Ram mating behavior after long-term selection for reproductive rate in Rambouillet ewes

Mating behavior is known to be heritable in several species, but it is not known if selection schemes for ewe reproductive traits affect mating behavior of rams. Therefore, our objectives were to determine if divergent (high vs low index) selection of a female reproductive trait (lambs born divided...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2002-10, Vol.80 (10), p.2588-2593
Hauptverfasser: Stellflug, J. N, Berardinelli, J. G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2593
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2588
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 80
creator Stellflug, J. N
Berardinelli, J. G
description Mating behavior is known to be heritable in several species, but it is not known if selection schemes for ewe reproductive traits affect mating behavior of rams. Therefore, our objectives were to determine if divergent (high vs low index) selection of a female reproductive trait (lambs born divided by age of ewe minus one) affects mating behavior patterns of male offspring during training to service an artificial vagina (AV) in a less than natural setting (Exp. 1) or during serving capacity tests (SCT) in simulated natural mating conditions (Exp. 2). The method for evaluating male mating behavior was a series of serving capacity tests to estimate sexual performance. For Exp. 1, five, 30-min observations were conducted to assess the mating behavior of 29 rams (22 mo old) being trained to service an AV. In Exp. 1, percentages of rams mounting (73 vs 36%) and ejaculating (67 vs 29%) differed (P < 0.05) between rams from high and low Rambouillet ewe selection lines, respectively. In Exp. 2, ram classification consisted of exposing each 22- to 24-mo-old ram (n = 48) to three unrestrained ewes in estrus for 18, 30-min tests. Any ram that had not mounted or ejaculated during SCT was evaluated for sexual orientation in a 30-min preference test in which each ram had access to both restrained estrual ewes and restrained rams. In Exp. 2, there was no difference (P > 0.2) in percentages of rams mounting (92 vs 78%) and ejaculating (88 vs 74%) between rams from high and low Rambouillet ewe selection lines, respectively. There was no difference (P > 0.33) between high and low ewe selection line rams for mounts or ejaculations for 18 SCT. Only one male-oriented ram was identified, which was from the high line. In Exp. 2, six SCT were necessary to obtain 95% reliability in sexual performance scores. Results of these studies indicate that long-term selection of ewes for litter size did not alter ram sexual performance after SCT under simulated natural mating conditions or affect incidence of male-oriented rams. Mating behavior observed during training to service an AV was lower for rams from ewes of the low selection line than for rams from ewes of the high selection line. We concluded that long-term selection for reproductive rate in ewes did not alter mating behavior patterns of male offspring; however, test conditions, such as restrained and unrestrained ewes and number of serving capacity tests, may affect conclusions in studies that evaluate sexual performance of rams
doi_str_mv 10.2527/2002.80102588x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72633617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72633617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-2164b52150f47c167ebb5d914f8fde697d3dbbbdec40503382a767250a15eb1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M9rFDEUB_Agil2rV48ShOpp1veSSSZ7LKX-gEJBFI8hmXmzmyUzU5OZ1v73ZtnFgqeEvE--PL6MvUVYCyWaTwJArA0gCGXMn2dshUqoSqKWz9mqzLAyBsUZe5XzHgCF2qiX7AxFjRIMrNiv727gg5vDuOWedu4-TIm7fqbE4zRuq3IZeKZI7RymkfdlmuguTd1SHu6JJzcTDyMvMX5aQow0c3qg_Jq96F3M9OZ0nrOfn69_XH2tbm6_fLu6vKlaaWCuBOraK4EK-rppUTfkveo2WPem70hvmk523vuO2hoUSGmEa3QjFDhU5LGT5-zDMbfs9HuhPNsh5JZidCNNS7aN0FJqbAp8_x_cT0say25WoEGJBg5ofURtmnJO1Nu7FAaXHi2CPfRtD33bf32XD-9OqYsfqHvip4ILuDgBl1sX--TGNuQnJzdao5HFfTy6XdjuHkIimwcXY4lFu3fZwHEDY-RfZISUbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218131807</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ram mating behavior after long-term selection for reproductive rate in Rambouillet ewes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Stellflug, J. N ; Berardinelli, J. G</creator><creatorcontrib>Stellflug, J. N ; Berardinelli, J. G</creatorcontrib><description>Mating behavior is known to be heritable in several species, but it is not known if selection schemes for ewe reproductive traits affect mating behavior of rams. Therefore, our objectives were to determine if divergent (high vs low index) selection of a female reproductive trait (lambs born divided by age of ewe minus one) affects mating behavior patterns of male offspring during training to service an artificial vagina (AV) in a less than natural setting (Exp. 1) or during serving capacity tests (SCT) in simulated natural mating conditions (Exp. 2). The method for evaluating male mating behavior was a series of serving capacity tests to estimate sexual performance. For Exp. 1, five, 30-min observations were conducted to assess the mating behavior of 29 rams (22 mo old) being trained to service an AV. In Exp. 1, percentages of rams mounting (73 vs 36%) and ejaculating (67 vs 29%) differed (P &lt; 0.05) between rams from high and low Rambouillet ewe selection lines, respectively. In Exp. 2, ram classification consisted of exposing each 22- to 24-mo-old ram (n = 48) to three unrestrained ewes in estrus for 18, 30-min tests. Any ram that had not mounted or ejaculated during SCT was evaluated for sexual orientation in a 30-min