Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients
To evaluate changes in serum and urinary zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium concentrations in critically ill patients receiving propofol containing disodium edetate (disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) versus sedative agents without EDTA. This was a randomised, open-label, parallel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Intensive care medicine 2000-01, Vol.26 Suppl 4 (S3), p.S413-S421 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S421 |
---|---|
container_issue | S3 |
container_start_page | S413 |
container_title | Intensive care medicine |
container_volume | 26 Suppl 4 |
creator | Higgins, T L Murray, M Kett, D H Fulda, G Kramer, K M Gelmont, D Dedhia, H V Levy, H Teres, D Zaloga, G P Ko, H Thompson, K A |
description | To evaluate changes in serum and urinary zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium concentrations in critically ill patients receiving propofol containing disodium edetate (disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) versus sedative agents without EDTA.
This was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group study with randomisation stratified by baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores.
Intensive care units (ICU) in 23 medical centres.
Medical, surgical, or trauma ICU patients 17 years of age or older who required mechanical ventilator support and sedation.
A total of 106 patients received propofol containing 0.005 % EDTA (propofol EDTA), and 104 received other sedative agents without EDTA (non-EDTA). Only the first 108 patients were assessed for urinary trace metal excretion. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected on days 2, 3, and 7 and every 7 days thereafter for determination of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium excretion; EDTA levels; urine osmolality; albumin levels; and glucose levels. The first 143 patients were assessed for serum concentration of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium; creatinine; blood urea nitrogen; and albumin at baseline and once during each 24-hour urine collection.
For the assessment of trace metals, patients receiving propofol EDTA demonstrated increased mean urinary excretion of zinc, copper, and iron compared with the normal range. All patients receiving sedatives demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and copper above normal reference values. Compared with the non-EDTA sedative group, the propofol EDTA group demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and iron. Mean serum concentrations of zinc and total calcium were decreased in both patient groups. Serum zinc concentrations increased from baseline to day 3 in the non-EDTA sedative group but not in the propofol EDTA group. Renal function, measured by blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance, did not deteriorate during ICU sedation with either regimen.
This study showed that critical illness is associated with increased urinary losses of zinc, copper, and iron. Propofol EDTA-treated patients had greater urinary losses of zinc and iron and lower serum zinc concentrations compared with the non-EDTA sedative group. No adverse events indicative of trace metal deficiency were observed in either group. The clinical significance of trace metal losses during critical illness is unclear and requir |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/PL00003785 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72595636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2631877671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-443efd6d09297b273ee45b2a63f7a1054350053eca055d5bece1bcde37ad697d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c9vFCEUB3BiNHatXvwDDPHgwWQUeDDsHJu2_kg20cN6njDwxqVhYAWmpnf_cKndpIlc3oEP7z3yJeQ1Zx84Y_rj9x1rB_RWPSEbLkF0XMD2KdkwkKKTvRRn5EUpN4xx3Sv-nJxxDpwNTG7In302FikGXDBWekgLplJN8YW6Nfv4k9oUq49rWgst6Ez1KdLfvh7oMadjmlP4J4yP9_j6an9BbzGXplM9YD69ucVCfaQ2--qtCeGO-hDosd20qeUleTabUPDVqZ6TH5-u95dfut23z18vL3adFXpbOykBZ9c7NohBT0IDolSTMD3M2nCmJCjGFKA1TCmnJrTIJ-sQtHH9oB2ck3cPfdvqv1YsdVx8sRiCidj-N2qhBtVD3-Db_-BNWnNsu43DAKpXAKyh9w_I5lRKxnk8Zr-YfDdyNt4HMz4G0_CbU8d1WtA90lMS8BfIOIrG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>993565330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Higgins, T L ; Murray, M ; Kett, D H ; Fulda, G ; Kramer, K M ; Gelmont, D ; Dedhia, H V ; Levy, H ; Teres, D ; Zaloga, G P ; Ko, H ; Thompson, K A</creator><creatorcontrib>Higgins, T L ; Murray, M ; Kett, D H ; Fulda, G ; Kramer, K M ; Gelmont, D ; Dedhia, H V ; Levy, H ; Teres, D ; Zaloga, G P ; Ko, H ; Thompson, K A</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate changes in serum and urinary zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium concentrations in critically ill patients receiving propofol containing disodium edetate (disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) versus sedative agents without EDTA.
This was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group study with randomisation stratified by baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores.
Intensive care units (ICU) in 23 medical centres.
Medical, surgical, or trauma ICU patients 17 years of age or older who required mechanical ventilator support and sedation.
A total of 106 patients received propofol containing 0.005 % EDTA (propofol EDTA), and 104 received other sedative agents without EDTA (non-EDTA). Only the first 108 patients were assessed for urinary trace metal excretion. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected on days 2, 3, and 7 and every 7 days thereafter for determination of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium excretion; EDTA levels; urine osmolality; albumin levels; and glucose levels. The first 143 patients were assessed for serum concentration of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium; creatinine; blood urea nitrogen; and albumin at baseline and once during each 24-hour urine collection.
