Effects of work on reproductive and productive performance of crossbred dairy cows in the Ethiopian highlands

An investigation was made at the International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) into the possibility of using cows in land cultivation as a means of reducing the dependency of smallholder farmers in the Ethiopian highlands on draught oxen power, a resource which is in short supply during the peak...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tropical animal health and production 1991-11, Vol.23 (4), p.241-249
Hauptverfasser: Agyemang, K, Astatke, A, Anderson, F.M, Mariam, W.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 249
container_issue 4
container_start_page 241
container_title Tropical animal health and production
container_volume 23
creator Agyemang, K
Astatke, A
Anderson, F.M
Mariam, W.W
description An investigation was made at the International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) into the possibility of using cows in land cultivation as a means of reducing the dependency of smallholder farmers in the Ethiopian highlands on draught oxen power, a resource which is in short supply during the peak of the cultivation season and usually leads to late planting and poor harvest. A total of 32 crossbred cows (1/2 Boran-1/2 Friesian) were used in an experiment to determine whether cows could be used to cultivate an average smallholder farm of 2.5 ha and to assess the effects of work on reproductive and productive performance; 16 served as a control group and were milked but not worked while the other 16 were milked in addition to providing draught power for cultivation. Draught cows were provided with extra feed and consumed 7% and 21% more hay and concentrate respectively than non-draught cows during a two-lactation cycle. After the end of the second lactation there were no significant differences between draught and non-draught animals for milk production (1,713 +/- 57.4 compared with [vs] 1,857 +/- 48.1 kg), lactation length (291 +/- 20.4 vs 277 +/- 18.0 days), calf birth weight (29.6 +/- 1.0 vs 29.3 +/- 1.0 kg), number of days open (77 +/- 14.1 vs 83 +/- 12.9), calving interval (355 +/- 14.5 vs 358 +/- 13.2 days), gestation length (278 +/- 1.6 vs 274 +/- 1.4 days) and number of services per conception (1.21 vs 1.64). The number of hours worked by each pair of crossbred cows was sufficient to cultivate the average smallholder farm of 2.5ha.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF02357108
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72670149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72670149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-823400976bbe2acf6d9af0d4b083abab5744a0d1b82799dbf72cfa63f133505b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkElPwzAQhS0EgrJcuCN84oAUGC-xkyNUZZGQOADnyGtraOJiJyD-PYFWgtNo9L55evMQOiZwQQDk5fUNUFZKAtUWmpBSskJyVm2jCQCvCy653EP7Ob8CjHgldtEukbUoaTVB7cx7Z_qMo8efMb3h2OHkVinawfThw2HVWfxvXbnkY2pVZ9zPiUkxZ52cxVaF9IVN_Mw4dLhfODzrFyGugurwIswXy9EoH6Idr5bZHW3mAXq5mT1P74qHx9v76dVDYRiIvqgo4wC1FFo7qowXtlYeLNdQMaWVLiXnCizRFZV1bbWX1HglmCeMlVBqdoDO1r5j8vfB5b5pQzZuOYZwcciNpEIC4fUInq_B30eS880qhValr4ZA89Nt89ftCJ9sXAfdOvuHrssc9dO17lVs1DyF3Lw8USAMqBCiEsC-ATXSfns</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72670149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of work on reproductive and productive performance of crossbred dairy cows in the Ethiopian highlands</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Agyemang, K ; Astatke, A ; Anderson, F.M ; Mariam, W.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Agyemang, K ; Astatke, A ; Anderson, F.M ; Mariam, W.W</creatorcontrib><description>An investigation was made at the International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) into the possibility of using cows in land cultivation as a means of reducing the dependency of smallholder farmers in the Ethiopian highlands on draught oxen power, a resource which is in short supply during the peak of the cultivation season and usually leads to late planting and poor harvest. A total of 32 crossbred cows (1/2 Boran-1/2 Friesian) were used in an experiment to determine whether cows could be used to cultivate an average smallholder farm of 2.5 ha and to assess the effects of work on reproductive and productive performance; 16 served as a control group and were milked but not worked while the other 16 were milked in addition to providing draught power for cultivation. Draught cows were provided with extra feed and consumed 7% and 21% more hay and concentrate respectively than non-draught cows during a two-lactation cycle. After the end of the second lactation there were no significant differences between draught and non-draught animals for milk production (1,713 +/- 57.4 compared with [vs] 1,857 +/- 48.1 kg), lactation length (291 +/- 20.4 vs 277 +/- 18.0 days), calf birth weight (29.6 +/- 1.0 vs 29.3 +/- 1.0 kg), number of days open (77 +/- 14.1 vs 83 +/- 12.9), calving interval (355 +/- 14.5 vs 358 +/- 13.2 days), gestation length (278 +/- 1.6 vs 274 +/- 1.4 days) and number of services per conception (1.21 vs 1.64). The number of hours worked by each pair of crossbred cows was sufficient to cultivate the average smallholder farm of 2.5ha.