Factors Associated with Recurrence of Accessory Pathway Conduction After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation

Catheter ablation of 215 accessory pathways (APs) using radiofrequency current (RF) was attempted in 204 consecutive patients. Two hundred twelve of the 215 (99%) APs were successfully ablated. After a minimum follow‐up period of 1 month (mean 8.5 ± 5.4 months), AP conduction had returned in 17 pati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 1991-11, Vol.14 (11), p.2042-2048
Hauptverfasser: TWIDALE, NICHOLAS, WANG, XUNZHANG, BECKMAN, KAREN J., MCLELLAND, JAMES H., MOULTON, KRIEGH P., PRIOR, MICHAEL I., HAZLITT, H. ANDREW, LAZZARA, RALPH, JACKMAN, WARREN M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2048
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2042
container_title Pacing and clinical electrophysiology
container_volume 14
creator TWIDALE, NICHOLAS
WANG, XUNZHANG
BECKMAN, KAREN J.
MCLELLAND, JAMES H.
MOULTON, KRIEGH P.
PRIOR, MICHAEL I.
HAZLITT, H. ANDREW
LAZZARA, RALPH
JACKMAN, WARREN M.
description Catheter ablation of 215 accessory pathways (APs) using radiofrequency current (RF) was attempted in 204 consecutive patients. Two hundred twelve of the 215 (99%) APs were successfully ablated. After a minimum follow‐up period of 1 month (mean 8.5 ± 5.4 months), AP conduction had returned in 17 patients (8%). Recurrence of AP conduction was manifest by atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia in six patients, palpitations suggestive of AV reentrant tachycardia in five patients, ventricular preexcitation on electrocardiogram in five patients, and inducible AV reentrant tachycardia during a follow‐up electrophysiological study in one asymptomatic patient. AP conduction returned as early as 12 hours and as late as 4.7 months, but was evident within 2 months of ablution in 15 of 17 (88%) patients. AP conduction recurred in 12%‐14% of anteroseptal, right free‐wall, and posteroseptal APs, but only 5% of left free‐wall APs (P < 0.01). Retrograde only conducting APs (concealed APs) had recurrence of AP conduction more frequently (16%) than APs that exhibited antegrade conduction (5.5%; P < 0.01). Failure to record AP potentials from the ablation electrode, reflecting poor AP localization, was a strong predictor for recurrence of AP conduction. AP conduction returned in 19% of 48 APs when AP potentials were not recorded, compared to 5% of 164 APs where AP potentials were recorded from the ablation electrode (P < 0.01). The time to block of AP conduction from the onset of RF current application was longer in APs with recurrence of conduction (4.9 ± 6.1 sec vs 2.9 ± 3.4 sec; P < 0.02). Recurrence of AP conduction was more frequent when the stability of the ablation electrode was poor (12% of 41 APs vs 7% of 171 APs with stable electrode placement], and when the AP had multiple components (11% of 36 APs ablated at multiple sites vs 7% of 176 APs where AP was ablated at a single site), but these were not statistically significant. All 17 patients with recurrence of AP conduction underwent a second successful ablation. In conclusion, the overall incidence of recurrence of AP conduction is low, but is higher for right free‐wall and septal APs, concealed APs, and probably relates to poor AP localization.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02812.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72576224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72576224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4092-aa3dbd7023f073ce25a20afc0806f026e01c9d123824959317d3597a386f63813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM9v0zAUxy0EGmXwJyBZHLgle7bjOOZEqLaxUWCaQBwt17G1lLQetqO2_z2OUo0z72LpfX8864PQOwIlyXOxKQmvoGgIlyWRkpRpDbQhtDw8Q4sn6TlaAKlE0bBGvkSvYtwAQA0VP0NnRFBCKVmg_kqb5EPEbYze9DrZDu_79IDvrRlDsDtjsXe4NcZmQzjiO50e9vqIl37XjSb1fodbl2zA97rrvQv2z5hDWc8-O-3b9aAn22v0wukh2jen9xz9vLr8sfxcrL5f3yzbVWEqkLTQmnXrTgBlDgQzlnJNQTsDDdQOaG2BGNkRyhpaSS4ZER3jUmjW1K5mDWHn6P3c-xh8_ktMattHY4dB76wfoxKUi5rSKhs_zEYTfIzBOvUY-q0OR0VATZzVRk0w1QRTTZzVibM65PDb05VxvbXdv-gMNusfZ33fD_b4H83qrl1eUqhorijmij4me3iq0OG3qgUTXP36dq1uv9x-_cTFSgn2F4iunSo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72576224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors Associated with Recurrence of Accessory Pathway Conduction After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>TWIDALE, NICHOLAS ; WANG, XUNZHANG ; BECKMAN, KAREN J. ; MCLELLAND, JAMES H. ; MOULTON, KRIEGH P. ; PRIOR, MICHAEL I. ; HAZLITT, H. ANDREW ; LAZZARA, RALPH ; JACKMAN, WARREN M.</creator><creatorcontrib>TWIDALE, NICHOLAS ; WANG, XUNZHANG ; BECKMAN, KAREN J. ; MCLELLAND, JAMES H. ; MOULTON, KRIEGH P. ; PRIOR, MICHAEL I. ; HAZLITT, H. ANDREW ; LAZZARA, RALPH ; JACKMAN, WARREN M.