Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur

The bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur, spine and radius shaft was determined in 75 women with atraumatic fractures of the proximal femur (FXf) (average age: 70.1 +/- 9.6 years) and 51 controls of similar age. Fractures were classified as either cervical (n = 36) or trochanteric (n = 3...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoporosis international 1991-02, Vol.1 (2), p.81-86
Hauptverfasser: Vega, E, Mautalen, C, Gómez, H, Garrido, A, Melo, L, Sahores, A O
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 86
container_issue 2
container_start_page 81
container_title Osteoporosis international
container_volume 1
creator Vega, E
Mautalen, C
Gómez, H
Garrido, A
Melo, L
Sahores, A O
description The bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur, spine and radius shaft was determined in 75 women with atraumatic fractures of the proximal femur (FXf) (average age: 70.1 +/- 9.6 years) and 51 controls of similar age. Fractures were classified as either cervical (n = 36) or trochanteric (n = 39) on the basis of radiographic and surgical finding. The BMD of spine and proximal femur was determined by dual-photon absorptiometry (Lunar DP3) and the BMD of the radius shaft by single photon absorptiometry. The BMD of patients with FXf was significantly decreased over all skeletal sites compared to controls of similar age. No significant correlation was found between age and the BMD of the femoral neck in patients with FXf. Patients with trochanteric FXf were older and thinner (average: age, 72.9 +/- 9.4 years; weight, 53.1 +/- 7.8 kg) compared with patients with cervical fractures (age, 67.2 +/- 8.9 years; weight, 59.3 +/- 8.3 kg). Likewise the BMD of trochanteric FXf was lower at all measured sites: femoral neck, 0.548 +/- 0.066 g/cm2 vs 0.624 +/- 0.055 g/cm2 (P less than 0.001); L2-L4, 0.799 +/- 0.115 g/cm2 vs 0.925 +/- 0.106 g/cm2 (P less than 0.001); radius shaft, 0.454 +/- 0.057 g/cm2 vs 0.502 +/- 0.083 g/cm2 (P less than 0.05). Of the patients with trochanteric fractures 66% had concomitant vertebral fractures, while this occurred in only 28% of the patients with cervical fractures (P (Fisher) = 0.0007). In summary, females with trochanteric FXf are older, thinner, have less bone mass in all measured sites and suffer with a significantly greater frequency of vertebral fractures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF01880448
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72655834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72655834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-d6a28a5602d08b93fd1f8f3bcbc0457947a051d9a158c72b7ae985bd25a55e093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0MFLwzAUBvAgypzTi3chJw9CNWmaJTm64VQYeFHwVtLkhUXadCapuv_eygae3uXH9977ELqk5JYSIu4WK0KlJFUlj9CUVowVpZrzYzQliolCVfT9FJ2l9EFGrJSYoAkVijAlpqhe9AFw5wNE3WILIfm8wz7grc4eQk742-cNNhC_vBmFDhbn2JuNDhmiN9hFbfIQIeHe4bwBvI39j-9G6qAb4jk6cbpNcHGYM_S2enhdPhXrl8fn5f26MFSJXNi5LqXmc1JaIhvFnKVOOtaYxpCKC1UJTTi1SlMujSgboUFJ3tiSa85hfHOGrve54_rPAVKuO58MtK0O0A-pFuWcc8mqEd7soYl9ShFcvY3juXFXU1L_tVn_tzniq0Pq0HRg_-m-PvYL3DVwPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72655834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Vega, E ; Mautalen, C ; Gómez, H ; Garrido, A ; Melo, L ; Sahores, A O</creator><creatorcontrib>Vega, E ; Mautalen, C ; Gómez, H ; Garrido, A ; Melo, L ; Sahores, A O</creatorcontrib><description>The bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur, spine and radius shaft was determined in 75 women with atraumatic fractures of the proximal femur (FXf) (average age: 70.1 +/- 9.6 years) and 51 controls of similar age. Fractures were classified as either cervical (n = 36) or trochanteric (n = 39) on the basis of radiographic and surgical finding. The BMD of spine and proximal femur was determined by dual-photon absorptiometry (Lunar DP3) and the BMD of the radius shaft by single photon absorptiometry. The BMD of patients with FXf was significantly decreased over all skeletal sites compared to controls of similar age. No significant correlation was found between age and the BMD of the femoral neck in patients with FXf. Patients with trochanteric FXf were older and thinner (average: age, 72.9 +/- 9.4 years; weight, 53.1 +/- 7.8 kg) compared with patients with