For the assessment of trace metals, patients receiving propofol EDTA demonstrated increased mean urinary excretion of zinc, copper, and iron compared with the normal range. All patients receiving sedatives demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and copper above normal reference values. Compared with the non-EDTA sedative group, the propofol EDTA group demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and iron. Mean serum concentrations of zinc and total calcium were decreased in both patient groups. Serum zinc concentrations increased from baseline to day 3 in the non-EDTA sedative group but not in the propofol EDTA group. Renal function, measured by blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance, did not deteriorate during ICU sedation with either regimen.
This study showed that critical illness is associated with increased urinary losses of zinc, copper, and iron. Propofol EDTA-treated patients had greater urinary losses of zinc and iron and lower serum zinc concentrations compared with the non-EDTA sedative group. No adverse events indicative of trace metal deficiency were observed in either group. The clinical significance of trace metal losses during critical illness is unclear and requires further study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/PL00003785</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11310904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacokinetics ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology ; APACHE ; Calcium - metabolism ; Chelating Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Chelating Agents - pharmacology ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Cobalt ; Copper ; Creatinine ; Critical Illness ; Drug dosages ; Edetic Acid - pharmacokinetics ; Edetic Acid - pharmacology ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Hemodynamics - drug effects ; Homeostasis ; Humans ; Illnesses ; Intensive care ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morphine ; Nitrogen ; Odds Ratio ; Patients ; Physiology ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacokinetics ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology ; Propofol - pharmacokinetics ; Propofol - pharmacology ; Prospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Trace elements ; Trace Elements - metabolism ; Urine ; Vital signs ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Intensive care medicine, 2000-01, Vol.26 Suppl 4 (S3), p.S413-S421</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-443efd6d09297b273ee45b2a63f7a1054350053eca055d5bece1bcde37ad697d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11310904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higgins, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kett, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulda, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, K M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelmont, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedhia, H V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teres, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaloga, G P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, K A</creatorcontrib><title>Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients</title><title>Intensive care medicine</title><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><description>To evaluate changes in serum and urinary zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium concentrations in critically ill patients receiving propofol containing disodium edetate (disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) versus sedative agents without EDTA.
This was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group study with randomisation stratified by baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores.
Intensive care units (ICU) in 23 medical centres.
Medical, surgical, or trauma ICU patients 17 years of age or older who required mechanical ventilator support and sedation.
A total of 106 patients received propofol containing 0.005 % EDTA (propofol EDTA), and 104 received other sedative agents without EDTA (non-EDTA). Only the first 108 patients were assessed for urinary trace metal excretion. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected on days 2, 3, and 7 and every 7 days thereafter for determination of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium excretion; EDTA levels; urine osmolality; albumin levels; and glucose levels. The first 143 patients were assessed for serum concentration of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium; creatinine; blood urea nitrogen; and albumin at baseline and once during each 24-hour urine collection.
For the assessment of trace metals, patients receiving propofol EDTA demonstrated increased mean urinary excretion of zinc, copper, and iron compared with the normal range. All patients receiving sedatives demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and copper above normal reference values. Compared with the non-EDTA sedative group, the propofol EDTA group demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and iron. Mean serum concentrations of zinc and total calcium were decreased in both patient groups. Serum zinc concentrations increased from baseline to day 3 in the non-EDTA sedative group but not in the propofol EDTA group. Renal function, measured by blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance, did not deteriorate during ICU sedation with either regimen.
This study showed that critical illness is associated with increased urinary losses of zinc, copper, and iron. Propofol EDTA-treated patients had greater urinary losses of zinc and iron and lower serum zinc concentrations compared with the non-EDTA sedative group. No adverse events indicative of trace metal deficiency were observed in either group. The clinical significance of trace metal losses during critical illness is unclear and requires further study.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology</subject><subject>APACHE</subject><subject>Calcium - metabolism</subject><subject>Chelating Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Chelating Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Cobalt</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Edetic Acid - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Edetic Acid - pharmacology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - drug effects</subject><subject>Homeostasis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology</subject><subject>Propofol - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Propofol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Trace Elements - metabolism</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Vital signs</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0342-4642</issn><issn>1432-1238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c9vFCEUB3BiNHatXvwDDPHgwWQUeDDsHJu2_kg20cN6njDwxqVhYAWmpnf_cKndpIlc3oEP7z3yJeQ1Zx84Y_rj9x1rB_RWPSEbLkF0XMD2KdkwkKKTvRRn5EUpN4xx3Sv-nJxxDpwNTG7In302FikGXDBWekgLplJN8YW6Nfv4k9oUq49rWgst6Ez1KdLfvh7oMadjmlP4J4yP9_j6an9BbzGXplM9YD69ucVCfaQ2--qtCeGO-hDosd20qeUleTabUPDVqZ6TH5-u95dfut23z18vL3adFXpbOykBZ9c7NohBT0IDolSTMD3M2nCmJCjGFKA1TCmnJrTIJ-sQtHH9oB2ck3cPfdvqv1YsdVx8sRiCidj-N2qhBtVD3-Db_-BNWnNsu43DAKpXAKyh9w_I5lRKxnk8Zr-YfDdyNt4HMz4G0_CbU8d1WtA90lMS8BfIOIrG</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>Higgins, T