Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI

Background: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible. Patients: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2000-12, Vol.28 (6), p.319-324
Hauptverfasser: Stuckensen, Tankred, Kovács, Adorján F., Adams, Stephan, Baum, Richard P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 324
container_issue 6
container_start_page 319
container_title Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery
container_volume 28
creator Stuckensen, Tankred
Kovács, Adorján F.
Adams, Stephan
Baum, Richard P.
description Background: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible. Patients: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Study design: In a prospective study, PET using fluoro-desoxy-glucose (18F-FDG), ultrasound, CT and MRI of head and neck were compared with the postoperative histologic tissue evaluation. Two thousand one hundred and ninety-six neck lymph nodes of 106 patients were investigated. In all patients the tumour was resected and a lymph node dissection was performed. Results: The diagnostic procedures showed the following results when compared with the histological findings: PET: sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, accuracy 75%; Ultrasound: 84%, 68%, 76%; CT: 66%, 74%, 70%; MRI: 64%, 69% 66%. Thus PET showed the highest specificity while ultrasound had the highest sensitivity compared with the other staging procedures. A non-significant correlation was found between the size of a lymph node metastasis and the ability to detect it. In 10 patients, second primary tumours or distant metastases were detected by PET only. Conclusion: Due to the high number of small lymph node metastases from oral cavity carcinoma, the non-invasive neck staging methods are limited to a maximum accuracy of 76%. Elective neck treatment should be mandatory for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
doi_str_mv 10.1054/jcms.2000.0172
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72612562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1010518200901720</els_id><sourcerecordid>72612562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-9a6f49d596a5736bb2a8f52bf07fc55d5f5233a45fe161ccb630b49897cc75b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtv1DAURi0Eog_YskSWkFg1g-3Ej7BDo1IqFYFgWFs3jtO6JHZqO4O65ZfjaEawYuWHjj_d7xihV5RsKOHNu3szpQ0jhGwIlewJOqVKqqqhtH1a9oSSilPFTtBZSveFEkS1z9EJpY3gtJan6Pf3DLfO3-Iw4HxnsbfmJ3Yez5Cd9TnhXy7f4RBhxAb2Lj_i9LDAFJaEjR3Xy2icDxOk9xjwHEOarclub7EJ0wzRpeDX7K-Xuwu8jDlCCovvL_B2h8H3-PO36xfo2QBjsi-P6zn68fFyt_1U3Xy5ut5-uKlMLVSuWhBD0_a8FcBlLbqOgRo46wYiB8N5z8uhrqHhg6WCGtOJmnRNq1ppjOSdrM_R20NumfJhsSnryaW1BHhb-mjJBGVcsAJuDqApdVK0g56jmyA-akr0al2v1vVqXa_Wy4PXx-Slm2z_Dz9qLsCbIwDJwDhE8Malv1zLlGRtodSBssXC3tmokymfYGzvYpGq--D-N8EfDi2eQw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72612562</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Stuckensen, Tankred ; Kovács, Adorján F. ; Adams, Stephan ; Baum, Richard P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stuckensen, Tankred ; Kovács, Adorján F. ; Adams, Stephan ; Baum, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible. Patients: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Study design: In a prospective study, PET using fluoro-desoxy-glucose (18F-FDG), ultrasound, CT and MRI of head and neck were compared with the postoperative histologic tissue evaluation. Two thousand one hundred and ninety-six neck lymph nodes of 106 patients were investigated. In all patients the tumour was resected and a lymph node dissection was performed. Results: The diagnostic procedures showed the following results when compared with the histological findings: PET: sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, accuracy 75%; Ultrasound: 84%, 68%, 76%; CT: 66%, 74%, 70%; MRI: 64%, 69% 66%. Thus PET showed the highest specificity while ultrasound had the highest sensitivity compared with the other staging procedures. A non-significant correlation was found between the size of a lymph node metastasis and the ability to detect it. In 10 patients, second primary tumours or distant metastases were detected by PET only. Conclusion: Due to the high number of small lymph node metastases from oral cavity carcinoma, the non-invasive neck staging methods are limited to a maximum accuracy of 76%. Elective neck treatment should be mandatory for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1054/jcms.2000.0172</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11465137</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMSET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Dentistry ; Diagnostic Imaging ; False Negative Reactions ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Mouth Neoplasms - pathology ; Mouth Neoplasms - surgery ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neoplasms, Second Primary - pathology ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, Emission-Computed ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tumors ; Ultrasonography ; Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2000-12, Vol.28 (6), p.319-324</ispartof><rights>2000 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-9a6f49d596a5736bb2a8f52bf07fc55d5f5233a45fe161ccb630b49897cc75b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-9a6f49d596a5736bb2a8f52bf07fc55d5f5233a45fe161ccb630b49897cc75b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2000.0172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27911,27912,45982</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=928729$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11465137$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stuckensen, Tankred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovács, Adorján F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><title>Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Background: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible. Patients: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Study design: In a prospective study, PET using fluoro-desoxy-glucose (18F-FDG), ultrasound, CT and MRI of head and neck were compared with the postoperative histologic