cervical fractures (age, 67.2 +/- 8.9 years; weight, 59.3 +/- 8.3 kg). Likewise the BMD of trochanteric FXf was lower at all measured sites: femoral neck, 0.548 +/- 0.066 g/cm2 vs 0.624 +/- 0.055 g/cm2 (P less than 0.001); L2-L4, 0.799 +/- 0.115 g/cm2 vs 0.925 +/- 0.106 g/cm2 (P less than 0.001); radius shaft, 0.454 +/- 0.057 g/cm2 vs 0.502 +/- 0.083 g/cm2 (P less than 0.05). Of the patients with trochanteric fractures 66% had concomitant vertebral fractures, while this occurred in only 28% of the patients with cervical fractures (P (Fisher) = 0.0007). In summary, females with trochanteric FXf are older, thinner, have less bone mass in all measured sites and suffer with a significantly greater frequency of vertebral fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01880448</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1790397</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Density ; Female ; Femoral Neck Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Femoral Neck Fractures - pathology ; Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging ; Hip Fractures - pathology ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Radionuclide Imaging</subject><ispartof>Osteoporosis international, 1991-02, Vol.1 (2), p.81-86</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-d6a28a5602d08b93fd1f8f3bcbc0457947a051d9a158c72b7ae985bd25a55e093</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-d6a28a5602d08b93fd1f8f3bcbc0457947a051d9a158c72b7ae985bd25a55e093</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1790397$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vega, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mautalen, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrido, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahores, A O</creatorcontrib><title>Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur</title><title>Osteoporosis international</title><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><description>The bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur, spine and radius shaft was determined in 75 women with atraumatic fractures of the proximal femur (FXf) (average age: 70.1 +/- 9.6 years) and 51 controls of similar age. Fractures were classified as either cervical (n = 36) or trochanteric (n = 39) on the basis of radiographic and surgical finding. The BMD of spine and proximal femur was determined by dual-photon absorptiometry (Lunar DP3) and the BMD of the radius shaft by single photon absorptiometry. The BMD of patients with FXf was significantly decreased over all skeletal sites compared to controls of similar age. No significant correlation was found between age and the BMD of the femoral neck in patients with FXf. Patients with trochanteric FXf were older and thinner (average: age, 72.9 +/- 9.4 years; weight, 53.1 +/- 7.8 kg) compared with patients with cervical fractures (age, 67.2 +/- 8.9 years; weight, 59.3 +/- 8.3 kg). Likewise the BMD of trochanteric FXf was lower at all measured sites: femoral neck, 0.548 +/- 0.066 g/cm2 vs 0.624 +/- 0.055 g/cm2 (P less than 0.001); L2-L4, 0.799 +/- 0.115 g/cm2 vs 0.925 +/- 0.106 g/cm2 (P less than 0.001); radius shaft, 0.454 +/- 0.057 g/cm2 vs 0.502 +/- 0.083 g/cm2 (P less than 0.05). Of the patients with trochanteric fractures 66% had concomitant vertebral fractures, while this occurred in only 28% of the patients with cervical fractures (P (Fisher) = 0.0007). In summary, females with trochanteric FXf are older, thinner, have less bone mass in all measured sites and suffer with a significantly greater frequency of vertebral fractures.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Femoral Neck Fractures - pathology</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hip Fractures - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><issn>0937-941X</issn><issn>1433-2965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0MFLwzAUBvAgypzTi3chJw9CNWmaJTm64VQYeFHwVtLkhUXadCapuv_eygae3uXH9977ELqk5JYSIu4WK0KlJFUlj9CUVowVpZrzYzQliolCVfT9FJ2l9EFGrJSYoAkVijAlpqhe9AFw5wNE3WILIfm8wz7grc4eQk742-cNNhC_vBmFDhbn2JuNDhmiN9hFbfIQIeHe4bwBvI39j-9G6qAb4jk6cbpNcHGYM_S2enhdPhXrl8fn5f26MFSJXNi5LqXmc1JaIhvFnKVOOtaYxpCKC1UJTTi1SlMujSgboUFJ3tiSa85hfHOGrve54_rPAVKuO58MtK0O0A-pFuWcc8mqEd7soYl9ShFcvY3juXFXU1L_tVn_tzniq0Pq0HRg_-m-PvYL3DVwPw</recordid><startdate>199102</startdate><enddate>199102</enddate><creator>Vega, E</creator><creator>Mautalen, C</creator><creator>Gómez, H</creator><creator>Garrido, A</creator><creator>Melo, L</creator><creator>Sahores, A