Diagnosis of adult tuberculous meningitis by use of clinical and laboratory features
The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis is difficult. Discrimination of cases from those of bacterial meningitis by clinical features alone is often impossible, and current laboratory methods remain inadequate or inaccessible in developing countries. We aimed to create a simple diagnostic aid for tu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2002-10, Vol.360 (9342), p.1287-1292 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1292 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9342 |
container_start_page | 1287 |
container_title | The Lancet (British edition) |
container_volume | 360 |
creator | Thwaites, GE Chau, TTH Stepniewska, K Phu, NH Chuong, LV Sinh, DX White, NJ Parry, CM Farrar, JJ |
description | The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis is difficult. Discrimination of cases from those of bacterial meningitis by clinical features alone is often impossible, and current laboratory methods remain inadequate or inaccessible in developing countries. We aimed to create a simple diagnostic aid for tuberculous meningitis in adults on the basis of clinical and basic laboratory features.
We compared the clinical and laboratory features on admission of 251 adults at an infectious disease hospital in Vietnam who satisfied diagnostic criteria for tuberculous (n=143) or bacterial (n=108) meningitis. Features independently predictive of tuberculous meningitis were modelled by multivariate logistic regression to create a diagnostic rule, and by a classification-tree method. The performance of both diagnostic aids was assessed by resubstitution and prospective test data methods.
Five features were predictive of a diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: age, length of history, white-blood-cell count, total cerebrospinal fluid white-cell count, and cerebrospinal fluid neutrophil proportion. A diagnostic rule developed from these features was 97% sensitive and 91% specific by resubstitution, and 86% sensitive and 79% specific when applied prospectively to a further 42 adults with tuberculous meningitis, and 33 with bacterial meningitis. The corresponding values for the classification tree were 99% and 93% by resubstitution, and 88% and 70% with prospective test data.
This study suggests that simple clinical and laboratory data can help in the diagnosis of adults with tuberculous meningitis. Although the usefulness of the diagnostic rule will vary depending on the prevalence of tuberculosis and HIV-1 infection, we suggest it be applied to adults with meningitis and a low cerebrospinal fluid glucose, particularly in settings with limited microbiological resources. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11318-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72642619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140673602113183</els_id><sourcerecordid>227876741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-75377a3767ddc3827eda2dd54c6be4870589daa78429aeb9136c3278724505a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1rFTEUBuAgir1Wf4IyWBS7GM33x0qk1lYouPAu3IVMcqakzM3UZCLcf9_c3osFobjKIs85HN4XodcEfySYyE8_MeG4l4rJD5ieEsKI7tkTtCJc8V5w9espWv0lR-hFKTcYYy6xeI6OCOWEU8xXaP01uus0l1i6eexcqNPSLXWA7Os019JtIMV0HZf2P2y7WmDH_BRT9G7qXArd5IY5u2XO224Et9QM5SV6NrqpwKvDe4zW387XZ5f91Y-L72dfrnovJF96JZhSjimpQvBMUwXB0RAE93IArhUW2gTnlObUOBgMYdIzqrSiXGDh2DF6v197m-ffFcpiN7F4mCaXoN1uFZWcSmIaPPkH3sw1p3aapVgawzSRO_X2MUWMwURxzRsSe-TzXEqG0d7muHF5awm2u2LsfTF2l7rF1N4XY1mbe3NYXocNhIepQxMNvDsAV1q0Y3bJx_LgmNFSCdLc572DFuyfCNkWHyF5CDGDX2yY439OuQMI36ha</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>199017484</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnosis of adult tuberculous meningitis by use of clinical and laboratory features</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Thwaites, GE ; Chau, TTH ; Stepniewska, K ; Phu, NH ; Chuong, LV ; Sinh, DX ; White, NJ ; Parry, CM ; Farrar, JJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Thwaites, GE ; Chau, TTH ; Stepniewska, K ; Phu, NH ; Chuong, LV ; Sinh, DX ; White, NJ ; Parry, CM ; Farrar, JJ</creatorcontrib><description>The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis is difficult. Discrimination of cases from those of bacterial meningitis by clinical features alone is often impossible, and current laboratory methods remain inadequate or inaccessible in developing countries. We aimed to create a simple diagnostic aid for tuberculous meningitis in adults on the basis of clinical and basic laboratory features.
We compared the clinical and laboratory features on admission of 251 adults at an infectious disease hospital in Vietnam who satisfied diagnostic criteria for tuberculous (n=143) or bacterial (n=108) meningitis. Features independently predictive of tuberculous meningitis were modelled by multivariate logistic regression to create a diagnostic rule, and by a classification-tree method. The performance of both diagnostic aids was assessed by resubstitution and prospective test data methods.
Five features were predictive of a diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: age, length of history, white-blood-cell count, total cerebrospinal fluid white-cell count, and cerebrospinal fluid neutrophil proportion. A diagnostic rule developed from these features was 97% sensitive and 91% specific by resubstitution, and 86% sensitive and 79% specific when applied prospectively to a further 42 adults with tuberculous meningitis, and 33 with bacterial meningitis. The corresponding values for the classification tree were 99% and 93% by resubstitution, and 88% and 70% with prospective test data.