</creatorcontrib><description>Catheter ablation of 215 accessory pathways (APs) using radiofrequency current (RF) was attempted in 204 consecutive patients. Two hundred twelve of the 215 (99%) APs were successfully ablated. After a minimum follow‐up period of 1 month (mean 8.5 ± 5.4 months), AP conduction had returned in 17 patients (8%). Recurrence of AP conduction was manifest by atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia in six patients, palpitations suggestive of AV reentrant tachycardia in five patients, ventricular preexcitation on electrocardiogram in five patients, and inducible AV reentrant tachycardia during a follow‐up electrophysiological study in one asymptomatic patient. AP conduction returned as early as 12 hours and as late as 4.7 months, but was evident within 2 months of ablution in 15 of 17 (88%) patients. AP conduction recurred in 12%‐14% of anteroseptal, right free‐wall, and posteroseptal APs, but only 5% of left free‐wall APs (P &lt; 0.01). Retrograde only conducting APs (concealed APs) had recurrence of AP conduction more frequently (16%) than APs that exhibited antegrade conduction (5.5%; P &lt; 0.01). Failure to record AP potentials from the ablation electrode, reflecting poor AP localization, was a strong predictor for recurrence of AP conduction. AP conduction returned in 19% of 48 APs when AP potentials were not recorded, compared to 5% of 164 APs where AP potentials were recorded from the ablation electrode (P &lt; 0.01). The time to block of AP conduction from the onset of RF current application was longer in APs with recurrence of conduction (4.9 ± 6.1 sec vs 2.9 ± 3.4 sec; P &lt; 0.02). Recurrence of AP conduction was more frequent when the stability of the ablation electrode was poor (12% of 41 APs vs 7% of 171 APs with stable electrode placement], and when the AP had multiple components (11% of 36 APs ablated at multiple sites vs 7% of 176 APs where AP was ablated at a single site), but these were not statistically significant. All 17 patients with recurrence of AP conduction underwent a second successful ablation. In conclusion, the overall incidence of recurrence of AP conduction is low, but is higher for right free‐wall and septal APs, concealed APs, and probably relates to poor AP localization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-8159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02812.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1721221</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>accessory atrioventricular pathways ; Adult ; catheter ablation ; Electrocoagulation ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart Conduction System - physiopathology ; Humans ; Incidence ; preexcitation syndrome ; Radio Waves ; radiofrequency current ; Recurrence ; supravenfricular tachycardia ; Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - epidemiology ; Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - physiopathology ; Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - surgery ; Time Factors ; Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome ; Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome - physiopathology ; Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome - surgery</subject><ispartof>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1991-11, Vol.14 (11), p.2042-2048</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4092-aa3dbd7023f073ce25a20afc0806f026e01c9d123824959317d3597a386f63813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4092-aa3dbd7023f073ce25a20afc0806f026e01c9d123824959317d3597a386f63813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1991.tb02812.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1540-8159.1991.tb02812.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1721221$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TWIDALE, NICHOLAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, XUNZHANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BECKMAN, KAREN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCLELLAND, JAMES H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOULTON, KRIEGH P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRIOR, MICHAEL I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAZLITT, H. ANDREW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAZZARA, RALPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JACKMAN, WARREN M.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors Associated with Recurrence of Accessory Pathway Conduction After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation</title><title>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</title><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><description>Catheter ablation of 215 accessory pathways (APs) using radiofrequency current (RF) was attempted in 204 consecutive patients. Two hundred twelve of the 215 (99%) APs were successfully ablated. After a minimum follow‐up period of 1 month (mean 8.5 ± 5.4 months), AP conduction had returned in 17 patients (8%). Recurrence of AP conduction was manifest by atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia in six