L</creator><creator>Murray, M</creator><creator>Kett, D H</creator><creator>Fulda, G</creator><creator>Kramer, K M</creator><creator>Gelmont, D</creator><creator>Dedhia, H V</creator><creator>Levy, H</creator><creator>Teres, D</creator><creator>Zaloga, G P</creator><creator>Ko, H</creator><creator>Thompson, K A</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients</title><author>Higgins, T L ; Murray, M ; Kett, D H ; Fulda, G ; Kramer, K M ; Gelmont, D ; Dedhia, H V ; Levy, H ; Teres, D ; Zaloga, G P ; Ko, H ; Thompson, K A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-443efd6d09297b273ee45b2a63f7a1054350053eca055d5bece1bcde37ad697d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology</topic><topic>APACHE</topic><topic>Calcium - metabolism</topic><topic>Chelating Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Chelating Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Cobalt</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Edetic Acid - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Edetic Acid - pharmacology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - drug effects</topic><topic>Homeostasis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology</topic><topic>Propofol - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Propofol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Trace Elements - metabolism</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Vital signs</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higgins, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kett, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulda, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, K M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelmont, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedhia, H V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teres, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaloga, G P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, K A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higgins, T L</au><au>Murray, M</au><au>Kett, D H</au><au>Fulda, G</au><au>Kramer, K M</au><au>Gelmont, D</au><au>Dedhia, H V</au><au>Levy, H</au><au>Teres, D</au><au>Zaloga, G P</au><au>Ko, H</au><au>Thompson, K A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients</atitle><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>26 Suppl 4</volume><issue>S3</issue><spage>S413</spage><epage>S421</epage><pages>S413-S421</pages><issn>0342-4642</issn><eissn>1432-1238</eissn><abstract>To evaluate changes in serum and urinary zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium concentrations in critically ill patients receiving propofol containing disodium edetate (disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) versus sedative agents without EDTA.
This was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group study with randomisation stratified by baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores.
Intensive care units (ICU) in 23 medical centres.
Medical, surgical, or trauma ICU patients 17 years of age or older who required mechanical ventilator support and sedation.
A total of 106 patients received propofol containing 0.005 % EDTA (propofol EDTA), and 104 received other sedative agents without EDTA (non-EDTA). Only the first 108 patients were assessed for urinary trace metal excretion. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected on days 2, 3, and 7 and every 7 days thereafter for determination of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium excretion; EDTA levels; urine osmolality; albumin levels; and glucose levels. The first 143 patients were assessed for serum concentration of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium; creatinine; blood urea nitrogen; and albumin at baseline and once during each 24-hour urine collection.
For the assessment of trace metals, patients receiving propofol EDTA demonstrated increased mean urinary excretion of zinc, copper, and iron compared with the normal range. All patients receiving sedatives demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and copper above normal reference values. Compared with the non-EDTA sedative group, the propofol EDTA group demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and iron. Mean serum concentrations of zinc and total calcium were decreased in both patient groups. Serum zinc concentrations increased from baseline to day 3 in the non-EDTA sedative group but not in the propofol EDTA group. Renal function, measured by blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance, did not deteriorate during ICU sedation with either regimen.
This study showed that critical illness is associated with increased urinary losses of zinc, copper, and iron. Propofol EDTA-treated patients had greater urinary losses of zinc and iron and lower serum zinc concentrations compared with the non-EDTA sedative group. No adverse events indicative of trace metal deficiency were observed in either group. The clinical significance of trace metal losses during critical illness is unclear and requires further study.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>11310904</pmid><doi>10.1007/PL00003785</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0342-4642 |
ispartof | Intensive care medicine, 2000-01, Vol.26 Suppl 4 (S3), p.S413-S421 |
issn | 0342-4642 1432-1238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72595636 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anesthesia Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacokinetics Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology APACHE Calcium - metabolism Chelating Agents - pharmacokinetics Chelating Agents - pharmacology Chi-Square Distribution Cobalt Copper Creatinine Critical Illness Drug dosages Edetic Acid - pharmacokinetics Edetic Acid - pharmacology Female Fentanyl Hemodynamics - drug effects Homeostasis Humans Illnesses Intensive care Male Middle Aged Morphine Nitrogen Odds Ratio Patients Physiology Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacokinetics Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology Propofol - pharmacokinetics Propofol - pharmacology Prospective Studies Statistics, Nonparametric Trace elements Trace Elements - metabolism Urine Vital signs Zinc |
title | Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T07%3A54%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trace%20element%20homeostasis%20during%20continuous%20sedation%20with%20propofol%20containing%20EDTA%20versus%20other%20sedatives%20in%20critically%20ill%20patients&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Higgins,%20T%20L&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=26%20Suppl%204&rft.issue=S3&rft.spage=S413&rft.epage=S421&rft.pages=S413-S421&rft.issn=0342-4642&rft.eissn=1432-1238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/PL00003785&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2631877671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=993565330&rft_id=info:pmid/11310904&rfr_iscdi=true |