This study suggests that simple clinical and laboratory data can help in the diagnosis of adults with tuberculous meningitis. Although the usefulness of the diagnostic rule will vary depending on the prevalence of tuberculosis and HIV-1 infection, we suggest it be applied to adults with meningitis and a low cerebrospinal fluid glucose, particularly in settings with limited microbiological resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-547X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11318-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12414204</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANCAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Adults ; Age Factors ; AIDS ; Bacteria ; Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the nervous system. Bacterial myositis ; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood ; Cerebrospinal fluid ; Cerebrospinal Fluid - cytology ; Chemotherapy ; Classification ; Decision Trees ; Developing countries ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Female ; HIV ; Human bacterial diseases ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Laboratories ; Laboratory methods ; LDCs ; Leukocyte Count ; Lymphocytes ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Meningitis ; Middle Aged ; Neutrophils ; Neutrophils - cytology ; Proteins ; Regression Analysis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Test procedures ; Tropical diseases ; Tropical medicine ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections ; Tuberculosis, Meningeal - diagnosis</subject><ispartof>The Lancet (British edition), 2002-10, Vol.360 (9342), p.1287-1292</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Lancet Ltd. Oct 26, 2002</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 26, 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-75377a3767ddc3827eda2dd54c6be4870589daa78429aeb9136c3278724505a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-75377a3767ddc3827eda2dd54c6be4870589daa78429aeb9136c3278724505a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673602113183$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13986751$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12414204$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thwaites, GE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chau, TTH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepniewska, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phu, NH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuong, LV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinh, DX</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, NJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, CM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrar, JJ</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnosis of adult tuberculous meningitis by use of clinical and laboratory features</title><title>The Lancet (British edition)</title><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><description>The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis is difficult. Discrimination of cases from those of bacterial meningitis by clinical features alone is often impossible, and current laboratory methods remain inadequate or inaccessible in developing countries. We aimed to create a simple diagnostic aid for tuberculous meningitis in adults on the basis of clinical and basic laboratory features.
We compared the clinical and laboratory features on admission of 251 adults at an infectious disease hospital in Vietnam who satisfied diagnostic criteria for tuberculous (n=143) or bacterial (n=108) meningitis. Features independently predictive of tuberculous meningitis were modelled by multivariate logistic regression to create a diagnostic rule, and by a classification-tree method. The performance of both diagnostic aids was assessed by resubstitution and prospective test data methods.
Five features were predictive of a diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: age, length of history, white-blood-cell count, total cerebrospinal fluid white-cell count, and cerebrospinal fluid neutrophil proportion. A diagnostic rule developed from these features was 97% sensitive and 91% specific by resubstitution, and 86% sensitive and 79% specific when applied prospectively to a further 42 adults with tuberculous meningitis, and 33 with bacterial meningitis. The corresponding values for the classification tree were 99% and 93% by resubstitution, and 88% and 70% with prospective test data.
This study suggests that simple clinical and laboratory data can help in the diagnosis of adults with tuberculous meningitis. Although the usefulness of the diagnostic rule will vary depending on the prevalence of tuberculosis and HIV-1 infection, we suggest it be applied to adults with meningitis and a low cerebrospinal fluid glucose, particularly in settings with limited microbiological resources.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the nervous system. Bacterial myositis</subject><subject>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal Fluid - cytology</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Decision Trees</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory methods</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Leukocyte Count</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meningitis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neutrophils</subject><subject>Neutrophils - cytology</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><subject>Tropical medicine</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Meningeal - diagnosis</subject><issn>0140-6736</issn><issn>1474-547X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1rFTEUBuAgir1Wf4IyWBS7GM33x0qk1lYouPAu3IVMcqakzM3UZCLcf9_c3osFobjKIs85HN4XodcEfySYyE8_MeG4l4rJD5ieEsKI7tkTtCJc8V5w9espWv0lR-hFKTcYYy6xeI6OCOWEU8xXaP01uus0l1i6eexcqNPSLXWA7Os019JtIMV0HZf2P2y7WmDH_BRT9G7qXArd5IY5u2XO224Et9QM5SV6NrqpwKvDe4zW387XZ5f91Y-L72dfrnovJF96JZhSjimpQvBMUwXB0RAE93IArhUW2gTnlObUOBgMYdIzqrSiXGDh2DF6v197m-ffFcpiN7F4mCaXoN1uFZWcSmIaPPkH3sw1p3aapVgawzSRO_X2MUWMwURxzRsSe-TzXEqG0d7muHF5awm2u2LsfTF2l7rF1N4XY1mbe3NYXocNhIepQxMNvDsAV1q0Y3bJx_LgmNFSCdLc572DFuyfCNkWHyF5CDGDX2yY439OuQMI36ha</recordid><startdate>20021026</startdate><enddate>20021026</enddate><creator>Thwaites, GE</creator><creator>Chau, TTH</creator><creator>Stepniewska, K</creator><creator>Phu, NH</creator><creator>Chuong, LV</creator><creator>Sinh, DX</creator><creator>White, NJ</creator><creator>Parry, CM</creator><creator>Farrar, JJ</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Lancet</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021026</creationdate><title>Diagnosis