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02357108</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1796528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; birth weight ; Body Weight ; calves ; calving interval ; calving rate ; Cattle - genetics ; Cattle - physiology ; crossbreds ; Crosses, Genetic ; dairy cows ; draft animals ; Eating ; feed intake ; Female ; highlands ; Lactation ; milk yield ; Physical Exertion ; plowing ; Reproduction</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 1991-11, Vol.23 (4), p.241-249</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-823400976bbe2acf6d9af0d4b083abab5744a0d1b82799dbf72cfa63f133505b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1796528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agyemang, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astatke, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, F.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariam, W.W</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of work on reproductive and productive performance of crossbred dairy cows in the Ethiopian highlands</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>An investigation was made at the International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) into the possibility of using cows in land cultivation as a means of reducing the dependency of smallholder farmers in the Ethiopian highlands on draught oxen power, a resource which is in short supply during the peak of the cultivation season and usually leads to late planting and poor harvest. A total of 32 crossbred cows (1/2 Boran-1/2 Friesian) were used in an experiment to determine whether cows could be used to cultivate an average smallholder farm of 2.5 ha and to assess the effects of work on reproductive and productive performance; 16 served as a control group and were milked but not worked while the other 16 were milked in addition to providing draught power for cultivation. Draught cows were provided with extra feed and consumed 7% and 21% more hay and concentrate respectively than non-draught cows during a two-lactation cycle. After the end of the second lactation there were no significant differences between draught and non-draught animals for milk production (1,713 +/- 57.4 compared with [vs] 1,857 +/- 48.1 kg), lactation length (291 +/- 20.4 vs 277 +/- 18.0 days), calf birth weight (29.6 +/- 1.0 vs 29.3 +/- 1.0 kg), number of days open (77 +/- 14.1 vs 83 +/- 12.9), calving interval (355 +/- 14.5 vs 358 +/- 13.2 days), gestation length (278 +/- 1.6 vs 274 +/- 1.4 days) and number of services per conception (1.21 vs 1.64). The number of hours worked by each pair of crossbred cows was sufficient to cultivate the average smallholder farm of 2.5ha.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>birth weight</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>calves</subject><subject>calving interval</subject><subject>calving rate</subject><subject>Cattle - genetics</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>crossbreds</subject><subject>Crosses, Genetic</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>draft animals</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>feed intake</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>highlands</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>milk yield</subject><subject>Physical Exertion</subject><subject>plowing</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkElPwzAQhS0EgrJcuCN84oAUGC-xkyNUZZGQOADnyGtraOJiJyD-PYFWgtNo9L55evMQOiZwQQDk5fUNUFZKAtUWmpBSskJyVm2jCQCvCy653EP7Ob8CjHgldtEukbUoaTVB7cx7Z_qMo8efMb3h2OHkVinawfThw2HVWfxvXbnkY2pVZ9zPiUkxZ52cxVaF9IVN_Mw4dLhfODzrFyGugurwIswXy9EoH6Idr5bZHW3mAXq5mT1P74qHx9v76dVDYRiIvqgo4wC1FFo7qowXtlYeLNdQMaWVLiXnCizRFZV1bbWX1HglmCeMlVBqdoDO1r5j8vfB5b5pQzZuOYZwcciNpEIC4fUInq_B30eS880qhValr4ZA89Nt89ftCJ9sXAfdOvuHrssc9dO17lVs1DyF3Lw8USAMqBCiEsC-ATXSfns</recordid><startdate>19911101</startdate><enddate>19911101</enddate><creator>Agyemang, K</creator><creator>Astatke, A</creator><creator>Anderson, F.M</creator><creator>Mariam, W.W</creator><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911101</creationdate><title>Effects of work on reproductive and productive performance of crossbred dairy cows in the Ethiopian highlands</title><author>Agyemang, K ; Astatke, A ; Anderson, F.M ; Mariam, W.