Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise

Clark BC, Manini TM, Mayer JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Graves JE. Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1547-52. Objective: To evaluate the effects of exercise intensity and multiple sets on muscle activation patte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2002-11, Vol.83 (11), p.1547-1552
Hauptverfasser: Clark, Brian C., Manini, Todd M., Mayer, John M., Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L., Graves, James E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1552
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1547
container_title Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
container_volume 83
creator Clark, Brian C.
Manini, Todd M.
Mayer, John M.
Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.
Graves, James E.
description Clark BC, Manini TM, Mayer JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Graves JE. Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1547-52. Objective: To evaluate the effects of exercise intensity and multiple sets on muscle activation patterns during trunk extension exercise. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based musculoskeletal research laboratory. Participants: Twenty volunteers recruited from a university setting. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Electromyographic activity was recorded from the L3–4 paraspinal region, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscles during multiple sets of trunk extension exercise at intensities representing 40%, 50%, and 70% of peak isometric force. Results: As exercise intensity increased, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased to a greater extent than the activity of the paraspinal region. At the 50% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity was significantly greater than the paraspinal region electromyographic activity, whereas at the 70% intensity no differences were found between muscles. During multiple sets of exercise at the same intensity a muscle by set interaction was observed. This interaction revealed that with respect to other muscle groups, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased between sets 1 and 2, whereas electromyographic decrements occurred in the paraspinal region. During exercise at the 40% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity increased to a greater extent between sets 1 and 2 when compared with the paraspinal region. Conclusion: Exercise intensity and multiple sets result in alterations in muscle recruitment patterns of the lumbar and hip extensor muscles. These findings raise questions as to the efficacy of added loading and multiple sets during trunk extension exercise. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
doi_str_mv 10.1053/apmr.2002.34828
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72675471</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999302002496</els_id><sourcerecordid>72675471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ad43ad12280b2dea7cf32ec34a9c255787b76e50feeb335ba6640d194ceb9ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1TAMgCMEYo_BmRvKBW59S5ymaY9oGgxpEheQuEVp4u4F2qQk7cT79-TtVdoJcbItf7asz4S85WzPmRRXZp7SHhiDvahbaJ-RHZcCqhb4j-dkxxgTVdd14oK8yvlnKRsp-EtywaEGECB2pL8Z0S4pTsd4n8x88JYau_gHvxxpHOhyQDquU28SNcHRg58p_lkw5JgydWvy4Z66YzBTmVvSGn5tbR9DyTBZn_E1eTGYMeObLV6S759uvl3fVndfP3-5_nhX2VqxpeLG1cI4DtCyHhwaZQcBaEVtOgtSqlb1qkHJBsReCNmbpqmZ411tse-MFZfkw3nvnOLvFfOiJ58tjqMJGNesFTRK1or_F-StaiSHE3h1Bm2KOScc9Jz8ZNJRc6ZP_vXJvz7514_-y8S7bfXaT-ie-E14Ad5vgMnWjEMyoTh64moGrANVuO7MYTH24DHpbD0Gi86n8jDtov_nEX8BSOWj2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18765121</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Clark, Brian C. ; Manini, Todd M. ; Mayer, John M. ; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. ; Graves, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clark, Brian C. ; Manini, Todd M. ; Mayer, John M. ; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. ; Graves, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>Clark BC, Manini TM, Mayer JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Graves JE. Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1547-52. Objective: To evaluate the effects of exercise intensity and multiple sets on muscle activation patterns during trunk extension exercise. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based musculoskeletal research laboratory. Participants: Twenty volunteers recruited from a university setting. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Electromyographic activity was recorded from the L3–4 paraspinal region, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscles during multiple sets of trunk extension exercise at intensities representing 40%, 50%, and 70% of peak isometric force. Results: As exercise intensity increased, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased to a greater extent than the activity of the paraspinal region. At the 50% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity was significantly greater than the paraspinal region electromyographic activity, whereas at the 70% intensity no differences were found between muscles. During multiple sets of exercise at the same intensity a muscle by set interaction was observed. This interaction revealed that with respect to other muscle groups, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased between sets 1 and 2, whereas electromyographic decrements occurred in the paraspinal region. During exercise at the 40% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity increased to a greater extent between sets 1 and 2 when compared with the paraspinal region. Conclusion: Exercise intensity and multiple sets result in alterations in muscle recruitment patterns of the lumbar and hip extensor muscles. These findings raise questions as to the efficacy of added loading and multiple sets during trunk extension exercise. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34828</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12422323</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Back - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Buttocks - physiology ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment ; Electromyography ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Exercise Therapy - methods ; Female ; Hip - physiology ; Humans ; Isometric Contraction - physiology ; Low Back Pain - etiology ; Low Back Pain - physiopathology ; Low Back Pain - prevention &amp; control ; Lumbosacral Region - physiology ; Lumbrosacral region ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscles ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Rehabilitation ; Spine ; Thigh - physiology ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2002-11, Vol.83 (11), p.1547-1552</ispartof><rights>2002 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ad43ad12280b2dea7cf32ec34a9c255787b76e50feeb335ba6640d194ceb9ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ad43ad12280b2dea7cf32ec34a9c255787b76e50feeb335ba6640d194ceb9ac3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.34828$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14020927$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12422323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clark, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manini, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Clark BC, Manini TM, Mayer JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Graves JE. Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1547-52. Objective: To evaluate the effects of exercise intensity and multiple sets on muscle activation patterns during trunk extension exercise. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based musculoskeletal research laboratory. Participants: Twenty volunteers recruited from a university setting. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Electromyographic activity was recorded from the L3–4 paraspinal region, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscles during multiple sets of trunk extension exercise at intensities representing 40%, 50%, and 70% of peak isometric force. Results: As exercise intensity increased, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased to a greater extent than the activity of the paraspinal region. At the 50% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity was significantly greater than the paraspinal region electromyographic activity, whereas at the 70% intensity no differences were found between muscles. During multiple sets of exercise at the same intensity a muscle by set interaction was observed. This interaction revealed that with respect to other muscle groups, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased between sets 1 and 2, whereas electromyographic decrements occurred in the paraspinal region. During exercise at the 40% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity increased to a greater extent between sets 1 and 2 when compared with the paraspinal region. Conclusion: Exercise intensity and multiple sets result in alterations in muscle recruitment patterns of the lumbar and hip extensor muscles. These findings raise questions as to the efficacy of added loading and multiple sets during trunk extension exercise. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Back - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Buttocks - physiology</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hip - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isometric Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region - physiology</subject><subject>Lumbrosacral region</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Thigh - physiology</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1TAMgCMEYo_BmRvKBW59S5ymaY9oGgxpEheQuEVp4u4F2qQk7cT79-TtVdoJcbItf7asz4S85WzPmRRXZp7SHhiDvahbaJ-RHZcCqhb4j-dkxxgTVdd14oK8yvlnKRsp-EtywaEGECB2pL8Z0S4pTsd4n8x88JYau_gHvxxpHOhyQDquU28SNcHRg58p_lkw5JgydWvy4Z66YzBTmVvSGn5tbR9DyTBZn_E1eTGYMeObLV6S759uvl3fVndfP3-5_nhX2VqxpeLG1cI4DtCyHhwaZQcBaEVtOgtSqlb1qkHJBsReCNmbpqmZ411tse-MFZfkw3nvnOLvFfOiJ58tjqMJGNesFTRK1or_F-StaiSHE3h1Bm2KOScc9Jz8ZNJRc6ZP_vXJvz7514_-y8S7bfXaT-ie-E14Ad5vgMnWjEMyoTh64moGrANVuO7MYTH24DHpbD0Gi86n8jDtov_nEX8BSOWj2A</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>Clark, Brian C.</creator><creator>Manini, Todd M.</creator><creator>Mayer, John M.</creator><creator>Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.</creator><creator>Graves, James E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise</title><author>Clark, Brian C. ; Manini, Todd M. ; Mayer, John M. ; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. ; Graves, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-1ad43ad12280b2dea7cf32ec34a9c255787b76e50feeb335ba6640d194ceb9ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Back - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Buttocks - physiology</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hip - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isometric Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region - physiology</topic><topic>Lumbrosacral region</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Thigh - physiology</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clark, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manini, Todd M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graves, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clark, Brian C.</au><au>Manini, Todd M.</au><au>Mayer, John M.</au><au>Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.</au><au>Graves, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1547</spage><epage>1552</epage><pages>1547-1552</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Clark BC, Manini TM, Mayer JM, Ploutz-Snyder LL, Graves JE. Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1547-52. Objective: To evaluate the effects of exercise intensity and multiple sets on muscle activation patterns during trunk extension exercise. Design: Descriptive, repeated measures. Setting: University-based musculoskeletal research laboratory. Participants: Twenty volunteers recruited from a university setting. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Electromyographic activity was recorded from the L3–4 paraspinal region, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris muscles during multiple sets of trunk extension exercise at intensities representing 40%, 50%, and 70% of peak isometric force. Results: As exercise intensity increased, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased to a greater extent than the activity of the paraspinal region. At the 50% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity was significantly greater than the paraspinal region electromyographic activity, whereas at the 70% intensity no differences were found between muscles. During multiple sets of exercise at the same intensity a muscle by set interaction was observed. This interaction revealed that with respect to other muscle groups, the electromyographic activity of the gluteus maximus increased between sets 1 and 2, whereas electromyographic decrements occurred in the paraspinal region. During exercise at the 40% intensity level, biceps femoris electromyographic activity increased to a greater extent between sets 1 and 2 when compared with the paraspinal region. Conclusion: Exercise intensity and multiple sets result in alterations in muscle recruitment patterns of the lumbar and hip extensor muscles. These findings raise questions as to the efficacy of added loading and multiple sets during trunk extension exercise. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12422323</pmid><doi>10.1053/apmr.2002.34828</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9993
ispartof Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2002-11, Vol.83 (11), p.1547-1552
issn 0003-9993
1532-821X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72675471
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Back - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Buttocks - physiology
Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment
Electromyography
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Exercise Therapy - methods
Female
Hip - physiology
Humans
Isometric Contraction - physiology
Low Back Pain - etiology
Low Back Pain - physiopathology
Low Back Pain - prevention & control
Lumbosacral Region - physiology
Lumbrosacral region
Male
Medical sciences
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Muscles
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Rehabilitation
Spine
Thigh - physiology
Weight-Bearing
title Electromyographic activity of the lumbar and hip extensors during dynamic trunk extension exercise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T10%3A01%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electromyographic%20activity%20of%20the%20lumbar%20and%20hip%20extensors%20during%20dynamic%20trunk%20extension%20exercise&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Clark,%20Brian%20C.&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1547&rft.epage=1552&rft.pages=1547-1552&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/apmr.2002.34828&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72675471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18765121&rft_id=info:pmid/12422323&rft_els_id=S0003999302002496&rfr_iscdi=true