preference test in which each ram had access to both restrained estrual ewes and restrained rams. In Exp. 2, there was no difference (P &gt; 0.2) in percentages of rams mounting (92 vs 78%) and ejaculating (88 vs 74%) between rams from high and low Rambouillet ewe selection lines, respectively. There was no difference (P &gt; 0.33) between high and low ewe selection line rams for mounts or ejaculations for 18 SCT. Only one male-oriented ram was identified, which was from the high line. In Exp. 2, six SCT were necessary to obtain 95% reliability in sexual performance scores. Results of these studies indicate that long-term selection of ewes for litter size did not alter ram sexual performance after SCT under simulated natural mating conditions or affect incidence of male-oriented rams. Mating behavior observed during training to service an AV was lower for rams from ewes of the low selection line than for rams from ewes of the high selection line. We concluded that long-term selection for reproductive rate in ewes did not alter mating behavior patterns of male offspring; however, test conditions, such as restrained and unrestrained ewes and number of serving capacity tests, may affect conclusions in studies that evaluate sexual performance of rams.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/2002.80102588x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12413080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Am Soc Animal Sci</publisher><subject>Animal productions ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breeding ; Copulation ; Ejaculation ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Libido - physiology ; Litter Size - genetics ; Male ; Reproduction - genetics ; Selection, Genetic ; Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Sheep ; Sheep - genetics ; Sheep - physiology ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2002-10, Vol.80 (10), p.2588-2593</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Oct 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-2164b52150f47c167ebb5d914f8fde697d3dbbbdec40503382a767250a15eb1d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13966183$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12413080$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stellflug, J. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berardinelli, J. G</creatorcontrib><title>Ram mating behavior after long-term selection for reproductive rate in Rambouillet ewes</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description>Mating behavior is known to be heritable in several species, but it is not known if selection schemes for ewe reproductive traits affect mating behavior of rams. Therefore, our objectives were to determine if divergent (high vs low index) selection of a female reproductive trait (lambs born divided by age of ewe minus one) affects mating behavior patterns of male offspring during training to service an artificial vagina (AV) in a less than natural setting (Exp. 1) or during serving capacity tests (SCT) in simulated natural mating conditions (Exp. 2). The method for evaluating male mating behavior was a series of serving capacity tests to estimate sexual performance. For Exp. 1, five, 30-min observations were conducted to assess the mating behavior of 29 rams (22 mo old) being trained to service an AV. In Exp. 1, percentages of rams mounting (73 vs 36%) and ejaculating (67 vs 29%) differed (P &lt; 0.05) between rams from high and low Rambouillet ewe selection lines, respectively. In Exp. 2, ram classification consisted of exposing each 22- to 24-mo-old ram (n = 48) to three unrestrained ewes in estrus for 18, 30-min tests. Any ram that had not mounted or ejaculated during SCT was evaluated for sexual orientation in a 30-min preference test in which each ram had access to both restrained estrual ewes and restrained rams. In Exp. 2, there was no difference (P &gt; 0.2) in percentages of rams mounting (92 vs 78%) and ejaculating (88 vs 74%) between rams from high and low Rambouillet ewe selection lines, respectively. There was no difference (P &gt; 0.33) between high and low ewe selection line rams for mounts or ejaculations for 18 SCT. Only one male-oriented ram was identified, which was from the high line. In Exp. 2, six SCT were necessary to obtain 95% reliability in sexual performance scores. Results of these studies indicate that long-term selection of ewes for litter size did not alter ram sexual performance after SCT under simulated natural mating conditions or affect incidence of male-oriented rams. Mating behavior observed during training to service an AV was lower for rams from ewes of the low selection line than for rams from ewes of the high selection line. We concluded that long-term selection for reproductive rate in ewes did not alter mating behavior patterns of male offspring; however, test conditions, such as restrained and unrestrained ewes and number of serving capacity tests, may affect conclusions in studies that evaluate sexual performance of rams.