Measurement and Management of Quality in Managed Care Organizations: Alive and Improving

Leatherman et al, Schlackman, and McGuirk-Porell et al all provide important examples of how managed care organizations (MCOs) will measure quality in this decade (except for health care status, which none have yet incorporated). All three organizations rely on insurance claims as a data source and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:QRB - Quality Review Bulletin 1991-11, Vol.17 (11), p.343-348
1. Verfasser: Goldfield, Norbert G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 348
container_issue 11
container_start_page 343
container_title QRB - Quality Review Bulletin
container_volume 17
creator Goldfield, Norbert G.
description Leatherman et al, Schlackman, and McGuirk-Porell et al all provide important examples of how managed care organizations (MCOs) will measure quality in this decade (except for health care status, which none have yet incorporated). All three organizations rely on insurance claims as a data source and quality management as a tool for improving quality; United Health Care and US Health-care use claims data to improve care for the entire membership, a still unrealized potential for MCOs. All three programs, relatively new, can be only minimally evaluated in terms of measurement validity, cost-efficiency, and improvement in the quality of care. The impact of such MCOs depends on policy initiatives, improvements in outcome and process measures, and MCOs' commitment to serve the total population, including the uninsured and Medicaid populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0097-5990(16)30484-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72666736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0097599016304845</els_id><sourcerecordid>72666736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-b41aeb62e41a1cbc658cba7b55917c47fbf9307ea879d4f804e5396f2620feca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxfOgzKH7CIM-iT5Uk7ZJWl9Ehn8GG0NU8C0k6e0ItOlM2sH89Gbr0Efzcrk599yT_BCaEnxDMGG3bxgXPKZFga8Iu05xlmcxPUHj3-szNPHeKBwOT3iej9CI8JwXjIzR5xKk7x00YLtI2jJaSivXQ9tW0Wsva9PtImOPQhnNpINo5dbSmm_Zmdb6u-ihNls42OfNxrVbY9cX6LSStYfJsZ6jj6fH99lLvFg9z2cPi1gnnHaxyogExRIIlWilGc21klxRWhCuM16pqkgxBxneW2ZVjjOgacGqhCW4Ai3Tc3Q57A25Xz34TjTGa6hraaHtveAJY4ynLAzSYVC71nsHldg400i3EwSLPUhxACn2xEToDiAFDb7pMaBXDZR_rgFh0O8HHcIvtwac8NqA1VAaB7oTZWv-SfgBqw2FLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72666736</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurement and Management of Quality in Managed Care Organizations: Alive and Improving</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Goldfield, Norbert G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goldfield, Norbert G.</creatorcontrib><description>Leatherman et al, Schlackman, and McGuirk-Porell et al all provide important examples of how managed care organizations (MCOs) will measure quality in this decade (except for health care status, which none have yet incorporated). All three organizations rely on insurance claims as a data source and quality management as a tool for improving quality; United Health Care and US Health-care use claims data to improve care for the entire membership, a still unrealized potential for MCOs. All three programs, relatively new, can be only minimally evaluated in terms of measurement validity, cost-efficiency, and improvement in the quality of care. The impact of such MCOs depends on policy initiatives, improvements in outcome and process measures, and MCOs' commitment to serve the total population, including the uninsured and Medicaid populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0097-5990</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0097-5990(16)30484-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1787961</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Health Services Research - methods ; Humans ; Insurance Claim Review ; Managed Care Programs - organization &amp; administration ; Managed Care Programs - standards ; Management Quality Circles ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards ; Reimbursement Mechanisms ; Risk Management ; United States</subject><ispartof>QRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1991-11, Vol.17 (11), p.343-348</ispartof><rights>1991 Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-b41aeb62e41a1cbc658cba7b55917c47fbf9307ea879d4f804e5396f2620feca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-b41aeb62e41a1cbc658cba7b55917c47fbf9307ea879d4f804e5396f2620feca3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1787961$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goldfield, Norbert G.