Visual outcome after silicone oil removal and recurrent retinal detachment repair
Purpose Prospective analysis of the effect of removal of silicone oil (ROSO) in eyes with complicated retinal detachments and evaluation of the visual outcome following recurrent retinal detachment after silicone oil removal. Methods We evaluated 62 consecutive cases of ROSO over a 12 month period....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Eye (London) 2000-12, Vol.14 (6), p.834-838 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 838 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 834 |
| container_title | Eye (London) |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Flaxel, Christina J Mitchell, Suzanne M Aylward, G William |
| description | Purpose
Prospective analysis of the effect of removal of silicone oil (ROSO) in eyes with complicated retinal detachments and evaluation of the visual outcome following recurrent retinal detachment after silicone oil removal.
Methods
We evaluated 62 consecutive cases of ROSO over a 12 month period. All eyes had previously undergone silicone oil placement for complicated retinal detachments. All eyes undergoing scheduled ROSO over the time period of the study were entered and were reviewed post-operatively.
Results
Sixty-two eyes were entered into the study. Twenty-one of 62 (34%) developed recurrent retinal detachment following ROSO; 18 of these 21 recurrent detachments were reattached with one additional procedure and only 5 required replacement of the silicone oil. Ten of these 21 eyes (48%) had improvement or stabilisation in final visual acuity compared with the presenting visual acuity. Overall, 39 eyes (63%) had improvement in vision following ROSO and 76% of all eyes had ambulatory visual acuity at the end of the follow-up period. Fourteen eyes required cataract extraction with ROSO to attain this final visual acuity.
Conclusion
Overall, ROSO has a significant rate of recurrent retinal detachment, with a high reattachment rate with one additional procedure. Few of these eyes need the silicone oil replaced. Most eyes will retain ambulatory visual acuity even with multiple procedures in cases of complicated retinal detachments following ROSO even with recurrent retinal detachment. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/eye.2000.232 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72612765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72612765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-d6593a533741090c44c4977e84167823bea71377488b1cceb454842dad3d12d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68ywFwZNd89mkR1n8ggURVLyFbDqrkbZZk1bYf2-WFr14mmHehxnmQeiU4DnBTF3BFuYUYzynjO6hKeGyyAUXfB9NcSlwTil9m6CjGD8xTqHEh2hCiFBcMTVFT68u9qbOfN9Z30Bm1h2ELLraWd9C5l2dBWj8d0JMW6Xe9iFA26Wuc22aVtAZ-9EMo41x4RgdrE0d4WSsM_Rye_O8uM-Xj3cPi-tlbllJurwqRMmMYExygktsObe8lBIUJ4VUlK3ASMKk5EqtiLWwSi8pTitTsYrQirAZuhj2boL_6iF2unHRQl2bFnwftaQFobIQCbwcQBt8jAHWehNcY8JWE6x3CnVSqHcKdVKY8LNxb79qoPqDR2cJOB8BE62p18G01sVfTglFBE5UPlAxBe07BP3p-5CMxf_P_gAIdYeH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72612765</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual outcome after silicone oil removal and recurrent retinal detachment repair</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Flaxel, Christina J ; Mitchell, Suzanne M ; Aylward, G William</creator><creatorcontrib>Flaxel, Christina J ; Mitchell, Suzanne M ; Aylward, G William</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Prospective analysis of the effect of removal of silicone oil (ROSO) in eyes with complicated retinal detachments and evaluation of the visual outcome following recurrent retinal detachment after silicone oil removal.
Methods
We evaluated 62 consecutive cases of ROSO over a 12 month period. All eyes had previously undergone silicone oil placement for complicated retinal detachments. All eyes undergoing scheduled ROSO over the time period of the study were entered and were reviewed post-operatively.
