Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI
Background: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible. Patients: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2000-12, Vol.28 (6), p.319-324 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 324 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 319 |
container_title | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Stuckensen, Tankred Kovács, Adorján F. Adams, Stephan Baum, Richard P. |
description | Background: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible. Patients: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Study design: In a prospective study, PET using fluoro-desoxy-glucose (18F-FDG), ultrasound, CT and MRI of head and neck were compared with the postoperative histologic tissue evaluation. Two thousand one hundred and ninety-six neck lymph nodes of 106 patients were investigated. In all patients the tumour was resected and a lymph node dissection was performed. Results: The diagnostic procedures showed the following results when compared with the histological findings: PET: sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, accuracy 75%; Ultrasound: 84%, 68%, 76%; CT: 66%, 74%, 70%; MRI: 64%, 69% 66%. Thus PET showed the highest specificity while ultrasound had the highest sensitivity compared with the other staging procedures. A non-significant correlation was found between the size of a lymph node metastasis and the ability to detect it. In 10 patients, second primary tumours or distant metastases were detected by PET only. Conclusion: Due to the high number of small lymph node metastases from oral cavity carcinoma, the non-invasive neck staging methods are limited to a maximum accuracy of 76%. Elective neck treatment should be mandatory for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1054/jcms.2000.0172 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72612562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1010518200901720</els_id><sourcerecordid>72612562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-9a6f49d596a5736bb2a8f52bf07fc55d5f5233a45fe161ccb630b49897cc75b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtv1DAURi0Eog_YskSWkFg1g-3Ej7BDo1IqFYFgWFs3jtO6JHZqO4O65ZfjaEawYuWHjj_d7xihV5RsKOHNu3szpQ0jhGwIlewJOqVKqqqhtH1a9oSSilPFTtBZSveFEkS1z9EJpY3gtJan6Pf3DLfO3-Iw4HxnsbfmJ3Yez5Cd9TnhXy7f4RBhxAb2Lj_i9LDAFJaEjR3Xy2icDxOk9xjwHEOarclub7EJ0wzRpeDX7K-Xuwu8jDlCCovvL_B2h8H3-PO36xfo2QBjsi-P6zn68fFyt_1U3Xy5ut5-uKlMLVSuWhBD0_a8FcBlLbqOgRo46wYiB8N5z8uhrqHhg6WCGtOJmnRNq1ppjOSdrM_R20NumfJhsSnryaW1BHhb-mjJBGVcsAJuDqApdVK0g56jmyA-akr0al2v1vVqXa_Wy4PXx-Slm2z_Dz9qLsCbIwDJwDhE8Malv1zLlGRtodSBssXC3tmokymfYGzvYpGq--D-N8EfDi2eQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72612562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Stuckensen, Tankred ; Kovács, Adorján F. ; Adams, Stephan ; Baum, Richard P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stuckensen, Tankred ; Kovács, Adorján F. ; Adams, Stephan ; Baum, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible. Patients: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Study design: In a prospective study, PET using fluoro-desoxy-glucose (18F-FDG), ultrasound, CT and MRI of head and neck were compared with the postoperative histologic tissue evaluation. Two thousand one hundred and ninety-six neck lymph nodes of 106 patients were investigated. In all patients the tumour was resected and a lymph node dissection was performed. Results: The diagnostic procedures showed the following results when compared with the histological findings: PET: sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, accuracy 75%; Ultrasound: 84%, 68%, 76%; CT: 66%, 74%, 70%; MRI: 64%, 69% 66%. Thus PET showed the highest specificity while ultrasound had the highest sensitivity compared with the other staging procedures. A non-significant correlation was found between the size of a lymph node metastasis and the ability to detect it. In 10 patients, second primary tumours or distant metastases were detected by PET only. Conclusion: Due to the high number of small lymph node metastases from oral cavity carcinoma, the non-invasive neck staging methods are limited to a maximum accuracy of 76%. Elective neck treatment should be mandatory for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1054/jcms.2000.0172</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11465137</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMSET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Dentistry ; Diagnostic Imaging ; False Negative Reactions ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Mouth Neoplasms - pathology ; Mouth Neoplasms - surgery ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - pathology ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, Emission-Computed ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tumors ; Ultrasonography ; Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2000-12, Vol.28 (6), p.319-324</ispartof><rights>2000 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-9a6f49d596a5736bb2a8f52bf07fc55d5f5233a45fe161ccb630b49897cc75b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-9a6f49d596a5736bb2a8f52bf07fc55d5f5233a45fe161ccb630b49897cc75b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2000.0172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=928729$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11465137$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stuckensen, Tankred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovács, Adorján F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><title>Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Background: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible. Patients: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Study