>Manini, Todd M.</au><au>Mayer, John M.</au><au>Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.</au><au>Graves, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1547</spage><epage>1552</epage><pages>1547-1552</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Clark BC, Manini TM, Mayer JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Graves JE. Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1547-52. Objective: To evaluate the effects of exercise intensity and multiple sets on muscle activation patterns during trunk extension exercise. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based musculoskeletal research laboratory. Participants: Twenty volunteers recruited from a university setting. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Electromyographic activity was recorded from the L3–4 paraspinal region, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscles during multiple sets of trunk extension exercise at intensities representing 40%, 50%, and 70% of peak isometric force. Results: As exercise intensity increased, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased to a greater extent than the activity of the paraspinal region. At the 50% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity was significantly greater than the paraspinal region electromyographic activity, whereas at the 70% intensity no differences were found between muscles. During multiple sets of exercise at the same intensity a muscle by set interaction was observed. This interaction revealed that with respect to other muscle groups, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased between sets 1 and 2, whereas electromyographic decrements occurred in the paraspinal region. During exercise at the 40% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity increased to a greater extent between sets 1 and 2 when compared with the paraspinal region. Conclusion: Exercise intensity and multiple sets result in alterations in muscle recruitment patterns of the lumbar and hip extensor muscles. These findings raise questions as to the efficacy of added loading and multiple sets during trunk extension exercise. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12422323</pmid><doi>10.1053/apmr.2002.34828</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2002-11, Vol.83 (11), p.1547-1552 |
issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72675471 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Back - physiology Biological and medical sciences Buttocks - physiology Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment Electromyography Exercise Exercise - physiology Exercise Therapy - methods Female Hip - physiology Humans Isometric Contraction - physiology Low Back Pain - etiology Low Back Pain - physiopathology Low Back Pain - prevention & control Lumbosacral Region - physiology Lumbrosacral region Male Medical sciences Muscle, Skeletal - physiology Muscles Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Rehabilitation Spine Thigh - physiology Weight-Bearing |
title | Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T10%3A01%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electromyographic%20activity%20of%20the%20lumbar%20and%20hip%20extensors%20during%20dynamic%20trunk%20extension%20exercise&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Clark,%20Brian%20C.&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1547&rft.epage=1552&rft.pages=1547-1552&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/apmr.2002.34828&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72675471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18765121&rft_id=info:pmid/12422323&rft_els_id=S0003999302002496&rfr_iscdi=true |