tissue evaluation. Two thousand one hundred and ninety-six neck lymph nodes of 106 patients were investigated. In all patients the tumour was resected and a lymph node dissection was performed. Results: The diagnostic procedures showed the following results when compared with the histological findings: PET: sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, accuracy 75%; Ultrasound: 84%, 68%, 76%; CT: 66%, 74%, 70%; MRI: 64%, 69% 66%. Thus PET showed the highest specificity while ultrasound had the highest sensitivity compared with the other staging procedures. A non-significant correlation was found between the size of a lymph node metastasis and the ability to detect it. In 10 patients, second primary tumours or distant metastases were detected by PET only. Conclusion: Due to the high number of small lymph node metastases from oral cavity carcinoma, the non-invasive neck staging methods are limited to a maximum accuracy of 76%. Elective neck treatment should be mandatory for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Second Primary - pathology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtv1DAURi0Eog_YskSWkFg1g-3Ej7BDo1IqFYFgWFs3jtO6JHZqO4O65ZfjaEawYuWHjj_d7xihV5RsKOHNu3szpQ0jhGwIlewJOqVKqqqhtH1a9oSSilPFTtBZSveFEkS1z9EJpY3gtJan6Pf3DLfO3-Iw4HxnsbfmJ3Yez5Cd9TnhXy7f4RBhxAb2Lj_i9LDAFJaEjR3Xy2icDxOk9xjwHEOarclub7EJ0wzRpeDX7K-Xuwu8jDlCCovvL_B2h8H3-PO36xfo2QBjsi-P6zn68fFyt_1U3Xy5ut5-uKlMLVSuWhBD0_a8FcBlLbqOgRo46wYiB8N5z8uhrqHhg6WCGtOJmnRNq1ppjOSdrM_R20NumfJhsSnryaW1BHhb-mjJBGVcsAJuDqApdVK0g56jmyA-akr0al2v1vVqXa_Wy4PXx-Slm2z_Dz9qLsCbIwDJwDhE8Malv1zLlGRtodSBssXC3tmokymfYGzvYpGq--D-N8EfDi2eQw</recordid><startdate>20001201</startdate><enddate>20001201</enddate><creator>Stuckensen, Tankred</creator><creator>Kovács, Adorján F.</creator><creator>Adams, Stephan</creator><creator>Baum, Richard P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001201</creationdate><title>Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI</title><author>Stuckensen, Tankred ; Kovács, Adorján F. ; Adams, Stephan ; Baum, Richard P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-9a6f49d596a5736bb2a8f52bf07fc55d5f5233a45fe161ccb630b49897cc75b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Second Primary - pathology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stuckensen, Tankred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovács, Adorján F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baum, Richard P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stuckensen, Tankred</au><au>Kovács, Adorján F.</au><au>Adams, Stephan</au><au>Baum, Richard P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2000-12-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>319-324</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><coden>JCMSET</coden><abstract>Background: The choice of treatment in patients with oral malignancies depends on accurate pretreatment staging and particularly the detection of lymph node involvement. Therefore staging of the neck should be as accurate as possible. Patients: One hundred and six patients with histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Study design: In a prospective study, PET using fluoro-desoxy-glucose (18F-FDG), ultrasound, CT and MRI of head and neck were compared with the postoperative histologic tissue evaluation. Two thousand one hundred and ninety-six neck lymph nodes of 106 patients were investigated. In all patients the tumour was resected and a lymph node dissection was performed. Results: The diagnostic procedures showed the following results when compared with the histological findings: PET: sensitivity 70%, specificity 82%, accuracy 75%; Ultrasound: 84%, 68%, 76%; CT: 66%, 74%, 70%; MRI: 64%, 69% 66%. Thus PET showed the highest specificity while ultrasound had the highest sensitivity compared with the other staging procedures. A non-significant correlation was found between the size of a lymph node metastasis and the ability to detect it. In 10 patients, second primary tumours or distant metastases were detected by PET only. Conclusion: Due to the high number of small lymph node metastases from oral cavity carcinoma, the non-invasive neck staging methods are limited to a maximum accuracy of 76%. Elective neck treatment should be mandatory for all patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11465137</pmid><doi>10.1054/jcms.2000.0172</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-5182
ispartof Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2000-12, Vol.28 (6), p.319-324
issn 1010-5182
1878-4119
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72612562
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery
Dentistry
Diagnostic Imaging
False Negative Reactions
False Positive Reactions
Female
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Lymph Node Excision
Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mouth Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Mouth Neoplasms - pathology
Mouth Neoplasms - surgery
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplasms, Second Primary - pathology
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Radiopharmaceuticals
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, Emission-Computed
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tumors
Ultrasonography
Upper respiratory tract, upper alimentary tract, paranasal sinuses, salivary glands: diseases, semeiology
title Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A29%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Staging%20of%20the%20neck%20in%20patients%20with%20oral%20cavity%20squamous%20cell%20carcinomas:%20a%20prospective%20comparison%20of%20PET,%20ultrasound,%20CT%20and%20MRI&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Stuckensen,%20Tankred&rft.date=2000-12-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=319-324&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft.coden=JCMSET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1054/jcms.2000.0172&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72612562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72612562&rft_id=info:pmid/11465137&rft_els_id=S1010518200901720&rfr_iscdi=true