Results
Sixty-two eyes were entered into the study. Twenty-one of 62 (34%) developed recurrent retinal detachment following ROSO; 18 of these 21 recurrent detachments were reattached with one additional procedure and only 5 required replacement of the silicone oil. Ten of these 21 eyes (48%) had improvement or stabilisation in final visual acuity compared with the presenting visual acuity. Overall, 39 eyes (63%) had improvement in vision following ROSO and 76% of all eyes had ambulatory visual acuity at the end of the follow-up period. Fourteen eyes required cataract extraction with ROSO to attain this final visual acuity.
Conclusion
Overall, ROSO has a significant rate of recurrent retinal detachment, with a high reattachment rate with one additional procedure. Few of these eyes need the silicone oil replaced. Most eyes will retain ambulatory visual acuity even with multiple procedures in cases of complicated retinal detachments following ROSO even with recurrent retinal detachment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-222X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/eye.2000.232</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11584838</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EYEEEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cataract - etiology ; Cataract Extraction ; Child ; clinical-study ; Female ; Glaucoma - etiology ; Humans ; Laboratory Medicine ; Macula Lutea - pathology ; Macula Lutea - surgery ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Recurrence ; Reoperation ; Retinal Detachment - pathology ; Retinal Detachment - surgery ; Silicone Oils - therapeutic use ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit ; Surgical Oncology ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Eye (London), 2000-12, Vol.14 (6), p.834-838</ispartof><rights>College of Ophthalmologists 2000</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-d6593a533741090c44c4977e84167823bea71377488b1cceb454842dad3d12d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-d6593a533741090c44c4977e84167823bea71377488b1cceb454842dad3d12d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/eye.2000.232$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/eye.2000.232$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=858150$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11584838$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flaxel, Christina J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aylward, G William</creatorcontrib><title>Visual outcome after silicone oil removal and recurrent retinal detachment repair</title><title>Eye (London)</title><addtitle>Eye</addtitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><description>Purpose
Prospective analysis of the effect of removal of silicone oil (ROSO) in eyes with complicated retinal detachments and evaluation of the visual outcome following recurrent retinal detachment after silicone oil removal.
Methods
We evaluated 62 consecutive cases of ROSO over a 12 month period. All eyes had previously undergone silicone oil placement for complicated retinal detachments. All eyes undergoing scheduled ROSO over the time period of the study were entered and were reviewed post-operatively.
Results
Sixty-two eyes were entered into the study. Twenty-one of 62 (34%) developed recurrent retinal detachment following ROSO; 18 of these 21 recurrent detachments were reattached with one additional procedure and only 5 required replacement of the silicone oil. Ten of these 21 eyes (48%) had improvement or stabilisation in final visual acuity compared with the presenting visual acuity. Overall, 39 eyes (63%) had improvement in vision following ROSO and 76% of all eyes had ambulatory visual acuity at the end of the follow-up period. Fourteen eyes required cataract extraction with ROSO to attain this final visual acuity.