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-823400976bbe2acf6d9af0d4b083abab5744a0d1b82799dbf72cfa63f133505b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>birth weight</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>calves</topic><topic>calving interval</topic><topic>calving rate</topic><topic>Cattle - genetics</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>crossbreds</topic><topic>Crosses, Genetic</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>draft animals</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>feed intake</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>highlands</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>milk yield</topic><topic>Physical Exertion</topic><topic>plowing</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agyemang, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Astatke, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, F.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mariam, W.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agyemang, K</au><au>Astatke, A</au><au>Anderson, F.M</au><au>Mariam, W.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of work on reproductive and productive performance of crossbred dairy cows in the Ethiopian highlands</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>1991-11-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>241-249</pages><issn>0049-4747</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>An investigation was made at the International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) into the possibility of using cows in land cultivation as a means of reducing the dependency of smallholder farmers in the Ethiopian highlands on draught oxen power, a resource which is in short supply during the peak of the cultivation season and usually leads to late planting and poor harvest. A total of 32 crossbred cows (1/2 Boran-1/2 Friesian) were used in an experiment to determine whether cows could be used to cultivate an average smallholder farm of 2.5 ha and to assess the effects of work on reproductive and productive performance; 16 served as a control group and were milked but not worked while the other 16 were milked in addition to providing draught power for cultivation. Draught cows were provided with extra feed and consumed 7% and 21% more hay and concentrate respectively than non-draught cows during a two-lactation cycle. After the end of the second lactation there were no significant differences between draught and non-draught animals for milk production (1,713 +/- 57.4 compared with [vs] 1,857 +/- 48.1 kg), lactation length (291 +/- 20.4 vs 277 +/- 18.0 days), calf birth weight (29.6 +/- 1.0 vs 29.3 +/- 1.0 kg), number of days open (77 +/- 14.1 vs 83 +/- 12.9), calving interval (355 +/- 14.5 vs 358 +/- 13.2 days), gestation length (278 +/- 1.6 vs 274 +/- 1.4 days) and number of services per conception (1.21 vs 1.64). The number of hours worked by each pair of crossbred cows was sufficient to cultivate the average smallholder farm of 2.5ha.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>1796528</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02357108</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-4747
ispartof Tropical animal health and production, 1991-11, Vol.23 (4), p.241-249
issn 0049-4747
1573-7438
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72670149
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Animals
birth weight
Body Weight
calves
calving interval
calving rate
Cattle - genetics
Cattle - physiology
crossbreds
Crosses, Genetic
dairy cows
draft animals
Eating
feed intake
Female
highlands
Lactation
milk yield
Physical Exertion
plowing
Reproduction
title Effects of work on reproductive and productive performance of crossbred dairy cows in the Ethiopian highlands
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A52%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20work%20on%20reproductive%20and%20productive%20performance%20of%20crossbred%20dairy%20cows%20in%20the%20Ethiopian%20highlands&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Agyemang,%20K&rft.date=1991-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=241-249&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02357108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72670149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72670149&rft_id=info:pmid/1796528&rfr_iscdi=true