Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients

To evaluate changes in serum and urinary zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium concentrations in critically ill patients receiving propofol containing disodium edetate (disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) versus sedative agents without EDTA. This was a randomised, open-label, parallel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intensive care medicine 2000-01, Vol.26 Suppl 4 (S3), p.S413-S421
Hauptverfasser: Higgins, T L, Murray, M, Kett, D H, Fulda, G, Kramer, K M, Gelmont, D, Dedhia, H V, Levy, H, Teres, D, Zaloga, G P, Ko, H, Thompson, K A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S421
container_issue S3
container_start_page S413
container_title Intensive care medicine
container_volume 26 Suppl 4
creator Higgins, T L
Murray, M
Kett, D H
Fulda, G
Kramer, K M
Gelmont, D
Dedhia, H V
Levy, H
Teres, D
Zaloga, G P
Ko, H
Thompson, K A
description To evaluate changes in serum and urinary zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium concentrations in critically ill patients receiving propofol containing disodium edetate (disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) versus sedative agents without EDTA. This was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group study with randomisation stratified by baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores. Intensive care units (ICU) in 23 medical centres. Medical, surgical, or trauma ICU patients 17 years of age or older who required mechanical ventilator support and sedation. A total of 106 patients received propofol containing 0.005 % EDTA (propofol EDTA), and 104 received other sedative agents without EDTA (non-EDTA). Only the first 108 patients were assessed for urinary trace metal excretion. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected on days 2, 3, and 7 and every 7 days thereafter for determination of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium excretion; EDTA levels; urine osmolality; albumin levels; and glucose levels. The first 143 patients were assessed for serum concentration of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium; creatinine; blood urea nitrogen; and albumin at baseline and once during each 24-hour urine collection. For the assessment of trace metals, patients receiving propofol EDTA demonstrated increased mean urinary excretion of zinc, copper, and iron compared with the normal range. All patients receiving sedatives demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and copper above normal reference values. Compared with the non-EDTA sedative group, the propofol EDTA group demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and iron. Mean serum concentrations of zinc and total calcium were decreased in both patient groups. Serum zinc concentrations increased from baseline to day 3 in the non-EDTA sedative group but not in the propofol EDTA group. Renal function, measured by blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance, did not deteriorate during ICU sedation with either regimen. This study showed that critical illness is associated with increased urinary losses of zinc, copper, and iron. Propofol EDTA-treated patients had greater urinary losses of zinc and iron and lower serum zinc concentrations compared with the non-EDTA sedative group. No adverse events indicative of trace metal deficiency were observed in either group. The clinical significance of trace metal losses during critical illness is unclear and requir
doi_str_mv 10.1007/PL00003785
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72595636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2631877671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-443efd6d09297b273ee45b2a63f7a1054350053eca055d5bece1bcde37ad697d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c9vFCEUB3BiNHatXvwDDPHgwWQUeDDsHJu2_kg20cN6njDwxqVhYAWmpnf_cKndpIlc3oEP7z3yJeQ1Zx84Y_rj9x1rB_RWPSEbLkF0XMD2KdkwkKKTvRRn5EUpN4xx3Sv-nJxxDpwNTG7In302FikGXDBWekgLplJN8YW6Nfv4k9oUq49rWgst6Ez1KdLfvh7oMadjmlP4J4yP9_j6an9BbzGXplM9YD69ucVCfaQ2--qtCeGO-hDosd20qeUleTabUPDVqZ6TH5-u95dfut23z18vL3adFXpbOykBZ9c7NohBT0IDolSTMD3M2nCmJCjGFKA1TCmnJrTIJ-sQtHH9oB2ck3cPfdvqv1YsdVx8sRiCidj-N2qhBtVD3-Db_-BNWnNsu43DAKpXAKyh9w_I5lRKxnk8Zr-YfDdyNt4HMz4G0_CbU8d1WtA90lMS8BfIOIrG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>993565330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Higgins, T L ; Murray, M ; Kett, D H ; Fulda, G ; Kramer, K M ; Gelmont, D ; Dedhia, H V ; Levy, H ; Teres, D ; Zaloga, G P ; Ko, H ; Thompson, K A</creator><creatorcontrib>Higgins, T L ; Murray, M ; Kett, D H ; Fulda, G ; Kramer, K M ; Gelmont, D ; Dedhia, H V ; Levy, H ; Teres, D ; Zaloga, G P ; Ko, H ; Thompson, K A</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate changes in serum and urinary zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium concentrations in critically ill patients receiving propofol containing disodium edetate (disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) versus sedative agents without EDTA. This was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group study with randomisation stratified by baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores. Intensive care units (ICU) in 23 medical centres. Medical, surgical, or trauma ICU patients 17 years of age or older who required mechanical ventilator support and sedation. A total of 106 patients received propofol containing 0.005 % EDTA (propofol EDTA), and 104 received other sedative agents without EDTA (non-EDTA). Only the first 108 patients were assessed for urinary trace metal excretion. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected on days 2, 3, and 7 and every 7 days thereafter for determination of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium excretion; EDTA levels; urine osmolality; albumin levels; and glucose levels. The first 143 patients were assessed for serum concentration of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium; creatinine; blood urea nitrogen; and albumin at baseline and once during each 24-hour urine collection. For the assessment of trace metals, patients receiving propofol EDTA demonstrated increased mean urinary excretion of zinc, copper, and iron compared with the normal range. All patients receiving sedatives demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and copper above normal reference values. Compared with the non-EDTA sedative group, the propofol EDTA group demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and iron. Mean serum concentrations of zinc and total calcium were decreased in both patient groups. Serum zinc concentrations increased from baseline to day 3 in the non-EDTA sedative group but not in the propofol EDTA group. Renal function, measured by blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance, did not deteriorate during ICU sedation with either regimen. This study showed that critical illness is associated with increased urinary losses of zinc, copper, and iron. Propofol EDTA-treated patients had greater urinary losses of zinc and iron and lower serum zinc concentrations compared with the non-EDTA sedative group. No adverse events indicative of trace metal deficiency were observed in either group. The clinical significance of trace metal losses during critical illness is unclear and requires further study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/PL00003785</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11310904</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anesthesia ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacokinetics ; Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology ; APACHE ; Calcium - metabolism ; Chelating Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Chelating Agents - pharmacology ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Cobalt ; Copper ; Creatinine ; Critical Illness ; Drug dosages ; Edetic Acid - pharmacokinetics ; Edetic Acid - pharmacology ; Female ; Fentanyl ; Hemodynamics - drug effects ; Homeostasis ; Humans ; Illnesses ; Intensive care ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morphine ; Nitrogen ; Odds Ratio ; Patients ; Physiology ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacokinetics ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology ; Propofol - pharmacokinetics ; Propofol - pharmacology ; Prospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Trace elements ; Trace Elements - metabolism ; Urine ; Vital signs ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Intensive care medicine, 2000-01, Vol.26 Suppl 4 (S3), p.S413-S421</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-443efd6d09297b273ee45b2a63f7a1054350053eca055d5bece1bcde37ad697d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11310904$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higgins, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kett, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulda, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, K M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelmont, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedhia, H V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teres, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaloga, G P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, K A</creatorcontrib><title>Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients</title><title>Intensive care medicine</title><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><description>To evaluate changes in serum and urinary zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium concentrations in critically ill patients receiving propofol containing disodium edetate (disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) versus sedative agents without EDTA. This was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group study with randomisation stratified by baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores. Intensive care units (ICU) in 23 medical centres. Medical, surgical, or trauma ICU patients 17 years of age or older who required mechanical ventilator support and sedation. A total of 106 patients received propofol containing 0.005 % EDTA (propofol EDTA), and 104 received other sedative agents without EDTA (non-EDTA). Only the first 108 patients were assessed for urinary trace metal excretion. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected on days 2, 3, and 7 and every 7 days thereafter for determination of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium excretion; EDTA levels; urine osmolality; albumin levels; and glucose levels. The first 143 patients were assessed for serum concentration of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium; creatinine; blood urea nitrogen; and albumin at baseline and once during each 24-hour urine collection. For the assessment of trace metals, patients receiving propofol EDTA demonstrated increased mean urinary excretion of zinc, copper, and iron compared with the normal range. All patients receiving sedatives demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and copper above normal reference values. Compared with the non-EDTA sedative group, the propofol EDTA group demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and iron. Mean serum concentrations of zinc and total calcium were decreased in both patient groups. Serum zinc concentrations increased from baseline to day 3 in the non-EDTA sedative group but not in the propofol EDTA group. Renal function, measured by blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance, did not deteriorate during ICU sedation with either regimen. This study showed that critical illness is associated with increased urinary losses of zinc, copper, and iron. Propofol EDTA-treated patients had greater urinary losses of zinc and iron and lower serum zinc concentrations compared with the non-EDTA sedative group. No adverse events indicative of trace metal deficiency were observed in either group. The clinical significance of trace metal losses during critical illness is unclear and requires further study.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology</subject><subject>APACHE</subject><subject>Calcium - metabolism</subject><subject>Chelating Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Chelating Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Cobalt</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Edetic Acid - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Edetic Acid - pharmacology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>Hemodynamics - drug effects</subject><subject>Homeostasis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology</subject><subject>Propofol - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Propofol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Trace Elements - metabolism</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Vital signs</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0342-4642</issn><issn>1432-1238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c9vFCEUB3BiNHatXvwDDPHgwWQUeDDsHJu2_kg20cN6njDwxqVhYAWmpnf_cKndpIlc3oEP7z3yJeQ1Zx84Y_rj9x1rB_RWPSEbLkF0XMD2KdkwkKKTvRRn5EUpN4xx3Sv-nJxxDpwNTG7In302FikGXDBWekgLplJN8YW6Nfv4k9oUq49rWgst6Ez1KdLfvh7oMadjmlP4J4yP9_j6an9BbzGXplM9YD69ucVCfaQ2--qtCeGO-hDosd20qeUleTabUPDVqZ6TH5-u95dfut23z18vL3adFXpbOykBZ9c7NohBT0IDolSTMD3M2nCmJCjGFKA1TCmnJrTIJ-sQtHH9oB2ck3cPfdvqv1YsdVx8sRiCidj-N2qhBtVD3-Db_-BNWnNsu43DAKpXAKyh9w_I5lRKxnk8Zr-YfDdyNt4HMz4G0_CbU8d1WtA90lMS8BfIOIrG</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>Higgins, T L</creator><creator>Murray, M</creator><creator>Kett, D H</creator><creator>Fulda, G</creator><creator>Kramer, K M</creator><creator>Gelmont, D</creator><creator>Dedhia, H V</creator><creator>Levy, H</creator><creator>Teres, D</creator><creator>Zaloga, G P</creator><creator>Ko, H</creator><creator>Thompson, K A</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients</title><author>Higgins, T L ; Murray, M ; Kett, D H ; Fulda, G ; Kramer, K M ; Gelmont, D ; Dedhia, H V ; Levy, H ; Teres, D ; Zaloga, G P ; Ko, H ; Thompson, K A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278t-443efd6d09297b273ee45b2a63f7a1054350053eca055d5bece1bcde37ad697d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology</topic><topic>APACHE</topic><topic>Calcium - metabolism</topic><topic>Chelating Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Chelating Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Cobalt</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Edetic Acid - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Edetic Acid - pharmacology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>Hemodynamics - drug effects</topic><topic>Homeostasis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology</topic><topic>Propofol - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Propofol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Trace Elements - metabolism</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Vital signs</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higgins, T L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kett, D H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fulda, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, K M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelmont, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dedhia, H V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teres, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaloga, G