Conclusion
Overall, ROSO has a significant rate of recurrent retinal detachment, with a high reattachment rate with one additional procedure. Few of these eyes need the silicone oil replaced. Most eyes will retain ambulatory visual acuity even with multiple procedures in cases of complicated retinal detachments following ROSO even with recurrent retinal detachment.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cataract - etiology</subject><subject>Cataract Extraction</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>clinical-study</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma - etiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Macula Lutea - pathology</subject><subject>Macula Lutea - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - pathology</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - surgery</subject><subject>Silicone Oils - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68ywFwZNd89mkR1n8ggURVLyFbDqrkbZZk1bYf2-WFr14mmHehxnmQeiU4DnBTF3BFuYUYzynjO6hKeGyyAUXfB9NcSlwTil9m6CjGD8xTqHEh2hCiFBcMTVFT68u9qbOfN9Z30Bm1h2ELLraWd9C5l2dBWj8d0JMW6Xe9iFA26Wuc22aVtAZ-9EMo41x4RgdrE0d4WSsM_Rye_O8uM-Xj3cPi-tlbllJurwqRMmMYExygktsObe8lBIUJ4VUlK3ASMKk5EqtiLWwSi8pTitTsYrQirAZuhj2boL_6iF2unHRQl2bFnwftaQFobIQCbwcQBt8jAHWehNcY8JWE6x3CnVSqHcKdVKY8LNxb79qoPqDR2cJOB8BE62p18G01sVfTglFBE5UPlAxBe07BP3p-5CMxf_P_gAIdYeH</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Flaxel, Christina J</creator><creator>Mitchell, Suzanne M</creator><creator>Aylward, G William</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>Visual outcome after silicone oil removal and recurrent retinal detachment repair</title><author>Flaxel, Christina J ; Mitchell, Suzanne M ; Aylward, G William</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-d6593a533741090c44c4977e84167823bea71377488b1cceb454842dad3d12d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cataract - etiology</topic><topic>Cataract Extraction</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>clinical-study</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma - etiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Macula Lutea - pathology</topic><topic>Macula Lutea - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - pathology</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - surgery</topic><topic>Silicone Oils - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flaxel, Christina J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aylward, G William</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flaxel, Christina J</au><au>Mitchell, Suzanne M</au><au>Aylward, G William</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual outcome after silicone oil removal and recurrent retinal detachment repair</atitle><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle><stitle>Eye</stitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>834</spage><epage>838</epage><pages>834-838</pages><issn>0950-222X</issn><eissn>1476-5454</eissn><coden>EYEEEC</coden><abstract>Purpose
Prospective analysis of the effect of removal of silicone oil (ROSO) in eyes with complicated retinal detachments and evaluation of the visual outcome following recurrent retinal detachment after silicone oil removal.
Methods
We evaluated 62 consecutive cases of ROSO over a 12 month period. All eyes had previously undergone silicone oil placement for complicated retinal detachments. All eyes undergoing scheduled ROSO over the time period of the study were entered and were reviewed post-operatively.
Results
Sixty-two eyes were entered into the study. Twenty-one of 62 (34%) developed recurrent retinal detachment following ROSO; 18 of these 21 recurrent detachments were reattached with one additional procedure and only 5 required replacement of the silicone oil. Ten of these 21 eyes (48%) had improvement or stabilisation in final visual acuity compared with the presenting visual acuity. Overall, 39 eyes (63%) had improvement in vision following ROSO and 76% of all eyes had ambulatory visual acuity at the end of the follow-up period. Fourteen eyes required cataract extraction with ROSO to attain this final visual acuity.
Conclusion
Overall, ROSO has a significant rate of recurrent retinal detachment, with a high reattachment rate with one additional procedure. Few of these eyes need the silicone oil replaced. Most eyes will retain ambulatory visual acuity even with multiple procedures in cases of complicated retinal detachments following ROSO even with recurrent retinal detachment.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>11584838</pmid><doi>10.1038/eye.2000.232</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0950-222X |
| ispartof | Eye (London), 2000-12, Vol.14 (6), p.834-838 |
| issn | 0950-222X 1476-5454 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72612765 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Cataract - etiology Cataract Extraction Child clinical-study Female Glaucoma - etiology Humans Laboratory Medicine Macula Lutea - pathology Macula Lutea - surgery Male Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Ophthalmology Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology Postoperative Complications - surgery Prospective Studies Recurrence Reoperation Retinal Detachment - pathology Retinal Detachment - surgery Silicone Oils - therapeutic use Surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Surgery of the eye and orbit Surgical Oncology Treatment Outcome Visual Acuity |
| title | Visual outcome after silicone oil removal and recurrent retinal detachment repair |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A27%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20outcome%20after%20silicone%20oil%20removal%20and%20recurrent%20retinal%20detachment%20repair&rft.jtitle=Eye%20(London)&rft.au=Flaxel,%20Christina%20J&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=834&rft.epage=838&rft.pages=834-838&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft.coden=EYEEEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/eye.2000.232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72612765%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72612765&rft_id=info:pmid/11584838&rfr_iscdi=true |