</creatorcontrib><title>Measurement and Management of Quality in Managed Care Organizations: Alive and Improving</title><title>QRB - Quality Review Bulletin</title><addtitle>QRB Qual Rev Bull</addtitle><description>Leatherman et al, Schlackman, and McGuirk-Porell et al all provide important examples of how managed care organizations (MCOs) will measure quality in this decade (except for health care status, which none have yet incorporated). All three organizations rely on insurance claims as a data source and quality management as a tool for improving quality; United Health Care and US Health-care use claims data to improve care for the entire membership, a still unrealized potential for MCOs. All three programs, relatively new, can be only minimally evaluated in terms of measurement validity, cost-efficiency, and improvement in the quality of care. The impact of such MCOs depends on policy initiatives, improvements in outcome and process measures, and MCOs' commitment to serve the total population, including the uninsured and Medicaid populations.</description><subject>Health Services Research - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance Claim Review</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - standards</subject><subject>Management Quality Circles</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Reimbursement Mechanisms</subject><subject>Risk Management</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0097-5990</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF9LwzAUxfOgzKH7CIM-iT5Uk7ZJWl9Ehn8GG0NU8C0k6e0ItOlM2sH89Gbr0Efzcrk599yT_BCaEnxDMGG3bxgXPKZFga8Iu05xlmcxPUHj3-szNPHeKBwOT3iej9CI8JwXjIzR5xKk7x00YLtI2jJaSivXQ9tW0Wsva9PtImOPQhnNpINo5dbSmm_Zmdb6u-ihNls42OfNxrVbY9cX6LSStYfJsZ6jj6fH99lLvFg9z2cPi1gnnHaxyogExRIIlWilGc21klxRWhCuM16pqkgxBxneW2ZVjjOgacGqhCW4Ai3Tc3Q57A25Xz34TjTGa6hraaHtveAJY4ynLAzSYVC71nsHldg400i3EwSLPUhxACn2xEToDiAFDb7pMaBXDZR_rgFh0O8HHcIvtwac8NqA1VAaB7oTZWv-SfgBqw2FLw</recordid><startdate>199111</startdate><enddate>199111</enddate><creator>Goldfield, Norbert G.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199111</creationdate><title>Measurement and Management of Quality in Managed Care Organizations: Alive and Improving</title><author>Goldfield, Norbert G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-b41aeb62e41a1cbc658cba7b55917c47fbf9307ea879d4f804e5396f2620feca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Health Services Research - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance Claim Review</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - standards</topic><topic>Management Quality Circles</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Reimbursement Mechanisms</topic><topic>Risk Management</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goldfield, Norbert G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>QRB - Quality Review Bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goldfield, Norbert G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurement and Management of Quality in Managed Care Organizations: Alive and Improving</atitle><jtitle>QRB - Quality Review Bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>QRB Qual Rev Bull</addtitle><date>1991-11</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>343-348</pages><issn>0097-5990</issn><abstract>Leatherman et al, Schlackman, and McGuirk-Porell et al all provide important examples of how managed care organizations (MCOs) will measure quality in this decade (except for health care status, which none have yet incorporated). All three organizations rely on insurance claims as a data source and quality management as a tool for improving quality; United Health Care and US Health-care use claims data to improve care for the entire membership, a still unrealized potential for MCOs. All three programs, relatively new, can be only minimally evaluated in terms of measurement validity, cost-efficiency, and improvement in the quality of care. The impact of such MCOs depends on policy initiatives, improvements in outcome and process measures, and MCOs' commitment to serve the total population, including the uninsured and Medicaid populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>1787961</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0097-5990(16)30484-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0097-5990
ispartof QRB - Quality Review Bulletin, 1991-11, Vol.17 (11), p.343-348
issn 0097-5990
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72666736
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Health Services Research - methods
Humans
Insurance Claim Review
Managed Care Programs - organization & administration
Managed Care Programs - standards
Management Quality Circles
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards
Reimbursement Mechanisms
Risk Management
United States
title Measurement and Management of Quality in Managed Care Organizations: Alive and Improving
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A00%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurement%20and%20Management%20of%20Quality%20in%20Managed%20Care%20Organizations:%20Alive%20and%20Improving&rft.jtitle=QRB%20-%20Quality%20Review%20Bulletin&rft.au=Goldfield,%20Norbert%20G.&rft.date=1991-11&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=343-348&rft.issn=0097-5990&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0097-5990(16)30484-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72666736%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72666736&rft_id=info:pmid/1787961&rft_els_id=S0097599016304845&rfr_iscdi=true