P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, K A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higgins, T L</au><au>Murray, M</au><au>Kett, D H</au><au>Fulda, G</au><au>Kramer, K M</au><au>Gelmont, D</au><au>Dedhia, H V</au><au>Levy, H</au><au>Teres, D</au><au>Zaloga, G P</au><au>Ko, H</au><au>Thompson, K A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients</atitle><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>26 Suppl 4</volume><issue>S3</issue><spage>S413</spage><epage>S421</epage><pages>S413-S421</pages><issn>0342-4642</issn><eissn>1432-1238</eissn><abstract>To evaluate changes in serum and urinary zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium concentrations in critically ill patients receiving propofol containing disodium edetate (disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) versus sedative agents without EDTA. This was a randomised, open-label, parallel-group study with randomisation stratified by baseline Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores. Intensive care units (ICU) in 23 medical centres. Medical, surgical, or trauma ICU patients 17 years of age or older who required mechanical ventilator support and sedation. A total of 106 patients received propofol containing 0.005 % EDTA (propofol EDTA), and 104 received other sedative agents without EDTA (non-EDTA). Only the first 108 patients were assessed for urinary trace metal excretion. Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected on days 2, 3, and 7 and every 7 days thereafter for determination of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium excretion; EDTA levels; urine osmolality; albumin levels; and glucose levels. The first 143 patients were assessed for serum concentration of zinc, cobalt, copper, iron, and calcium; creatinine; blood urea nitrogen; and albumin at baseline and once during each 24-hour urine collection. For the assessment of trace metals, patients receiving propofol EDTA demonstrated increased mean urinary excretion of zinc, copper, and iron compared with the normal range. All patients receiving sedatives demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and copper above normal reference values. Compared with the non-EDTA sedative group, the propofol EDTA group demonstrated increased urinary excretion of zinc and iron. Mean serum concentrations of zinc and total calcium were decreased in both patient groups. Serum zinc concentrations increased from baseline to day 3 in the non-EDTA sedative group but not in the propofol EDTA group. Renal function, measured by blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, and creatinine clearance, did not deteriorate during ICU sedation with either regimen. This study showed that critical illness is associated with increased urinary losses of zinc, copper, and iron. Propofol EDTA-treated patients had greater urinary losses of zinc and iron and lower serum zinc concentrations compared with the non-EDTA sedative group. No adverse events indicative of trace metal deficiency were observed in either group. The clinical significance of trace metal losses during critical illness is unclear and requires further study.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>11310904</pmid><doi>10.1007/PL00003785</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0342-4642
ispartof Intensive care medicine, 2000-01, Vol.26 Suppl 4 (S3), p.S413-S421
issn 0342-4642
1432-1238
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72595636
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesia
Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacokinetics
Anesthetics, Intravenous - pharmacology
APACHE
Calcium - metabolism
Chelating Agents - pharmacokinetics
Chelating Agents - pharmacology
Chi-Square Distribution
Cobalt
Copper
Creatinine
Critical Illness
Drug dosages
Edetic Acid - pharmacokinetics
Edetic Acid - pharmacology
Female
Fentanyl
Hemodynamics - drug effects
Homeostasis
Humans
Illnesses
Intensive care
Male
Middle Aged
Morphine
Nitrogen
Odds Ratio
Patients
Physiology
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacokinetics
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology
Propofol - pharmacokinetics
Propofol - pharmacology
Prospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric
Trace elements
Trace Elements - metabolism
Urine
Vital signs
Zinc
title Trace element homeostasis during continuous sedation with propofol containing EDTA versus other sedatives in critically ill patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T07%3A54%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trace%20element%20homeostasis%20during%20continuous%20sedation%20with%20propofol%20containing%20EDTA%20versus%20other%20sedatives%20in%20critically%20ill%20patients&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Higgins,%20T%20L&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=26%20Suppl%204&rft.issue=S3&rft.spage=S413&rft.epage=S421&rft.pages=S413-S421&rft.issn=0342-4642&rft.eissn=1432-1238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/PL00003785&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2631877671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=993565330&rft_id=info:pmid/11310904&rfr_iscdi=true