design: In a prospective study, PET using fluoro-desoxy-glucose (18F-FDG), ultrasound, CT and MRI of head and neck were compared with the postoperative histologic tissue evaluation. Two thousand one hundred and ninety-six neck lymph nodes of 106 patients were investigated. In all patients the tumour was resected and a lymph node dissection was performed. Results: The diagnostic procedures showed the following results when compared with the histological findings: PET: sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, accuracy 75%; Ultrasound: 84%, 68%, 76%; CT: 66%, 74%, 70%; MRI: 64%, 69% 66%. Thus PET showed the highest specificity while ultrasound had the highest sensitivity compared with the other staging procedures. A non-significant correlation was found between the size of a lymph node metastasis and the ability to detect it. In 10 patients, second primary tumours or distant metastases were detected by PET only. Conclusion: Due to the high number of small lymph node metastases from oral cavity carcinoma, the non-invasive neck staging methods are limited to a maximum accuracy of 76%. Elective neck treatment should be mandatory for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - pathology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtv1DAURi0Eog_YskSWkFg1g-3Ej7BDo1IqFYFgWFs3jtO6JHZqO4O65ZfjaEawYuWHjj_d7xihV5RsKOHNu3szpQ0jhGwIlewJOqVKqqqhtH1a9oSSilPFTtBZSveFEkS1z9EJpY3gtJan6Pf3DLfO3-Iw4HxnsbfmJ3Yez5Cd9TnhXy7f4RBhxAb2Lj_i9LDAFJaEjR3Xy2icDxOk9xjwHEOarclub7EJ0wzRpeDX7K-Xuwu8jDlCCovvL_B2h8H3-PO36xfo2QBjsi-P6zn68fFyt_1U3Xy5ut5-uKlMLVSuWhBD0_a8FcBlLbqOgRo46wYiB8N5z8uhrqHhg6WCGtOJmnRNq1ppjOSdrM_R20NumfJhsSnryaW1BHhb-mjJBGVcsAJuDqApdVK0g56jmyA-akr0al2v1vVqXa_Wy4PXx-Slm2z_Dz9qLsCbIwDJwDhE8Malv1zLlGRtodSBssXC3tmokymfYGzvYpGq--D-N8EfDi2eQw</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Stuckensen, Tankred</creator><creator>Kovács, Adorján F.</creator><creator>Adams, Stephan</creator><creator>Baum, Richard P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI</title><author>Stuckensen, Tankred ; Kovács, Adorján F. ; Adams, Stephan ; Baum, Richard P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-9a6f49d596a5736bb2a8f52bf07fc55d5f5233a45fe161ccb630b49897cc75b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - pathology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stuckensen, Tankred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovács, Adorján F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stuckensen, Tankred</au><au>Kovács, Adorján F.</au><au>Adams, Stephan</au><au>Baum, Richard P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>319-324</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><coden>JCMSET</coden><abstract>Background: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible. Patients: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Study design: In a prospective study, PET using fluoro-desoxy-glucose (18F-FDG), ultrasound, CT and MRI of head and neck were compared with the postoperative histologic tissue evaluation. Two thousand one hundred and ninety-six neck lymph nodes of 106 patients were investigated. In all patients the tumour was resected and a lymph node dissection was performed. Results: The diagnostic procedures showed the following results when compared with the histological findings: PET: sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, accuracy 75%; Ultrasound: 84%, 68%, 76%; CT: 66%, 74%, 70%; MRI: 64%, 69% 66%. Thus PET showed the highest specificity while ultrasound had the highest sensitivity compared with the other staging procedures. A non-significant correlation was found between the size of a lymph node metastasis and the ability to detect it. In 10 patients, second primary tumours or distant metastases were detected by PET only. Conclusion: Due to the high number of small lymph node metastases from oral cavity carcinoma, the non-invasive neck staging methods are limited to a maximum accuracy of 76%. Elective neck treatment should be mandatory for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11465137</pmid><doi>10.1054/jcms.2000.0172</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-5182 |
ispartof | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2000-12, Vol.28 (6), p.319-324 |
issn | 1010-5182 1878-4119 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72612562 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery Dentistry Diagnostic Imaging False Negative Reactions False Positive Reactions Female Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Lymph Node Excision Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Mouth Neoplasms - pathology Mouth Neoplasms - surgery Neoplasm Staging Neoplasms, Second Primary - pathology Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit Predictive Value of Tests Prospective Studies Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry Radiopharmaceuticals Sensitivity and Specificity Tomography, Emission-Computed Tomography, X-Ray Computed Tumors Ultrasonography Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology |
title | Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A29%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Staging%20of%20the%20neck%20in%20patients%20with%20oral%20cavity%20squamous%20cell%20carcinomas:%20a%20prospective%20comparison%20of%20PET,%20ultrasound,%20CT%20and%20MRI&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Stuckensen,%20Tankred&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=319-324&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft.coden=JCMSET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1054/jcms.2000.0172&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72612562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72612562&rft_id=info:pmid/11465137&rft_els_id=S1010518200901720&rfr_iscdi=true |