patients, palpitations suggestive of AV reentrant tachycardia in five patients, ventricular preexcitation on electrocardiogram in five patients, and inducible AV reentrant tachycardia during a follow‐up electrophysiological study in one asymptomatic patient. AP conduction returned as early as 12 hours and as late as 4.7 months, but was evident within 2 months of ablution in 15 of 17 (88%) patients. AP conduction recurred in 12%‐14% of anteroseptal, right free‐wall, and posteroseptal APs, but only 5% of left free‐wall APs (P &lt; 0.01). Retrograde only conducting APs (concealed APs) had recurrence of AP conduction more frequently (16%) than APs that exhibited antegrade conduction (5.5%; P &lt; 0.01). Failure to record AP potentials from the ablation electrode, reflecting poor AP localization, was a strong predictor for recurrence of AP conduction. AP conduction returned in 19% of 48 APs when AP potentials were not recorded, compared to 5% of 164 APs where AP potentials were recorded from the ablation electrode (P &lt; 0.01). The time to block of AP conduction from the onset of RF current application was longer in APs with recurrence of conduction (4.9 ± 6.1 sec vs 2.9 ± 3.4 sec; P &lt; 0.02). Recurrence of AP conduction was more frequent when the stability of the ablation electrode was poor (12% of 41 APs vs 7% of 171 APs with stable electrode placement], and when the AP had multiple components (11% of 36 APs ablated at multiple sites vs 7% of 176 APs where AP was ablated at a single site), but these were not statistically significant. All 17 patients with recurrence of AP conduction underwent a second successful ablation. In conclusion, the overall incidence of recurrence of AP conduction is low, but is higher for right free‐wall and septal APs, concealed APs, and probably relates to poor AP localization.</description><subject>accessory atrioventricular pathways</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>catheter ablation</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>preexcitation syndrome</subject><subject>Radio Waves</subject><subject>radiofrequency current</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>supravenfricular tachycardia</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome</subject><subject>Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome - physiopathology</subject><subject>Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome - surgery</subject><issn>0147-8389</issn><issn>1540-8159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkM9v0zAUxy0EGmXwJyBZHLgle7bjOOZEqLaxUWCaQBwt17G1lLQetqO2_z2OUo0z72LpfX8864PQOwIlyXOxKQmvoGgIlyWRkpRpDbQhtDw8Q4sn6TlaAKlE0bBGvkSvYtwAQA0VP0NnRFBCKVmg_kqb5EPEbYze9DrZDu_79IDvrRlDsDtjsXe4NcZmQzjiO50e9vqIl37XjSb1fodbl2zA97rrvQv2z5hDWc8-O-3b9aAn22v0wukh2jen9xz9vLr8sfxcrL5f3yzbVWEqkLTQmnXrTgBlDgQzlnJNQTsDDdQOaG2BGNkRyhpaSS4ZER3jUmjW1K5mDWHn6P3c-xh8_ktMattHY4dB76wfoxKUi5rSKhs_zEYTfIzBOvUY-q0OR0VATZzVRk0w1QRTTZzVibM65PDb05VxvbXdv-gMNusfZ33fD_b4H83qrl1eUqhorijmij4me3iq0OG3qgUTXP36dq1uv9x-_cTFSgn2F4iunSo</recordid><startdate>199111</startdate><enddate>199111</enddate><creator>TWIDALE, NICHOLAS</creator><creator>WANG, XUNZHANG</creator><creator>BECKMAN, KAREN J.</creator><creator>MCLELLAND, JAMES H.</creator><creator>MOULTON, KRIEGH P.</creator><creator>PRIOR, MICHAEL I.</creator><creator>HAZLITT, H. ANDREW</creator><creator>LAZZARA, RALPH</creator><creator>JACKMAN, WARREN M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199111</creationdate><title>Factors Associated with Recurrence of Accessory Pathway Conduction After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation</title><author>TWIDALE, NICHOLAS ; WANG, XUNZHANG ; BECKMAN, KAREN J. ; MCLELLAND, JAMES H. ; MOULTON, KRIEGH P. ; PRIOR, MICHAEL I. ; HAZLITT, H. ANDREW ; LAZZARA, RALPH ; JACKMAN, WARREN M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4092-aa3dbd7023f073ce25a20afc0806f026e01c9d123824959317d3597a386f63813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>accessory atrioventricular pathways</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>catheter ablation</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>preexcitation syndrome</topic><topic>Radio Waves</topic><topic>radiofrequency current</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>supravenfricular tachycardia</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome</topic><topic>Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome - physiopathology</topic><topic>Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TWIDALE, NICHOLAS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, XUNZHANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BECKMAN, KAREN J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MCLELLAND, JAMES H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOULTON, KRIEGH P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRIOR, MICHAEL I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAZLITT, H. ANDREW</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAZZARA, RALPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JACKMAN, WARREN M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TWIDALE, NICHOLAS</au><au>WANG, XUNZHANG</au><au>BECKMAN, KAREN J.