Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire
Page SJ, Shawaryn MA, Cernich AN, Linacre JM. Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1579-84. Objective: To evaluate the measurement properties of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (RODQ) by using rating scale analyses. Design: Calibrat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2002-11, Vol.83 (11), p.1579-1584 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1584 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 1579 |
| container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
| container_volume | 83 |
| creator | Page, Stephen J. Shawaryn, Marla A. Cernich, Alison N. Linacre, John M. |
| description | Page SJ, Shawaryn MA, Cernich AN, Linacre JM. Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1579-84. Objective: To evaluate the measurement properties of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (RODQ) by using rating scale analyses. Design: Calibration of item responses by using a data set. Setting: Four outpatient therapy clinics in the northeastern United States. Patients: Convenience sample of 95 community-dwelling adults exhibiting mild to severe low back pain-related disability (LBP-D). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: The RODQ. Results: Several Rasch analyses were performed, with 1 item deleted and 2 response categories collapsed, creating a better test without increased error. A schema for item administration and evaluation was also developed. Conclusions: By using the abbreviated scale, suggested item order, and predicted responses, abbreviated versions of the instrument can be applied to measure LBP-D more efficiently. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1053/apmr.2002.34604 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72668563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999302002551</els_id><sourcerecordid>72668563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-752adbcfd5c6c005e1ea72f694b1767f57698c4bbe82234c86089513ea4e64d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLw0AQhxdRbK2evUkueku772TxJMUXCD2o4G3ZbCa6miZxtw_637ttAz15Gmb4ZubHh9AlwWOCBZuYbu7HFGM6ZlxifoSGRDCa5pR8HKMhxpilSik2QGchfMdWCkZO0YBQTimjaohuX62pXfOZtFWy-ILEw8oFKJNZWENY-E1St-ukMPYn6Yxrkt9lnLq2aYzzcI5OKlMHuOjrCL0_3L9Nn9KX2ePz9O4ltSxjizQT1JSFrUphpcVYAAGT0UoqXpBMZpXIpMotLwrIYyhuc4lzJQgDw0HyUrERutnf7Xy7C6DnLlioa9NAuww6o1LmQrIITvag9W0IHirdeTc3fqMJ1ltfeutLb33pna-4cdWfXhZzKA98LygC1z1gQjRVedNYFw4cxxQrtn2t9hxEESsHXgfroLFQRlF2ocvW_RviDxndhh8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72668563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Open Access Journals</source><creator>Page, Stephen J. ; Shawaryn, Marla A. ; Cernich, Alison N. ; Linacre, John M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Page, Stephen J. ; Shawaryn, Marla A. ; Cernich, Alison N. ; Linacre, John M.</creatorcontrib><description>Page SJ, Shawaryn MA, Cernich AN, Linacre JM. Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1579-84. Objective: To evaluate the measurement properties of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (RODQ) by using rating scale analyses. Design: Calibration of item responses by using a data set. Setting: Four outpatient therapy clinics in the northeastern United States. Patients: Convenience sample of 95 community-dwelling adults exhibiting mild to severe low back pain-related disability (LBP-D). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: The RODQ. Results: Several Rasch analyses were performed, with 1 item deleted and 2 response categories collapsed, creating a better test without increased error. A schema for item administration and evaluation was also developed. Conclusions: By using the abbreviated scale, suggested item order, and predicted responses, abbreviated versions of the instrument can be applied to measure LBP-D more efficiently. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34604</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12422329</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APMHAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Adult ; Aged ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Calibration ; Disability Evaluation ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Low back pain ; Low Back Pain - classification ; Low Back Pain - diagnosis ; Low Back Pain - physiopathology ; Low Back Pain - psychology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; New England ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Pain Measurement - standards ; Psychometrics ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Rehabilitation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2002-11, Vol.83 (11), p.1579-1584</ispartof><rights>2002 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-752adbcfd5c6c005e1ea72f694b1767f57698c4bbe82234c86089513ea4e64d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-752adbcfd5c6c005e1ea72f694b1767f57698c4bbe82234c86089513ea4e64d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999302002551$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14020933$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12422329$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Page, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shawaryn, Marla A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cernich, Alison N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linacre, John M.</creatorcontrib><title>Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Page SJ, Shawaryn MA, Cernich AN, Linacre JM. Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1579-84. Objective: To evaluate the measurement properties of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (RODQ) by using rating scale analyses. Design: Calibration of item responses by using a data set. Setting: Four outpatient therapy clinics in the northeastern United States. Patients: Convenience sample of 95 community-dwelling adults exhibiting mild to severe low back pain-related disability (LBP-D). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: The RODQ. Results: Several Rasch analyses were performed, with 1 item deleted and 2 response categories collapsed, creating a better test without increased error. A schema for item administration and evaluation was also developed. Conclusions: By using the abbreviated scale, suggested item order, and predicted responses, abbreviated versions of the instrument can be applied to measure LBP-D more efficiently. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - classification</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>New England</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - standards</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtLw0AQhxdRbK2evUkueku772TxJMUXCD2o4G3ZbCa6miZxtw_637ttAz15Gmb4ZubHh9AlwWOCBZuYbu7HFGM6ZlxifoSGRDCa5pR8HKMhxpilSik2QGchfMdWCkZO0YBQTimjaohuX62pXfOZtFWy-ILEw8oFKJNZWENY-E1St-ukMPYn6Yxrkt9lnLq2aYzzcI5OKlMHuOjrCL0_3L9Nn9KX2ePz9O4ltSxjizQT1JSFrUphpcVYAAGT0UoqXpBMZpXIpMotLwrIYyhuc4lzJQgDw0HyUrERutnf7Xy7C6DnLlioa9NAuww6o1LmQrIITvag9W0IHirdeTc3fqMJ1ltfeutLb33pna-4cdWfXhZzKA98LygC1z1gQjRVedNYFw4cxxQrtn2t9hxEESsHXgfroLFQRlF2ocvW_RviDxndhh8</recordid><startdate>20021101</startdate><enddate>20021101</enddate><creator>Page, Stephen J.</creator><creator>Shawaryn, Marla A.</creator><creator>Cernich, Alison N.</creator><creator>Linacre, John M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021101</creationdate><title>Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire</title><author>Page, Stephen J. ; Shawaryn, Marla A. ; Cernich, Alison N. ; Linacre, John M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-752adbcfd5c6c005e1ea72f694b1767f57698c4bbe82234c86089513ea4e64d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - classification</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - diagnosis</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>New England</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - standards</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Page, Stephen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shawaryn, Marla A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cernich, Alison N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linacre, John M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Page, Stephen J.</au><au>Shawaryn, Marla A.</au><au>Cernich, Alison N.</au><au>Linacre, John M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2002-11-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1579</spage><epage>1584</epage><pages>1579-1584</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><coden>APMHAI</coden><abstract>Page SJ, Shawaryn MA, Cernich AN, Linacre JM. Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1579-84. Objective: To evaluate the measurement properties of the Revised Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (RODQ) by using rating scale analyses. Design: Calibration of item responses by using a data set. Setting: Four outpatient therapy clinics in the northeastern United States. Patients: Convenience sample of 95 community-dwelling adults exhibiting mild to severe low back pain-related disability (LBP-D). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: The RODQ. Results: Several Rasch analyses were performed, with 1 item deleted and 2 response categories collapsed, creating a better test without increased error. A schema for item administration and evaluation was also developed. Conclusions: By using the abbreviated scale, suggested item order, and predicted responses, abbreviated versions of the instrument can be applied to measure LBP-D more efficiently. © 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12422329</pmid><doi>10.1053/apmr.2002.34604</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
| ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2002-11, Vol.83 (11), p.1579-1584 |
| issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72668563 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Open Access Journals |
| subjects | Activities of Daily Living Adult Aged Bias Biological and medical sciences Calibration Disability Evaluation Diseases of the osteoarticular system. Orthopedic treatment Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Humans Logistic Models Low back pain Low Back Pain - classification Low Back Pain - diagnosis Low Back Pain - physiopathology Low Back Pain - psychology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged New England Pain Measurement - methods Pain Measurement - standards Psychometrics Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Rehabilitation Sensitivity and Specificity Severity of Illness Index Surveys and Questionnaires - standards |
| title | Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T19%3A31%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scaling%20of%20the%20revised%20Oswestry%20low%20back%20pain%20questionnaire&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Page,%20Stephen%20J.&rft.date=2002-11-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1579&rft.epage=1584&rft.pages=1579-1584&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft.coden=APMHAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/apmr.2002.34604&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72668563%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72668563&rft_id=info:pmid/12422329&rft_els_id=S0003999302002551&rfr_iscdi=true |