</description><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Copulation</subject><subject>Ejaculation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Libido - physiology</subject><subject>Litter Size - genetics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reproduction - genetics</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep - genetics</subject><subject>Sheep - physiology</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M9rFDEUB_Agil2rV48ShOpp1veSSSZ7LKX-gEJBFI8hmXmzmyUzU5OZ1v73ZtnFgqeEvE--PL6MvUVYCyWaTwJArA0gCGXMn2dshUqoSqKWz9mqzLAyBsUZe5XzHgCF2qiX7AxFjRIMrNiv727gg5vDuOWedu4-TIm7fqbE4zRuq3IZeKZI7RymkfdlmuguTd1SHu6JJzcTDyMvMX5aQow0c3qg_Jq96F3M9OZ0nrOfn69_XH2tbm6_fLu6vKlaaWCuBOraK4EK-rppUTfkveo2WPem70hvmk523vuO2hoUSGmEa3QjFDhU5LGT5-zDMbfs9HuhPNsh5JZidCNNS7aN0FJqbAp8_x_cT0say25WoEGJBg5ofURtmnJO1Nu7FAaXHi2CPfRtD33bf32XD-9OqYsfqHvip4ILuDgBl1sX--TGNuQnJzdao5HFfTy6XdjuHkIimwcXY4lFu3fZwHEDY-RfZISUbg</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Stellflug, J. N</creator><creator>Berardinelli, J. G</creator><general>Am Soc Animal Sci</general><general>American Society of Animal Science</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>Ram mating behavior after long-term selection for reproductive rate in Rambouillet ewes</title><author>Stellflug, J. N ; Berardinelli, J. G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-2164b52150f47c167ebb5d914f8fde697d3dbbbdec40503382a767250a15eb1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Copulation</topic><topic>Ejaculation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Libido - physiology</topic><topic>Litter Size - genetics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reproduction - genetics</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep - genetics</topic><topic>Sheep - physiology</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stellflug, J. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berardinelli, J. G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stellflug, J. N</au><au>Berardinelli, J. G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ram mating behavior after long-term selection for reproductive rate in Rambouillet ewes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2588</spage><epage>2593</epage><pages>2588-2593</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Mating behavior is known to be heritable in several species, but it is not known if selection schemes for ewe reproductive traits affect mating behavior of rams. Therefore, our objectives were to determine if divergent (high vs low index) selection of a female reproductive trait (lambs born divided by age of ewe minus one) affects mating behavior patterns of male offspring during training to service an artificial vagina (AV) in a less than natural setting (Exp. 1) or during serving capacity tests (SCT) in simulated natural mating conditions (Exp. 2). The method for evaluating male mating behavior was a series of serving capacity tests to estimate sexual performance. For Exp. 1, five, 30-min observations were conducted to assess the mating behavior of 29 rams (22 mo old) being trained to service an AV. In Exp. 1, percentages of rams mounting (73 vs 36%) and ejaculating (67 vs 29%) differed (P &lt; 0.05) between rams from high and low Rambouillet ewe selection lines, respectively. In Exp. 2, ram classification consisted of exposing each 22- to 24-mo-old ram (n = 48) to three unrestrained ewes in estrus for 18, 30-min tests. Any ram that had not mounted or ejaculated during SCT was evaluated for sexual orientation in a 30-min preference test in which each ram had access to both restrained estrual ewes and restrained rams. In Exp. 2, there was no difference (P &gt; 0.2) in percentages of rams mounting (92 vs 78%) and ejaculating (88 vs 74%) between rams from high and low Rambouillet ewe selection lines, respectively. There was no difference (P &gt; 0.33) between high and low ewe selection line rams for mounts or ejaculations for 18 SCT. Only one male-oriented ram was identified, which was from the high line. In Exp. 2, six SCT were necessary to obtain 95% reliability in sexual performance scores. Results of these studies indicate that long-term selection of ewes for litter size did not alter ram sexual performance after SCT under simulated natural mating conditions or affect incidence of male-oriented rams. Mating behavior observed during training to service an AV was lower for rams from ewes of the low selection line than for rams from ewes of the high selection line. We concluded that long-term selection for reproductive rate in ewes did not alter mating behavior patterns of male offspring; however, test conditions, such as restrained and unrestrained ewes and number of serving capacity tests, may affect conclusions in studies that evaluate sexual performance of rams.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Am Soc Animal Sci</pub><pmid>12413080</pmid><doi>10.2527/2002.80102588x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2002-10, Vol.80 (10), p.2588-2593
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72633617
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animal productions
Animal reproduction
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Breeding
Copulation
Ejaculation
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Libido - physiology
Litter Size - genetics
Male
Reproduction - genetics
Selection, Genetic
Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology
Sheep
Sheep - genetics
Sheep - physiology
Terrestrial animal productions
Vertebrates
title Ram mating behavior after long-term selection for reproductive rate in Rambouillet ewes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T11%3A13%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ram%20mating%20behavior%20after%20long-term%20selection%20for%20reproductive%20rate%20in%20Rambouillet%20ewes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Stellflug,%20J.%20N&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2588&rft.epage=2593&rft.pages=2588-2593&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/2002.80102588x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72633617%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218131807&rft_id=info:pmid/12413080&rfr_iscdi=true