</au><au>MCLELLAND, JAMES H.</au><au>MOULTON, KRIEGH P.</au><au>PRIOR, MICHAEL I.</au><au>HAZLITT, H. ANDREW</au><au>LAZZARA, RALPH</au><au>JACKMAN, WARREN M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors Associated with Recurrence of Accessory Pathway Conduction After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation</atitle><jtitle>Pacing and clinical electrophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pacing Clin Electrophysiol</addtitle><date>1991-11</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2042</spage><epage>2048</epage><pages>2042-2048</pages><issn>0147-8389</issn><eissn>1540-8159</eissn><abstract>Catheter ablation of 215 accessory pathways (APs) using radiofrequency current (RF) was attempted in 204 consecutive patients. Two hundred twelve of the 215 (99%) APs were successfully ablated. After a minimum follow‐up period of 1 month (mean 8.5 ± 5.4 months), AP conduction had returned in 17 patients (8%). Recurrence of AP conduction was manifest by atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia in six patients, palpitations suggestive of AV reentrant tachycardia in five patients, ventricular preexcitation on electrocardiogram in five patients, and inducible AV reentrant tachycardia during a follow‐up electrophysiological study in one asymptomatic patient. AP conduction returned as early as 12 hours and as late as 4.7 months, but was evident within 2 months of ablution in 15 of 17 (88%) patients. AP conduction recurred in 12%‐14% of anteroseptal, right free‐wall, and posteroseptal APs, but only 5% of left free‐wall APs (P &lt; 0.01). Retrograde only conducting APs (concealed APs) had recurrence of AP conduction more frequently (16%) than APs that exhibited antegrade conduction (5.5%; P &lt; 0.01). Failure to record AP potentials from the ablation electrode, reflecting poor AP localization, was a strong predictor for recurrence of AP conduction. AP conduction returned in 19% of 48 APs when AP potentials were not recorded, compared to 5% of 164 APs where AP potentials were recorded from the ablation electrode (P &lt; 0.01). The time to block of AP conduction from the onset of RF current application was longer in APs with recurrence of conduction (4.9 ± 6.1 sec vs 2.9 ± 3.4 sec; P &lt; 0.02). Recurrence of AP conduction was more frequent when the stability of the ablation electrode was poor (12% of 41 APs vs 7% of 171 APs with stable electrode placement], and when the AP had multiple components (11% of 36 APs ablated at multiple sites vs 7% of 176 APs where AP was ablated at a single site), but these were not statistically significant. All 17 patients with recurrence of AP conduction underwent a second successful ablation. In conclusion, the overall incidence of recurrence of AP conduction is low, but is higher for right free‐wall and septal APs, concealed APs, and probably relates to poor AP localization.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>1721221</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02812.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8389
ispartof Pacing and clinical electrophysiology, 1991-11, Vol.14 (11), p.2042-2048
issn 0147-8389
1540-8159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_72576224
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects accessory atrioventricular pathways
Adult
catheter ablation
Electrocoagulation
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Conduction System - physiopathology
Humans
Incidence
preexcitation syndrome
Radio Waves
radiofrequency current
Recurrence
supravenfricular tachycardia
Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - epidemiology
Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - physiopathology
Tachycardia, Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry - surgery
Time Factors
Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome - physiopathology
Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome - surgery
title Factors Associated with Recurrence of Accessory Pathway Conduction After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A21%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20Associated%20with%20Recurrence%20of%20Accessory%20Pathway%20Conduction%20After%20Radiofrequency%20Catheter%20Ablation&rft.jtitle=Pacing%20and%20clinical%20electrophysiology&rft.au=TWIDALE,%20NICHOLAS&rft.date=1991-11&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2042&rft.epage=2048&rft.pages=2042-2048&rft.issn=0147-8389&rft.eissn=1540-8159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02812.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E72576224%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72576224&rft_id=info:pmid/1721221&rfr_iscdi=true