of adult tuberculous meningitis by use of clinical and laboratory features</title><author>Thwaites, GE ; Chau, TTH ; Stepniewska, K ; Phu, NH ; Chuong, LV ; Sinh, DX ; White, NJ ; Parry, CM ; Farrar, JJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-75377a3767ddc3827eda2dd54c6be4870589daa78429aeb9136c3278724505a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the nervous system. Bacterial myositis</topic><topic>Bacterial Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal Fluid - cytology</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Decision Trees</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory methods</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Leukocyte Count</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meningitis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neutrophils</topic><topic>Neutrophils - cytology</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><topic>Tropical medicine</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Meningeal - diagnosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thwaites, GE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chau, TTH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepniewska, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phu, NH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chuong, LV</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinh, DX</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, NJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parry, CM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farrar, JJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thwaites, GE</au><au>Chau, TTH</au><au>Stepniewska, K</au><au>Phu, NH</au><au>Chuong, LV</au><au>Sinh, DX</au><au>White, NJ</au><au>Parry, CM</au><au>Farrar, JJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnosis of adult tuberculous meningitis by use of clinical and laboratory features</atitle><jtitle>The Lancet (British edition)</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet</addtitle><date>2002-10-26</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>360</volume><issue>9342</issue><spage>1287</spage><epage>1292</epage><pages>1287-1292</pages><issn>0140-6736</issn><eissn>1474-547X</eissn><coden>LANCAO</coden><abstract>The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis is difficult. Discrimination of cases from those of bacterial meningitis by clinical features alone is often impossible, and current laboratory methods remain inadequate or inaccessible in developing countries. We aimed to create a simple diagnostic aid for tuberculous meningitis in adults on the basis of clinical and basic laboratory features.
We compared the clinical and laboratory features on admission of 251 adults at an infectious disease hospital in Vietnam who satisfied diagnostic criteria for tuberculous (n=143) or bacterial (n=108) meningitis. Features independently predictive of tuberculous meningitis were modelled by multivariate logistic regression to create a diagnostic rule, and by a classification-tree method. The performance of both diagnostic aids was assessed by resubstitution and prospective test data methods.
Five features were predictive of a diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: age, length of history, white-blood-cell count, total cerebrospinal fluid white-cell count, and cerebrospinal fluid neutrophil proportion. A diagnostic rule developed from these features was 97% sensitive and 91% specific by resubstitution, and 86% sensitive and 79% specific when applied prospectively to a further 42 adults with tuberculous meningitis, and 33 with bacterial meningitis. The corresponding values for the classification tree were 99% and 93% by resubstitution, and 88% and 70% with prospective test data.
This study suggests that simple clinical and laboratory data can help in the diagnosis of adults with tuberculous meningitis. Although the usefulness of the diagnostic rule will vary depending on the prevalence of tuberculosis and HIV-1 infection, we suggest it be applied to adults with meningitis and a low cerebrospinal fluid glucose, particularly in settings with limited microbiological resources.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12414204</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11318-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-6736 |
ispartof | The Lancet (British edition), 2002-10, Vol.360 (9342), p.1287-1292 |
issn | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72642619 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Acquired immune deficiency syndrome Adolescent Adult Adults Age Factors AIDS Bacteria Bacterial diseases Bacterial diseases of the nervous system. Bacterial myositis Bacterial Infections - diagnosis Biological and medical sciences Blood Cerebrospinal fluid Cerebrospinal Fluid - cytology Chemotherapy Classification Decision Trees Developing countries Diagnosis Diagnostic systems Female HIV Human bacterial diseases Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Infections Infectious diseases Laboratories Laboratory methods LDCs Leukocyte Count Lymphocytes Male Medical diagnosis Medical research Medical sciences Meningitis Middle Aged Neutrophils Neutrophils - cytology Proteins Regression Analysis Sensitivity and Specificity Test procedures Tropical diseases Tropical medicine Tuberculosis Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections Tuberculosis, Meningeal - diagnosis |
title | Diagnosis of adult tuberculous meningitis by use of clinical and laboratory features |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A06%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnosis%20of%20adult%20tuberculous%20meningitis%20by%20use%20of%20clinical%20and%20laboratory%20features&rft.jtitle=The%20Lancet%20(British%20edition)&rft.au=Thwaites,%20GE&rft.date=2002-10-26&rft.volume=360&rft.issue=9342&rft.spage=1287&rft.epage=1292&rft.pages=1287-1292&rft.issn=0140-6736&rft.eissn=1474-547X&rft.coden=LANCAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11318-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E227876741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=199017484&rft_id=info:pmid/12414204&rft_els_id=S0140673602113183&rfr_iscdi=true |