O</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199102</creationdate><title>Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur</title><author>Vega, E ; Mautalen, C ; Gómez, H ; Garrido, A ; Melo, L ; Sahores, A O</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-d6a28a5602d08b93fd1f8f3bcbc0457947a051d9a158c72b7ae985bd25a55e093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Femoral Neck Fractures - pathology</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hip Fractures - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vega, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mautalen, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrido, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melo, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahores, A O</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vega, E</au><au>Mautalen, C</au><au>Gómez, H</au><au>Garrido, A</au><au>Melo, L</au><au>Sahores, A O</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur</atitle><jtitle>Osteoporosis international</jtitle><addtitle>Osteoporos Int</addtitle><date>1991-02</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>81-86</pages><issn>0937-941X</issn><eissn>1433-2965</eissn><abstract>The bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal femur, spine and radius shaft was determined in 75 women with atraumatic fractures of the proximal femur (FXf) (average age: 70.1 +/- 9.6 years) and 51 controls of similar age. Fractures were classified as either cervical (n = 36) or trochanteric (n = 39) on the basis of radiographic and surgical finding. The BMD of spine and proximal femur was determined by dual-photon absorptiometry (Lunar DP3) and the BMD of the radius shaft by single photon absorptiometry. The BMD of patients with FXf was significantly decreased over all skeletal sites compared to controls of similar age. No significant correlation was found between age and the BMD of the femoral neck in patients with FXf. Patients with trochanteric FXf were older and thinner (average: age, 72.9 +/- 9.4 years; weight, 53.1 +/- 7.8 kg) compared with patients with cervical fractures (age, 67.2 +/- 8.9 years; weight, 59.3 +/- 8.3 kg). Likewise the BMD of trochanteric FXf was lower at all measured sites: femoral neck, 0.548 +/- 0.066 g/cm2 vs 0.624 +/- 0.055 g/cm2 (P less than 0.001); L2-L4, 0.799 +/- 0.115 g/cm2 vs 0.925 +/- 0.106 g/cm2 (P less than 0.001); radius shaft, 0.454 +/- 0.057 g/cm2 vs 0.502 +/- 0.083 g/cm2 (P less than 0.05). Of the patients with trochanteric fractures 66% had concomitant vertebral fractures, while this occurred in only 28% of the patients with cervical fractures (P (Fisher) = 0.0007). In summary, females with trochanteric FXf are older, thinner, have less bone mass in all measured sites and suffer with a significantly greater frequency of vertebral fractures.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>1790397</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF01880448</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-941X
ispartof Osteoporosis international, 1991-02, Vol.1 (2), p.81-86
issn 0937-941X
1433-2965
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72655834
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Density
Female
Femoral Neck Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Femoral Neck Fractures - pathology
Hip Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Hip Fractures - pathology
Humans
Middle Aged
Radionuclide Imaging
title Bone mineral density in patients with cervical and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T23%3A36%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bone%20mineral%20density%20in%20patients%20with%20cervical%20and%20trochanteric%20fractures%20of%20the%20proximal%20femur&rft.jtitle=Osteoporosis%20international&rft.au=Vega,%20E&rft.date=1991-02&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=81-86&rft.issn=0937-941X&rft.eissn=1433-2965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01880448&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72655834%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72655834&rft_id=info:pmid/1790397&rfr_iscdi=true